Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, May 20, 2007 | Reason : Astronomy | print version Print | Comments

Document Hubble Finds Ring of Dark Matter

by hubblesite.org

Thanks to for the link.

Reposted from:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/17/full/

Hubble Finds Ring of Dark Matter
Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have discovered a ghostly ring of dark matter that formed long ago during a titanic collision between two massive galaxy clusters.

The ring's discovery is among the strongest evidence yet that dark matter exists. Astronomers have long suspected the existence of the invisible substance as the source of additional gravity that holds together galaxy clusters. Such clusters would fly apart if they relied only on the gravity from their visible stars. Although astronomers don't know what dark matter is made of, they hypothesize that it is a type of elementary particle that pervades the universe.

"This is the first time we have detected dark matter as having a unique structure that is different from both the gas and galaxies in the cluster," said astronomer M. James Jee of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., a member of the team that spotted the dark-matter ring.

The researchers spotted the ring unexpectedly while they were mapping the distribution of dark matter within the galaxy cluster Cl 0024+17 (ZwCl 0024+1652), located 5 billion light-years from Earth. The ring measures 2.6 million light-years across. Although astronomers cannot see dark matter, they can infer its existence in galaxy clusters by observing how its gravity bends the light of more distant background galaxies.

"Although the invisible matter has been found before in other galaxy clusters, it has never been detected to be so largely separated from the hot gas and the galaxies that make up galaxy clusters," Jee said. "By seeing a dark-matter structure that is not traced by galaxies and hot gas, we can study how it behaves differently from normal matter."

During the team's dark-matter analysis, they noticed a ripple in the mysterious substance, somewhat like the ripples created in a pond from a stone plopping into the water.

"I was annoyed when I saw the ring because I thought it was an artifact, which would have implied a flaw in our data reduction," Jee explained. "I couldn't believe my result. But the more I tried to remove the ring, the more it showed up. It took more than a year to convince myself that the ring was real. I've looked at a number of clusters and I haven't seen anything like this."

Curious about why the ring was in the cluster and how it had formed, Jee found previous research that suggested the cluster had collided with another cluster 1 to 2 billion years ago. The research, published in 2002 by Oliver Czoske of the Argeleander-Institut fur Astronomie at the Universitat Bonn, was based on spectroscopic observations of the cluster's three-dimensional structure. The study revealed two distinct groupings of galaxies clusters, indicating a collision between both clusters.

Astronomers have a head-on view of the collision because it occurred fortuitously along Earth's line of sight. From this perspective, the dark-matter structure looks like a ring.

Computer simulations of galaxy cluster collisions, created by the team, show that when two clusters smash together, the dark matter falls to the center of the combined cluster and sloshes back out. As the dark matter moves outward, it begins to slow down under the pull of gravity and pile up, like cars bunched up on a freeway.

"By studying this collision, we are seeing how dark matter responds to gravity," said team member Holland Ford of Johns Hopkins University. "Nature is doing an experiment for us that we can't do in a lab, and it agrees with our theoretical models."

Dark matter makes up most of the universe's material. Ordinary matter, which makes up stars and planets, comprises only a few percent of the universe's matter.

Tracing dark matter is not an easy task, because it does not shine or reflect light. Astronomers can only detect its influence by how its gravity affects light. To find it, astronomers study how faint light from more distant galaxies is distorted and smeared into arcs and streaks by the gravity of the dark matter in a foreground galaxy cluster, a powerful trick called gravitational lensing. By mapping the distorted light, astronomers can deduce the cluster's mass and trace how dark matter is distributed in the cluster.

"The collision between the two galaxy clusters created a ripple of dark matter that left distinct footprints in the shapes of the background galaxies," Jee explained. "It's like looking at the pebbles on the bottom of a pond with ripples on the surface. The pebbles' shapes appear to change as the ripples pass over them. So, too, the background galaxies behind the ring show coherent changes in their shapes due to the presence of the dense ring."

Jee and his colleagues used Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys to detect the faint, distorted, faraway galaxies behind the cluster that cannot be resolved with ground-based telescopes. "Hubble's exquisite images and unparalleled sensitivity to faint galaxies make it the only tool for this measurement," said team member Richard White of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore.

Previous observations of the Bullet Cluster with Hubble and the Chandra X-ray Observatory presented a sideways view of a similar encounter between two galaxy clusters. In that collision, the dark matter was pulled apart from the hot cluster gas, but the dark matter still followed the distribution of cluster galaxies. Cl 0024+17 is the first cluster to show a dark matter distribution that differs from the distribution of both the galaxies and the hot gas.

The team's paper will appear in the June 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

CONTACT

Donna Weaver/Ray Villard
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md.
410-338-4493/4514

Richard White
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md.
(phone) 410-338-4899
(e-mail) rlw@stsci.edu

Myungkook James Jee
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
(phone) 410-516-5497
(e-mail) mkjee@pha.jhu.edu

Lisa De Nike
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
(phone) 443-287-9906
(e-mail) lde@jhu.edu

Comments 1 - 21 of 21 | | View Alternate Comment Thread

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #42831 by dlitt on May 20, 2007 at 12:16 am

 avatar
From this perspective, the dark-matter structure looks like a ring.

Could it be God's sphincter? [sorry... couldn't help myself :-)]

Other Comments by dlitt

2. Comment #42877 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on May 20, 2007 at 3:57 am

 avatarWow. I clicked over to the article and got the 1.7 mb picture. Just amazing.

To think that any human on earth (with a modest internet connection) can simply download something like this.

Incredible.

Other Comments by briancoughlanworldcitizen

3. Comment #42883 by bluebird on May 20, 2007 at 4:08 am

 avatarWay cool. Once again, we REALLY wish Carl Sagan were alive to witness this, and other cosmic goings on.

Other Comments by bluebird

4. Comment #42884 by NJS on May 20, 2007 at 4:14 am

When I realise how all those galaxies have billions of stars with who knows how many planets "identical" to earth there must be, it makes me first of all feel humble and secondly makes me a million times more sure that some pathetic desert sky god is nonsense.

Other Comments by NJS

5. Comment #42962 by Kakashi_monkey on May 20, 2007 at 6:36 am

 avatarDark matter is pretty important for understanding the universe. It holds galaxies and clusters together with its own gravity. Without it, there might not be any clusters....
This is a good finding for DM research. I hope they find more stuff like this.

Other Comments by Kakashi_monkey

6. Comment #42987 by ghostbuster on May 20, 2007 at 8:23 am

I am thinking that it might not only hold star clusters together but our universe itself. We may indeed be oscillating between expansion and collapse?

Other Comments by ghostbuster

7. Comment #42998 by RickM on May 20, 2007 at 9:00 am

 avatarAmazing image. I hope they figure out what that stuff is before my days are up.

Other Comments by RickM

8. Comment #43009 by Humble Pie on May 20, 2007 at 9:19 am

This, of course, is awe-inspiring and, as someone else mentioned upthread, humbling. However, forgive me if I'm being dense (quite likely), but isn't there something slightly amiss here? According to the fourth paragraph, this cluster is "located 5 billion light-years from Earth". On the other hand, in paragraph eight, we're told that "Jee found previous research that suggested the cluster had collided with another cluster 1 to 2 billion years ago". If the cluster is located 5 billion light-years from Earth, how can we be looking at the results of something that happened 1 to 2 billion years ago? Not that this affects the central point of the article, of course, but even so…

Other Comments by Humble Pie

9. Comment #43010 by Ryan.Vilbig on May 20, 2007 at 9:19 am

Does anyone here object to me attending mass today at St. Ann's in North St. Louis. Speak now or forever hold your peace. Let me know ASAP, because I would need to leave soon if I go.

Ryan Vilbig
(636)236-5469
407 N Taylor Ave
St. Louis MO 63108
ryan.vilbig@gmail.com

Other Comments by Ryan.Vilbig

10. Comment #43019 by Humble Pie on May 20, 2007 at 9:30 am

Of course not, Ryan. Why would they? It's entirely your own business and none of ours whatsoever.

Other Comments by Humble Pie

11. Comment #43057 by RickM on May 20, 2007 at 11:38 am

 avatarHumble Pie,

It's the "collision" that they're estimating occurred 1-2 bya, not what we are seeing now. What we are seeing now is the result of the ongoing "tossing about" of the colliding galaxies.

Let's say the collision occurred, say 2 bya. Starting with the image we have now, imagine rolling the tape back 2 b years. What we would see is the two galaxies on the brink of collision and they would be 3 b light years distant.

If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.

Other Comments by RickM

12. Comment #43072 by BAEOZ on May 20, 2007 at 12:44 pm

 avatarHey guys, it's a little off topic, but I was watching 'the root of all evil' last night on the ABC here in Oz. Very good. I loved Richard's comment about how he doesn't dress women where he comes from. Ted Haggard came across as an arrogant bully. He was the one accusing Richard of being arrogant. Richard's just so bloody polite. I don't know how he does it, but I'm glad he does....

Other Comments by BAEOZ

13. Comment #43080 by D'Arcy on May 20, 2007 at 1:15 pm

 avatarAn interesting article. One gripe with it:
Dark matter makes up most of the universe's material.


Current observations suggest that in fact some 25% of the observable universe is made up of dark matter, the ring in the photo, whilst some 70% is made of dark energy. This mysterious dark energy is postulated because observations have shown that the expansion of the universe is increasing in speed. Some 5% of the universe is that part that we can observe using the available tools.

Whatever way you look at it, 2 billion or 5 billion years, the mere observation blasts great holes in the Genesis account of creation and the biblical stories which followed, which many unfortunately ignorant people take as their guide through life.

The human life span is short enough without perpetuating ignorance to the next generation. The time has come for all those theists to jettison their useless cargo of faith, realise that they are a part of humanity, and that now is the time to sort out the world, because we've all got to live in it.

Other Comments by D'Arcy

14. Comment #43220 by Humble Pie on May 20, 2007 at 11:37 pm

Thanks, Rick. Good of you to take the time to reply. However, I still can't get my (dull) brain round it, I'm afraid. If the cluster is located 5 billion light-years from Earth (give or take!), surely "what we're seeing now" happened 5 billion years ago?

Other Comments by Humble Pie

15. Comment #43223 by Humble Pie on May 21, 2007 at 12:19 am

Hi, D'Arcy! Thanks for your clarification. Just one small gripe of my own - not with you, of course, but stimulated by your post.

You say: "Whatever way you look at it, 2 billion or 5 billion years, the mere observation blasts great holes in the Genesis account of creation and the biblical stories which followed". No doubt you're right but, in my view, with or without this "mere observation", we can easily blast great holes in the Genesis account of creation. I'm sometimes troubled by what I can only call the "boys'-book-of-science" reaction to new "discoveries". Scientists get things wrong all the time. It's all part of the trial-and-error of the scientific endeavour. Old theories are demonstrated to have been erroneous in some respect and new theories are offered in their place. Subsequently, these new theories are demonstrated to have been erroneous in some respect, and so the whole exciting but difficult and painstaking process goes on. In the end, all we know is that, at present (and perhaps forever, given the limits of our brains), we know very little. Well, no. That needs correcting too! On the human scale, we know a hell of a lot, thanks to the work of scientists way, way beyond my mental capacity. But on the universal or absolute scale? Very little. Very, very little. But cheer up! One thing you can be absolutely sure of. The Judaeo-Christian god is, was and forever shall be entirely man-made.

Other Comments by Humble Pie

16. Comment #43230 by bamboospitfire on May 21, 2007 at 1:37 am

 avatarOn the time/distance issue, perhaps the truth is that the collision occurred 1-2 billion years before the scenario that we're currently observing, which would actually make it 6-7 billion years ago given the distance of 5 billion light years. It could just be an ambiguity in the text.

Either way, this is just mind-blowing. The detail in the large image is incredible. Star clusters are one thing, but galaxy clusters like this defy language. I couldn't agree more with NJS's comments.

Other Comments by bamboospitfire

17. Comment #43398 by CruciFiction on May 21, 2007 at 9:18 am

A ring of "dark matter" in space reported on the same day Fallwell dies. Interesting.

Other Comments by CruciFiction

18. Comment #43470 by dawgdoc2000 on May 21, 2007 at 2:46 pm

 avatarIf this photo represented all the galaxies in the rest of the universe, it would still be impressive. The fact that this is just one relatively tiny spot in the entirety of the universe that Hubble focused on is positively mind-numbing.

Other Comments by dawgdoc2000

19. Comment #43608 by Awl on May 22, 2007 at 5:27 am

I have just set the picture as my desktop background. It's against company policy of course, but it is always good to be reminded how small and insignificant our "global corporation" really is!

Other Comments by Awl

20. Comment #43636 by bluebird on May 22, 2007 at 6:56 am

 avatarAnyone interested in Astronomy Photo of Day,
I hope this address/link works! We have it set up as a daily screensaver.



http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

Other Comments by bluebird

21. Comment #43803 by Funny Grievous on May 22, 2007 at 5:32 pm

 avatarI've always been interested in the unknown, so what could be more exciting than dark matter! I can't wait to see what secrets it holds.

Other Comments by Funny Grievous
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: