Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Sunday, June 3, 2007 | Science : Astronomy | print version Print | Comments

Document Gamma-Ray Wipe-Out

by Naomi Miles, FirstScience.com

Thanks to ranjani for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.firstscience.com/home/articles/space/gamma-ray-wipe-out_31878.html

A massive blast of radiation from space once almost sterilized the Earth

Gamma-ray bursts: the biggest, most powerful explosions in the Universe since the Big Bang. They are a million trillion times brighter than the Sun. Each day, we detect a burst of gamma radiation coming from a random direction in the sky. Lasting anywhere from a fraction of a second to several minutes, these high-energy astronomical enigmas have a deadly power.

hydrogen bomb
The monitoring of nuclear-weapon tests led researchers to the biggest bangs in the Universe

Until very recently, we really didn't know very much about them. Gamma-ray bursts were only discovered in the late 1960s, quite by accident. During the Cold War, the US military sent up satellites to detect signs of illegal nuclear testing by the Soviet Union. These Vela satellites were fitted with gamma-ray detectors, since nuclear explosions release copious amounts of this extremely energetic radiation. The American military was surprised that their satellites instead detected great explosions of gamma-ray photons coming from space.

So what are these gamma-ray bursts? How are they formed, and where do they come from? Over the past 15 or so years, satellites and ground-based observations have provided a mass of data that has helped scientists to answer these questions.

Scientists have identified two kinds of gamma-ray burst (GRB): short duration (average 0.3 second) and long duration (average 30 seconds). Experts suspect that these form in totally different ways. Although they are fairly confident they understand the origin of long-duration GRBs, short duration GRBs remain a puzzle.

Long-duration bursts

Long-durations GRBs come from a particular kind of star known as a "Wolf-Rayet". Wolf-Rayet stars are huge and feisty, very hot and very heavy. They spit out a huge amount of stellar material. There are Wolf-Rayet stars in our Galaxy, but the culprits that produce GRBs sit at the most distant edges of the Universe, so far away that we can't see them twinkle, even using the most powerful telescopes.

hypernova
Hypernova: the origin of the most dangerous gamma-ray bursts?

We can, however, see them when they die. When a Wolf-Rayet star reaches the end of its life, it explodes as a massive supernova (a 'hypernova') before collapsing into a black hole. In the explosion, a super-heated blast of energy from the core rips through the body of the star at almost the speed of light. Gamma rays form when the blast wave smashes into stellar material. They rush outward until they explode from the star's surface. The blast wave follows closely behind, colliding with gas and dust to produce photons of all wavelengths, from X-ray through visible to radio. This is the dramatic supernova 'afterglow' we see from Earth.

Gamma-ray bursts take billions of years to reach Earth, even though they travel at the speed of light - 186,000 miles per second (300,000 km/s). The GRBs we observe today may have originated from a star that exploded when the Earth was half its present age.

What would happen if a star within the Milky Way erupted as a gamma-ray burster? Astrobiologist Adrian Melott from the University of Texas believes that this did happen; and the consequences were devastating.

Working with paleontologist Bruce Lieberman from the University of Kansas and others, Melott believes he has evidence that the second largest mass extinction of all time was a result of a gamma-ray burst.

How a gamma-ray burst could exterminate life on Earth

The Ordovician extinction occurred around 440 million years ago, when Earth was a water-world teeming with life. Lieberman describes the planet in those times: "If an alien from outer space was visiting they would probably characterise life on Earth as dominated by trilobites." Trilobites were a highly diverse family of crab-like creatures. In the earliest mass extinction event, they died out - along with two-thirds of all other species.

trilobite
Trilobites once ruled the Earth: then, 440 million years ago, they were totally wiped out

For years, scientists thought that this wipe-out was caused by a global ice age. However, there were problems with this hypothesis: there was seemingly no trigger to this sudden big freeze. Lieberman was unconvinced that an ice age alone could have killed so many species: "We have had other glaciations in the geological past that do not produce mass extinctions on scale that we see at the end of the Ordovician. So that's why we can't treat it as a smoking gun."

Working together, Melott and Lieberman pieced together an alternative theory, trying to work out what might have happened. They believe that, around 440 million years ago, a supernova within 10,000 light years of Earth exploded in a gamma-ray burst. The radiation destroyed the composition of the Earth's atmosphere, ripping apart the nitrogen and oxygen molecules. The planet became enveloped in brown smog - made up of lethal nitrogen dioxide - which blocked out the Sun's heat. Though the gamma ray burst lasted just a few seconds, the resulting smog triggered an ice age.

The nitrogen dioxide cloud blocked the Sun's infrared rays, but it didn't obstruct the shorter wavelengths of the ultraviolet. This was doubly bad news for the Earth, because the gamma-rays had also produced nitrogen oxide which destroyed the ozone layer. As a result, our planet's surface had no protection from a 300% increase in UV radiation. The Sun's deadly ultraviolet radiation ripped through the DNA of every living creature. Only those living deep underwater stood a chance of surviving.

Melott believes that the Earth has probably been fried by gamma ray bursts several times in its 4.5 billion year history. Could it happen again? Melott thinks so: "It could happen tomorrow or it could be in millions of years." Is it worth worrying about? No. Gamma-ray bursts hit without warning. We can't predict when or where they come from. And we can't do a thing to stop them.

For more information

Hooper Virtual Paleontological Museum - mass extinctions
http://park.org/Canada/Museum/extinction/tablecont.html

NASA - the low-down on gamma-ray bursts
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html

Comments 1 - 19 of 19 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #47202 by Laurence Winch-Furness on June 3, 2007 at 12:57 pm

 avatarFrem the descriptions of its effects, this sounds worse than the Permian event. The questiona arises, why wasn't it as comprehensive an extinction?

Other Comments by Laurence Winch-Furness

2. Comment #47206 by denoir on June 3, 2007 at 1:20 pm

 avatar
Working with paleontologist Bruce Lieberman from the University of Kansas and others


When I read this line, my first thought was "not the damn creationists again". Of course it wasn't, but it shows what a bad rep Kansas has gotten.

Other Comments by denoir

3. Comment #47208 by Pieter on June 3, 2007 at 1:29 pm

I saw a program on the discovery channel (or maybe PBS) about the discovery of these gamma ray extinctions. it didn't posit that any had happened to the earth yet, but the fact that we detect faint traces of hypernovae daily still scares the shit out of me. from what i remember a hypernovae can be a galactic-killer, sterilizing all life-giving planets for hundreds of thousands of light-years. if one happened in the milky way it probably wasn't as powerful as they say they can be.

Other Comments by Pieter

4. Comment #47209 by _J_ on June 3, 2007 at 1:31 pm

 avatarIn other news, it's been lovely and sunny here in Manchester. The end of another perfect day in this safe, human-friendly cosmos that God created just for us.

(Sorry for dragging god in again. Cosmology like this is fascinating in it's own right, of course.)

Other Comments by _J_

5. Comment #47210 by Don'tForgetToBreathe on June 3, 2007 at 1:39 pm

 avatarOkay, I'm a total geek so I have to say it...

Gaarrr!!!!! Hulk...sterile!? WTF!?

In all seriousness though, that's pretty neat. In a purely "wow the universe can really screw us over and there'd be jack we could do about it" kind of way.

Other Comments by Don'tForgetToBreathe

6. Comment #47212 by Tukka on June 3, 2007 at 2:17 pm

Is it worth worrying about? No. Gamma-ray bursts hit without warning. We can't predict when or where they come from. And we can't do a thing to stop them.
Thanks for that. I feel more relaxed already!

Other Comments by Tukka

7. Comment #47215 by Thanny on June 3, 2007 at 2:34 pm

This is a bit dated. Short GRB's have a good explanatory theory now.

My main problem with this article, however, is the end. No, you can't predict a GRB, but if you know the mechanism, you can see whether or not any can occur close enough to do damage.

There are no potential GRB objects close enough to cause any problems for life on earth at this time, so we needn't worry about that.

Other Comments by Thanny

8. Comment #47217 by steve99 on June 3, 2007 at 2:50 pm

 avatar
but the fact that we detect faint traces of hypernovae daily still scares the shit out of me. from what i remember a hypernovae can be a galactic-killer, sterilizing all life-giving planets for hundreds of thousands of light-years. if one happened in the milky way it probably wasn't as powerful as they say they can be.


There is no reason to be worried. Hypernovae happen less often now - they require stars of substantial mass, which are pretty rare (they were much more common in the early universe).

Hypernovae also shouldn't be that damaging. They could cause extinctions at thousands of light years, but almost certainly not at hundreds of thousands. The idea of 'galaxy sterilizing' events is fortunately much more science fiction than real science.

Also, gamma ray bursters are very directional. To do damage you would not only need a large collapsing star within 10,000 light years or less, but you would need the direction of its spin to be such that the energy is beamed in the direction of Earth. This is going to be very rare.

Also, recent research has suggested that the Milky Way is the wrong type of galaxy for bursters to form - the chance of one close to is is pretty small indeed.

Other Comments by steve99

9. Comment #47223 by jerem7 on June 3, 2007 at 3:31 pm

I'm calling a science foul here. Cute theory, NO evidence. I'm sure everyone here understands the problem with an elegant "theory" completely unsupported by evidence. I mean, are we just making up cool stuff and calling it science now? I expect this "wish it was true, so let's assume it is" crap from theists, but not scientists.

So is this flashy, irresponsible science? Or flashy, irresponsible journalism? Flip a coin, I guess.

Other Comments by jerem7

10. Comment #47299 by LeeC on June 4, 2007 at 3:07 am

 avatar
I'm calling a science foul here. Cute theory, NO evidence.


Yes and no…

Science has now seen a mechanism that would have terrible effects for life on Earth if it were to happen.

This is not in any doubt – the observations are there for all to see. The physics show that would we be F.. not very happy.

Now science starts to calculate some numbers…

How close would such an explosion need to be?
What are the chances of it happening in this galaxy?
What are the chances that the burst will be on target and hit the Earth?

It adds up to remote… but not zero.

So, what are the chances of it having already happened within the last 3 billions years… small, but possible.

With this the scientists have written a theory. They know extinctions happened long ago, and do not yet know why, so they have written a theory - seems a reasonable and scientific thing to do.

However, as they know. Just having a mechanism does not mean it happened this way.

So, you are right – it is just a theory and at the moment not a great one since it requires more evidence to point to the smoking gun (or blackhole).

Lee

BTW

Funny how it is – just the other week I was listening to a podcast on gamma-ray bursts, and now here they are making news.

If anyone is interested – I find the follow web site has some very good podcasts for the general listener on Astronomy.

http://www.astronomycast.com/

The show on Gamma-ray bursts is: -
http://media.libsyn.com/media/astronomycast/AstroCast-070514.mp3

Other Comments by LeeC

11. Comment #47312 by Pieter on June 4, 2007 at 3:58 am

thanks steve. the program i saw was from a few years ago, but it really didn't do much to try and play down people's fears of a gamma wave killing everything without a moment's notice.

Other Comments by Pieter

12. Comment #47324 by LeeC on June 4, 2007 at 5:03 am

 avatarSorry Pieter,

I know Steve made you feel better, so I am going to be naughty and make you worry again.

Although it is true what Steve said about the massive stars in our Milky Way, he forgot to tell you about the neutron binary star systems... they do exist in our Milky Way, and if neither of them are a pulsar, they are very hard to find.

These are probably the cause of "the other type" of gamma ray bursts mentioned in the article.

So... it is still possible today is the last day.

Probably not though.

Sleep easy... I'm sure god will protect us right?

Lee

Other Comments by LeeC

13. Comment #47432 by steve99 on June 4, 2007 at 1:35 pm

 avatarPieter: I am going to try and stop you worring (again!).

The length of the short bursts that may arise from neutron star pair or neutron star-black hole mergers is very short indeed - usually only a few hundredths of a second, and are about a thousandth of the energy of other bursters, so very unlikely to do any significant harm.

In summary, it is very unlikely indeed that we ever experienced a gamma ray extinction, or that we ever will.

Other Comments by steve99

14. Comment #47610 by LeeC on June 5, 2007 at 4:18 am

 avatarPhew...

Thanks Steve

Other Comments by LeeC

15. Comment #47614 by steve99 on June 5, 2007 at 4:26 am

 avatarLeeC: Things used to be even worse decades ago, when almost every science program seemed to be a different version of Doomsday... Ice Ages, Nuclear War, Nuclear Waste, Black Holes, Exploding Galaxies. I was worried for much of my teenage.

Other Comments by steve99

16. Comment #47919 by LeeC on June 6, 2007 at 3:38 am

 avatarSteve,

Now the doomsday people have to try harder and look at every new discovery in astronomy as another way to kill us all.

So we are down to comets and asteroids... although there is still a chance of a wandering planet/star/blackhole etc etc etc.

Oh... but of course, we still have global warming right, and all the oil will run out in 10 years so we will have wars and stuff.

What a happy world we live.

Not wanting to get religious or anything - but I am sure most of the fear is created by those theist nutters who want to "prove" the world is coming to an end.

Ho hum

Thanks again.

See you around.

Lee

Other Comments by LeeC

17. Comment #55708 by Rob Carter on July 12, 2007 at 3:50 am

Hmm, an interesting article, but marred by one elementary error, I quote,

"In the explosion, a super-heated blast of energy from the core rips through the body of the star at almost the speed of light."

There's nothing "almost" about it, they're photons!

Rob

Other Comments by Rob Carter

18. Comment #55716 by Quetzalcoatl on July 12, 2007 at 4:07 am

 avatarAh, but the speed is slightly slowed by the mass of the star that is surrounding the core. Even in our own Sun, photons can take millions of years to find their way from the core out into space because they get "bounced" off other particles.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

19. Comment #58923 by Your_Noodly_Master on July 26, 2007 at 5:28 pm

Hypernovae happen less often now - they require stars of substantial mass, which are pretty rare (they were much more common in the early universe).

Hypernovae also shouldn't be that damaging. They could cause extinctions at thousands of light years, but almost certainly not at hundreds of thousands. The idea of 'galaxy sterilizing' events is fortunately much more science fiction than real science.


Could gamma ray bursts have been common enough in the early Milky Way to explain the Fermi Paradox (The idea that intelligent life should be common, and advanced enough to be visible from here, yet not; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox)?

Other Comments by Your_Noodly_Master
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: