Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Tuesday, June 5, 2007 | Reason : Wingnut News | print version Print | Comments

Document Pell plans fidelity oath for principals

by Linda Morris

Thanks to Michael for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/pell-plans-fidelity-oath-for-principals/2007/06/03/1180809340768.html

Linda Morris Religious Affairs Reporter
June 4, 2007

comicTHE Catholic archdiocese of Sydney wants its 167 school principals, its deputy principals and religious education co-ordinators to publicly commit to a "vow of fidelity" by adhering to church teaching on homosexuality, birth control and women's ordination.

In a first for the Australian church, the Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal George Pell, is set to extend the oath of fidelity and profession of faith, a requirement of church law for bishops, priests and heads of seminaries, to all senior educational leaders.

The oath demands "religious submission of intellect and will" on questions of faith and morals - even if these are inferred but not defined by the pope and his bishops - and an acceptance that everything solemnly taught by church tradition is divinely inspired.

It suggests they would be bound not only to impart these teachings but to live by them.

The controversial requirement is contained in a draft pastoral plan circulated to all parishes of the Sydney archdiocese for comment. The plan, at least two years in the drafting, gives a series of priorities, goals and strategies for the archdiocese from 2008 to 2011.

Among its other new measures are marriage preparation classes for senior secondary school students, twice-yearly reviews of its educational bodies, and forums so Catholic politicians can be updated on church teachings.

There will also be renewed efforts to teach youth about "sexuality and life issues" through formal courses and seminars, and measures to bring in to the fold young people inspired by next year's World Youth Day.

Cardinal Pell has taken an intense interest in Catholic education, ordering the rewriting of the religious education curriculum, and aiming to turn around Catholic thinking that faith is caught, not taught.

The oath has symbolic value as a public commitment to the moral teachings and identity of the church and is not an attempt at control, the archdiocese says.

But a recent Vatican push to institute an oath for theologians in the US was greeted as an attack on academic independence and an attempt to impose tighter doctrinal controls over education institutions connected to the church.

One critic of the archdiocese's plan says it contains "shades of the Opus Dei", the Spanish-founded conservative Christian movement that achieved notoriety as the villain of the fictional bestseller The Da Vinci Code.Writing for the online magazine Catholica, a Sydney priest, Father Dan Donovan, said the plan needed a serious rewrite and failed to take note of the "infiltration" of Opus Dei and the Neocatechumenal Way, a lay movement that heads the turbulent Redfern parish.

In addition, the plan lacked a suitable process for "critiquing structures and providing just outcomes, and was directed to the needs of clergy and not churchgoers", he said.

"There must be developed a listening hierarchy who are able to connect with the broad masses of the faithful and their issues rather than endorsing the agenda of the various movements."

The Sydney Auxiliary Bishop Julian Porteous said the oath would act as a reminder to educational leaders of their role in promoting church teachings.

"It's not about control," he said. "The oath gives greater clarity to the importance of the role of principals in schools, that their first responsibility is that the Catholic faith is taught and lived authentically within the school.

"Anybody who speaks in a Catholic education institution is meant to be presenting the Catholic faith in its integrity. There can be a place for theologians to make explorations of criticism, but in teaching positions the role is to very much be faithful to the teaching of the church."

Comments 1 - 16 of 16 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #47758 by PaulJ on June 5, 2007 at 12:53 pm

 avatarThis looks similar to (though perhaps more draconian than) something the Anglican Bishops are attempting, as reported in the Sunday Telegraph.

(I've blogged about this here.)

Other Comments by PaulJ

2. Comment #47781 by MIND_REBEL on June 5, 2007 at 2:03 pm

 avatarStraight out of the middle ages. Scary stuff. Looks like they forgot about the enlightenment down under.

Other Comments by MIND_REBEL

3. Comment #47785 by harryh28 on June 5, 2007 at 2:17 pm

Speaking as an Australian, we are lucky that when religious elites like Pell speak loudly they only succeed in driving more Australians away from their church.

The two most senior politicians in the state of New South Wales which contans Pell's diocese of Sydney are just as publicly defying his threats. Largely because that is what the great majority of Australians would want them to do.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/catholic-mps-to-defy-pell-over-bill/2007/06/05/1180809521252.html

Other Comments by harryh28

4. Comment #47807 by Logicel on June 5, 2007 at 2:57 pm

 avatarThere can be a place for theologians to make explorations of criticism, but in teaching positions the role is to very much be faithful to the teaching of the church."
_____

Such a quaint phrase, exploration of criticism, not exactly criticizing any Catholic tenet, but simply exploring such criticism? So, little Theologians, play in your sand pile with your pails and shovels, but if any of your playful exploration result in serious criticism, the Pope will just override it.

Before this declaration, what were the Catholic teachers practicing and teaching: atheism?

The Catholic Church ping pongs between trying to appeal to the masses and after acheiving some success in doing so, a 'bright bulb' in their midst, then decides clarity and firmness is the way to go, until church attendance falls yet again, and the Catholic officials become yet again understanding and tolerate until they decide to tighten the screws once again. What a vicious and useless circle of pathetically manipulative dysfunction.

Other Comments by Logicel

5. Comment #47810 by jaytee_555 on June 5, 2007 at 3:08 pm

"...it's not about control..."

If that is not a disgraceful, outright barefaced LIE, I don't know what is.

Other Comments by jaytee_555

6. Comment #47818 by Donald on June 5, 2007 at 3:33 pm

THE Catholic archdiocese of Sydney wants its 167 school principals, its deputy principals and religious education co-ordinators to publically commit to ... an oath that demands "religious submission of intellect and will" on questions of faith and morals...

Yep, he understands the most effective way to propagate the faith, which so many "moderate" religious leaders have wandered away from.

Scary.

The pope will be pleased though. Perhaps Cardinal Pell might even fancy his chances to be the next pope?

Other Comments by Donald

7. Comment #47828 by mandrellian on June 5, 2007 at 4:25 pm

Hmmm...

"...the religious submission of intellect and will..."

OK kids, spot the key word in the preceding sentence.

I can't imagine many of Sydney's 167 catholic educators happily pledging unquestioning allegiance to the Vatican. The less influence that rogue state has on children's minds the better. I've always thought that "catholic education" is an oxymoron, but this putsch from Pell really highlights the difference between secular and mythical schools. We have keen bullshit detectors down here and if anyone does actually take this oath of ignorance I'm sure there'll be more than a few fingers crossed.

I hope I live long enough to see all religious education banned or at least pared down to the non-essential topics (of which it is the prime example), and the Vatican removed from its seat at the UN.

Other Comments by mandrellian

8. Comment #47857 by Russell Blackford on June 5, 2007 at 6:50 pm

What did we really expect from a totalitarian fanatic like Pell? All we can do is just keep saying, loudly, that he and his bloated cult have no moral authority whatsoever.

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

9. Comment #47859 by BAEOZ on June 5, 2007 at 7:12 pm

 avatarI heard once that Pell had the choice between playing ruck for Richmond and becoming a priest. For all Richmond's problems, imagine if he'd played for them and then became management.....Good for catholics perhaps, bad for long suffering tiger fans...

Other Comments by BAEOZ

10. Comment #47909 by mmurray on June 6, 2007 at 2:45 am

 avatar
Looks like they forgot about the enlightenment down under.


Pell makes it look bad but a lot of people are going to ignore him. More recently he has been telling Catholic politicians in NSW that if they don't vote against stem cell research they might be refused communion. He has been told to stuff off by everybody including the Premier

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200706/s1944347.htm

Michael

Other Comments by mmurray

11. Comment #47929 by newatheist on June 6, 2007 at 4:12 am

 avatarPell is a scary, archaic bigot from way back.

Anyhoo you can vote in an SMH poll about his warning to pollies, at http://www.smh.com.au/polls/politics/form.html
(sorry I'm still getting the hang of linking)

The positions to vote on are -

1. A spiritual leader has the right to point out moral and religious consequences

2. He should keep out of politics. Churchmen shouldn't make veiled threats against MPs

3. Let our elected representatives decide on their own

The poll has over 6200 total votes so far and position 2 is in front with 59%, position 1 is 25%. It's a quick click and submit with no registration and it seems to be still going.

Other Comments by newatheist

12. Comment #47970 by Mark U on June 6, 2007 at 6:57 am

And now he is trying to coerce politicians. See:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200706/s1943664.htm

Other Comments by Mark U

13. Comment #47989 by konquererz on June 6, 2007 at 8:02 am

 avatarThis is either a good sign or a bad sign for the world. After the last two years of people like Dawkins, Harris, Dennet, and Hitchens all banging the drum against religious dogmatism, the churches are circling the wagons. This is the time to not allow something like this to pass by quietly.

Other Comments by konquererz

15. Comment #48214 by pewkatchoo on June 7, 2007 at 4:04 am

 avatarLogicel summed it up pretty much for me. All the way backwards to the Inquisition.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

16. Comment #48710 by derwent on June 8, 2007 at 7:17 pm

 avatar
...the churches are circling the wagons.

Indeed. Religion most certainly will not die quietly; depressingly, things will probably get MUCH worse before they get better. They know what's at stake here, and they won't give up without a major fight...

Other Comments by derwent
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: