Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, June 27, 2007 | Science : Genetics | print version Print | Comments

Document Researchers May Remake Neanderthal DNA

by Randolph E. Schmid

Reposted from PhysOrg:

http://www.physorg.com/news102055359.html

Researchers studying Neanderthal DNA say it should be possible to construct a complete genome of the ancient hominid despite the degradation of the DNA over time.

There is also hope for reconstructing the genome of the mammoth and cave bear, according to a research team led by Svante Paabo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

Their findings are published in this week's online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Debate has raged for years about whether there is any relationship between Neanderthals and modern humans. Some researchers believe that Neanderthals were simply replaced by early modern humans, while others argue the two groups may have interbred.

Sequencing the genome of Neanderthals, who lived in Europe until about 30,000 years ago, could shed some light on that question.

In studies of Neanderthals, cave bear and mammoth, a majority of the DNA recovered was that of microorganisms that colonized the tissues after death, the researchers said.

But they were able to identify some DNA from the original animal, and Paabo and his colleagues were able to determine how it broke down over time. They also developed procedures to prevent contamination by the DNA of humans working with the material.

"We are confident that it will be technically feasible to achieve a reliable Neanderthal genome sequence," Paabo and his researchers reported.

They said problem of damaged areas in some DNA could be overcome by using a sufficient amount of Neanderthal DNA from different individuals, so the whole genome can be determined.

"The contamination and degradation of DNA has been a serious issue for the last 10 years," observed Erik Trinkaus, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis. "This is a serious attempt to deal with that issue and that's welcome."

"I'm not sure they have completely solved the problem, but they've made a big step in that direction," said Trinkaus, who was not involved in the research.

Anthropologist Richard Potts of the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, called the work "a very significant technical study of DNA decay."

The researchers "have tried to answer important questions about the potential to sequence ancient DNA," said Potts, who was not part of the research.

Milford Wolpoff, a University of Michigan Anthropologist, said creating a complete Neanderthal genome is a great goal.

But it is "sample intensive," he said, and he isn't sure enough DNA is available to complete the work. Curators don't like to see their specimens ground up, he said.

The research was funded by the Max Planck Society and the National Institutes of Health.

Comments 1 - 16 of 16 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #52543 by Deicide on June 27, 2007 at 8:30 am

Gentlemen, we can rebuild him...

Now that we have their DNA we can bring them back Jurassic Park style and ask them personally how they went extinct. lol

Other Comments by Deicide

2. Comment #52545 by Spinoza on June 27, 2007 at 8:40 am

 avatarI know that last comment is a joke... but uh... I'm pretty sure MEMORIES are not in your DNA... if they created a living Neanderthal, it wouldn't know how they went extinct.

Just saying...

Other Comments by Spinoza

3. Comment #52557 by Deicide on June 27, 2007 at 9:24 am

Lol, how condescending do you need to be, Spinoza? of course it's a joke.

Other Comments by Deicide

4. Comment #52573 by konquererz on June 27, 2007 at 10:13 am

 avatarpretty cool if they can really replicate the neanderthal dna sequence.

On another note, I doubt the cave man would be able to tell you WHY he went extinct. lol

Other Comments by konquererz

5. Comment #52590 by PeterK on June 27, 2007 at 11:38 am

Bring BACK the neanderthals?

I always assumed my neighbour was one.




( sorry blokes, I just had to do that )

Peter

Other Comments by PeterK

6. Comment #52596 by CJ22 on June 27, 2007 at 12:11 pm

 avatarQuestion: I'd always understoof that part of the definition of whether two individuals were of a different species was whether they could interbreed or not. If neanderthals and hom. sap. sap. could interbreed, are they still different species?

On reflection, horse and donkeys can interbreed (or something like that), so I guess I have the wrong end of the stick.

Other Comments by CJ22

7. Comment #52600 by Pagan on June 27, 2007 at 12:31 pm

Depends on whether they could produce offspring. Horse/donkey matings produce sterile mules, so that isn't a successful "breeding." Different chromosome numbers, I think.

Other Comments by Pagan

8. Comment #52614 by Pete_C on June 27, 2007 at 2:03 pm

The "species" idea doesn't admit of hard definitions like that - in my understanding, the question of "are these individuals the same species or not" is not as informative as "what is the phylogenetic relationship between these individuals", i.e. how related are they; when was their last common ancestor; how do their genomes compare, etc. To put it another way: when we have the Neanderthal genome, and find out our degree of relation to them, our knowledge will make the question "Are we the same species" superfluous.

If, after the genome sequence is done, it does turn out that there is evidence for interbreeding, I predict there will soon be a company that will purport to tell people their "Neanderthal quotient".

Other Comments by Pete_C

9. Comment #58169 by kardde1492 on July 23, 2007 at 8:30 pm

if we could succesfully interbreed wouldnt that make them or us a subspecies or something? or a different breed of the same species?

Other Comments by kardde1492

10. Comment #58172 by Goldy on July 23, 2007 at 9:08 pm

I believe lions and tigers produce offspring too. Maybe it is the degree of separation. Classification is also a bit hazy at times - things can be very close but not close enough to be the same species - difficulty is finding where to draw the line...

Other Comments by Goldy

11. Comment #58173 by Bonzai on July 23, 2007 at 9:20 pm

Can you just get DNA samples in the U.S. bible belt?

Other Comments by Bonzai

12. Comment #58174 by Bonzai on July 23, 2007 at 9:24 pm

Goldy,

I believe lions and tigers produce offspring too.


Yes they can in captivity, the offspring is called a "liger" (male lion mates with female tiger)or a "tigon" (female lion mates with male tiger).However the liger and tigon are sterile though.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/250400/liger/

Other Comments by Bonzai

13. Comment #107706 by the_ultimate_samurai on January 5, 2008 at 3:01 am

"its a liger, its pretty much my favourite animal, a lion and tiger mix, bred for their proficiency in magic"~napoleon dynamite.

sorry...i had to...

anyhow, about the article...interesting prospect, aside from studying the dna, lets face it, when you have one DNA sample...dont you want more? cloning a neanderthal would be waaay more effective means of understanding them than studying their dna, when you see how they act, interact, their level of intelegence, their ability for speach, the ability to create, their physical and mental differences, or if you can sequence a female to go with it, mating, parenting, socializing, much potential.

of course ethics comes in, they are homo, do they have human rights, are we violating them by studying them, can they even survive on their own, if so...is it right to release them to the wild after we make them. they couldnt blend into society and we cant just kill them...but they wouldnt be good for ecosystem...
maybe i shouldnt talk about problems to things that havent even been sugested yet...im not just jumping the gun, im jumping the purchase of the gun.

Other Comments by the_ultimate_samurai

14. Comment #107710 by Vaal on January 5, 2008 at 3:14 am

 avatarInteresting. There is a good novel called "Raising Abel", by Michael Gear and Kathleen O'Neal, where a young Neanderthal boy has been recreated, and is being hunted by fanatical Christian Evangelical zealots, determined to murder him. Very plausible and compelling reading. Highly recommended.

Of course they are our human cousins. As far as ethics is concerned, wasn't it homo Sapiens who were responsible for their extinction in the first place? They survived the vicissitudes of the Ice ages for hundreds of thousands of years before modern humanity arrived in Europe. They were either out competed or ethnically cleansed, perhaps a bit of both.

Other Comments by Vaal

15. Comment #107975 by the_ultimate_samurai on January 5, 2008 at 5:53 pm

little bit of both. but it is interesting the animals they mentioned reconstructing the DNA of...are all animals we drove to extinction.

Other Comments by the_ultimate_samurai

16. Comment #107986 by Goldy on January 5, 2008 at 7:05 pm

Has there been any sequencing of the Flores "hobbit" DNA that anyone knows of? I know I could try and look it up but I'm feeling lazy...hot and humid today in Aotearoa...

Other Comments by Goldy
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: