Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, June 28, 2007 | Science : Anthropology | print version Print | Comments

Document Scientists Find Earliest Sign of Cultivated Crops in Americas

by John Noble Wilford

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/28/science/28cnd-squash.html?ref=science

Scientists exploring the western slopes of the Andes in northern Peru have found seeds of domesticated squash from almost 10,000 years ago, about twice the age of previously discovered cultivated crops in the region.

The find in Peru and recent research in Mexico, anthropologists say, are evidence that farming developed in parts of the Americas nearly as early as it did in the Middle East, which has been considered the birthplace of the earliest agriculture.

Digging under house floors and grinding stones and in stone-lined storage bins, the archaeologist Tom D. Dillehey of Vanderbilt University, in Nashville, uncovered the squash seeds at several places in the Ñanchoc Valley, near the Pacific coast about 400 miles north of Lima. The excavations also yielded peanut hulls and cotton fibers — about 8,500 and 6,000 years old, respectively.

The new, more precise dating of the plant remains, some of which were collected two decades ago, are reported by Dr. Dillehey and colleagues in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

Their research also turned up traces of other domesticated plants, including a grain, manioc and some unidentified fruits, and stone hoes, furrowed garden plots and small-scale irrigation canals from approximately the same period.

The researchers concluded that these beginnings in plant domestication "served as catalysts for rapid social changes that eventually contributed to the development of intensified agriculture, institutionalized political power and towns in both the Andean highlands and on the coast between 5,000 and 4,000 years ago."

The evidence at Ñanchoc, Dr. Dillehey's team wrote, indicated that "agriculture played a more important and earlier role in the development of Andean civilization than previously understood."

In an accompanying article on early agriculture, Eve Emshwiller, an ethnobotanist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, was quoted as saying the reports of early dates for plant domestication in the New World were remarkable because the activity appeared to have occurred not long after humans first colonized the Americas, which is now thought to be at least 13,000 years ago.

The article also noted that 10,000-year-old cultivated squash seeds have recently been reported in Mexico, along with evidence of domesticated maize there by 9,000 years ago. Scholars now think that plants were domesticated independently in at least 10 "centers of origin;" those centers, in addition to the Middle East, Mexico and Peru, include places in Africa, southern India, China and New Guinea.

In the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East, an arc from modern-day Israel through Syria and southeastern Turkey to Iraq, wheat and barley were domesticated at least 10,000 years ago, and rye may have been domesticated 13,000 years ago. Experts in ancient agriculture suspect that the transition from foraging to cultivation started much earlier than that, and was not as abrupt a transformation as the archaeological record would seem to indicate.

Dr. Dillehey has devoted several decades to research on ancient cultures in South America. His most notable previous achievement was the discovery of a campsite of hunger-gatherers at Monte Verde, in Chile, which dates to about 13,000 years ago. Most archaeologists recognize this as the earliest well-documented human occupation site uncovered so far in the New World.

Other explorations in recent years have yielded increasing evidence of settlements and organized political societies that flourished in the coastal valleys of northern Peru, possibly as early as 5,000 years ago. Until now, the record of earlier farming in the region had been sparse.

Initial radiocarbon dating of the plant remains from Ñanchoc was based on wood charcoal buried at the sites, but the results varied widely and were considered unreliable. More recent radiocarbon dating, with a technique called accelerator mass spectrometry, relied on measurements from undisturbed buried charcoal and an analysis of the actual plant remains.

The distribution of building structures, canals and furrowed fields, Dr. Dillehey said, indicated that the Andean culture was moving beyond cultivation limited to individual households toward an organized agricultural society.

Botanists studying the squash, peanut and cotton remains determined that the specific strains did not grow naturally in the Ñanchoc area. The peanut, in particular, was thought to be better suited to cultivation in tropical forests and savannas elsewhere in South America. The wild ancestor of squash has yet to be identified, though lowlands in Colombia are thought to be a likely source.

So if the new research shows that the "horticultural economies in parts of the Andes took root by about 10,000 years ago," Dr. Dillehey's team said, it remains to be seen when and where the domestication of squash, peanuts and cotton took place.

Comments 1 - 8 of 8 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #52951 by Nails on June 28, 2007 at 5:13 pm

 avatarInteresting.
I wonder if evidence of anything else older than 5000 years old was washed away by the flood?
Or eaten by the Leviathon?
On a more serious note, it is quite amazing how far we have come in the last 20,000 years or so; our cognitive abilities have allowed us to evolve beyond our original 'DNA programming'.
From nomadic hunter-gatherers to home-buying internet freaks!!
Truly amazing really.

Other Comments by Nails

2. Comment #52956 by The Schuermannator on June 28, 2007 at 5:32 pm

 avatarTruly amazing MUST mean then that an all powerful Creator was involved.. haha, uhh.... NOT

Other Comments by The Schuermannator

3. Comment #52962 by Fire1974 on June 28, 2007 at 6:37 pm

Fantastic!
I'm right now reading Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond.
If true, this discovery alters a lot of the information and charts in that book. The overall premise of the book is still fascinating. It completely dismantles the relevance of any racist assumption regarding why the Europeans conquered the Americas.

Creationist/fundies have never imagined the depth and explanitory genius in this book. They should all read it and discover that religion was not even possible until there was enough food production to allow for it's promulgators. You can't feed a delusion without extra food.

Other Comments by Fire1974

4. Comment #53017 by CJ22 on June 29, 2007 at 2:43 am

 avatarWhat I find interesting about these dates for things happening is that they can only ever really go BACK in time. So any date accepted as the earliest date for which we have evidence should be considered a maximum (or minimum, I'm not sure which would be applied here, nomenclature is ambiguous) - the latest possible date for which this event could occur.

When you consider the odds against us happening to stumble upon the earliest POSSIBLE archeological records for an event (i.e. records for the first time the event occurred), then it's a reasonable assumption that these events occurred significantly before the earliest record. Makes you wonder how accurate our picture is - by definition it's going to be conservative. Just how old is our civilisation?

As for the religious, anybody who still continues to believe in a young Earth despite the torrent of evidence to the contrary, is just being willfully ignorant and obdurate, and is probably a lost cause.

Other Comments by CJ22

5. Comment #53078 by konquererz on June 29, 2007 at 8:41 am

 avatarCJ22,

Don't you know your theological nonsense at all? Its obvious to any good fundy that SATAN PLANTED THOSE SEEDS!!!!! They were placed there for the soul reason of damaging our faith!

HA HA, just kidding. You make an excellent point, the evidence is such that young earth believers give themselves over to delusions of the mind in order to continue their "comfy" place in life in which ultimately it doesn't matter what we do to this earth, Jesus will come back and fix it any way.

But on the article, its amazing to find out that our civilization may have started much earlier than we thought. We have come so far, I can't even image what it would be like without my computer!

Other Comments by konquererz

6. Comment #53270 by CJ22 on June 30, 2007 at 1:05 pm

 avatarWell, here's, to the day they invented alcohol. Cheers.

Other Comments by CJ22

7. Comment #53914 by Trunkmonkey on July 4, 2007 at 5:51 am

 avatarCJ22 There is a school of thought (and sadly I can't remember where I read this) which postulated that one of the major contributing factors for humans giving up the hunter/gatherer existence for farming was that as a species we learned how to get drunk when some wild yeast got into some fruit or grain and water and fermented it. As you have to be in one place for a couple of weeks or so for the fermentation process to complete and also, given that getting tanked up was pleasurable; the whole social group would want to get involved and more fruit/grain was required than could be found growing naturaly. Thus were the twin human activities of farming and the Friday night cave crawl born. Hooray!

Other Comments by Trunkmonkey

8. Comment #53915 by Trunkmonkey on July 4, 2007 at 5:54 am

 avatarBeer;
Helping ugly people get laid since 40,000 BCE

Other Comments by Trunkmonkey
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com