









Ah, the fervour in returning to my flock2. Comment #54410 by Serendip on July 7, 2007 at 12:49 am
What the hell was the point of that article?
No honey...
3. Comment #54415 by PaulJ on July 7, 2007 at 1:45 am
Atheists are expected to account for their beliefs in a way that religious people are not.This is so wrong.
4. Comment #54418 by Logicel on July 7, 2007 at 1:57 am
5. Comment #54423 by BMMcArdle on July 7, 2007 at 2:38 am
More "atheism is a religion/belief" ammo for the God-botherers.6. Comment #54426 by drive1 on July 7, 2007 at 3:03 am
Atheism was the religion of my childhood. I suffered for my beliefs. When my parents finally enrolled me in Sunday School because all the other children were doing it, I was sent to the remedial group and faced the humiliation of colouring in pictures of Jesus with children younger than me because I didn't know enough about the Bible. Later on as a primary schooler, I suffered persecution
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/opinion/a-fundamental-wrong-in-letting-some-marry/2007/03/30/1174761750887.html
Before you know it, fundamentalist parents will be insisting preschool children read storybooks about the fundamentalist lifestyle in order to better understand it. There will be colouring books directed at four-year-olds showing Jesus turning water into wine and walking on water, as if it were gospel.
What hope does a child indoctrinated with this sort of propaganda have of growing up to be normal? Can you really tell me they will not be more likely to grow up fundamentalist themselves?
7. Comment #54429 by He-man Daunted World on July 7, 2007 at 3:31 am
That was an horrible article.8. Comment #54436 by Serendip on July 7, 2007 at 4:28 am
@drive1 that second article you link to supports my view of the satirical nature of Lisa Pryor's writing. She is clearly attacking fundamentalist Christian opposition to gay marriage by using their own arguments against them, so that the stupidity and bigotry of their reasoning is made apparent. The article ends with the giveaway:Before you accuse me of hate speech, I should point out that I bear no grudge against fundamentalists personally. "Love the fundamentalist, hate the fundamentalism" is my policy.
I suppose one chink in this argument is that banning a minority from marrying is utterly unfair, inhumane and intolerant. Kind of like the ban on gay marriage.
9. Comment #54440 by pewkatchoo on July 7, 2007 at 5:34 am
10. Comment #54451 by Mango on July 7, 2007 at 7:34 am
11. Comment #54562 by Robert Maynard on July 7, 2007 at 7:28 pm
12. Comment #55448 by lindsay.wu on July 11, 2007 at 5:42 am
Fellas, I can guarantee you 100% these articles were in jest, and all the readers understood it as such.
1. Comment #54406 by Janus on July 6, 2007 at 11:39 pm
What the hell was the point of that article?
Other Comments by Janus