










Small, Yes, but Mighty: The Molecule Called Water2. Comment #55182 by A.Lex on July 10, 2007 at 7:54 am
"...boiling point at sea level of 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius), and a full 180 degrees (100 degrees Celsius) lying between the tempest of a teapot and the tinkling of an ice cube at 32 degrees (0 degrees Celsius)."3. Comment #55197 by Kakashi_monkey on July 10, 2007 at 8:30 am
4. Comment #55206 by Rtambree on July 10, 2007 at 8:46 am
Question:5. Comment #55216 by DC_Runner on July 10, 2007 at 9:13 am
Speaking of water ....6. Comment #55221 by Rtambree on July 10, 2007 at 9:21 am
5. Comment #55216 by DC_Runner7. Comment #55225 by ab_initio on July 10, 2007 at 9:42 am
Rtambree,8. Comment #55228 by Rtambree on July 10, 2007 at 9:48 am
Thanks Greg - that's a concise clear explanation that would have taken Alistair McGrath 14 unabridged volumes to totally obfuscate.9. Comment #55229 by robert s on July 10, 2007 at 9:48 am
The boiling point is the temperature at which the liquid and gaseous phases are in equilibrium.10. Comment #55233 by Smith on July 10, 2007 at 9:58 am
11. Comment #55236 by Friend Giskard on July 10, 2007 at 10:06 am
12. Comment #55238 by HarryHUK on July 10, 2007 at 10:14 am
Rtambree13. Comment #55245 by melisande on July 10, 2007 at 10:42 am
14. Comment #55258 by Kervinator on July 10, 2007 at 11:26 am
When God flooded the entire Earth and killed all of its inhabitants - except Noah, of course -- where did the water drain after it stopped raining?
15. Comment #55263 by Alkal on July 10, 2007 at 11:28 am
This is sheer poetry...16. Comment #55313 by ridelo on July 10, 2007 at 2:32 pm
All those special properties like those from water and the carbon atom. Looks alot as if some god designed them to make life possible. But if those properties weren't there we wouldn't be here to ask the question. Always that anthropic principle gets in the way of god! A very compelling thought: what if nature was as it is except that only water or the C-atom where slightly different? But that amounts to the same question as what would happen if the charge of the electron would be a little bit different.17. Comment #55324 by steveroot on July 10, 2007 at 3:34 pm
18. Comment #55326 by HarryHUK on July 10, 2007 at 3:52 pm
A very interesting thought,ridelo,it all seems highhly improbable,but there is something more improbable than that.19. Comment #55339 by Rtambree on July 10, 2007 at 5:00 pm
16. Comment #55313 by ridelo20. Comment #55352 by rthille on July 10, 2007 at 5:57 pm
but I like brocolli and spinach.21. Comment #55397 by ridelo on July 11, 2007 at 2:15 am
Interesting comment, Rtambree, but all your examples are accidental (the dimensions perhaps not). If elsewhere the conditions were about the same then there could be life too. Maybe not intelligent life but all the same life that might develop intelligence. But it takes a different set of natural laws tot change the C-atom or the polarity of the water molecule, I suppose.22. Comment #55406 by Rtambree on July 11, 2007 at 3:13 am
Ridelo,23. Comment #55434 by ridelo on July 11, 2007 at 4:55 am
Rtambree,24. Comment #55497 by rthille on July 11, 2007 at 9:55 am
I don't know enough physics, but I distrust statements like, "if this or that physical constant was just slightly different, the universe as we know it would have collapsed or been a desert." Maybe that physical constant is the result of some far more fundamental particle/constant interactions, and any changes at that level to introduce the physical constant change would still result in a universe conducive to life, since other particles/constants would change in unexpected/unpredictable (at this time) ways.25. Comment #55501 by Rtambree on July 11, 2007 at 10:20 am
>Therefore to say that a universe that supports intelligent life is extremely unlikely is not very well supported.26. Comment #76672 by Smith on October 6, 2007 at 4:12 pm
27. Comment #109878 by the_ultimate_samurai on January 10, 2008 at 1:46 am
i think life would have still formed if constants were different, i think it just wouldnt be life as we know it. i think one thing with the anthopic principal is that is looks at the universe in an egocentric means, much the same way the religious people do, they think only about themselves, it goes on the idea that everything in the universe is made perfect to support us. but it doesnt look the other way, we are made perfect to exist in the universe. its not a marvel of creation, its a marvel of evolution. given an environment life will tend to go to be best fit for that environment.Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com
1. Comment #55179 by Kervinator on July 10, 2007 at 7:50 am
Other Comments by Kervinator