Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, August 27, 2007 | Reason : Religion as Child Abuse | print version Print | Comments

Document Hebrew Charter School Spurs Dispute in Florida

by Abby Goodnough

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/24/education/24charter.html

The new public school at 2620 Hollywood Boulevard stands out despite its plain gray facade. Called the Ben Gamla Charter School, it is run by an Orthodox rabbi, serves kosher lunches and concentrates on teaching Hebrew.

About 400 students started classes at Ben Gamla this week amid caustic debate over whether a public school can teach Hebrew without touching Judaism and the unconstitutional side of the church-state divide. The conflict intensified Wednesday, when the Broward County School Board ordered Ben Gamla to suspend Hebrew lessons because its curriculum - the third proposed by the school - referred to a Web site that mentioned religion.

Opponents say that it is impossible to teach Hebrew - and aspects of Jewish culture - outside a religious context, and that Ben Gamla, billed as the nation's first Hebrew-English charter school, violates one of its paramount legal and political boundaries.

But supporters say the school is no different from hundreds of others around the country with dual-language programs, whose popularity has soared in ethnically diverse states like Florida.

“It’s not a religious school,” said Peter Deutsch, a former Democratic member of Congress from Florida who started Ben Gamla and hopes to replicate it in Los Angeles, Miami and New York. "South Florida is one of the largest Hebrew-speaking communities in the world outside Israel, so there are lots of really good reasons to try to create a program like this here."

The battle over Ben Gamla parallels one in New York over Khalil Gibran International Academy, a new public school that will focus on Arabic language and culture. But some who have followed the evolution of both schools say Ben Gamla could prove more problematic. As a charter school that receives public money but is exempt from certain rules, they say, it is subject to less oversight.

“Charter schools have greater autonomy than a school being run by the Board of Education,” said Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League. "Let's give it a shot, but let's watch it very, very carefully."

Mr. Deutsch said Ben Gamla, named for a Jewish high priest who established free universal schooling in ancient Israel, received 800 applications in one week this summer. About half of the applications were from adjacent Miami-Dade County, but the school admitted only Broward County residents, ensuring that almost everyone from the county who wanted to attend could do so.

The students are in kindergarten through eighth grade. About 80 percent transferred from other public schools, Mr. Deutsch said, and many, if not most, of the rest came from private Jewish day schools.

“I just didn’t appreciate the demand at all,” said Mr. Deutsch, who splits his time between South Florida and Israel. "If I had 5,000, maybe 10,000 desks available in South Florida today, I think I could fill them."

Under the school's charter agreement, students are to spend one period a day learning Hebrew. They will have a second daily class - math or science, for example - conducted in a mix of Hebrew and English.

There are no separate classes on Jewish culture, but Rabbi Adam Siegel, the school's director, said it would come up during Hebrew instruction. Teachers might also do special units on aspects of Jewish culture, he said, like Israeli folk dancing.

School officials have not asked students whether they are Jewish, Rabbi Siegel said, but 37 percent of parents identified Hebrew as their first language. Seventeen percent said Spanish was their primary language, he said, while 5 percent said Russian and 5 percent said French.

The school has a handful of black students, including members of a Baptist church that provides their transportation to and from the school.

Mr. Deutsch and Rabbi Siegel, a former Jewish day school director, said their critics were mostly defenders of Jewish day schools that stand to lose students and tuition money. No one has sued to stop the school, but Howard Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, said a lawsuit was possible.

“Whether this is going to cross the line or not will depend on what goes on in the classroom,” Mr. Simon said. "Will they neutrally and academically address religious topics, or will there be more preaching than teaching going on in the classroom? It is too early to tell."

Rabbi Siegel said the school was proceeding with such extreme caution that even a neutral mention of religion was unlikely. The sign outside Ben Gamla was going to include a Hebrew phrase for "welcome", Rabbi Siegel said, but because the literal translation is "blessed are those who come", he decided against it.

"Even basic things, like if there was a page that had a picture of a shofar, I pulled it out," Rabbi Siegel said, referring to the ram's horn used in High Holy Day services. "We went so far overboard, it's crazy."

The school board rejected Ben Gamla's first two Hebrew curriculum proposals after finding they included religious references. The second, which relied on a textbook titled 'Ha-Yesod', asked students to translate phrases like 'Our Holy Torah is dear to us' and 'Man is redeemed from his sins through repentance.'

Rabbi Siegel said the school would have omitted such phrases from lessons. On Tuesday, the school board hired Nathan Katz, a religious studies professor at Florida International University, to vet the latest curriculum proposal before its next meeting on Sept. 11. The school cannot teach Hebrew before then, a school board spokesman said.

Rabbi Siegel was originally the school's principal, but he hired someone else after people said it was inappropriate for a rabbi to oversee instruction. Rabbi Siegel, who does not have a congregation, said it should not have mattered.

"One of the most ridiculous complaints is that the line between culture and religion is so thin", he said. "Who better to make that distinction than a rabbi?"

Wryly, he added, "I don't envision myself doing bar mitzvahs for the middle school kids."

Eleanor Sobel, a school board member who is among Ben Gamla's most vocal critics, said making sure the school did not stray from constitutional rules would take a near-impossible level of supervision.

"I don't know how to monitor this, and that's why I have great concern", Ms. Sobel said. "Accountability is real important when you're dealing with taxpayers' money."

Allan Tuffs, the rabbi at Temple Beth El in Hollywood, said he, too, was worried about the school and what it could lead to. "Jews have thrived in America as in no other nation," Rabbi Tuffs said, "in large measure due to this concept of separation of church and state."

He added, "Once a Jewish school like Ben Gamla is established, you know that fundamentalist Christian groups throughout America will be lining up to replicate this model according to their religious tradition."

Undeterred, Mr. Deutsch is seeking four more charters for Ben Gamla schools in Broward and Palm Beach Counties, he said, and has already received one for a school in Miami.

He said he hoped to eventually open 100 Hebrew-English charter schools around the country. The school here is managed by Academica, a private company on whose board Mr. Deutsch has served, which manages 35 of Florida's roughly 350 charter schools.

Tzipora Nurieli, the mother of three Ben Gamla students, said she had spent more than $40,000 a year in tuition at a private Jewish day school. Ms. Nurieli, who immigrated from Israel, said that while her children could learn religion at home, they needed formal schooling in Hebrew.

"I believe we are creating a better world at this school because language is a bridge," she said. "I see all different kids in this school, and I know my children are becoming part of the universe."

Comments 1 - 10 of 10 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #65860 by Mango on August 27, 2007 at 6:44 am

 avatarObviously this is using tax dollars to fund a religious school. That the food is kosher should be a clear signal of its true nature.

Other Comments by Mango

2. Comment #65867 by donmak on August 27, 2007 at 7:16 am

This is something that has been worrying me for awhile. The Christian Conservatives have been vehemently against the public school system - blaming it for the secularization of America. Coincidentally, one of the biggest proponents of charter schools is the current Bush Administration. Even one of his daughters is choosing the charter school program as a career choice. I see this as a tool later on (10-15 years) to use public funds for religious education. This Hebrew School is nothing more than a harbinger of things to come.

dm

Other Comments by donmak

3. Comment #65868 by blu on August 27, 2007 at 7:20 am

I have to disagree with the previous poster. From the article it seems that they are going to great pains to avoid any hint of religious instruction here. Hebrew is the language of Israel and can be taught in a completely secular manner. This is not the first public school with a kosher menu, the menu is most often a reflection of the needs of the students rather than the curriculum of the school. And this actually reduces the number of students exposed to religious teachings. Should we ban the teaching of Latin because it was the language of the Catholic Church?

Other Comments by blu

4. Comment #65895 by 82abhilash on August 27, 2007 at 9:32 am

This is religion trying to sneak in through the back door, while making the tax payers pay for it. But the success or failure of this school will depend on how the students there perform as compared to those in other schools, academically.

There is still reason for worry though. Even a good education does not make you immune from religion. We know the 9/11 hijackers where college educated. Like Sam Harris said, "You could build a nuclear bomb and still believe you will get 72 virgins in paradise."

I think Christopher Hitchens is right when he says; we are religiously inclined by nature, and they are trying to exploit it. And if places like these can in the least make you tolerant of religious extremism, then to that extent they contribute to religious tyranny.

Other Comments by 82abhilash

5. Comment #65960 by kcjerith on August 27, 2007 at 3:18 pm

Of course the government should not be supporting religious education, however, let me say this. The government should not be paying for any form of education. One of the reasons that the united states stinks at educating its children is because the public school system is immune from competition. letting the private sector take over would more than likely mean a massive improvement in test scores (and actual knowledge). Yes this means that religious school would be allowed to thrive, but there is nothing that can be done about that, except attempt to ban them (and good luck with that).

Other Comments by kcjerith

6. Comment #65964 by The Schuermannator on August 27, 2007 at 3:41 pm

 avatarkcjerith says "...letting the private sector take over would more than likely mean a massive improvement in test scores (and actual knowledge)..."

And what about the lower class families who can't afford to send their children to a private school? There's a reason why most kids I know that come from private schools are snippy and snotty. Their parents are rich and spoil their children to death. Remember, private sector is in it to make money. So the fate of the next generation's education would rest solely on whether or not their parents could afford sending them to private school. Furthermore, you're seriously going to make the judgment that the entire United States public education system sucks? Where's your evidence of that, dude?

Other Comments by The Schuermannator

7. Comment #65985 by 82abhilash on August 27, 2007 at 5:12 pm

Schuermannator,
kcjerith is right. One of the reason private education is expensive right now is because it is next to impossible to compete with the government.

In a free market with open competition, all sorts of schools will arise, to fit every pocket. Each with its pros and cons. Just like today there are super markets to meet every budget. But that is a lesson in economics.

I donot think in such a climate there will even be need for banning faith based schools. They are not used to the idea of competing in a free and open market where ideas cannot be suppressed.

And without government suport through which they can force-feed their ideology, they will loose their sting.

Other Comments by 82abhilash

8. Comment #66155 by logical on August 29, 2007 at 4:50 am

 avatar82abhilash and kcjerith, please take a close look:
Competition is a meme just like god - in case one of you is the next to try to prove its functionality, please note that all those scholars who wrote about it either use philosophical/religious concepts of virtue (Adam Smith!!!) or a one-moment approach.
It does not work, in no field, but because we all were made familiar with religious ways of thinking (even those who attended some form of "state" school, not only kids like those in the article who are not supposed to do commandments as such in school) we are just used to it. We serve the "higher principle". We do not even demand that a system or organizational form functions for us, the living beings, and not for itself.
Nothing but private schools would be even worse than the mixed system most western countries acquired by now, and because of all of the reasons mentioned in this thread and others on schools combined.
In my time at university I was a member of a womens group researching the beginning of literacy for women after the witchburnings - all private from homeschooling for some(!) girls of nobility to the Swiss Sisters boarding schools.
I used to say that in my generation (nuns the first 5 years, but called "state school") there were more girls barely becoming literate...
and that was it.
Ceterum censeo: linguam latinam non necesse est.
My rusty latin does not allow me to add: why should other pseudoreligious crap?

Other Comments by logical

9. Comment #67505 by Cartomancer on September 3, 2007 at 3:58 pm

 avatar... non necesse esse, cur stercus pseudoreligiosus debet esse?

Other Comments by Cartomancer

10. Comment #111821 by KateGladstone on January 15, 2008 at 8:37 pm

As a somewhat competent speaker of Hebrew, I read with interest that a Hebrew-teaching school forbids a phrase meaning "Welcome" because the phrase's literal meaning expresses a religious notion. Since all Hebrew equivalents of "Welcome" express that notion (the various available phrases translate as "blessed is he who enters," "blessed is she who enters," and "blessed are they who enter"), I wonder what answer the school gives to students who ask how to say "Welcome" in Hebrew. (Does the school simply pretend that these common and requisite phrases do not exist? To avoid all mention of religion, do the schoolteachers and school librarians scissor "Welcome" out of their Hebrew dictionaries, textbooks, and grammars?)

Other Comments by KateGladstone
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com