Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Friday, August 31, 2007 | Reason : Wingnut News | print version Print | Comments

Document Orthodox Call on Sinners To Give Chickens a Fairer Shake

by Nathaniel Popper

Reposted from:
http://www.forward.com/articles/11506/

What happens when a ritual designed to remove sin might itself generate sin?

That was the thorny question asked by rabbis who met in Brooklyn earlier this month in preparation for this yea's High Holy Days. The ritual in question is kapparot, a practice generally performed during the period between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur in which a live chicken is swung over one's head in a gesture of transferring one's sins of the past year onto the animal.

At the August 6 meeting in the synagogue of the Novominsker rebbe, more than a dozen religious heavyweights - including Rabbi Aryeh Kotler and Rabbi David Zwiebel - considered evidence that the chickens may have been mistreated in past ceremonies and acknowledged that the problem rose to a level that could violate rabbinic law.

After the conference, the rabbis collectively issued a call for members of the community to clean up the process during this year's holiday season. The move was particularly notable because it came in response to complaints from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. In recent years, the animal rights group has come to be viewed as an adversary to the Orthodox community, with PETA run-ins leading more often to the butting of heads than to conciliatory gestures.

"In general, I don't think that PETA is taken very seriously in the Orthodox community, or in any civilized society," said Rabbi Avi Shafran, spokesman for the ultra-Orthodox Agudath Israel of America. "But that doesn't mean that they won't on occasion bring up something that is worth being brought up."

In an editorial, the Orthodox newspaper Hamodia wrote that"the lofty purpose for which the bird is slaughtered cannot in any way excuse improper handling or storage of the birds prior to shechitah," using the Hebrew word for slaughter.

The kapparot ceremony is one of the more colorful elements of the High Holy Days but one of the most historically fraught. Maimonides and later Joseph Caro, author of the authoritative code of Jewish law, both claimed that kapparot had its roots in pagan ritual and should be abandoned by religious Jews. But Moses Isserles, the famed 16th-century talmudist from Krakow promoted the practice, as did many of the founders of Hasidic Jewish sects.

Today, many Modern Orthodox Jews swing money, instead of chickens, over their heads. But Hasidic Jews have retained the use of the live animals. Men are instructed to use roosters, which are grasped by their shoulder blades and rotated above the person's head three times. Women use hens for the ritual (two if the practitioner is pregnant). The animal is then supposed to be slaughtered immediately after the ritual and donated to a poor family.

Given the number of chickens required for this ceremony, some in the Orthodox community said it is not surprising that problems have arisen.

"It's the very public nature and the pandemonium of slaughtering so many birds at one shot that necessarily involves problems," said Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the Orthodox Union and one of the participants at the August 6 meeting.

In recent years there have been a number of visible confrontations over the practice. In 2006, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals discovered 700 chickens that had been left in a garage in Brooklyn and, in another instance, PETA filed a complaint with the ASPCA in upstate New York when it found a batch of similarly abandoned birds.

PETA's letter this year was accompanied by a lengthy video from ceremonies in 2005 and 2006. Included are scenes of live chickens being stuffed into garbage bags and teenagers ripping the heads off of chickens, which would clearly render the chickens un-kosher.

"The risk of communicable avian diseases and bacterial contamination is alarming, and the inhumane treatment and mishandling of animals at every stage of the process must be prevented," the letter said.

PETA is known for its public campaigns, including the release of footage from the nation's largest kosher slaughterhouse. In this case, the organization did not release the letter to the public but instead sent it and the video to Thomas Frieden, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, as well as a few sympathetic members of the ultra-Orthodox community, who raised the issue with rabbis. A spokesman for Frieden said the department had no comment on the issue.

Weinreb said that, at the August 6 meeting, "there was no criticism of PETA per se; there was a discussion of on what level they should respond."

The next day, Hamodia ran its editorial, which called for an independent certifier to ensure that the animals are slaughtered according to kosher rules. A week later, Rabbi Gershom Tannenbaum devoted a column in Brooklyn's Jewish Press to the subject. He wrote that the “inhumane treatment is clearly prohibited by the Torah and mentioned a number of new measures, including the use of temporary shelters for the crates of chickens.

Bruce Friedrich, a vice president at PETA, said he has heard encouraging things from the organization's contacts inside the ultra-Orthodox community about this year's ceremony. There is, however, still the question of the ritual itself. Friedrich said that even if the animals are treated well before and after kapparot, the ceremony itself "should be abandoned for the same reason you wouldn't take a cat and swing it over your head."

He might have an unlikely ally in this effort. Tannenbaum, in his Jewish Press column, finished by noting that "using alternatives to chickens such as money to tzedakah, might be a desirable option. Even using a fish might be a good idea, if you can hold onto it!"

Comments 1 - 38 of 38 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #66726 by gcdavis on August 31, 2007 at 6:45 am

 avatarThey waste breath arguing over the "rights" of a chicken whilst continuing to mutilate the genitalia of millions of boys!

There is a comment facility at the Jewish Daily Forward website (url given in article)

Other Comments by gcdavis

2. Comment #66727 by APPlet on August 31, 2007 at 6:49 am

 avatarIf said pregnant woman is carrying twins must she then utilise three hens?

Other Comments by APPlet

3. Comment #66728 by coretemprising on August 31, 2007 at 6:50 am

ROLF!
...but, it is, I suppose, a step in the right direction? So many instances of otherwise intelligent people being just SO stupid. Years ago I was in a jewish/christian cult, so I've seen it all first hand. Although, we didn't do any chicken swinging. Geez! They could save all the chickens if they would just accept Jesus' sacrifice, though, right? Sigh.

Other Comments by coretemprising

4. Comment #66730 by Richard Morgan on August 31, 2007 at 6:53 am

 avatarTo think I read all that hoping to discover something about "swinging chicks".
Oh well....

Other Comments by Richard Morgan

5. Comment #66731 by coretemprising on August 31, 2007 at 6:55 am

Sorry, my "rolf" is not about the treatment of the chickens, just the overall ridiculousness of the foolish human religious spectacle.

Other Comments by coretemprising

6. Comment #66732 by Ford Prefect on August 31, 2007 at 6:56 am

'In general, I don't think that PETA is taken very seriously in the Orthodox community, or in any civilized society," said Rabbi Avi Shafran, spokesman for the ultra-Orthodox Agudath Israel of America.'

But swinging a live chicken over your head is civilised?

Other Comments by Ford Prefect

7. Comment #66733 by scottishgeologist on August 31, 2007 at 7:03 am

 avatarFFS! I've heard it all now. Jews arguing about "choking the chicken" I would have thought that that Onan business would have cleared that one up.

Never mind, whats next "bashing the bishop"?

Religion is a load of wank anyway.....

:-)))))

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

8. Comment #66735 by RascoHeldall on August 31, 2007 at 7:04 am

What embarrassing, cringeworthy idiocy.

Other Comments by RascoHeldall

9. Comment #66737 by pewkatchoo on August 31, 2007 at 7:09 am

 avatarPrimitive fuckwits.

Reminds me of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FtKYOtOIkE

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

10. Comment #66740 by hungarianelephant on August 31, 2007 at 7:17 am

 avatarThis is probably heresy here, but I do have a sneaking admiration for people of a religion who have been persecuted for the best part of a couple of thousand years, but whose priorities still lie in having four sets of cookware, plaiting the hair on their temples and swinging live chickens over their heads. Say what you like - they're good for a laugh.

Other Comments by hungarianelephant

11. Comment #66741 by Vaal on August 31, 2007 at 7:32 am

 avatarCan humans possibly get any more stupid? They should rename it Crackpot, rather than kapparot!

The sadistic Abrahamic religions should learn a little about empathy, and maybe they could do us all a favour by leaping over a cliff like lemmings (sorry, insult to lemmings) in order to expiate their sins, instead of scapegoating other living animals to sustain their monstrous egos.

Other Comments by Vaal

12. Comment #66742 by Mango on August 31, 2007 at 7:42 am

 avatarVaal -- of course the word itself "scapegoat" we have thanks to Jews as well who used a goat to get rid of their sins.

Other Comments by Mango

13. Comment #66744 by heathen2 on August 31, 2007 at 7:46 am

 avatarReading about ridiculous rituals such as this one just intensifies my abhorrence for religion and its practices. I feel like I'm being a grumpy grouch when I don't want to participate in some that are fairly benign from my culture of origin, but that invoke gods and prayer (no animal slaughter involved).

Should I just go along to please my mom?

Other Comments by heathen2

14. Comment #66746 by Northern Bright on August 31, 2007 at 7:52 am

 avatarSomeone please remind me what century we're living in?

For crying out loud - humans can guide a vessel through space to land on a precise spot on Mars (and then send back photos), we can transplant organs from one body to another, we can fly through the air, we can travel under the oceans, we can communicate instantaneously with people on the other side of the world, we can eradicate diseases that used to wipe people out in their millions, and we can make uncannily accurate quantum predictions (on which topic - LOVE the avatar, Richard Morgan!!) ... and yet there are still people out there who think that swinging a live animal round their head will remove their sins ... and even more who think we should respect that view.

Give me strength. Honestly - makes you want to weep, doesn't it?

Other Comments by Northern Bright

15. Comment #66749 by robotaholic on August 31, 2007 at 7:58 am

 avatarit's a good thing it's chickens instead of like Aligators ;)

ok so this goes farther than just believing in invisible people with superpowers- now you have to swing chickens, cut into genetalia, grow your temple hair long, wear silly hats! - I dunno, seems like alot - just to live forever...

Life extension technology seems like a safer bet

Other Comments by robotaholic

16. Comment #66753 by Alison on August 31, 2007 at 8:09 am

 avatarHow does swinging a chicken (or money, or fish) over one's head remove sin?

Ronald Grimes, building on the work of J.L. Austin, describes a number of ways in which ritual performances may become or be considered "infelicitous." Here is a rough taxonomy of infelicitous ritual performances:

1. Misfire (act purported but void)
~ 1.1. Misinvocation (act disallowed)
~~~ 1.11. Nonplay (lack of accepted conventional procedure)
~~~ 1.12. Misapplication (inappropriate persons or circumstances)
~ 1.2. Misexecutions (act vitiated)
~~~ 1.21. Flaw (incorrect, vague or inexplicit formula)
~~~ 1.22. Hitch (incomplete procedure)

2. Abuse (act professed but hollow)
~ 2.1. Insincerity (lack of requisite feelings, thoughts or intentions)
~ 2.2. Breach (failure to follow through)
~ 2.3. Gloss (procedures used to cover up problems)
~ 2.4. Flop (failure to produce appropriate mood or atmosphere)

3. Inffectuality (fails to precipitate anticipated empirical change)
4. Violation (act effective but demeaning)
5. Contagion (act leaps beyond proper boundaries)
6. Opacity (act unrecognizable or unintelligible)
7. Defeat (act discredits or invalidates other acts)
8. Omission (act not performed)
9. Misframe (genre of act misconstrued)

Let's apply some "ritual criticism" to the kapparot ritual and see how it fares.

PETA argues that the ritual should be considered a type of "misinvocation", a disallowed act, and specifically a "nonplay". This is due to their consideration of the ritual as a "violation" - a demeaning act.

Some Jewish authorities consider the ritual "contagious" or "defeating", as the chickens used in the ritual, which are supposed to be eaten afterwards, may not actually be kosher, due to infelicitous handling of said chickens. Others think the ritual is a "misapplication", inappropriate due to its possibly pagan origins.

If you drop the chicken during the ritual, or fling it against the wall, it's probably a "hitch".

Dumping the chickens in the garbage would be a "breach", failing to follow through on the protocol of donating the carcass to a poor family. Substituting fish or money may be a "gloss", trying to cover up the problem of chicken-swinging, but then again you've entered the territory of "misapplication" - money or fish may be considered inappropriate to this ritual.

To outsiders like ourselves, we may find the ritual "opaque", unable to ascertain how in the world swining a chicken absolves one of sin. We may even be "misframing" it, but I doubt it. Sadly, we can't really call the ritual "ineffectual", since there's no way to empirically measure the absolving of sin in the first place - unless you're also a Scientologist.

Those who find themselves ashamed or strangely still sinful after the ritual may feel that way because they were "insincere" in performing the ritual in the first place. Or maybe snapping the necks of chickens leads to this "flop" in mood. Maybe it's better to just "omit" the ritual altogether.

Other Comments by Alison

17. Comment #66762 by Vaal on August 31, 2007 at 8:46 am

 avatarHopefully the Buddhists are right and these half-wits will be reincarnated as chickens.

Now, that really would be irony!

Other Comments by Vaal

18. Comment #66777 by the izz on August 31, 2007 at 10:20 am

 avatarMuch ado about nothing...and chickens

The amount of time and human energy wasted in such endeavors (the debate over limbo comes to mind as well) is just so sad.

Other Comments by the izz

19. Comment #66782 by Duff on August 31, 2007 at 11:46 am

If these righteous people would be so thoughtful as to stop holding the little chickens by their shoulders and maybe gently grip them with both hands as they slowly sway side to side for maybe not more than two or three times, and then perhaps give the birds a bath in luke warm water and a handful of cornmeal. Then, if they didn't wring their necks but instead just said a simple little prayer asking the bird nicely to take a few of their sins, instead of all their sins, no one would take umbrage. Then, of course, taking the birds to a nice farm to spend the rest of their lives pecking.
I think that would make for a lovely ritual and at the same time make all those nasty people who object to the neck ringing happy.

Other Comments by Duff

20. Comment #66787 by Alison on August 31, 2007 at 12:14 pm

 avatarDuff, yours is a much prettier ritual. Let's swap out the chickens, though, and use chicks instead! Newborns should have fewer accretions of sin than full grown birds, after all. Then again, they might not be able to absorb as many sins, being so small. So, scratch that. Use really, really old chickens?

Other Comments by Alison

21. Comment #66790 by andwar99 on August 31, 2007 at 12:16 pm

For some reason Monty Python comes immediately to mind.

Other Comments by andwar99

22. Comment #66800 by sabre_truth on August 31, 2007 at 1:35 pm

It seems to me that the Rabbis are more concerned over whether the chicken flesh from the ritual is kosher or not, rather than whether they are abusing animals, or whether it is sanitary by modern standards.

And then there was this little chestnut:
"I don't think that PETA is taken very seriously in the Orthodox community, or in any civilized society"

I think the irony meter just exploded.

Other Comments by sabre_truth

23. Comment #66805 by dancingthemantaray on August 31, 2007 at 2:02 pm

"Men are instructed to use roosters, which are grasped by their shoulder blades and rotated above the person's head three times. Women use hens for the ritual (two if the practitioner is pregnant)"

Odd the lengths an omnipotent deity will make you go to so he can forgive your sins....wonder if you can see the little sins floating on up into the chicken...

Other Comments by dancingthemantaray

24. Comment #66818 by Quine on August 31, 2007 at 4:21 pm

 avatarIt continues to amaze me that all measure of idiocy is thrown out the window if something is part of someone's 'religion.'

Other Comments by Quine

25. Comment #66824 by Veronique on August 31, 2007 at 4:53 pm

 avatarTell me please, this is a spoof, isn't it? This can't possibly be true, can it? I dooon't believe it!! These are grown-up people, aren't they?

I have never heard such total rubbish!! I am gobsmacked. And they keep on wanting 'respect' from the rest of us. Good grief!! How the hell can anyone respect a belief that requires chickens to be waved over believers' heads. This is utterly bonkers.

It sounds like Chicken Noodle Soup where the manufacturers are (apocryphally) reputed to fly the chicken over the saucepan rather than add it to the stock. Now I know why the Jews give CNS to sick people as nourishment.

I spat my tea out!! I'll have to stop typing and do something practical before I go round the twist.

Shit, they are loopy. What did they do with their brains?
V

Other Comments by Veronique

26. Comment #66825 by HappyPrimate on August 31, 2007 at 4:54 pm

 avatarThe part of this article that struck me as woozy was the Rabbi says that this ritual might be of pagan origin and they should rethink it. Geez - after better than 5,000 years now they might rethink it as having pagan origins? ALL rituals have pagan origins. Duh.

Other Comments by HappyPrimate

27. Comment #66827 by Richard Morgan on August 31, 2007 at 5:07 pm

 avatar
Kentucky Fried Sins!
They're finger-lickin' evil!


Other Comments by Richard Morgan

28. Comment #66850 by Theocrapcy on August 31, 2007 at 7:15 pm

 avatarBrings new meaning to "on a wing and a prayer".

Other Comments by Theocrapcy

29. Comment #66855 by steveroot on August 31, 2007 at 8:36 pm

 avatarNice of them to enrich the chickens with sin before donating them to the poor. "Sinfully delicious"? Wonder if there's trans-fats in there...
Steve

Other Comments by steveroot

30. Comment #66857 by Cyboman on August 31, 2007 at 8:54 pm

I'm surprised there isn't more of this kind of thing. One of the central theological tenets of the Old Testament is animal sacrifice. It seems like on every other page someone is killing an animal to take care of there sins and Leviticus (if I remember correctly) is almost principally concerned with the proper way to perform animal sacrifices. Factory farming has reached moral standards that would make most people become vegetarians if they knew how they operated. I'm concerned that our religious traditions prevent us from seeing how immoral our treatment of livestock animals is because people can say "There's nowhere in the bible that says we have to treat animals nicely".

Other Comments by Cyboman

31. Comment #66858 by Richard Morgan on August 31, 2007 at 8:55 pm

 avatarI am a Welshman. From North Wales. (Welsh readers will know why I had to point out that detail, and will forgive me for my northern-ness, I trust.)
Apparently as recently as the mid eighteenth century, certain villages maintained the tradition of having an official "sin-eater".
In some part of Wales a very extraordinary rite was observed. "When a person died, the friends sent for the sin-eater of the district, who on his arrival places a piece of salt on the breast of the defunct, and upon the salt a piece of bread. He then muttered an incantation over the bread, which he finally ate; thereby eating up all the sins of the deceased. This done, he received the fee of two shillings and sixpence, and vanished as quickly as possible from the general gaze; for as it was believed that he really appropriated to his own use and behoof the sins of all those over whom he performed the above ceremony, he was utterly detested in the neighbourhood -- regarded as a mere Pariah -- as one irremediably lost."

Sin-eating was not a Bardic idea, it seems to have been a perverted and perverse tradition, probably reaching Wales by an oriental channel, in which the Jewish scape-goat and Christian Eucharistic Sacrifice are blended in disguise and distortion.

-- From Welsh sketches, by Ernest Silvanus Appleyard
At least it avoided brushes with PETA or the RSPCA.
I suppose.

Other Comments by Richard Morgan

32. Comment #66879 by DNAtheist on August 31, 2007 at 11:33 pm

 avatarNorthern Bright wrote:
Honestly - makes you want to weep, doesn't it?


Yes it does. And where are the religious "moderates" who endlessly claim that Dawkins' criticisms of religion are unfair because no one really takes these old books seriously?

Other Comments by DNAtheist

33. Comment #66936 by Nefrubyr on September 1, 2007 at 3:31 am

 avatar
The animal is then supposed to be slaughtered immediately after the ritual and donated to a poor family.

Mmmmm... sinlicious....

Seriously, I haven't seen anything this funny since I learned about eruvin. Although the woman on Enemies of Reason telling Dawkins what "we" now know about Atlantean DNA came close.

Other Comments by Nefrubyr

34. Comment #67227 by Shuggy on September 2, 2007 at 8:13 pm

 avatarComment #66741 by Vaal on August 31, 2007 at 7:32 am
...maybe they could do us all a favour by leaping over a cliff like lemmings (sorry, insult to lemmings)
No, urban legend, helped along by Disney, who had them flung over the cliff.

"Gallus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi..."
"Chicken of God, who takes away the sins of the world..."?
No, it doesn't sound the same, somehow.

Other Comments by Shuggy

35. Comment #67385 by Jonathan Dore on September 3, 2007 at 7:29 am

In general, I don't think that PETA is taken very seriously in the Orthodox community, or in any civilized society


I look forward to the day when "PETA" and "Orthodox community" will have changed places in that sentence.

Other Comments by Jonathan Dore

36. Comment #67910 by Mysturji on September 5, 2007 at 5:53 am

 avatarAll together now....

Waaaaave aaaaaaaaaaa chicken in the air
Stick a deckchair up your nose
Paint your left knee green
And then bury all your clothes
Buy a jumbo jet
Then extract your wisdom teeth
Form a string quartet
And pretend your name is Keith

Other Comments by Mysturji

37. Comment #67920 by pewkatchoo on September 5, 2007 at 7:11 am

 avatarI hope nobody here is suggesting that PETA and the fscking lunatics that run it are in anyway to be construed as civilised society.

Other Comments by pewkatchoo

38. Comment #67921 by pewkatchoo on September 5, 2007 at 7:12 am

 avatarMysturji
That was what my link above was:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FtKYOtOIkE

Other Comments by pewkatchoo
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: