Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, November 29, 2007 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Dogs Can Classify Complex Photos In Categories Like Humans Do

by ScienceDaily

Reposted from:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071128105543.htm


ScienceDaily (Nov. 29, 2007) — Like us, our canine friends are able to form abstract concepts. Friederike Range and colleagues from the University of Vienna in Austria have shown for the first time that dogs can classify complex color photographs and place them into categories in the same way that humans do. And the dogs successfully demonstrate their learning through the use of computer automated touch-screens, eliminating potential human influence.

In order to test whether dogs can visually categorize pictures, and transfer their knowledge to new situations, four dogs were shown landscape and dog photographs, and expected to make a selection on a computer touch-screen.

In the training phase, the dogs were shown both the landscape and dog photographs simultaneously and were rewarded with a food pellet if they selected the dog picture (positive stimulus). The dogs then took part in two tests.

In the first test, the dogs were shown completely different dog and landscape pictures. They continued to reliably select the dog photographs, demonstrating that they could transfer their knowledge gained in the training phase to a new set of visual stimuli, even though they had never seen those particular pictures before.

In the second test, the dogs were shown new dog pictures pasted onto the landscape pictures used in the training phase, facing them with contradictory information: on the one hand, a new positive stimulus as the pictures contained dogs even though they were new dogs; on the other hand, a familiar negative stimulus in the form of the landscape.

When the dogs were faced with a choice between the new dog on the familiar landscape and a completely new landscape with no dog, they reliably selected the option with the dog. These results show that the dogs were able to form a concept i.e. 'dog', although the experiment cannot tell us whether they recognized the dog pictures as actual dogs.

The authors also draw some conclusions on the strength of their methodology: "Using touch-screen computers with dogs opens up a whole world of possibilities on how to test the cognitive abilities of dogs by basically completely controlling any influence from the owner or experimenter." They add that the method can also be used to test a range of learning strategies and has the potential to allow researchers to compare the cognitive abilities of different species using a single method.

Journal reference: Range F et al (2007). Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition (DOI 10.1007/s10071-007-0123-2).

Adapted from materials provided by Springer.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #91926 by The Reverend Dark on November 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm

 avatarI conducted a similar experiment with my dog using a series of pictures of landscapes and of Kent Hovind - with positive stimulus given for landscapes.

As the experiment progressed I introduced pictures of Kent Hovind undergoing the bog standard indignities suffered by weak, clean-cut, prats with a penchant to falling on their knees while in jail.

The dog forwent the treats in order to see the Hovind pics; finding more satisfaction in them.

Other Comments by The Reverend Dark

2. Comment #92260 by nancy2001 on November 30, 2007 at 6:38 am

This is just anecdotal evidence. When my Yorkshire terrier Pookie was about six months old, I happened to be watching the movie Tarzan: The Legend of Greystoke on TV. I placed the puppy on my lap and noticed that he seemed to be unusually attentive to what was happening on screen. We sat like that for a long time and whenever I glanced at him, the dog seemed transfixed by the sights and sounds. I was really surprised since I'd never seen Pookie take any interest in anything on TV before. And the next time this movie was shown on TV many months later, he seemed completely indifferent to it. I really don't know what to make of this.

Other Comments by nancy2001

3. Comment #92394 by NMcC on November 30, 2007 at 12:16 pm

nancy2001

I do, he'd already seen it!

Other Comments by NMcC

4. Comment #92864 by jo5ef on December 1, 2007 at 3:55 pm

Good argument for objective reality. Reminds me of reading an article years ago in a university magazine by a philosophy student that argued that a tree (for example) was an artificially constructed concept that we're all brainwashed into accepting as real. Some weeks later I saw an article (similar to the one above) showing how chickens could be taught to recognise the concept of a tree, and i thought: Wow, chickens are smarter than philosophy majors.

Other Comments by jo5ef

5. Comment #98486 by Don_Stubbs on December 13, 2007 at 6:34 pm

The existence of dogs is probably the only plausible evidence of a benevolent creator.

Other Comments by Don_Stubbs
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: