










Fear of Barbara Forrest
In the Dover trial, you got the palpable sense that the creationists were terrified of Barbara Forrest's testimony. I did not know quite how deeply the dread was until today, though: the Texas director os science curriculum, Chris Comer, was pressured into resigning because she forwarded an e-mail announcing a talk by Barbara Forrest. One Lizzette Reynolds, Republican hack and senior advisor to the Texas Education Agency, was freaking horrified.This is highly inappropriate. I believe this is an offense that calls for termination or, at the very least, reassignment of responsibilities.
This is something that the State Board, the Governor's Office and members of the Legislature would be extremely upset to see because it assumes this is a subject that the agency supports.
the forwarding of this event announcement by Ms. Comer, as the Director of Science, from her TEA email account constitutes much more than just sharing information. Ms. Comer's email implies endorsement of the speaker and implies that TEA endorses the speaker's position on a subject on which the agency must remain neutral. Thus, sending this email compromises the agency's role in the TEKS revision process by creating the perception that TEA has a biased position on a subject directly related to the science education TEKS.
2. Comment #92127 by Stewart on November 29, 2007 at 10:59 pm
How about producing a short film about the getting-rid-of of Chris Comer that could precede screenings of "Expelled" in the cinemas? The side that is unjustifiedly screaming for equal time won't give one second of it once they have the upper hand.3. Comment #92130 by wagnerfilm on November 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm
4. Comment #92151 by action bastard on November 30, 2007 at 1:20 am
I don't understand how these creationist/ID wackos think science teachers are going to teach their classes if all the exam answers are "god did it". My mother is a science teacher in a small town in Texas and I'm reasonably sure she would retire rather teach pseudoscience.5. Comment #92172 by jonjermey on November 30, 2007 at 2:22 am
"Apparently, TEA members are supposed to close their eyes and maximize ignorance before making decisions."6. Comment #92352 by room101 on November 30, 2007 at 10:31 am
I have to say on a general level I am deeply relieved in knowing that the secularists have on their side two implacable watchdogs in the persons of Barbara Forrest and Nick Matzke. Their efforts drove the proverbial nail in the ID'ers coffin in Dover.7. Comment #92358 by phasmagigas on November 30, 2007 at 10:42 am
8. Comment #92671 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on December 1, 2007 at 6:29 am
9. Comment #93039 by Sean on December 2, 2007 at 3:41 am
Have we seen a statement from the TEA regarding their stance on the theory of gravity, or are they remaining neutral on that as well?10. Comment #93048 by Jonathan Dore on December 2, 2007 at 3:56 am
Thanks for the link Brian. I've just posted this:11. Comment #93309 by kaiserkriss on December 2, 2007 at 4:13 pm
12. Comment #93498 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on December 3, 2007 at 9:35 am
13. Comment #93679 by briancoughlanworldcitizen on December 3, 2007 at 10:43 pm
14. Comment #95041 by rod-the-farmer on December 7, 2007 at 8:12 am
This article is reposted from a website that accepts comments.
Why not share your comment on the article there as well? CLICK HERE
1. Comment #92103 by Zakie Chan on November 29, 2007 at 9:52 pm
Other Comments by Zakie Chan