Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, February 27, 2008 | Reason : Commentary | print version Print | Comments

Document A Pragmatist and a Lobbyist on Atheism

by Samuel G. Freedman

Reposted from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/us/23religion-web.html

The atheist lobby, in the blond, pregnant person of Jennifer Lange, waited with diminishing patience for the elevator in the Legislative Office Building.

Ms. Lange checked her watch one last time, then rounded a corner into the corridor and skipped down four flights of stairs. The back way to Assemblyman Richard L. Brodsky's office was just one of those useful things she knew about the inner workings of Albany.

Ms. Lange's mission on this Monday in early February was to scuttle a bill titled the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which she and every legislator on her agenda called in their common insiders' slang Rifra. Of the nearly 10,000 pieces of legislation introduced annually in the New York State Legislature, the act was one of only several dozen brought under the lead sponsorship of the Assembly's speaker, Sheldon Silver. It was not going to be an easy target.

Then again, in her 10 months as the part-time registered lobbyist for the Institute for Humanist Studies, Ms. Lange had already reckoned the difficulty of her task. Alone in Albany, and among just a few comparable figures elsewhere in the nation, she advocates for the political interests of secularists who variously describe themselves as nonbelievers, freethinkers, humanists, atheists, skeptics and brights.

The assignment puts her in competition with dozens of lobbyists for religious entities, including powerhouses like the Catholic Conference, and also individual churches, hospitals, charities and social service agencies. More broadly, Ms. Lange tries to offer persuasion and charm amid a climate of nasty polarization between the faithful and the faithless.

As represented in print by best-selling authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, atheism has lately mounted an in-your-face attack not simply on religion's influence on public policy, but on belief itself. From the opposite flank, Mitt Romney used a major address in his presidential campaign to espouse the view popular in pious circles that the United States is essentially divided between the committed adherents of all religions, a k a the good guys, and the secularists, a k a the enemy.

"It's not like I'm coming from Save the Children or something everybody's in favor of," Ms. Lange, 32, put it in an interview. "When you say you're an atheist, people think of negative values, of heathens. People feel that we're antireligious. I'm not trying to change anyone's religion. I don't even want to talk religion or the Bible when I'm lobbying. I want to stay focused on state policy and finding the places we can make common cause."

Such pragmatism is not only Ms. Lange's personal style. Leaders of the Institute for Humanist Studies, an Albany research organization founded in 1999, very consciously studied the religious right, as well as the gay rights movement, as models of successful lobbying.

"We were looking for examples of how a significant minority can mobilize their people and their friends and their families to achieve influence," said Matt Cherry, executive director of the institute. "There's been a tendency for atheists to use only the politics of protest — to be on the sidelines with all your purity — but not to roll up your sleeves."

In Ms. Lange, the institute found an experienced legislative tactician and a disarming public face. Ms. Lange grew up in Peoria, Ill., as a regular churchgoer and youth-group member in a United Methodist congregation. While she recalls having decided by her early teens that she did not believe in God — and being particularly disturbed by what she considered the misogyny of the Bible — she still accompanies her parents to church during family visits to the Midwest.

She put her idealism first into the Peace Corps, spending two years in Guatemala, and then into the presidency of the National Organization for Women's chapter in Buffalo. (In somewhat unfeminist fashion, she had followed a boyfriend to western New York.) She then became a legislative aide to Sam Hoyt III, a Democratic assemblyman from Buffalo, serving two years in his district office and then three in Albany.

Her time in the state capital gave her the practical savvy and personal connections that the humanist institute sought when it hired her last April. As Ms. Lange zigzagged through the office building on that Monday morning this month, she collected busses on the cheek and doting questions about her toddlers, Hannah and John. Her fond relations with the secretaries and administrative assistants ensured that she would get access, timely access, either to legislators or a staff member of consequence.

"Being an insider, I know who you need to know," she said. "I know the process. The bills, the legislation, the budget, scheduling meetings."

At each stop, Ms. Lange made her pitch against the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. While the measure sought to remove any "unreasonable burdens" from religious practice, the State Constitution more than amply protected religious freedom, she told legislators. A new law risked eroding the separation of church and state.

In her search for allies, she made sure to discuss issues like same-sex marriage and comprehensive sex education, on which she and many legislators already agreed. She also lined up sponsors and votes for a coming resolution to declare Feb. 12 as Darwin Day. (It passed unanimously.)

Still, none of the five Assembly members she met with promised to side against the religion measure. Mr. Brodsky, a Democrat from Westchester County, chided Ms. Lange that opposing the bill put her on the same side as lobbyists for fundamentalist Christians and ultra-Orthodox Jews, who deemed the measure too weak.

"Politics makes strange bedfellows," Ms. Lange conceded.

At a different meeting with a different Assembly member, Ms. Lange faced a different problem.

Kevin A. Cahill, a Democrat from Kingston, had not recalled cosponsoring the religious-freedom bill in June until she presented him with an information sheet about the measure.

"That means there's another side of the story," Mr. Cahill said, suggesting that he must have had a good reason to back the measure, which is being considered by the Assembly's Government Operations Committee. "You think there's a better way to do this?"

Ms. Lange went into her standard spiel about the State Constitution being the better way. Mr. Cahill, in turn, promised to "look back at what I've done and why."

The day's lobbying was just about over for Ms. Lange. The hallways now belonged to volunteers with canes and dogs, who were lobbying for the American Council of the Blind. Ms. Lange made her final stop with her old boss, Mr. Hoyt.

Seeing her arrive, he declared, "Charles Darwin is in the house."

Comments 1 - 21 of 21 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #134124 by AmericanGodless on February 27, 2008 at 9:50 am

 avatarI am glad that Jennifer Lange is doing this very necessary job; we need a lot more like her. When a legislator is a co-sponsor of a piece of legislation that is clearly indended to modify fundamental first-amendment liberties (for better or for worse), and can't even recall why he decided to co-sponsor, it is evident that legislators need the friendly diplomatic prodding Lang provides, if they are to do their job at all competently. It takes a certain kind of person to do that, and many of us just couldn't. It has its dangers, however, as it is related to what Richard called "The Neville Chamberlain school of evolutionists."

As represented in print by best-selling authors like Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, atheism has lately mounted an in-your-face attack not simply on religion's influence on public policy, but on belief itself.

Right. It is "in-your-face" to attempt to achieve a reasonable level of intellectual coherence. Why can't you just oppose the public influence of those who want to use the government to force us to join their game of "lets pretend;" why do you have to point out that it is, indeed, just an incoherent fable?

That's why I appreciate Richard so much. His is an essential task, to make it clear that a coherent natural world-view is possible. Nevertheless, I wish Good Luck to Jennifer Lang and any others with the stomach for the job of parsing out the part that is politically marketable to those who don't care about coherence.

Other Comments by AmericanGodless

2. Comment #134132 by Animavore on February 27, 2008 at 10:04 am

 avatarYou can't get anymore in-your-face then Christians calling to your door first thing on a Sunday morning. Or BattleCry. It's perfectly alright to profess your beliefs from the atop a miranet, a steeple or the highest mountain with unashamed pride. But to profess your disbelief, no no we can't do that. Someone stop that person. How dare he go in the face of the status quo. Dosen't he know that sensitive ears might hear (ie, those who's belief lies in a balance or young impressionable children with thier naturally inquisitive minds)? I have never heard such balatant disregard for all things sacred.

Other Comments by Animavore

3. Comment #134280 by Gymnopedie on February 27, 2008 at 2:26 pm

Something is a bit odd about the writing style here. Using phrases like "decided to be an atheist", commenting on her "unfeminist" behavior, saying "her standard spiel". Something about the language is subtly condescending and patronizing.

We need strong secular lobbyists, but it would be better to have a member of congress, a Supreme Court Judge, or a presidential candidate come out in ardent support for the separation of State and Church and be outright with the fact that freedom of religion ensures freedom from religion.

Other Comments by Gymnopedie

4. Comment #134388 by AshtonBlack on February 27, 2008 at 5:22 pm

 avatarPerhaps the author of the article doesn't share the lobbyist's worldview, but has been told to write the article?

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

5. Comment #134390 by Gymnopedie on February 27, 2008 at 5:33 pm

So perhaps I should expect that sort of writing? I guess I should dig a hole to once again lower the bar for my expectations of journalism.

Other Comments by Gymnopedie

6. Comment #134391 by AshtonBlack on February 27, 2008 at 5:38 pm

 avatarPerhaps :). I don't know this particular journo's view or integrity, but it would explain the rather shoddy style (imho) of this piece. My hat is firmly off, however, to Ms Lange.

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

7. Comment #134395 by Richard Morgan on February 27, 2008 at 5:53 pm

AshtonBlack
it would explain the rather shoddy style (imho) of this piece. My hat is firmly off,
Now I can imagine a hat being "firmly on, but firmly "off"?
"shoddy style"..."firmly off"?
At least you're not saying "totally" all over the place?
Or "awesome".
Thank god for that.
Totally awesome.
ArGGhh

Other Comments by Richard Morgan

8. Comment #134397 by AshtonBlack on February 27, 2008 at 5:59 pm

 avatarLike, totally. So I turned round to him and said "She didn't", so HE turned round and said "She DID!"....

Yes, "firmly" was a very unfortunate word to choose.

What about: My hat is "most definately" off to....?

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

9. Comment #134399 by MPhil on February 27, 2008 at 6:04 pm

 avatarGag me with a spoon!

(sorry, had to be done :)

Other Comments by MPhil

10. Comment #134403 by Richard Morgan on February 27, 2008 at 6:13 pm

"definately"?
Oh dear.
But you look like a nice guy.
Being grammatically disadvantaged here will enamour you to the theists, some of whom avoid using correct grammar as if it were forbidden by their religion.
(If English is not your mother tongue, please forgive me.)


Other Comments by Richard Morgan

11. Comment #134406 by AshtonBlack on February 27, 2008 at 6:23 pm

 avatarLooks like I should have gone here:

http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/

(That, or cut/paste/F7 into MS Word (tm).)

But thanks for the correction. As I said, very unfortunate.

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

12. Comment #134408 by AshtonBlack on February 27, 2008 at 6:26 pm

 avatarBy the way... That is a REAL webstie.

Other Comments by AshtonBlack

13. Comment #134423 by Gymnopedie on February 27, 2008 at 7:06 pm

Thanks Zeus I escaped the wrath of Richard Morgan's English 101 mini-classes!

Other Comments by Gymnopedie

14. Comment #134508 by Richard Morgan on February 27, 2008 at 11:11 pm

Satie-fan : you don't know what you're missing!

Other Comments by Richard Morgan

15. Comment #134549 by dbunker on February 28, 2008 at 1:21 am

It didn't surprise me that the legislator didn't know he cosponsored the bill. We need more people like Lange in every state to remind our elected reps that someone is paying attention to the issues.

Other Comments by dbunker

16. Comment #134570 by Dr Nev on February 28, 2008 at 2:10 am

 avatarWelcome to journalism in the 21st century... But I did laugh when reading "and skipped down four flights of stairs". Imagining a blond pregnant woman literally skipping down the stairs...I don't know maybe It's just my sense of humour?

Other Comments by Dr Nev

17. Comment #134573 by Dr Nev on February 28, 2008 at 2:16 am

 avatarAll joking aside. I do commend the work of Ms Lange.

Other Comments by Dr Nev

18. Comment #134620 by VanYoungman on February 28, 2008 at 3:45 am

 avatarNot only do I commend her, I would encourage others to let her know how much support she has.

Other Comments by VanYoungman

19. Comment #134775 by Gymnopedie on February 28, 2008 at 7:42 am

Uh oh, I've found someone who is musically literate!

Other Comments by Gymnopedie

20. Comment #135244 by Kevin A Jones on February 28, 2008 at 6:43 pm

 avatarI'm thinking we need a National Darwin Day.

Other Comments by Kevin A Jones

21. Comment #135677 by sanebuzz on February 29, 2008 at 7:45 am

Jennifer Lange c/o
Institute for Humanist Studies
48 Howard St.
Albany, N.Y.
12207 U.S.A.

I'm off to choose a postcard!

Other Comments by sanebuzz
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password:

Send a letter to the editor of the original media outlet.
letters@nytimes.com