Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, February 28, 2008 | Science : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Sea reptile is biggest on record

by BBC

Thanks to aflacgirl84 and Geoff for the link.

Reposted from:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7264856.stm

pterosaurA fossilised "sea monster" unearthed on an Arctic island is the largest marine reptile known to science, Norwegian scientists have announced.

The 150 million-year-old specimen was found on Spitspergen, in the Arctic island chain of Svalbard, in 2006.

The Jurassic-era leviathan is one of 40 sea reptiles from a fossil "treasure trove" uncovered on the island.

Nicknamed "The Monster", the immense creature would have measured 15m (50ft) from nose to tail.

And during the last field expedition, scientists discovered the remains of another so-called pliosaur which is thought to belong to the same species as The Monster - and may have been just as colossal.

The expedition's director Dr Jorn Hurum, from the University of Oslo Natural History Museum, said the Svalbard specimen is 20% larger than the previous biggest marine reptile - another massive pliosaur from Australia called Kronosaurus.

"We have carried out a search of the literature, so we now know that we have the biggest [pliosaur]. It's not just arm-waving anymore," Dr Hurum told the BBC News website.

"The flipper is 3m long with very few parts missing. On Monday, we assembled all the bones in our basement and we amazed ourselves - we had never seen it together before."

kid & flipper
The Monster's flipper alone measures 3m in length

Pliosaurs were a short-necked form of plesiosaur, a group of extinct reptiles that lived in the world's oceans during the age of the dinosaurs.

A pliosaur's body was tear drop-shaped with two sets of powerful flippers which it used to propel itself through the water.

"These animals were awesomely powerful predators," said plesiosaur palaeontologist Richard Forrest.

"If you compare the skull of a large pliosaur to a crocodile, it is very clear it is much better built for biting... by comparison with a crocodile, you have something like three or four times the cross-sectional space for muscles. So you have much bigger, more powerful muscles and huge, robust jaws.

"A large pliosaur was big enough to pick up a small car in its jaws and bite it in half."

"There are a few isolated bones of huge pliosaurs already known but this is the first find of a significant portion of a whole skeleton of such a giant," said Angela Milner, associate keeper of palaeontology at London's Natural History Museum

"It will undoubtedly add much to our knowledge of these top marine predators. Pliosaurs were reptiles and they were almost certainly not warm-blooded so this discovery is also a good demonstration of plate tectonics and ancient climates.

"One hundred and fifty million years ago, Svalbard was not so near the North Pole, there was no ice cap and the climate was much warmer than it is today."

The Monster was excavated in August 2007 and taken to the Natural History Museum in Oslo. Team members had to remove hundreds of tonnes of rock by hand in high winds, fog, rain, freezing temperatures and with the constant threat of attack by polar bears.

They recovered the animal's snout, some teeth, much of the neck and back, the shoulder girdle and a nearly complete flipper.

Unfortunately, there was a small river running through where the head lay, so much of the skull had been washed away.

A preliminary analysis of the bones suggests this beast belongs to a previously unknown species.

Unprecedented haul

The researchers plan to return to Svalbard later this year to excavate the new pliosaur.

A few skull pieces, broken teeth and vertebrae from this second large specimen are already exposed and plenty more may be waiting to be excavated.

"It's a large one, and has the same bone structure as the previous one we found," said Espen Knutsen, from Oslo's Natural History Museum, who is studying the fossils.

Dr Hurum and his colleagues have now identified a total of 40 marine reptiles from Svalbard. The haul includes many long-necked plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs in addition to the two pliosaurs.

Long-necked plesiosaurs are said to fit descriptions of Scotland's mythical Loch Ness monster. Ichthyosaurs bore a passing resemblance to modern dolphins, but they used an upright tail fin to propel themselves through the water.

Richard Forrest commented: "Here in Svalbard you have 40 specimens just lying around, which is like nothing we know.

"Even in classic fossil exposures such as you have in Dorset [in England], there are cliffs eroding over many years and every so often something pops up. But we haven't had 40 plesiosaurs from Dorset in 200 years."

The fossils were found in a fine-grained sedimentary rock called black shale. When the animals died, they sank to the bottom of a cold, shallow Jurassic sea and were covered over by mud. The oxygen-free, alkaline chemistry of the mud may explain the fossils' remarkable preservation, said Dr Hurum.

The discovery of another large pliosaur was announced in 2002. Known as the "Monster of Aramberri" after the site in north-eastern Mexico where it was dug up, the creature could be just as big as the Svalbard specimen, according to the team that found it.

But palaeontologists told the BBC a much more detailed analysis of these fossils was required before a true picture of its size could be obtained.

Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

Comments 1 - 12 of 12 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #134973 by emmet on February 28, 2008 at 12:20 pm

 avatarSvalbard is an utterly amazing place. I went there in the summer of 2005 with no particular interest in geology and came back with a couple of geology books and an armful of assorted leaf fossils picked up from the terminal moraine of Longyearbyen glacier. Highly recommended if you ever get a chance to go there.

Other Comments by emmet

2. Comment #135147 by bluebird on February 28, 2008 at 3:21 pm

 avatar"Sea monsters" fascinate me, and this one is no exception. Don't know if scientists routinely give their discoveries nick-names... I humbly suggest "Flipper2".

emmet, Svalbard does look amazing!! I hadn't heard of it until this article. (Thanks RDFSR).

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard

Other Comments by bluebird

3. Comment #135187 by njwong on February 28, 2008 at 5:07 pm

 avatarI first heard of Svalbard when reading Philip Pullman's "His Dark Materials" (The Golden Compass). In the novel, the island is the kingdom of the armoured bears.

Other Comments by njwong

4. Comment #135190 by Geoff on February 28, 2008 at 5:09 pm

 avatarI didn't know Svalbard existed! I thought it was just a location from the "Golden Compass", where the armoured polar bears lived.

Other Comments by Geoff

5. Comment #135201 by njwong on February 28, 2008 at 5:29 pm

 avatarEverything that Philip Pullman wrote in "His Dark Materials" has a scientific, literary, philosophical, or religious background/allusion. I recently read "The Rough Guide to Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials" by Paul Simpson, which has a good write up of all these areas that provided the inspiration for His Dark Materials. Apparently, Pullman even applied for a grant to visit Svalbard prior to writing the 1st novel, but the grant was rejected, so Pullman had to do his research using the public libraries instead.

Other Comments by njwong

6. Comment #135246 by sarah95 on February 28, 2008 at 6:45 pm

 avatar
"A large pliosaur was big enough to pick up a small car in its jaws and bite it in half."


The sea-monster equivalent of what Dawkins does to theist and creationist arguments...
;)

Other Comments by sarah95

7. Comment #135301 by Goodwithwood on February 28, 2008 at 7:46 pm

 avatarCoooool!! I've never heard of this Svalbard, I'll have to research it more.
I live in a palaeontologist's paradise. Here are some local digs .

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/05/050505085751.htm
http://www.physorg.com/news63302624.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/11/071130-AP-dinosaur-tracks.html

And much much more. There's much more in Utah than just morons.

Other Comments by Goodwithwood

8. Comment #135425 by Edanator on February 29, 2008 at 12:08 am

Svalbard is also where the new "doomsday vault" is placed:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7217821.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7262525.stm

Other Comments by Edanator

9. Comment #135429 by scottishgeologist on February 29, 2008 at 12:22 am

 avatarTremendous stuff - this sort of thing just keeps getting better. 150 million years old? Ah! God must have decded to make it "look" old, just to test our faith. Anywy, wonder what name Adam gave to it....

BTW, neat page on wikipedia about Svalbard. Love the polar bear warning road sign:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard

I might be wrong, but did the name "Spitzbergen" not apply to the whole archipelego at one time? I am pretty sure this was the useage in some old encyclopedias I used to have? Any Scandinavians able to clear that one?

:-)

SG

Other Comments by scottishgeologist

10. Comment #135470 by emmet on February 29, 2008 at 2:28 am

 avatarPhoto of me on Svalbard

Me on Svalbard with the mountains in the background. The first thing that you recognise in Longyearbyen, looking out across the fjord, is the glaciers that are always at the beginning of any documentary on polar bears. I felt like David Attenborough :o)

It doesn't cost much to get there, only a few hundred Euro from Oslo or Tromsö. Well worth it.

And, yes, the whole archipelago was once called Spitzbergen and the (big Western) island that is now just called Spitzbergen was called "West Spitzbergen". I'm not sure when the renaming happened, though.

Other Comments by emmet

11. Comment #135626 by Gunnar on February 29, 2008 at 6:48 am

 avatarFor once, I would really like to see a science topic WITHOUT any mention of religion in the comments...

Anyways, praise is due to Dr. Jørn Hurum for his incredible skill in spreading science to the general public. He deserves this discovery, even though I'm sure he'd like it more to find a new tyrannosaurid species.

Other Comments by Gunnar

12. Comment #135890 by Zelgadis on February 29, 2008 at 10:25 am

 avatarWow, that thing was huge, and yet, Noah was able to fit them all in the ark. God is amazing!.

P.S.: Did anyone else get creeped out by that image or am I just a big wuss?. =D

Other Comments by Zelgadis
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: