










Regulating Evolution: How Gene Switches Make Life2. Comment #175790 by jeremynel on May 6, 2008 at 3:28 am
Regretfully, the word "gene" is used in many different senses by various disciplines. This doesn't hinder the experts, but laymen can be misled.3. Comment #175798 by rod-the-farmer on May 6, 2008 at 4:04 am
4. Comment #175910 by Partisan on May 6, 2008 at 8:27 am
5. Comment #175945 by JFHalsey on May 6, 2008 at 9:09 am
A while back, there was an excellent article about the difference between genes and switches and proteins and all that lingo that means a whole lot of nothing to an amateur like me... does anyone remember what it was called? I searched through the archives but I wasn't even sure what to be looking for.6. Comment #175981 by kintaro_crab on May 6, 2008 at 10:10 am
7. Comment #176151 by Geoff on May 6, 2008 at 5:18 pm
8. Comment #176167 by chuckgoecke on May 6, 2008 at 6:17 pm
9. Comment #177454 by magic_bullets on May 9, 2008 at 5:54 am
As I'm a molecular geneticist I'll try to say something about the definition of the word gene: I think it's just out of convenience that molecular biologist define gene as more or less the "open reading frame" (=ORF), i.e. the region between the start and the stop codons. This is because when you're studying a particular DNA sequence, the gene part (=ORF) is the easy part to spot (because it is defined by the start and the stop codons). All other parts that might "belong" to a gene, such as promoters, enhancers etc. is much more difficult to figure out. It therefore makes sense to define them separately.10. Comment #178534 by Divineosaur on May 11, 2008 at 2:49 pm
1. Comment #175722 by JamesDB on May 5, 2008 at 11:51 pm
Other Comments by JamesDB