










The $10,000-a-Month Psychic2. Comment #200725 by Lightnin on June 28, 2008 at 7:06 am
When Seagate Technology, the $11 billion-a-year maker of hard drives for the Playstation 3 and Microsoft Xbox
3. Comment #200747 by PaulJ on June 28, 2008 at 7:33 am
But it forgets to mention one thing. A small thing, a minor detail, really: psychic powers don't exist.
4. Comment #200749 by bladesman on June 28, 2008 at 7:40 am
5. Comment #200751 by Diocletian on June 28, 2008 at 7:43 am
I wish I had a list of all the corporations hiring psychics, so I could be certain to not include them in my portfolio. Geeze.6. Comment #200756 by Clan/Rewired on June 28, 2008 at 7:58 am
7. Comment #200763 by bluebird on June 28, 2008 at 8:04 am
8. Comment #200766 by moderndaythomas on June 28, 2008 at 8:07 am
A big Hollywood producer says Day advised him in 2006 to pass on a can't-miss animated film, predicting it would bomb at the box office.
9. Comment #200767 by mordacious1 on June 28, 2008 at 8:13 am
She was strapped for cash after her marriage ended. How come she married a guy that she should have known was going to divorce her. If I knew, because I'm psychic, that my marriage was going to end, I would have put away a few bucks.10. Comment #200768 by kraut on June 28, 2008 at 8:13 am
What a fawning, spitlicking, arse crawling uncritical und superfluous article. Another paper down the drain.11. Comment #200771 by Radesq on June 28, 2008 at 8:15 am
12. Comment #200772 by TeraBrat on June 28, 2008 at 8:18 am
Psychics are not necessarily religious.13. Comment #200781 by stevecaldwell on June 28, 2008 at 8:27 am
14. Comment #200797 by geru on June 28, 2008 at 8:49 am
Argh.15. Comment #200830 by Double Bass Atheist on June 28, 2008 at 9:44 am
16. Comment #200846 by CrimsonRick on June 28, 2008 at 10:19 am
Along with "intuitive" or "mentalist", how about the other terms in mainstream America like "scam artist" and "swindler."17. Comment #200879 by Don_Quix on June 28, 2008 at 11:32 am
18. Comment #200888 by Border Collie on June 28, 2008 at 11:58 am
The only explanation I have for this is that apparently she's dealing with a basically detached from reality clientele anyway ... even though it seems idiotic, maybe she just closely observes them and offers a little reality advice which they think is miraculous because they're so wacked out. Or, maybe I'm just dreaming.19. Comment #200909 by Ailes du Serpent on June 28, 2008 at 12:54 pm
20. Comment #200912 by Duff on June 28, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Back in the 70s, in NYC, I had the fascinating experience of attending a few, large group sessions in the apartment (in the infamous Dakota) of "Reverend Rose". She was a very famous "psychic" in New York and used a few of what are now blatant scams to fool all of us young people.21. Comment #200944 by 8teist on June 28, 2008 at 2:49 pm
22. Comment #200946 by bachfiend on June 28, 2008 at 3:03 pm
You have to admire her initiative. At $10,000 a month she is probably more productive than many a CEO, who probably get paid that much just to get up in the morning to destroy shareholder value. Her teaching seminars sound much more interesting than many a meeting I have been forced to attend over the years (although I may be wrong; during most of them I was in a state of induced semi-coma).23. Comment #201100 by Valis667 on June 29, 2008 at 3:07 am
24. Comment #201112 by Barry Pearson on June 29, 2008 at 4:16 am
#200830 by Double Bass Atheist: I just can't understand how anyone, in 2008, can still think these charlatans are real... especially major corporations!Although I don't believe she has pre-cognition, there is often merit in business in forcing a decision of some kind.
#200946 by bachfiend: At $10,000 a month she is probably more productive than many a CEO, who probably get paid that much just to get up in the morning to destroy shareholder value. Her teaching seminars sound much more interesting than many a meeting I have been forced to attend over the years (although I may be wrong; during most of them I was in a state of induced semi-coma).
2.2 PsychologyWho was it who suggested that a valuable person to have is someone who is always wrong? (Parkinson?)
There are some tendencies that this Process attempts to avoid:
- middle-of-the-road positions may not be challenging enough to bring out the creative energies in the decision makers, and they may not see the need to fight for their views
- such intermediate positions may be so blurred that there is only the appearance, not the reality, of consensus
The Process is designed to avoid fence-sitting, and deliberately polarises decision-making like an agent provocateur.
However, the Process is a tool to aid consensus and decision making, not magic - whatever it says, professional people must exercise their own judgement and not use the Nuremberg defence "I was only obeying orders". If the resultant decision remains disliked, then they should follow their judgement, and the Process has served its purpose by challenging a position which has probably turned out to be robust....
2.3 Summary of the Process
.... The first pass through the Process is likely to yield anomalies and discomfort.... Typically this is because the decision requires some choices to be made, and half-hearted choices are likely to lead to uncomfortable decisions.
Therefore, if the decisions the first time are not liked, the Process should be run again, this time paying attention to why uncomfortable conclusions have been reached, and correcting them.
25. Comment #201156 by Atheist_from_Hell on June 29, 2008 at 8:21 am
26. Comment #201200 by KrisRamJ on June 29, 2008 at 12:21 pm
27. Comment #201244 by justaperson on June 29, 2008 at 1:25 pm
28. Comment #201627 by Roel on June 30, 2008 at 12:38 am
You don't need to be a psychic to know that there is poor coordination between the company's research and marketing teams. There always is.29. Comment #201628 by action bastard on June 30, 2008 at 12:40 am
Note to self: Don't ever buy stock in Seagate Technology. A multi-billion dollar company that hires a psychic for $10000 a month is not the sort of management I'm looking for as an investor.30. Comment #201636 by Marcus Hill on June 30, 2008 at 1:02 am
"quick insights into the poor coordination between the company's research and marketing teams"31. Comment #201681 by hungarianelephant on June 30, 2008 at 3:32 am
I just can't understand how anyone, in 2008, can still think these charlatans are real... especially major corporations!
Apparently religious gullibility extends beyond religion itself.
32. Comment #201682 by nalfeshnee on June 30, 2008 at 3:38 am
...all of what Barry P. said...
33. Comment #201695 by irate_atheist on June 30, 2008 at 4:44 am
34. Comment #201846 by Ed-words on June 30, 2008 at 10:21 am
It should be spelled NewsWEAK.35. Comment #201889 by cerad on June 30, 2008 at 11:28 am
36. Comment #204580 by amindformurder on July 5, 2008 at 9:42 am
1. Comment #200723 by SomeDanGuy on June 28, 2008 at 7:05 am
"But just as there are no atheists in foxholes, a bleak business climate can make believers out of anyone. "Ugh, repeating that lie enough as a given premise won't make it true.
Obviously, hiring a psychic to read opponents' minds is silly, but I think bringing them in to help with how your employees work together is not unreasonable. They have a remarkable skill set when it comes reading body language and discerning subtle queues of what people are actually thinking. Of course, if they go with the usual tactic of telling you what you want to hear, that won't help much.
Other Comments by SomeDanGuy