Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Saturday, February 17, 2007 | Reason : Evolution and Biology | print version Print | Comments

Document Researchers find 6,000-year-old fossil evidence

by Katherine Kostiuk, EurekAlert!

Reposted from:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-02/uom-rf6021207.php

Oldest domesticated chili peppers give clues to connections among disparate cultures

COLUMBIA, Mo. – Researchers, including a paleoethnobotanist at the University of Missouri-Columbia, recently found fossil evidence in seven archaeological sites ranging from the Bahamas to present-day Peru that showed people were eating domesticated chili peppers as long as 6,000 years ago. This makes chili peppers one of the oldest domesticated food sources in the Americas. The study will be published in the Feb. 15 edition of the journal Science.

"Before our research, there wasn't much archaeological evidence to show that prehistoric people in Central and South America were eating domesticated chili peppers," said Deborah Pearsall, professor of anthropology in MU's College of Arts and Science. "Chili peppers don't preserve well because when you cook with them, you eat most of them; you don't have husks or shells that are thrown away and preserved. That's why we used a technique that involved analyzing microscopic starch grains on cooking and grinding tools to find this new evidence."

Pearsall, who studied tools from sites in Ecuador and the Bahamas, teamed with a group of scientists doing research in various locations in Central and South America; the project was led by Linda Perry, a research associate at the Smithsonian National Museum of Nature History's Archaeobiology Program. Perry discovered an unknown microfossil starch grain while doing research in Venezuela, and when the other researchers compared notes, they realized that their work in the Bahamas, Panama, Ecuador and Peru also revealed the same unknown starch grain. After studying the starches of many domesticated and wild plants, Perry determined that the mystery starch was a chili pepper.

"We knew from historic and ethnographic records that people were eating domesticated chili peppers, but this archaeological evidence confirms those findings. It also shows us that chili peppers are one of the oldest domesticated food sources in the Americas and that people in distant areas all ate them. This suggests that these groups might have had some type of contact with each other," Pearsall said.

Loma Alta and Real Alto, the sites in southwestern Ecuador studied by Pearsall, turned up the oldest starch of domesticated chili peppers, at approximately 6,000 years old. Starch of the peppers in other sites ranged from approximately 5,600 years to 500 years old. Under a microscope, the starch grains appeared as large, flattened disks with shallow central depressions, different from the appearance of starch grains from other foods.

This discovery enables researchers to gain a better picture of ancient diets. By analyzing the grains on cooking tools, they were able to determine that people used the same grinding stones to grind corn, chili peppers and a root crop called manioc, and they probably combined these ingredients to make soups, stews and other dishes. Pearsall found evidence of this diet on grinding stones from four ancient households at Real Alto, leading her to conclude that these foods were eaten by everyone, not just the commoners or the elites.

###

The paper's title is "Starch Fossils and the Domestication and Dispersal of Chili Peppers (Capsiucum app. L.) in the Americas" Collaborators include Perry, the lead investigator; Pearsall; Ruth Dickau, Sonia Zarrillo and J. Scott Raymond of the University of Calgary; Irene Holst, Dolores R. Piperno and Richard G. Cooke of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Mary Jane Berman of Miami University; Kurt Rademaker and Daniel H. Sandweiss of the University of Maine; Anthony J. Ranere of Temple University; Franz Scaramelli of Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas, Carretera Panamericana in Venezuela; Kay Tarble of Universidad Central de Venezuela; and James A. Zeidler of Colorado State University.

Comments 1 - 19 of 19 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #22416 by padster1976 on February 17, 2007 at 2:02 am

 avatarThat title is misleading!! I was expecting to read 'proof of creation' or something daft like that.

So one of the first things that happened after the creation of the earth was adam and eve tucked into peppers!? 4000 years AFTER the domestication of the dog!?

I really think that we need some demonstrations or some other public protest against this vile mind disease that is religion.

Other Comments by padster1976

2. Comment #22419 by Manic on February 17, 2007 at 2:51 am

That title is misleading


Yes it is. :)
It was scary to read it from the title. :)

Other Comments by Manic

3. Comment #22421 by Homo economicus on February 17, 2007 at 3:08 am

 avatar'We knew from historic and ethnographic records that people were eating domesticated chili peppers, but this archaeological evidence confirms those findings.'

Looking for evidence, now that seems like a good idea. Wonder who would be against that? ;)

Other Comments by Homo economicus

4. Comment #22422 by Duff on February 17, 2007 at 3:28 am

The big story here is not that chili peppers were eaten six thousand years ago, but that they have actually found food remnants eaten by Adam and Eve, or their actual children!!! And, not only that, the Garden of Eden was in Mexico!!!

Other Comments by Duff

5. Comment #22423 by Vadjong on February 17, 2007 at 4:10 am

 avatarTo the first comments above :

No, the title is perfectly clear. It is telling, however, how much your brain gets sensitized to the number "6000 years old".
If there are 100,000 year old fossils, there are also 6000 years old fossils. There was more happening that day than just the creation of the earth by God.

Other Comments by Vadjong

6. Comment #22425 by ArtlessFrank on February 17, 2007 at 4:18 am

 avatarIt confirms my long held theory that Adam actually ate a hot chili, not an apple, to bring about the fall of man. He took a mighty bite then blasphemed in shock at its acerbic tang, causing God great repulsion.

The result of which was our original ancestors being cast out of paradise.

Chili is the devil's food, right along side licorice...

Other Comments by ArtlessFrank

7. Comment #22427 by mjwemdee on February 17, 2007 at 5:59 am

 avatarFantastic news.
I am curious to know how the museum curators at Liberty University in Virginia square THAT with their 6000-year-old dinosaur fossils...

Other Comments by mjwemdee

8. Comment #22430 by Robert Maynard on February 17, 2007 at 7:09 am

 avatar
I am curious to know how the museum curators at Liberty University in Virginia square THAT with their 6000-year-old dinosaur fossils...

YEC's maintain that the dinosaurs co-existed with humans, and alongside all the mammalian creatures which evolved to fill the ecological niches.. left by the dinosaurs.

I don't see what chili evidence is going to do to that particular claim. :P

Other Comments by Robert Maynard

9. Comment #22437 by sindiosxfa on February 17, 2007 at 8:41 am

Chili smoke killed the dinosaurs and made god go away and no where to be found. ah, and thatīs why pepper spray should be branded as evil...Letīs all unite against using chili to make god appear again and who knows maybe dinosaurs could come back too.
Greetings from Mexico

Other Comments by sindiosxfa

10. Comment #22444 by Zelgadis on February 17, 2007 at 4:52 pm

 avatarYeah... bit of a slow news day, isn't it? :P by the way, I didn't really think the title was misleading but it did make me read it a couple more times before I clicked on it, just to prepare myself in case it was something idiotic.

Now, on the subject of the article... I don't know, I just can't make myself feel too excited about fossilised chili pepper particles, I mean, I'm a geek but even I have limits. n_n

I did enjoy reading it though, due to the fact that everyone started doing schtick.(my favourite: god got chili-smoked hehe).

Saludos from México too. ^-^

Other Comments by Zelgadis

11. Comment #22451 by MelM on February 18, 2007 at 6:56 pm

Maybe this will spice things up:

"Scientists urged to run for school boards"

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/20070213-090821-1493r/

Other Comments by MelM

12. Comment #22453 by Russell Blackford on February 18, 2007 at 5:19 pm

Hey, lay off the Rolling Stones. They may be slightly mummified, but "fossils" is putting it too strongly. Either that, or I'll soon be a fossil myself - which is all too likely, now I think about it.

Back on topic, that 6000-year figure really does have unavoidable connotations, doesn't it? I, too, was expecting that there was going to be something for or against young Earth creationism.

Other Comments by Russell Blackford

13. Comment #22454 by thalesian on February 18, 2007 at 6:19 pm

 avatarWhat makes this discovery so fantastic is how early it is. Archaeologists are accustomed to finding staple crops (Wheat, Corn, Maize) being developed and refined that early, but Chili Peppers? It helps confirm the findings of Sherman and Billing (1999), in that spices like peppers are essential to the maintenance of meat products. This suggets a higher, if incidental, understanding of food preservation early on.

Other Comments by thalesian

14. Comment #22458 by lasyadela on February 19, 2007 at 12:33 am

 avatarI think God put the chili peppers there for the dinosaurs...
... not.

Other Comments by lasyadela

15. Comment #22463 by Vadjong on February 19, 2007 at 2:00 am

 avatarBrontosaur meat tastes like bland chicken, so a bit of strong seasoning is in order. (My ma had this wonderful recipe, I'll have to ask her.)
Never tasted T-Rex, though. For obvious reasons. Guess it would be more like ostrich, or sumthing.

Other Comments by Vadjong

16. Comment #22466 by BillySands on February 19, 2007 at 7:17 am

 avatarPadster, that would explain why the bible has no instructions on cooking dog chilli.

Other Comments by BillySands

17. Comment #22471 by Azven on February 19, 2007 at 9:18 am

 avatar
This suggests that these groups might have had some type of contact with each other


Or that different groups found out seperately that with chillis they could eat slightly off or less flavoursome meat and therefore include more protein in their diet - and the people with more protein survived! The tools on the other hand might tell a different story. How similar (or different) were the tools between different peoples?

Other Comments by Azven

18. Comment #22472 by Azven on February 19, 2007 at 6:22 am

 avatarBy the way the figure of 6000 years compares well with the "Out Of Africa -- Bacteria, As Well: Homo Sapiens And H. Pylori Jointly Spread Across The Globe" article.

Other Comments by Azven

19. Comment #22538 by Frostbit on February 19, 2007 at 5:17 pm

6000 years ago? Holy cow they found Adam and Eve. They even found the forbidden pepper. Someone call the pope.

Other Comments by Frostbit
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: