Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Monday, March 26, 2007 | Reason : Astronomy | print version Print | Comments

Document Across the Universe: A Guide to the Past, Present and Future of the Cosmos

by Patrick Moore

Reposted from:
http://acrosstheuniverse.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/is-life-elsewhere/

Is Life Elsewhere?

Of all the questions facing mankind, perhaps the most fascinating is concerned with life beyond the Earth. Does it exist — if so, where? — and what will it be like? So far we do not have the answers, and some people still maintain that we are alone in the universe. Since there are around a hundred thousand million stars in our galaxy, many of which are attended by planets, this seems unlikely, but we cannot be sure because we have no positive proof of life anywhere except on Earth. However, I have the feeling that at least one of these fundamental points may soon be cleared up.

We may be virtually certain that many planets moving around other stars are similar to Earth in size and mass, and that many of their parent stars are of a solar type; after all, our Sun is a very ordinary star. It follows that in the galaxy there are vast numbers of planets that are suitable for life of the kind we can understand — that is to say, carbon-based life. (I do not propose here to discuss truly alien life-forms; that would lead into totally uncharted waters!) The vital question, then, is this: will life automatically appear upon a world where conditions are tolerable, and will it then develop as far as its environment permits? If we could find just one world that does support life, we would be entitled to claim that life must be widespread all over the universe. And to me, it seems that the clue may be given to us by our near neighbor, the red planet Mars.

Mars through an amateur telescope. (Peter Lawrence/Digitalsky.org.uk)

Only a few decades ago, it was still believed that the dark areas on Mars were due to vegetation; Percival Lowell's brilliant, canal-building Martian engineers had been banished to the realm of science fiction, but Mars was not dismissed as a sterile planet. We now know that there is no vegetation and probably no surface life at all, mainly because of radiation hazards, but there is still a strong possibility that primitive life-forms exist, perhaps in underground lakes. New missions have been planned, and there is every hope that in the near future we will find out whether any living organisms survive there.

Some observers thought that structures seen in this meteorite from Mars might be fossil bacteria, but the idea is very controversial. (NASA/JSC via Hubblesite)

My point is this. If we find any life, no matter how primitive, it will prove that life will appear wherever it can. (I suppose there is a vague chance that organisms were blasted away from Earth and deposited on Mars, but this really does seem too unlikely to be taken seriously.) If we find that Mars today is sterile, we will still not have a definite answer to our fundamental question, but Mars may well be atypical of planets in general. I have an open mind; I hope we will find some sign of Martian life, and I admit that I will be disappointed if we do not. We must wait and see.

Comments 1 - 14 of 14 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #27788 by Friend Giskard on March 26, 2007 at 5:49 pm

 avatar
(I suppose there is a vague chance that organisms were blasted away from Earth and deposited on Mars, but this really does seem too unlikely to be taken seriously.)

There is a less vague chance that life started on Mars and got blasted the other way. This theory is discussed at length by Paul Davies in his (very interesting) book The Fifth Miracle. He makes it seem very plausible.

(Incidentally, I spotted The Fifth Miracle on Jack Straw's bookshelf in a TV interview once.)

Other Comments by Friend Giskard

2. Comment #27795 by BaronOchs on March 26, 2007 at 6:29 pm

 avatarBacteria have been found surviving in even the most inhospitable parts of the earth, prompting me to think it's quite probable there may at least be single-celled life forms on other planets. Another momentous thing to hope for is observing life originate again in a laboratory, which might tell us how likely life is to come into being on planets other than our own, as well as being yet another vindication of evolution.

Another place in our solar system where they might just possibly be life is underneath the ice on Jupiter's moon Europa, if it isn't too cold. I recall research on Lake Vostok underneath the Antarctic Ice should offer clues about that.

Apparently though Ladbrokes et al have taken so many bets that there is life on mars that if it is discovered they risk going into receivership!

Other Comments by BaronOchs

3. Comment #27801 by lenornst on March 26, 2007 at 7:08 pm

This problem has been discussed carefully, and at length a large number of times in the past, particularly as a criticism of the SETI approach.

For example see "Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The debate continues; A Biologist looks at the numbers" Physics Today, March, 1982 p.26:

<http://www.pipeline.com/~lenornst/SETI.html>

where I go into some detail about the biological probabilities involved in the evolution of life, the evolution of nerve cells, of eyes and of intelligence. And:

<http://www.pipeline.com/~lenornst/Life.html>

where earlier as well as more up to date arguments are collected.

Other Comments by lenornst

4. Comment #27813 by Yorker on March 26, 2007 at 10:58 pm

An amazing man is Patrick, still active and intellectually sharp. He must be close to 90 years old, it's a long while since I read his book "80 Not Out". Many years ago I saw him demonstrating his typing skills, he used two typewriters, one for each hand!

Other Comments by Yorker

5. Comment #27819 by Eamonn Shute on March 27, 2007 at 12:20 am

 avatarLast year Sir Patrick sent the following letter to "Sky & Telescope" magazine:-

"Reviewing my 'Atlas of the Universe' David Tytell comments that the book 'isn't very pretty'. I would refer him to one of the many children's books available. These are very pretty indeed and will clearly be far more suited to his needs."

:-)

I can strongly recommend his autobiography.

Other Comments by Eamonn Shute

6. Comment #27861 by padster1976 on March 27, 2007 at 4:29 am

 avatarPatrick Moore is great!

Other Comments by padster1976

7. Comment #27874 by Eamonn Shute on March 27, 2007 at 5:14 am

 avatarSir Patrick has nothing but contempt for the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, who he describes as "just as slimy and rude as Mr Carey" (his predecessor). Both men belong to the RSPCA but support fox hunting, which Patrick is very strongly against.
"And far from being fit to run the CofE I do not personally regard either of them as fit to run a whelk stall. If this is Christianity then give me paganism!"

Other Comments by Eamonn Shute

8. Comment #27876 by Cregaune on March 27, 2007 at 5:26 am

 avatarPatrick Moore may be an "amazing man" He may even be "great"; but a liberal he is not.

Let's not forget that in the late eighties he spoke out on numerous occasions (press and TV) in favour of 'Section 28' (a law introduced in the UK in 1988 and repealed in 2003 which forbade local councils from "promot[ing] the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship".)

I can think of greater men.


Cregaune

Other Comments by Cregaune

9. Comment #27919 by cheshirecat on March 27, 2007 at 8:40 am

Just found my old copy of 'mission to mars' by patrick moore in which Mars is described as having a thin oxygen atmosphere and animal life. Seems to be that Moore is rather dissapointed that there isn't life on Mars. I feel the same way. I would bet that they will not find anything remotely akin to life on mars though.

Other Comments by cheshirecat

10. Comment #28034 by mjwemdee on March 27, 2007 at 4:27 pm

 avatarThe man is a great astronomer. And he plays a mean xylophone too.

Other Comments by mjwemdee

11. Comment #28382 by David Williams on March 29, 2007 at 3:15 am

Sir Patrick is quite a legend. He has hosted the monthly The Sky at Night on the BBC since 24th April 1957, thats 50 years with the same presenter! It would be most cool if life was found on Mars in his lifetime, only time will tell on that one.

Other Comments by David Williams

12. Comment #29007 by diquea on April 1, 2007 at 6:38 am

If there were life on two planets in this one solar system... just wow. I would have to be there to see the look on the face of those who say life is just too improbable, blah blah blah.

Other Comments by diquea

13. Comment #29011 by BillySands on April 1, 2007 at 7:03 am

 avatarI often find that when people talk about the probability of life in general, they tend to think in terms of life as we recognise it here on earth. Even on earth there are many niches that are occupied by life that were previously thought uninhabitle. This is another reason to be unimpressed by those who try to use the anthropic principle for theistic purposes: that and the fact that there may be a billion billion planets in a 12 billion year old universe - not counting all the planets that have been and ever will be. If the earth were the only planet in the universe, and it were a few thousand years old, then the theist would have a stronger case - instead of none at all. Could that be why creationists are in denial of scientific facts? just a thought!

Other Comments by BillySands

14. Comment #29020 by Donald on April 1, 2007 at 8:08 am

cheshirecat wrote: "Just found my old copy of 'mission to mars' by patrick moore in which Mars is described as having a thin oxygen atmosphere and animal life."

I think you should also mention that it was fiction. It was a novel, not one of his educational books!

Other Comments by Donald
Reload Comments | Back to Top

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: