Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 | Reason : In the News | print version Print | Comments |

Document The Great Evangelical Decline

by Huffington Post

Thanks to Jim Thompson for the link.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-wicker/the-great-evangelical-dec_b_105009.html

The Great Evangelical Decline

What Baptist leaders have known for years is finally public: The Southern Baptist Convention is a denomination in decline. Half of the SBC's 43,000 churches will have shut their doors by 2030 if current trends continue.

And unless God provides a miracle, the trends will continue. The denomination's growth rate has been declining since the 1950s. The conservative/fundamentalist takeover 30 years ago was supposed to turn the trend around; it didn't make a bit of difference.

Leaders said it did. Reporters and politicians believed it did. But the numbers kept going down until, finally, they have become obvious to everyone.

Evangelical faith has been dropping since 1900, when 42 percent of the U.S. claimed that distinction. Every year, Religious Right evangelicals, such as those who lead the Southern Baptists, are a smaller proportion of the country. Every year, their core values are violated more flagrantly by the media, scientific discovery and mainstream behavior. Every election, politicians promise to serve them and then don't because evangelicals lack the power to make them.

What all this means is that we were duped.

All the hype proclaiming an evangelical resurgence was merely that - hype, a furious shout from a faith losing its grip, manipulation by a relatively small group of dedicated, focused, political power-seekers.

The long decline of Southern Baptist faith is critical to the entire evangelical movement because the Southern Baptist Convention, which claims 16 million members, is the biggest evangelical denomination in the country, almost six times as large as the next biggest predominately white evangelical denomination.

The second-largest evangelical group, the National Association of Evangelicals, has claimed 30 million members. Their churches actually have 7.6 million, tops. Most of those are having the same problems the Baptists are having.

As the true picture of evangelicals' problems has developed, panicked leaders are splitting into camps. Some say that the church is lax, soft, sold out. That what's needed is an even bigger dose of the medicine that the SBC fundamentalist takeover delivered. More authority, more strict interpretations of the Bible, more sermons about sin and suffering and sacrifice, more rigor about who is and who isn't getting to go to heaven.

Others say the problem is image. Evangelicals have been seen as mean-spirited and narrow. Caring about the environment and giving more attention to the poor and needy will turn it around. Get out of politics, they say. Play down abortion and gay rights. That will fix the problem.

But these responses won't halt the increasing irrelevance of evangelical faith to the great majority of the U.S. population. Here are just three of the many reasons.

One is Alcoholics Anonymous and all its 12-step offspring - the creation of two Christian men who wanted to help alcoholics. They modeled AA on the teachings of Jesus and the ideas of philosopher William James. Instead of asking alcoholics to be saved, they asked them to call on a god of their own understanding.

They eschewed guilt and any talk of sinfulness. Repentance was directed at specific people who had been harmed. There was no doctrine, no institution, no demand for monetary support.

Tens of millions of addicts and other troubled people learned that they didn't have to read the Bible, attend church or follow a preacher's rules to engage a divine power that could heal them.

Such open-ended faith had never been experienced before. And so the role of the church as interpreter of God's truth and the Bible as its sole repository lost power with millions.

The second attack came within the church as American evangelicals themselves became less willing to proclaim that they are the only ones saved. That idea had seemed reasonable when people lived in fairly homogeneous groups. Since few people had much to do with foreigners - except in times of war, when they were trying to kill them, or from behind a tourist's camera, when they were making souvenirs of them - "our way is the only way" seemed reasonable.

But international travel, business and communication have changed that. So have huge waves of immigration. Now "the other" is likely to be your son-in-law or grandchild.

The idea that only one little part of one kind of religion has the only way to God has begun to seem more and more unlikely, rude, un-Christian, even. And evangelicals, who don't like being boorish any more than anyone else, have become less and less willing to relegate their neighbors to hell.

So we have a completely formless god of great power and instant accessibility romping around, rescuing millions whom everyone else had given up on. Then we have more Christians getting squeamish about proclaiming hegemony over heaven.

And along comes The Pill. Nothing in history has changed human relations as much as that little white pill.

The curse God laid on Eve wasn't quite so ironclad anymore. Skip forward a few decades, and couples started delaying marriage until their late 20s, 30s or even 40s. But that pill meant there was less pressure to abstain from sex until the wedding.

So hardly anyone did. Evangelical leaders resolutely hewed to the abstinence standard at least formally, resulting in little more than extra hypocrisy.

That didn't matter much. Hypocrisy has always flourished, and it hasn't killed the church yet. But evangelicals' failure to grapple with change meant the church was no help in a world where people were expected to sleep together long before marriage and desperately sought guidance about when and with whom.

Evangelical leaders defend their stance by claiming that God doesn't change and that neither does sin. But sin does change. Slavery wasn't sin once. Now it is. Taking a wife and a concubine wasn't sin once. Now it is.

And God - or our understanding of what God is, which is all we actually have - changes, too. Human understandings are remolded so that faith can remain vital and effective during new times.

Whether evangelical intransigence is pleasing to God isn't anything that humans can ever be absolutely sure of. If it is pleasing to him, God may send a great revival that will sweep the country and restore them to their place of predominance.

Such revivals have happened before. They could happen again.

But I've named only three of the ways that evangelical faith has come to seem less useful, necessary and vital to those who might benefit from its teachings. Evangelical faith is failing in so many other ways that a growing number of Christians believe a New Reformation is needed.

If they are correct, the Southern Baptist Convention is unlikely to lead that reformation. Let's hope it is at least around to participate.

Christine Wicker is the author of "The Fall of the Evangelical Nation: The Surprising Crisis Inside the Church." Her e-mail address is christine@christinewicker.com and her web address is www.christinewicker.com

Comments 51 - 70 of 70 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

51. Comment #188981 by savroD on June 5, 2008 at 5:43 am

 avatarBy the way....
As far as reformation goes.... these people might try getting a science based education, as well as put their faith in the struggle of their fellow humans to make scientific and logical sense of the world!

Other Comments by savroD

52. Comment #188987 by emmet on June 5, 2008 at 6:39 am

 avatar
Wow, what an amazing scientific discovery! The half life of churches is 22 years!

Yes, but what does a church emit when it decays? Two prayer groups and an atheist?

Other Comments by emmet

53. Comment #188988 by Quetzalcoatl on June 5, 2008 at 6:43 am

 avatarEmmet-

Yes, but what does a church emit when it decays? Two prayer groups and an atheist?


Two prayer groups, an atheist and a sex scandal.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

54. Comment #188989 by evolvetoday on June 5, 2008 at 6:45 am

"Some say that the church is lax, soft, sold out"

This was the exact thing my sister was talking about a couple of weeks ago. Our father was a southern baptist preacher and she still occasionally needs her hellfire and brimstone fix. She was saying that all the large 10 million dollar complexes are so reformed that you wouldn't even recognize them anymore. Most have switched from the King James Version to "modern interpretations" of the bible. Gone are the healing services and revivals...it's all about networking now. She is now driving 40 miles to find a traditional backwoods baptist church that she likes...and this is in Alabama.

Just my opinion but I think the new baptists have reformed so much they no longer need to go to baptist churches anymore. It's now more acceptable to stay home and watch Joel Olsteen or to become a methodist because they let you drink alcohol. So one can hope that they are starting to "evolve" and hopefully one day they will wake up...

Other Comments by evolvetoday

55. Comment #188990 by Tyler Durden on June 5, 2008 at 6:48 am

 avatar
Yes, but what does a church emit when it decays? Two prayer groups and an atheist?
Two prayer groups, an atheist, a sex scandal, and some sort of "financial irregularity".

(The money was just resting in my account, honest!)

Other Comments by Tyler Durden

56. Comment #188997 by emmet on June 5, 2008 at 7:02 am

 avatar
Two prayer groups, an atheist and a sex scandal.

Not to be confused with pastor-emission decay where a church emits a cleric and one or more scandals, but otherwise remains stable.

Scandals come in different flavours, of course, sex scandals, drug scandals, embezzlement scandals, and tax scandals. Have I left any out?

There's also the curious phenomenon of scandal absorption, where a large church can be bombarded with scandals, absorb all of them, and neither emit a pastor nor disintegrate.

Other Comments by emmet

57. Comment #189000 by j.mills on June 5, 2008 at 7:34 am

 avatar
Whether evangelical intransigence is pleasing to God isn't anything that humans can ever be absolutely sure of. If it is pleasing to him, God may send a great revival that will sweep the country and restore them to their place of predominance.

(Put aside why you'd believe there's a god.) If it is possible for Man to act against the will of god, how could we attribute anything to god's 'pleasure'? Who's to say s/he/it doesn't hate revivals and cherish Hindoos and atheists?

Contrarily, if it is not possible to act against the will of god, there goes free will and sin, and everything must be what god wants.

"If it is pleasing to him, God may..." - not exactly a readily falsifiable hypothesis, is it? "If he likes string, he may also like drawing in the sand."

See, this is - not to go on, but - this is a little-mentioned leap of logic in the theist case. EVEN IF there's a god, and EVEN IF god 'wrote' the Bible (or whatever scripture), and EVEN IF everyone could agree on its message, that STILL wouldn't demonstrate that following 'the message' of the Bible was what god wanted of people.

If the scientific conclusion from the evidence all over god's universe (expansion of space, fossils, geology) is not to be relied upon, on what basis should the Bible itself be privileged? It's just as likely to be a lie, a joke, a test, as is archeopteryx. In the absence of evidence, god must be unknowable, and all theology just wild (you can't even say, "informed") speculation.

Other Comments by j.mills

58. Comment #189020 by steveroot on June 5, 2008 at 8:08 am

 avatar
...a furious shout from a faith losing its grip...

I thought this was nicely put. The "grip" being the ability to maintain the delusion.

56. Comment #188997 by emmet on June 5, 2008 at 7:02 am

Not to be confused with pastor-emission...

And speaking of particle physics, don't forget the low-tech olfactory detector:
http://religiousfreaks.com/2006/02/26/robert-tilton-is-pastor-gas/

@Christine Wicker: Welcome to the forum! I enjoyed your piece, which I suspect may not have met with universal approval. :-)
Ste5e

Other Comments by steveroot

59. Comment #189029 by phil rimmer on June 5, 2008 at 8:31 am

 avatarComment #188979 by Tyler Durden

Many here would agree with the greater truth embodied in your corrections and observations. But the piece was intended, I suspect, as a broadly non-offensive set of observations directed at a predominantly Christian audience. It pointed out the social logic of moving to a more tolerant, less dogmatic, religious stance.

Is there not merit in encouraging a move in the religious zeitgeist of this sort? Sure, we want the move to carry on so that all dogma is shunned but if we were to see commentary like this getting into the mainstream media this would be good, no?

Other Comments by phil rimmer

60. Comment #189048 by CruciFiction on June 5, 2008 at 9:30 am

Good news is always welcome!

However, religion will continue to hold enormous wealth with which they will fight tooth & nail, and as dirty and nasty as they think is required. Churches own [on average] some 20% of all the privately owned land area within the US!! And the loss of tax revenue from this tax exempt land is made up by everyone with higher taxes than would have to be paid if the [unconstitutional] exemption did not exist. So we are all subsidizing religion, whether we like it or not.

Other Comments by CruciFiction

61. Comment #189063 by Neil Schipper on June 5, 2008 at 10:36 am

Christine, interesting article. I must say I found the conclusions hard to jibe with the stats we often hear about the rates of literal biblical belief in the U.S. compared with other western countries, and specifically with the anxiety and intimidation many science teachers face.

Other Comments by Neil Schipper

62. Comment #189071 by Tom Coward on June 5, 2008 at 11:03 am

I sit here in northern New England, constantly agog at what goes on in the Bible Belt. Christine's article is consistent with my observations up here, as fundamentalism is definitely in decline, both in terms of numbers of adherents and political influence. The local fundie umbrella organization, The Christian Civic League, came a cropper a couple of years ago over a plan to blackmail public officials about their sexual orientation, and then managed NOT to defeat a gay rights referendum that was passed 55% to 45%. So, evengelicals are definitely having a hard time up here!

Other Comments by Tom Coward

63. Comment #189118 by discipline on June 5, 2008 at 1:39 pm

> evengelicals are definitely having a hard time up here!

I see no evidence of this here in rural Virginia. I not only have yet to ever see a church close, but new churches are being built all the time. Evangelicals may not be growing in number, but they still retain massive power to influence education and other social policy issues.

Evangelicalism is all about financial and political power -- the actual beliefs and practices are secondary. Just as I don't see a decline in right-wing Republicans, I don't see evangelicals fading away any time soon.

Don't forget that 40-50% of Americans are creationists. It's going to literally take generations to achieve Dawkins-style scientific rationality. It's too early to celebrate yet.

Other Comments by discipline

64. Comment #189177 by acs on June 5, 2008 at 4:19 pm

Re Adamhaar

Yeah - I might have been grasping a little for a good example. It was a time of social upheaval and lots did change in the 70's. Perhaps the best example was the 'no fault divroce' under the Family Law Act 1975?

Also, I too am waiting to see whether Woomera is actually taken down.

Nonetheless I stand by my initial assertion. Perhaps a better example would be the generations between the reigns of Henry VIII --> Mary --> Elizabeth I. Catholic, Protestant, Catholic, Protestant (Remember to burn whatever came before)!!.

Other Comments by acs

65. Comment #189489 by thewhitepearl on June 6, 2008 at 11:00 am

 avatarWhoa Whoa Whoa...WHOA..

I'd like to meet the evangelists and fundies that were described in THAT article...

" they are correct, the Southern Baptist Convention is unlikely to lead that reformation. Let's hope it is at least around to participate."

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I surely hope the SBC's won't be the only one's shut down by 2030.

Other Comments by thewhitepearl

66. Comment #189545 by bad_andy on June 6, 2008 at 12:55 pm

 avatarI had an interesting exchange with a family member who is still active in the church I was raise in. He told me that as an atheist I'd never be truly happy since I would lack the relationship with God that most people need to feel healthy and whole.

So I did some digging and started finding numbers that suggested that while Xians are a large group of people, they aren't a majority on the planet. Of the Xians, 2/3rds still identified as Catholic, not Protestant or Evangelical. Further, the particular fundamentalist faith to which he still belonged, according to one of it's own publications, wasn't even keeping pace with population growth in the U.S. and had been on a very steady decline since the Regan era.

This was encouraging. I think that this goes hand in hand with the "sudden" resurgence of open discussion of non-religious points of view in the mainstream media. People are tired of being told who and what to do by a loud handful of fundamentalists. They have been for years and now they are walking away in noticeable numbers. Hardly sounds basic to happiness to me.

Other Comments by bad_andy

67. Comment #189643 by Christine Wicker on June 6, 2008 at 9:17 pm

I was joking about the cynical deal. Journalists think cynical is good. I should have chosen a better word.

Thank you for the welcome. I'm interested in your perspectives.

I was joking a little bit when I called myself an evangelical in one of my interviews. I was making the point that if you don't have to believe anything or act any way, why not?

I was saved at nine and I grew up very serious and fairly devout. I left church in college, as many people do. I was angry with religion for a long time, as many people are.

Now? Well some days I believe in God. Some days I don't. Some days I think I can feel the presence of "something" that feels like God. Most days I don't.

I used to worry about those things quite a bit. Now I don't.

I don't think what I believe is important, perhaps because it fluctuates so much. And what I believe doesn't change the truth. I don't flatter myself that I know the truth.

I don't think believing in God and being a good person are linked. Some of the best people I know are believers. Others aren't.

Jesus seems to go beyond belief for me. He's bred in the bone. No matter what I'm writing about, he keeps showing up, metaphorically speaking. I've come to terms with that as one of the realities of my life. I don't think it has to be a reality of anyone else's life. But it's my heritage and as time goes by I'm more and more all right with that.

As for the Southern Baptists dying out, I can see why some of you might like that idea. It would have advantages. But some people get something important out of that type of faith. I wouldn't want them to have to go without that. Life can be hard.

Other Comments by Christine Wicker

68. Comment #189645 by sent2null on June 6, 2008 at 9:42 pm

 avatarA moment of silence brethren for the decline in the number of evangelists...

...

...


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehawwwww!!!!!!


What a moment it is! It should be obvious that my lamentations are quite false and boldly so. I think the internet is only going to accelerate the decline as people who would other wise be subject to information only from their small local community and the strong peer pressures those communities place, are now able to reach out to individuals with similarly questioning minds online. The internet and the ubiquity of access to information is going to spur revolutions in human interaction that we barely can surmise. If it can do its part to hasten the obliteration of religious belief, it can't happen fast enough.

Other Comments by sent2null

69. Comment #189772 by Laurie Fraser on June 7, 2008 at 8:37 am

 avatarHi Christine, and welcome to the site. You said "Well some days I believe in God. Some days I don't". Sorry, but that's not good enough for us atheists. We demand 100% conviction (pardon me, that's just my little joke). Seriously, though, as a former believer I sympathise with the plight of those who ask the big questions (and why wouldn't you?). Be bold, girl - say it loud & proud: THERE IS NO GOD!

(Gee whillikers, I love saying that. Still gives me a frisson. [That's French for a stiffy.])

Other Comments by Laurie Fraser

70. Comment #190012 by rod-the-farmer on June 8, 2008 at 6:37 am

 avatarRe Comment #188988 by Quetzalcoatl on June 5, 2008 at 6:43 am

Emmet-

Yes, but what does a church emit when it decays? Two prayer groups and an atheist?



Two prayer groups, an atheist and a sex scandal.

Actually, if you examine the trails in a bibul chamber closely, it is the sex scandal that enters the church, bouncing around until it hits something, causing the church to split into two prayer groups and an atheist. The sex scandal is the CAUSE of the fission, not a result.

Other Comments by rod-the-farmer
Reload Comments | Back to Top

More Comments: First | Previous | 1 2

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: