Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)
Thursday, December 11, 2008 | Science : Earth Sciences | print version Print | Comments |

Document Key Event That Breaks Continents Apart Discovered

by Science Daily

Thanks to GP for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081210090817.htm

ScienceDaily (Dec. 11, 2008) — Researchers have captured for the first time a geological event considered key in shaping the Earth's landscape. An international research team led by Eric Calais, a Purdue University professor of geophysics, was able to measure ground displacements as two tectonic plates in Africa moved apart and molten rock pushed its way toward the surface during the first so-called "dyking event" ever recorded within the planet's continental crust.

The event left a wall of magma 6 miles long and 5 feet wide wedged between the two plates. A paper detailing the event will be published Dec. 11 in Nature.

Dyking events have been reported in the thin oceanic crust but had never been directly observed and quantified in the thicker areas of the planet's shell, Calais said.

"Such dyking events had been included in theories, but researchers had never before been in the right place at the right time with the right equipment to record them," Calais said. "The event was preceded by a slow slipping of the tectonic plates along a fault line. This also had not been seen before. Faults usually slip suddenly, which produces earthquakes, but this was a very seismically quiet course of events that lasted about one week."

The existence of these events provides a key element of how the Earth's rigid outer shell - the lithosphere - breaks apart and moves. The known forces pushing and pulling on continents are not powerful enough to break them apart. However, repeated dyking events could weaken the lithosphere severalfold, allowing it to shift and break under far less force, Calais said.

"To break a continent apart, one needs to overcome the strength of the Earth's lithosphere," he said. "But when we calculate the forces available from plate tectonics, we find that they are not large enough to do the job. We know that continents break apart and have done so repeatedly in the geological past. So, how can it happen? One way is to add a little push to the system, and this is exactly what dyke intrusions do."

During a dyke intrusion, magma held in deep reservoirs breaks through surrounding rock and rises toward the surface, forcing the two plates apart, and, over time, weakening the lithosphere by transferring heat to the surrounding rocks. The magma fills and widens cracks and fractures as it rises. The end result is a vertical wall, or dyke, of magma that has pushed the Earth's crust apart, he said.

"Eventually, if these events occur over and over again for millions of years, an ocean will form between the two plates," he said. "So, today in Tanzania, we are really witnessing the earliest stages of ocean formation."

Calais and his collaborators captured this event in Tanzania's Lake Natron basin during the summer of 2007. The basin lies near the southern tip of the eastern branch of the East African Rift, the area where the Somalia and Nubia tectonic plates are moving apart.

Reports of a series of moderate earthquakes from northern Tanzania felt all the way to Nairobi in Kenya caught the team's attention. French collaborators had installed seismographs in the vicinity of the Natron basin a few months before the event and recorded more than 600 small earthquakes in two weeks, pinpointing the center of the tectonic activity. Tanzanian researchers were able to collect Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements in the Natron area. Calais compared these measurements with those taken earlier to determine the amount of displacement of the Earth's surface. But these displacements did not match what was expected from the earthquakes.

"The displacement was much too large given the small size of the earthquakes, which was the first lead that something unusual was happening," Calais said. "Soon after these earthquakes, one of the volcanoes in the area entered an explosive eruptive stage, which indicated that magma was involved. So we had an idea this might be a dyking event."

He then worked with colleagues in Luxembourg to obtain radar interferometry (InSAR) data, which provided a detailed picture of ground movements. A team of led by Belgium scientists went to the area for a field check and mapped 13 miles of open fissures that corresponded well with the observations from InSAR data.

"Once we had all of the measurements, in particular the InSAR data, we knew that the combined dataset could only be explained by the injection of a dyke," Calais said. "If we had only the GPS data and/or seismic activity data, this would have been difficult to prove. We needed all of these methods to really understand what was happening."

A dyking event is mostly an aseismic process, meaning it does not create large earthquakes or release a lot of ground-shaking energy. It would be easy to miss such an occurrence without some of the advanced geodetic measurement technology available today, he said.

"When you look at events like this with only one measurement tool, you are half blind," Calais said. "You are missing a lot of what the planet is telling us. Sometimes it whispers instead of shouting."

It is possible that there have been several dyking events on the East African Rift within the past few decades, he said.

"If there is evidence that these events have been happening within recent time, there is no reason not to believe that they have been happening for several million years," Calais said. "This could then be a very important contribution to the dynamics of the East African Rift system."

Co-authors of the paper include Nicolas d'Oreye and Anneleen Oyen from the National Museum of Natural History in Luxembourg; Julie Albaric, Jacques Déverchère and Julie Perrot from the University of Brest in France; Anne Deschamps from the National Center for Scientific Research in France; Damien Delvaux, Francois Kervyn, Benoit Smets and Christelle Wauthier from the Royal Museum for Central Africa in Belgium; Cynthia Ebinger from the University of Rochester; Richard W. Ferdinand from the University of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania; Athanas S. Macheyeki from the Renard Centre of Marine Geology in Belgium; Elifuraha Saria from Ardhi University in Tanzania; and D. Sarah Stamps from Purdue.

Calais and his collaborators next will watch the surrounding area for the aftermath of this dyking event.

"When a large event like this occurs, the state of stress on the Earth's upper layers are changed, and we expect several additional events to follow," Calais said. "Other magma reservoirs may be touched and trigger another dyking event. It will take a while for the system to relax again and get back to its quiet, steady-state, behavior."

His team also plans to examine the area in more detail to try to discover evidence of past dyking events. This information could illustrate any historical patterns in the incidences of these events and how regularly they occur.

"At stake is a better understanding of geohazards in East African countries, whose fragile economy may easily be disrupted even by seismic or volcanic events of moderate magnitude," Calais said.

The National Science Foundation funded this research.

Comments 1 - 50 of 67 |

Reload Comments | Back to Top | Page Numbers

1. Comment #300437 by Eshto on December 11, 2008 at 5:57 pm

 avatarAt last we can retire the Paul Bunyan's axe theory.

Other Comments by Eshto

2. Comment #300448 by Sarmatae1 on December 11, 2008 at 6:49 pm

 avatar
Calais and his collaborators captured this event in Tanzania's Lake Natron basin during the summer of 2007. The basin lies near the southern tip of the eastern branch of the East African Rift, the area where the Somalia and Nubia tectonic plates are moving apart.


It's amazing to see what some scientists will brave for the advancement of science. This is not only a politically volatile area, it is geographically volatile. Heres a link to a picture and a little info on Lake Natron. Just so we don't get the impression of a couple of scientists sitting in a hammock with a fishing pole and a piece of straw protruding from the mouth. Truly if you had to go to this area. There better be a damned good reason, lol.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=5465

Other Comments by Sarmatae1

3. Comment #300468 by j.mills on December 11, 2008 at 8:28 pm

 avatarLimerick Summary News Service!

Sixteen scientists once wrote a paper
On how dyking's a continent-shaper.
They found six miles of crust
Split by tectonic thrust -
Magma sandwich for tea! What a caper!

Other Comments by j.mills

4. Comment #300490 by gazzaofbath on December 12, 2008 at 12:47 am

 avatarOh well, another unclear phenomenon understood, another area where the 'god of gaps' is no longer required - this time the gaps between the continental blocks!

Other Comments by gazzaofbath

5. Comment #300497 by gcdavis on December 12, 2008 at 1:27 am

 avatarNice one j.mills!

Other Comments by gcdavis

6. Comment #300502 by AllanW on December 12, 2008 at 1:40 am

 avatarTerrific science being done here. I'm no geologist but I followed the report and papers here well enough.

Flippant aside;
I had a Chandler Bing moment at the start because I've just switched to this thread from reading the Prop 8 one (Carto's wedding plans, the video, Steve's wedding pictures) and flashed on Matt Perry saying;
"Oh come on, people! 'Dyking event'; just so many possibilities ..."

Other Comments by AllanW

7. Comment #300629 by Rettet181 on December 12, 2008 at 8:18 am

It is always enjoyable to witness a dyking event. I particularly like when they are preceded by a bit of "slow slipping" before a quick "earthquake", followed by some visible tremors.

Other Comments by Rettet181

8. Comment #300697 by xsjadolateralus on December 12, 2008 at 9:33 am

 avatarI still don't see how this could account for our oceans considering much of the ocean's surface is somewhat smooth and without debris. If there is magma pushing them apart then how do they push apart equally and constantly considering the continents are still drifting away at a very slow speed?

Otherwise, YAY for geology! If this is conclusive evidence for a theory then I am happy.

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

9. Comment #300703 by Roger Stanyard on December 12, 2008 at 9:51 am

 avatarxsjadolateralus - my limited knowledge of plate tectonics is that where the magma pushes upwards in the mid-oceanic ridges, there is plenty of "debris" and undersea mountain ranges (some of which break surface). It is simply wrong to say that the sub-oceoanic areas are somewhat smooth.

Other Comments by Roger Stanyard

10. Comment #300716 by mrjohnno on December 12, 2008 at 10:31 am

4. Comment #300490 by gazzaofbath on December 12, 2008 at 12:47 am

another area where the 'god of gaps' is no longer required - this time the gaps between the continental blocks!


I think you will find that the 'god of the gaps' works in the same manner. It has nothing to do with the validity of some particular answer but simply the introduction of another invalid question which has God as the answer.

I admire your optimism however.

Johnno

Other Comments by mrjohnno

11. Comment #300720 by splink on December 12, 2008 at 11:06 am

A dyke intrusion also split apart my parents marriage.

Other Comments by splink

12. Comment #300750 by hayesky on December 12, 2008 at 12:11 pm

 avatarThe smooth areas of the ocean are covered in thick deposits that waves and other forces have carried out to sea, also dust settling through the water and falling to the bottom. Been a while since geology class but i think that is close.

Other Comments by hayesky

13. Comment #300759 by Evilcor on December 12, 2008 at 12:24 pm

 avatarIntrusive Dyking: It fills the gaps!

or,

Dyke Event: Spread 'em!

or,

Dykes do it long and strong

or,

African Dykes: No Dutch boys need apply

or,

Liquid Dyke Intrusion: A 4 Non-Blonds tribute band

or,

Well, you get the point. . . I'm emotionally adolescent.

Other Comments by Evilcor

14. Comment #300762 by Evilcor on December 12, 2008 at 12:29 pm

 avatarOne more -

Dykes: Queerer than can be supposed by your philosophy.

Ok, I think that does it.

Other Comments by Evilcor

15. Comment #300765 by Tezcatlipoca on December 12, 2008 at 12:39 pm

 avatarI thought comment #300629 by Rettet181 was the best of the lot. I'll have to run these by my sister and her partner and see how they fly...

Other Comments by Tezcatlipoca

16. Comment #300779 by Naturalist1 on December 12, 2008 at 1:21 pm

 avatarNews Flash Everyone:
I just got my new Scientific American(Jan. 09)!
The entire issue is about Evolution! It is "A Special Issue on the Most Powerful Idea in Science". On the cover are titles of the articles:
Headline:The Evolution of Evolution,
The Future of Human Evolution,
Molecular Proof of Natural Selection,
How Life Invents Complex Traits,
And my favourite:
Creationist' Latest Tricks
Go out and get this one! Can't wait to start at it!

Other Comments by Naturalist1

17. Comment #300785 by King of NH on December 12, 2008 at 2:22 pm

 avatar
I still don't see how this could account for our oceans considering much of the ocean's surface is somewhat smooth and without debris.


The ocean's surface is smooth and regular because it is water, and tends to attempt a spherical... Oh, wait, probably means the bottom. Okay. There, too, though, it is the water. The water "evenly" disperses the soil into a relatively smooth surface, since there is no underwater runoff to gouge paths through this surface. It is, as defined, the bottom. If we were to blast the sand out of the way, we would find a rocky and disjointed surface preserved in its scarry birthpains.

Iceland is one of the evidences that the ocean is not even or smooth. But Iceland will eventually erode and fall as a sandy cloud, drifting evenly down to the ocean floor.

I guess the best opportunity to see this effect is to go to a mountain lake. There you can climb the rocky outcropings to a craggy shore, put on some goggles and tip toe across the sharp mineral debris and shards of quartz, and swim down to see the smooth, sandy lake floor. The ocean is just this on a much bigger scale. [caution: mountain lakes are often very, very cold]

Other Comments by King of NH

18. Comment #300793 by j.mills on December 12, 2008 at 2:59 pm

 avatarSimilar theme, I'm watching on DVD the Beeb's series "Earth: The Power of the Planet". The globe-trotting presenter is a bit gushy and labours the point, but it's very entertaining and fairly informative. (I hadn't realised volcanoes were important in maintaining CO2 levels.)

Gonna watch the rest of it now, cheerio!

Other Comments by j.mills

19. Comment #300803 by Border Collie on December 12, 2008 at 3:22 pm

 avatarAre they sure that Moses is not still out there somewhere waving his staff?

Other Comments by Border Collie

20. Comment #300812 by epsilondelta on December 12, 2008 at 3:42 pm

Thanks for the heads-up Naturalist1. I was planning on going to the bookstore anyway, so I'll make sure to pick up a copy.

Other Comments by epsilondelta

21. Comment #301179 by xsjadolateralus on December 13, 2008 at 10:23 pm

 avatar"xsjadolateralus - my limited knowledge of plate tectonics is that where the magma pushes upwards in the mid-oceanic ridges, there is plenty of "debris" and undersea mountain ranges (some of which break surface). It is simply wrong to say that the sub-oceoanic areas are somewhat smooth."

The ocean floor is filled with valleys and canyons and all kinds of geographical features but a large portion of it is fairly smooth compared to the rest of it. Yes there is loose sand which covers it and many different layers under that which constantly change and resurfaces it. But those same layers are on top of the rough areas as well so you can't just say that those areas are smooth because dust and sand are on them covering the rough mountainous features laying underneath(suggested by another commenter). So it is fair to assume by observation of sub-oceanic maps(which are fairly detailed) that there are smooth areas of sub-oceanic terrain. So if the continents were all together at one point(pangea)then wouldn't there have to be an outlining tectonic plate around each and every continent so that they could all separate from each other as they have? Also does gravity have anything to do with the shifting of the plates or does gravity not play any role at all in this(forgive me for saying) mysterious and all together difficult to visualize natural phenomena?

I'm wondering because it seems like something like continents(which are huge and heavy) shifting around or spreading at the seams would need a fairly large engine to be possible and as we are spinning around a large heavy ball of gas and create quite a bit of gravity doing so which is evident.... wouldn't this have a main part to play in the moving and distributing of continents?

I would imagine it does since gravity is kind of the force behind everything in our world. But how does that fit in with this theory? I have never heard of someone even mention gravity when explaining plate tectonics or the separation of continents.

thanks for your time.

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

22. Comment #301180 by xsjadolateralus on December 13, 2008 at 10:43 pm

 avatar"To break a continent apart, one needs to overcome the strength of the Earth's lithosphere," he said. "But when we calculate the forces available from plate tectonics, we find that they are not large enough to do the job. We know that continents break apart and have done so repeatedly in the geological past. So, how can it happen? One way is to add a little push to the system, and this is exactly what dyke intrusions do."

During a dyke intrusion, magma held in deep reservoirs breaks through surrounding rock and rises toward the surface, forcing the two plates apart, and, over time, weakening the lithosphere by transferring heat to the surrounding rocks. The magma fills and widens cracks and fractures as it rises. The end result is a vertical wall, or dyke, of magma that has pushed the Earth's crust apart, he said.

"Eventually, if these events occur over and over again for millions of years, an ocean will form between the two plates,"


So, if a dyke(wall of magma,fractured and hardened)is to account for oceans then why would we not see a more constant feature of the sub-oceanic terrain? If you visualize this happening again and again then you basically have wave after wave of magma creating space between the continents, constantly creating a thicker and thicker dyke like wave after wave. Well my point is then, wouldn't there be a sort of patern or consistent appearance of the ocean floor? Also, if these dyke intrusions are basically a large wall then why don't they protrude the surface or make underwater mountains? What is to stop them from growing vertically if they are so immense as to basically cut through the lithosphere?

What is the basic force behind this? Does the magma just decide to rise to the surface in the middle of the oceans and not through volcanic areas? I was under the impression that there was always an engine or mechanism behind events. If anyone would care to explain what the mechanism behind this is then that would be great. Unless all you have to say is "dude, magma is hot and theres like some plates that they slide around on".

thanks

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

23. Comment #301394 by King of NH on December 14, 2008 at 6:06 pm

 avatarxsjadolateralus:

You are asking too many questions, I think, to get into. Good questions, but a lot. There is gravity pulling on one edge that pulls the plate over. There is erosion. There are lunar, tidal forces. There is the heat ramining from earth's birth.

Maybe someone here knows a good book?

Other Comments by King of NH

24. Comment #301401 by Goldy on December 14, 2008 at 6:19 pm

 avatarXjs
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/tecmech.html
I guess is a good place to start. Or look into geology :-)

Other Comments by Goldy

25. Comment #301405 by xsjadolateralus on December 14, 2008 at 6:35 pm

 avatar"You are asking too many questions"

Sounds vaguely familiar, usually meaning I'm doing my job to be inquisitive.

Yes thank you for the suggestions but that wasn't what I was getting to, I do know about lunar gravitational pull and all sorts of neat things about the earth and it's surroundings, I'm really probing into something different by asking these questions. So far I haven't found a reasonable answer.

Thanks goldy for telling me to look into geology, that's good advice for someone who is asking advanced geological questions....

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

26. Comment #301408 by Goldy on December 14, 2008 at 6:52 pm

 avatar
Thanks goldy for telling me to look into geology, that's good advice for someone who is asking advanced geological questions....

:-D
Sorry - new child, sleepless nights...ummm...errr...
I am a biologist...if that's a reason... ;-)

Edit - if you go to wikipedia, at the bottom there are generally references. Might be good to check them out - sometimes the search is better than getting the answer on a plate :-)

Other Comments by Goldy

27. Comment #301412 by xsjadolateralus on December 14, 2008 at 7:05 pm

 avatarI wasn't asking for you to explain the whole of geology to me, in fact I wasn't asking for you to explain anything. I was trying to reconcile what I consider conflicting information.

Thanks for another piece of GREAT advice with wikipedia, what a fantastic site! I'll come back in an hour and see if you told me about a site called google.


"good advice if you've got shit for brains..." -H.S. Thompson

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

28. Comment #301418 by Brian English on December 14, 2008 at 7:16 pm

 avatarxsj, the process is referring to the breaking of the continental crust. Once you've got the continental crust broken you're into oceanic, basaltic crust, which is just the cooling of the magma as it reaches the water or surfact. This creates really cool pillow lava. The important point though is that you no longer have this process of dykes forming in continental crust because it is no longer continental crust, but shallower oceanic crust which has a split in it where the crust is moving away towards a subduction zone. There's no need for gargantuan pressures to split the crust as it's already split.

Other Comments by Brian English

29. Comment #301419 by Brian English on December 14, 2008 at 7:19 pm

 avatarThe magma in the mantle is moving due to convection currents. The closer into the core (of the Earth), the higher the heat an pressure. The hotter magma rises towards the surface. If there is a hot-spot (Hawaii, volcanoes in Australia, etc) or a split in the crust it can even reach the surface. If there isn't it moves along under the crust till it cools and then heads back down to be reheated. This has a conveyer belt effect on the crust that is riding on top of the mantle.

Other Comments by Brian English

30. Comment #301421 by Brian English on December 14, 2008 at 7:25 pm

 avatar
Well my point is then, wouldn't there be a sort of patern or consistent appearance of the ocean floor?
The ocean floor is moving away from mid-oceanic ridges, which originated where continents split. There are patterns of reverse-magnetism in the ocean floor where fresh lava was magnetized. Each side of the mid-oceanic ridge has a matching pattern.
Also, if these dyke intrusions are basically a large wall then why don't they protrude the surface or make underwater mountains?
because it's no longer in continental crust. But they can find a weak spot in the crust (continental or oceanic) and reach the surface, or well up underground. These are called hotspots. If they reach the surface you'll get a volcano like Hawaii.
What is to stop them from growing vertically if they are so immense as to basically cut through the lithosphere?
They have already cut through the lithospere when they split a continent. They can't do it again. The split continent is dragged apart by convection currents and the gap filled with fresh mantle goo. This is a proto-ocean. Of course this process is controlled by convection currents. When they change so does the separation or joining of continental masses and subduction of oceanic crusts.

Other Comments by Brian English

31. Comment #301438 by xsjadolateralus on December 14, 2008 at 10:43 pm

 avatar"They have already cut through the lithospere when they split a continent. "

And how did they do that in the first place?


"The split continent is dragged apart by convection currents and the gap filled with fresh mantle goo."

So, this is the causal mechanism to move the continents? Convection currents?

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

32. Comment #301441 by Brian English on December 14, 2008 at 10:58 pm

 avatar
And how did they do that in the first place?
Uhm, the mantle pushed up into weakend bits of the continental crust. This article seems to be talking about it. The continent sits astride separate convection cells which put a strain on it. It's not enough to split the continent. But the continent will not be uniform at all times and places and while sitting astride currents going in different directions heat and pressure on weaker points allows magma to rise up into faults or deform and move these weaker points. This allows dyking and further undermining of the integrity of the continental crust, a rift valley may form given enough time. Either this continues till the crust is no longer able to maintain itself in one piece and a split occurs, which will then be filled by oceanic crust, or the convection currents move and the crust doesn't split. There are large lakes (Eyre, etc) and a bay in South Australia that are part of a failed rift valley that was splitting Australia a long time ago. We can measure this now days with seismographic equipment or millions of years after the event the rock that underwent dyking may be uplifted and eroded so that we see the dyking that is evidence of the rifting.

So, this is the causal mechanism to move the continents? Convection currents
Yes, the mantle moves. You might think that rock can't flow, but then you'd be applying your knowledge of rocks at standard conditions to circumstances that are definitely not at 1 atmosphere of pressure and a pleasant 25 degrees celcius. Solids behave with quite a bit of plasticity (like a liquid) at the pressures and temperatures found at the base of and beneath the crust. The mantle can be thought of a a thick goo drags along the crust that sits above it. So both oceanic and contintental crust is dragged along convection currents. Of course, I'm taking cause in a Humean sense. ;)

Other Comments by Brian English

34. Comment #301455 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 12:45 am

 avatarHey xsjadolateralus
Have you tried this rather interesting site called Google?

Of course, if research is rather difficult, I believe there are some books called "xxx for dummies"

Be right up your street, methinks.

Other Comments by Goldy

35. Comment #301457 by Brian English on December 15, 2008 at 12:46 am

 avatarYou're an evil bastard Goldy. :)

Other Comments by Brian English

36. Comment #301458 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 12:48 am

 avatarWell, if he's playing the smart fuckwit, what can a man do?

:-D

Other Comments by Goldy

37. Comment #301463 by Brian English on December 15, 2008 at 12:55 am

 avatarYou are correct Goldy. There is not a secret geologist conspiracy (TM) that keeps the details from the plebs. It's all out there on Google and Wiki. What may be a problem is for someone who doesn't have the background to intergrate what all that information means. If you've never considered and entertained the plasticity of solids then it is probably all too difficult to grasp....I'm giving our friend the benefit of the doubt.

Other Comments by Brian English

38. Comment #301468 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 1:01 am

 avatarI did, but he turned all arsy on me. Fuck him, if he can't read a fucking book.....

Xjs - have you also thought about these things called L-I-B-R-A-R-I-E-S? Full of books! Try one at a university or try this amazing other site called Amazon - they sell the damn things!

Fck, if you can't find a Fisher Price answer in google, you're really fucked in this WWW!

:-)

Other Comments by Goldy

39. Comment #301472 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 1:08 am

 avatarLack of sleep, it's all. Need more beer :-)

Xjs - I apologise, really. I'll not try and answer any more of your questions. I'm obviously not equipt to do so, being a mere biology researcher (answers to my questions not found on the web, though PubMed is my source of choice). In fact, I'll not ever respond to any more of your posts. Happy?

Other Comments by Goldy

40. Comment #301476 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 1:15 am

 avatar:-D

Other Comments by Goldy

41. Comment #301487 by LeeC on December 15, 2008 at 1:36 am

I think it is all done with mirrors...

Other Comments by LeeC

42. Comment #301637 by xsjadolateralus on December 15, 2008 at 9:11 am

 avatarGet a fucking room you two.

Meanwhile you can stop pretending to answer my questions, the answers you gave were pretty idiotic considering Plate tectonics is a simple theory to understand and I spend plenty of time researching and READING BOOKS.

You were dense enough to assume I didn't already know what answer you would give. I'm really just poking fun at subduction and so called dyke intrusions. They really can not account for splitting/moving continents, it's just another band aid to support a theory that has many holes. This phenomena had a better alternative theory many years ago but was overlooked by most of the scientific community.

I don't want to get into it with you two so let's just leave it at that... you guys are dense and this theory sucks.

HEY OMGZ,EVER HEARD OF THIS SITE CALLED YOUTUBE.COM. OMGZ IT'S LIKE FUTUROIC!

get off the computer for two hours each day and realize you're a dumbass. fuckwit.

Other Comments by xsjadolateralus

43. Comment #301640 by Quetzalcoatl on December 15, 2008 at 9:15 am

 avatarxsjadolateralus-

This phenomena had a better alternative theory many years ago but was overlooked by most of the scientific community.


What might this alternative theory be?

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl

44. Comment #301643 by Vaal on December 15, 2008 at 9:19 am

 avatarQuetz

Sin, of course!

Other Comments by Vaal

45. Comment #301651 by CaptainMandate on December 15, 2008 at 9:30 am

 avatarbloody science eh? always overlooking the good theories for the sake of the ones that are consistent with empirical evidence.

Other Comments by CaptainMandate

46. Comment #301653 by Peacebeuponme on December 15, 2008 at 9:31 am

This phenomena had a better alternative theory many years ago but was overlooked by most of the scientific community.
Suddenly things are a lot clearer.

Angels with invisible ropes are actually sitting on the moon and playing a complicated strategy game with our continents.

Its just self-interested geologists with no imagination that refuse to acknowledge this.

Other Comments by Peacebeuponme

47. Comment #301697 by Goldy on December 15, 2008 at 12:58 pm

 avatarComment #301637 by xsjadolateralus
Words must've gotten a bit big, eh? Well, that's research for you...
;-)

Edit
Funny, always the crackpots and religious that are the nastiest pieces of work, eh? However, I would love to hear about his ID theory on continental drift.

Other Comments by Goldy

48. Comment #301860 by Goldy on December 16, 2008 at 1:02 am

 avatarHmmm, Xjs is all a-quiet. I guess this refutation of geological theories of the past century is not worthy of our uncouth and uneducated minds.
Oddly, that does not surprise me....

Other Comments by Goldy

49. Comment #302551 by Degsy on December 17, 2008 at 9:04 am

Is 'xsjadolateralus' still about. You had better step up to the plate here and allow your own ideas on this to take the battering you have just doled out to other peoples. Just because you have an idea, or more to the point here, one you like, does not grant you some sort of clemency. So I ask you, and you alone, what is the alternative theory from years ago, overlooked by the scientific community that better explains the theories formulated here from the sort of meticulous and head-wrecking scientific research that actually provides answers?

Other Comments by Degsy

50. Comment #302553 by Quetzalcoatl on December 17, 2008 at 9:12 am

 avatarDegsy-

He's gone quiet. Shame, I was all fired up and keen to hear about his alternative theory.

Other Comments by Quetzalcoatl
Reload Comments | Back to Top

More Comments: 1 2 | Next | Last

Comment Entry: Please Login

Register a new account

Username:

Password: