Before I start, I would like to say that I think that most of what Dr. Dawkins thinks about religion makes very good sense. I understand and agree with the idea of not believing in what there is no evidence to support.  I am however curious, when it comes to the existence of god, what evidence, if found, would be sufficient to convince you that such a being does, in reality, exist? Because if we are rejecting the existence of god solely due to the lack of evidence that could never be found, then, it seems to me, we are not being any more logical than any other religious group.