1st sorry for the improper english, not native. One of my most favor modern authors really Richard Dawkins is. Loved the selfish gene and god the delusion wasnt any worse. Having little trouble with finishing Darwins origin of species being less readable than not scholar might prefer.
The question is when you define beleiver as the opposite to atheist and agnostic as the middle like in god delusion, how do you define anarchist that oppose all authoroty, insane? but the scientist say the beleivers are insane also if they dont follow their suggestions and the insane seek refuge from the beleivers.
Dont diss this because the improper english nor the logic or lack of it.