1. My response to the GOP evolution question

Comment #38068 by pawn on May 6, 2007 at 10:37 pm

It is not the concept of evolution that is flawed, it is the assumption that natural selection is the driving force behind evolution. Science has failed to provide an impetus for evolution as completely as religion has.

2. My response to the GOP evolution question

Comment #38065 by pawn on May 6, 2007 at 10:28 pm

To believe that natural selection is the sole driving force behind evolution requires as much faith as to believe that God is responsible. There is much evidence for evolution, but no hard evidence for the impetus behind it. Only religious and scientific theories that cannot be substantiated and that fail to fully justify it. Although evolution is undeniable, neither religion nor science has yet postulated a plausible reason for it.

3. Those fanatical atheists

Comment #38059 by pawn on May 6, 2007 at 10:09 pm

It is not the concept of evolution that is flawed, it is the assumption that natural selection is the driving force behind evolution. Science has failed to provide a plausible impetus for evolution as completely as religion has.

4. A Split Emerges as Conservatives Discuss Darwin

Comment #38052 by pawn on May 6, 2007 at 9:25 pm

It is not the concept of evolution that is flawed, it is the assumption that natural selection is the driving force behind evolution. Science has failed to provide an impetus for evolution as completely as religion has.