Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by Big City


1. Richard Dawkins interviewed by John Humphrys on Cardinal Murphy O'Connor

Comment #177628 by Big City on May 9, 2008 at 11:45 am

"But I think this is the first time I have heard any reputable spokesman...say that reason leads to terror and oppression."-Dawk

"Rum-balakasha-oom! In the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, I cast out the demon of the intellect!"

2. My Response to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Comment #177164 by Big City on May 8, 2008 at 5:13 pm

The letter by Boteach that Richard is responding to is extremely disheartening. It's whiney to a pathetic degree. It's very much like a little kid who gets flustered while pitching a fit and makes absolutely no point other than 'Oh no you didn't!'

3. Museums teach society lacking in science literacy

Comment #173099 by Big City on April 30, 2008 at 10:34 am

rod-the-farmer said:

Now, if there were something similar to display the scale of time since the formation of the earth, and the origin of life, then perhaps the kids and even fundies would start to understand just how much "room" there is/was for evolution to take place.

I'm pretty sure that Prof. Dawkins did just such an experiment on one of the DVDs for sell on this site. I think it was "Break the Science Barrier" but it might have been "Growing Up in the Universe". He goes to a classroom of schoolchildren, and brings posters of specific animals from the human lineage since before reptiles. Then he asks them to separate themselves at distances relative to the spans of time between these animals. Of course, it isn't long before the demonstration can't be carried out anymore, because the children would have to walk to neighboring cities!

4. A Conversation with Expelled's Associate Producer Mark Mathis

Comment #164928 by Big City on April 20, 2008 at 9:09 pm

This is nuts. What a slippery bastard.

OMG listen to part 2

For realsies.

5. Dawkins warns of human extinction

Comment #155280 by Big City on April 4, 2008 at 9:47 am

al-rawandi,
You forgot,"Christianity has many benefits.(health, positive thinking, charity)"

I've noted before how quickly Christians are willing to move from one 'proof' to the next, like they didn't put much stock in their previous argument, anyway.

6. Christian Founders 3D Adventure Computer Game

Comment #153018 by Big City on March 31, 2008 at 9:46 pm

How about the Left Behind video game?

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/13144.html

(If there's an ad at the beginning, you can fast-forward through it.)

7. Happy Birthday, Richard Dawkins!

Comment #150175 by Big City on March 26, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Happy Birthday, Professor Dawkins.

Hang on for the Singularity!

10. Richard Dawkins on The Alan Colmes Show

Comment #143906 by Big City on March 14, 2008 at 3:33 pm

I'm with forksmuggler, I didn't predict his personality at all.

Christians are their own worst enemies. They make complete fools of themselves at every opportunity.
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew.

11. I don't believe in atheists

Comment #143806 by Big City on March 14, 2008 at 12:44 pm

That's just a four and a half minute clip. It shows Hitchens working Hedges, though.
I think the whole speech has been taken off the internet. I could only find that clip and a highlight reel(both of them on zombietime).

13. I don't believe in atheists

Comment #143778 by Big City on March 14, 2008 at 12:00 pm

Does anyone know where we can get the whole Hitchens vs. Hedges debate?
As I'm sure you've noticed, it's been removed from YouTube and zombietime.

14. Bishop accuses gays of 'conspiracy' against the Catholic Church

Comment #143096 by Big City on March 13, 2008 at 12:46 pm

"These groups are defending their position, I am defending mine"

So somehow this makes them equally moral?

15. Crossing the Divide

Comment #140322 by Big City on March 7, 2008 at 6:18 am

Podaar, did you just change your avatar? I could swear it was different on the first page a second ago. Weird.

And, hey, I was adopted! Big ups!

16. Hebrew University researcher: Moses was tripping at Mount Sinai

Comment #139950 by Big City on March 6, 2008 at 7:36 pm

Wrought sez:

...so most of the population was on acid for a month or two.

I think I've heard about that. Ergot, wasn't it? I read that it was a common occurrence for people to go dancing and spinning in the street.

17. Hebrew University researcher: Moses was tripping at Mount Sinai

Comment #138851 by Big City on March 4, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Lucas said:

Let me tell you, such an experience changes you. Unfortunately, most people react stupidly and take their experience to be some sort of evidence of some mystical reality...
Fact. If you do salvia, you will immediately believe in some sort of transcendent Gaia bullshit. Our brains aren't meant to think like that.
Go to Youtube and search for 'salvia' to see what it does.
But don't do salvia. Seriously. Do mushrooms or acid or something.

This also reminds me of Julian Jaynes' The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.

18. Moral thinking

Comment #131655 by Big City on February 22, 2008 at 11:52 pm

I turn my back for one minute and you atheist nerds start talking about Star Trek. Heathens.

PS: TNG. End of story. TNG.

19. Fleabytes

Comment #130566 by Big City on February 20, 2008 at 10:09 pm

A magnum opus, Paula.

Excellent writing with no bullshit posturing.
A perfect antithesis to Christian literature, and a welcome addition to the arsenal.

20. Bill Moyers Interviews Susan Jacoby

Comment #129011 by Big City on February 18, 2008 at 1:40 pm

BicycleRepairMan,
I'm glad you beat me to that. An informed public is essential to the democratic process.

kintaro_crab,
Language is extremely important in politics. Especially when 24 hour news channels repeat sound-bites over and over again. People go with their gut reaction. Politicians use language to trick people who don't think about it too closely.
http://richarddawkins.net/article,2115,The-Mind-of-the-Market,Michael-Shermer

Also, before going on a rant about how smart the internet makes people, maybe you should proofread your comment for spelling and punctuation. Look up "run-on sentence" on Wikipedia.

22. Council pays psychic for exorcism

Comment #126488 by Big City on February 13, 2008 at 11:02 am

Is it illegal to advertise yourself as a exorcist in the phone book, then go to these people's houses and tell them there's no such things as ghosts?

23. Hitchens and Boteach Debate on God

Comment #125308 by Big City on February 11, 2008 at 8:11 am

Hitchens says that life can't survive on most parts of our planet, but haven't scientists found extremophiles in very hot and very cold parts of Earth? Isn't this why there is reason to think life may exist on planets that are very different from our own?

Rabbi Boteach says evodevo scientists never think mutation leads to advancement. Childish. Not only does it do so often, it brings with it a propensity to mutation. So not only do we accumulate beneficial traits, the method itself is passed down. Mutations occur at a beneficial rate.

Boteach reminds me of Screech.

25. Why Darwin matters

Comment #124149 by Big City on February 8, 2008 at 1:37 pm

I hate to agree with Styrer[notable edit], but in this case I do agree that it is best to address the issue. This is why we look to humanism for morality and not to an observation about nature.

26. Richard Dawkins on The Big Debate

Comment #117925 by Big City on January 30, 2008 at 1:55 am

On what the Bishop said at the very beginning:
"The Church of England has a rich history in that it essentially initiated organized religion."(paraphrased)
1)What does this have to do with modern schools? That argument implies America should still have slavery.
2)How does this apply to other faith schools? Should there only be Anglican religious schools?

On what the Catholic teacher, Louistas Nyuyse, said about school prayer:
"It helps other kids learn about Catholics and the Catholic kids grow in their faith."(paraphrased, again)
How is this not biased?

Also, I've never seen a Muslim defend Islam and not seem like a fanatic.

27. Interview with Richard Dawkins

Comment #116593 by Big City on January 26, 2008 at 7:18 pm

Also, it's very telling that as soon as an "excellent proof" for God's existence gets shot down, they move straight to Plan B, completely unfazed. It really shows how much stock they put in their own arguments.

28. Interview with Richard Dawkins

Comment #116592 by Big City on January 26, 2008 at 7:16 pm

That was pathetic. People need to learn the difference between what they think and what they know.

"I know the fossils aren't there, because I've never seen them!"

It's so damn frustrating.

29. The devilish church practice of exorcism

Comment #114254 by Big City on January 21, 2008 at 4:26 pm

babrock,
I'm pretty sure you can delete those 4 inadvertent posts.

30. Vatican slams California firm's cloning experiments

Comment #114252 by Big City on January 21, 2008 at 4:11 pm

cowalker said:

Just to be safe they could squeeze off a drop of sterile water into each petri dish and say "I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit." Bingo.

Mark my words: In ten years, this will be standard practice.

31. King Me!

Comment #113523 by Big City on January 19, 2008 at 10:35 pm

Atheists are arrogant in thinking that the rules of chess are meant to be understood. Chess has its reasons.

33. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #110113 by Big City on January 10, 2008 at 1:53 pm

Blake,
I, too, fail to understand how any sort of transfer of consciousness could be achieved through transfer of information. Honestly, though, I do believe what he says about the future of technology, in large part because I see the exponential rate of growth in that area to be mindblowing, even in my short lifetime. I do believe that nanotechnology will have the extreme affect that he says. Like I said, I question it, too, but I think this is largely a result of how unbelievable it seems now, not how impossible the task really is.

34. Richard Dawkins on The Late Edition with Marcus Brigstocke

Comment #110044 by Big City on January 10, 2008 at 11:24 am

Tyler,
Luke, Chapter 9, Verses 59-62:
[59] He said to another man, "Follow me." But the man replied, "Lord, first let me go and bury my father."
[60] Jesus said to him, "Let the dead bury their own dead, but you go and proclaim the kingdom of God."
[61] Still another said, "I will follow you, Lord; but first let me go back and say goodbye to my family."
[62] Jesus replied, "No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for service in the kingdom of God."

35. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #110035 by Big City on January 10, 2008 at 11:07 am

studiorat,
Stephen Hawking released a children's book recently that's been getting a little flack for being godless.

36. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #109829 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 9:30 pm

Amnis,
Transhumanism is the idea that humans have evolved to the point that we now have a means (technology) to supersede evolution. In other words, survival of the fittest and natural selection took a relatively long time, but got us to such an advanced level that we can take advancement into our own hands.

This fact, and its implications, means that we are becoming a level of human that is hardly comparable with, say, medieval man. We are already modifying ourselves in ways that they would think is magic. Soon we will merge with technology, and eventually, the boundary between us and computers will blur. Technology is making us posthuman. If you are looking for beginning information, I would search wikipedia for transhumanism or posthuman and follow the links and search for articles about the major players.

A great set of books on the topic, for any level of reader/interest, are Ray Kurzweil's "The Age of Spiritual Machines" and "The Singularity is Near". They are two of the most interesting books I have read. They should give you a very good grasp of the topic.

I honestly cannot recommend these books enough.

37. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #109773 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 4:44 pm

OsakaGuy,
Thanks a lot for that reference and link! Very helpful.

Everyone else,
The link to John Allen Paulos's Beyond Belief 07 speech that OsakaGuy posted earlier deals directly with the book. He reads excerpts from it and describes how people's misconceptions about math and probabilty affect the way they think about logic. It's very interesting. Reminds me of the Penn & Teller Bullshit episode "Numbers".

Now I understand how his profession is relevant to the topic.
But I still say most Christians see being smart as a flaw.

38. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #109732 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 3:08 pm

Stone,
That's hilarious, I have had that exact thought on the "admitted schmo" book, unfortunately, I still have to pay student loans in the meantime!

39. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #109730 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Quetzalcoatl,
I think you're point is consistent with what Baeoz said. "...if your favorite thing doesn't need a cause, then why does anything need a cause?" is a pretty good way to put it. You're pretty much using their logic to show them that their argument doesn't make sense (namely, Baeoz's first premise).

40. The Mind of the Market

Comment #109715 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 2:47 pm

Steve,
I 'half-agree' with you. The good doctor may know that he's being a bit weasely in his logic, but I think the reasoning of these people (including him and his audience) is "Now, I know this doesn't make sense, but how can I convince myself that it does?" Reconciling themselves with their rose tinted glasses, more than a deliberate misrepresentation. After all, they obviously believe it is true, that it must somehow be true.

42. Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up

Comment #109691 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 1:52 pm

I don't really understand how the author being a mathematician figures into the argument. I think that it may actually hurt the debate, considering a lot of Christians view science as an excuse to dismiss a point of view. "Oh, the scientists think their logic makes them smarter than God, little do they know, we don't care about logic."

43. The Mind of the Market

Comment #109644 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 11:22 am

epeeist,
I think your first theory on the hit counter is pretty plausible. I've been there a few times in the last hour just to convince myself they're being serious. Also, the comments on that post are pretty pathetic. Reminiscent of someone covering their ears and shouting "I'm not listening!"
(PS: TNG>DS9)

annabanana,
You see what happens to young ladies once they become atheists? They turn their back on the Lord, and they instantly become pimps. Sad fact.

44. The Mind of the Market

Comment #109631 by Big City on January 9, 2008 at 10:16 am

Damn you, Brian,
Atheismsucks just ruined my day. The most recent video post is one of the most ignorant things I've ever seen.
More evidence that Christianity is one big circle jerk. "How can we lie to ourselves and make it sound smart?"

annabanana,
I'm gonna need you to send that 'single, hot, atheist' my way, if you'd be so kind.

That having been said, this book seems pretty interesting. Any religion pales in comparison to evolutionary psychology, in my opinion.

45. Hook, line and rapture

Comment #109150 by Big City on January 8, 2008 at 12:44 pm

"...but it would be, if it were,"
This is great. The ending is hilarious and makes some really good points.

There's recently been an uproar here in Atlanta about the 'megachurches' and the extravagant homes their preachers own. The news interviews with the congregations make them seem like they don't have a problem with it.
If you guys haven't seen Pat Robertson's television show, you really should. Sow a seed of faith!

46. Sam Harris debate with Rabbi David Wolpe

Comment #108121 by Big City on January 6, 2008 at 4:14 am

I have to agree that Wolpe is more competent than D'Souza, but I'm with the Horsemen in that I really wish that one of these guys would put forth an argument that made me reconsider atheism.

I know they won't, because they're just running around shoving their fingers in the dam, but I really feel if I was a Christian (or Jew), that I would be bothered by their inability to make it flat-out obvious that there is a god. I know that when I was a Christian, I had never even heard an atheist argument, so I have to think the faithful in attendance have to at least be shaken a little.

Also, Wolpe lumps "there is a god" in with a lot of opinions. If you listen to the examples he gives of unscientific, unprovable statements, they're all personal opinions and value judgments, not facts about truth.

Also, the only reason the Civil War was so devastating to us was that every casualty on both sides was an American, so of course the American casualty rate is going to be high.

48. THE FOUR HORSEMEN - Available Now on DVD!

Comment #101112 by Big City on December 19, 2007 at 10:04 pm

walk and Graham,
I, for one, smoked off and on for 4 or 5 years and never felt any sort of addiction or 'need' for a cigarette. It's been about two years since I've smoked a cigarette and I could still take it or leave it.

49. THE FOUR HORSEMEN - Available Now on DVD!

Comment #101110 by Big City on December 19, 2007 at 9:57 pm

Jesus Christ, Cartomancer, just go to YouTube if you're gonna rant.

50. 'Growing Up in the Universe' now available free online

Comment #98636 by Big City on December 14, 2007 at 1:02 am

I had never seen this before, and just got through with the series. I kept thinking, "I wish I had seen this as a kid."

I grew up in the Bible Belt, and the only biology we learned was to emphasize God's glorious plan. No one there has science explained to them like this (at least not in school), and as a result, no one I grew up with cared about science. It was just seen as another of God's mysterious ways.

If I saw this when it came out (I was like 8), I'd probably be a scientist right now.

More Pages: 1 2 | Next