1. Common New Atheist Fallacies

Comment #200714 by marting on June 28, 2008 at 6:34 am

Wow, the bit qouting the god delusion at the end made a little sense to me. So, on a hunch, I grabbed my copy and read that part. And then I looked at the context. And of course it turns out that Koukl completely misrepresents the context.

What Richard Dawkins does:
Disprove argument for god.
Disprove argument for god.
Disprove argument for god.
...
All arguments exhausted, therefore there most certainly is no god.

What Koukl claims he dos:
Disprove argument for intelligent design.
Therefore there is most certainly no god.

Could Koukl really have made an honest mistake here? Personally, I don't think so.

2. Vote on freedom of expression marks the end of Universal Human Rights

Comment #152907 by marting on March 31, 2008 at 5:30 pm

Please, please tell me this is not real.