1. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313517 by isthatclear on January 6, 2009 at 8:31 am

(Yes, they do unfortunately - Wooter is a special case and regularly scores a good 60 to 100 Hovinds with his posts.)

Philip1978

Your answers I quoted here are showing us how smart you are(!)


(I am in awe of how utterly daft he is, I am usually against feeding the trolls but I get such enjoyment out of seeing him try and thrash away at people far more knowledgeable than he is AND actually thinking he is doing a good thing!)

We enjoy ourselves as well when you write back though we are totally clueless what you are talking about – rather than seeing a guy who is entertaining himself with his illogical answers; now check it out;

(The stupidity and way of thinking is fascinating, its like trying to understand gravity - I will bet there is an answer, there has to be, science may one day find that)

So gravity and how the planets happened in the first place are under the investigation of science and some day they will find it. That is a relief. So I guess we make a list of questions that evolins pass the ball; So the third one is entering the list; How come a fetus comes to life?

Dawkins, can you help your evolins? This is fascinating when we see evolins getting stuck

2. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313278 by isthatclear on January 6, 2009 at 1:43 am

Yes evolins, me and entire world, are all ears.

Now Mr IQ and dawkins how that small fetus gets bigger and comes to alive and moves?

Blindwatcmaker or luck and chances methinking?

Mr dawkins, are you sweating or stutering or hiding?

3. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313271 by isthatclear on January 6, 2009 at 1:32 am

Brian English is getting bright(!)
(You didn't ask what was the result of an abortion. You asked what was different between an abortion and a person. You silly fool.)

My question: what is the diffrence between killing a person and abortion?

Is it? Man, it is really getting funny. Now evolins even cannot understand one simple question? Are you evolving(?)into something?


(Have you ever seen a 2 month fetus survive outside the womb? Are you seriously telling me it is a person? You are showing your IQ to the world.)
. Now Mr IQ and dawkins how that small fetus gets bigger and comes to alive and moves?

Blindwatcmaker or luck and chances methinking?

Really? How a fetus comes to life(if parents are not athiets)

4. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313198 by isthatclear on January 5, 2009 at 11:25 pm

One is a human, the other is a medical procedure. There, not too difficult was it?

Are you serious when you answer to my questions, what is the diffrence between killing a person and abortion?

Man! all unborn babies are medical procedures(!) that is incredible evolins; you are showing your IQ to entire world

Mr dawkins do not ban my sudents' questions in your head; you are gonna be delusional more; face them if you can


Rootsquare or whatever

Who are u? Are you joke?

Laurie frasier

you can do better, pal. Just hit your head on the wall and keep saying not enough evidence not enough evidence in the exhibition of The earth.

5. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313197 by isthatclear on January 5, 2009 at 11:14 pm

Mr dawkins you just BANned MY QUESTIONS AGAIN? This is not good and it is very hideous. I am writing and you are deleting as if i did not write it? How do you feel?

6. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #313059 by isthatclear on January 5, 2009 at 8:30 pm

Mr dawkins says
early abortions is okay?

So what is the difference between killing a human being and abortion?

My students keep asking;
another one , Mr Dawkins

There you go;

How do you explain the spider's creation with your delusion? fangs, poison, sticky silk, etc

coincidence, luck and chances, so complicated that you can't reason with it!( I like this funny answer from evolins)

7. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #311652 by isthatclear on January 3, 2009 at 9:15 pm

IF they would have they would not come up with such a delusional idea, ET?

8. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #311651 by isthatclear on January 3, 2009 at 9:13 pm

What atheist can do? Can they have babies?

I guess not. Since they live their present time and claim that they have no mind, then, they can act like animals; Ooops, animals have babies; so they can be some kind of creatures like aliens which fit in ET; They can live off limits, homesexuality, Lesbians, etc since they cannot think because they have no minds. iF THEY WOULD HAVE


Second question Mr dawkins

How do you explain the gravity with ET(not movie short for evolution theory) As we know without gravity, we cannot survive! So is it evolved from something? Blindwatcmaker or sky sieve? Coincidence, luck, menotthinking.

9. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions - 28th Dec 2008

Comment #311650 by isthatclear on January 3, 2009 at 9:11 pm

Mr Dawkins, my students’ BIGquestionS are accumulating by going unanswered except a few funny ones (samples are below) which are being clown? We are all waiting anxiously!

I repeat my question: How do you explain conscious and mind in Human beings? Your silence is discrediting your delusional, fairy tale story, evolution, more! All my students are waiting for your answer!

Evolin 1:( isthatclear- How do you know human beings have mind? Dont you know that god makes mind in magic toaster. What does god put in toaster? God knows!) By sarmatel?

Evolin 2:( Neurons. Now fuck off.) by Diacanu

And may answer to sarmatel:

If you have no mind, then, you are no different from an animal. If you can think about past present and future times - that we do - we have mind. For animals, they have got only present time, they eat, use the toilet and sleep. So atheits will fit in __________?

10. What do atheists do at Christmas?

Comment #311649 by isthatclear on January 3, 2009 at 8:51 pm

isthatclear-
How do you know human beings have mind? Dont you know that god makes mind in magic toaster. What does god put in toaster? God knows!)

If you have no mind, then, you are no different from an animal. If you can think about past present and future times - that we do - we have mind. For animals, they have got only present time, they eat, use the toilet and sleep. So atheits will fit in __________?

Sarmatel

This is for you;

What about blindwatcmaker ? Does it have a toaster to spell the GRAVITY for the earth? Or Gravity just evolved(!) like other planets? popped up?

11. What do atheists do at Christmas?

Comment #308336 by isthatclear on December 29, 2008 at 8:26 pm

Decius

How is your self-indulging going? Happy? Pretending to be happy? So what do you think about dying? Some day we are all gonna die? You me all these guys on this web page? Even Dawkins!
So what is gonna happen then? Your soul, your mind?

Mr Dawkins

I repeat my question: How do you explain conscious and mind in Human beings? Your silence is discrediting your delusional, fairy tale story, evolution, more! All my students are waiting for your answer!

12. What do atheists do at Christmas?

Comment #307983 by isthatclear on December 29, 2008 at 8:12 am

isthatclear -

(You know, I'm amazed you have the skill to turn on a computer.)

No I have got an atheist guys’ computer; it turns on and off itself when I say the magic word, dawkins(!)


Alrawandi
(I suggesting make to get a fish, what is my cousin….)
Please when you write English, be clear. I see evolution tree effects on your tread. Take it easy and keep an eye on the worm.



Decius,
Self-descriptive


The whitepearl
Onthewooters, indeed. It's ok I think I can handle it. Tonight I am D&P. ;)

Handle with me? I thought you hooked up with girly magazines. You cannot handle with me nor my Logic.

TO MR DAWKINS

One of my gifted students have a question:

How do you explain mind of human beings? We can think, judge, sense, dream etc. What is that evolved from?

13. What do atheists do at Christmas?

Comment #306158 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 7:11 am

Dawkins
here is an idea what atheists can do in Christsmas!

They can buy a worm and just say all their magical blindwatchmaker spells, add up some methinking, as much as luck and chances, some improbable spice and wait for the worm to turn into A Turkey.

Please you have to cook the Turkey once you have it through evolution(!). It cannot be cooked by itself. You know nothing can happen by itself. Otherwise you will be like my atheist neighbour who has been waiting for His Turkey to be cooked for a long time.

14. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306153 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 7:04 am

Sorry Pal, on this web page, having degrees do not mean anything since evolins run for it. You know what I have to get back to another atheist who is waiting for a fish to turn into a frog? I have to convince him!

Take it easy! Just be careful about spelling. You are doing good otherwise.

15. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306116 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 5:07 am

Philip now you have an answer that suits you. Dawkins has got a lot of degree but still says fish is my cousin.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHA!

ROTFLMFAO!

Take is easy philip\


Frasier
don't get mad. Your english is like an evolution tree so are your eyes. Thanks your your self-description though.

16. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306064 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 4:29 am

Take it easy steve. You are out of my League. You are so smart(!) smarter than your cousin fish

17. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306056 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 4:24 am

Steve and eepist

Out of luck and out of chance, ha?

18. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306052 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 4:21 am

I can reply late not because i am scared but I am busy convincing an atheist who stands in front of an elephat and tries to make friends with fish; he insists that they are related. Oh man It is gonna be a long day.

19. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306050 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 4:19 am

SALEXc

(you think your deity was responsible, may I point you in the direction of the "infinite regress" argument; namely, who made your god?)

I am overwhelmed by your reply. God is the creator that created us, who cannot be created, and this question is like a very last resort for evolins when they are stuck.

There is a beautiful ship like earth floating around the sun and itself itself at the same time to make years and days and nights for us apart from this, on this ship like earth everything is ready; food, water air, protection, best heater like sun etc

Now you are saying that if you do not see the designer of ship or the funny question who created the designer, is not answered, we can surely get back to the funny idea that well-designed ship has no designer. Luck and chances did it.

Sorry! This is really funny? Funnier that funny.

Okay one million dollar questios; check the following pages and tell me how do you explain the harmony and cooperation between lungs, oxygen, carbondioxide, trees, light, sun, photoshthesis?

Please don't get funny by saying that luck and chances.


http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/faculty/farabee/BIOBK/BioBookPS.html

http://www.caroline-webb.com/Writings_Purpose.htm

http://e-articles.info/e/a/title/General-Discussion-about-Photosynthesis-and-Light/

20. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306022 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 3:57 am

Once there was a guy who believed that everything happened by themselves or luck and chances. His name was Blindwatcmaker. Blindwatchmaker did not believe that there is a creator. His close friend was a believer and his name was Eyeopener. His job was to make medicine according to the doctor’s prescription. One day Blindwatchmaker came upon and asked Eyeopener to make a medicine. Eyeopener said “okay”, and told Blindwatchmaker that he would call him when the medicine was ready. One week was gone but yet there was no news from Eyeopener. One month was gone but still were no news. Blindwatcmaker decided to go to Eyeopener’s pharmacy and asked what it took him so long to make a medicine. The conversation ran as following;

Blindwatchmaker: What’s up, Eyeopener? It is more than one month but still no medicine.
Eyeopener: No worries! I prepared all the ingredients and placed them in the jars. Now all the jars are on the table. I am just waiting for any luck or chances or any outside wind or something that could knock all the jars onto the floor so that ingredients cam mix and your medicine can be done.

Blindwatchmaker:Are you CRAZY? How come there will be wind in a closed place.

Eyeopener: Then you will not be lucky.

Blindwatchmaker: Even though the jars are knocked down, how the ingredients will be mixed with the exact amount? A little less or a little more can cause the medicine to be poison.

Eyeopener: You are right. So are DNA and Molecules. How come molecules can join together by luck and chances in a Dna to get right combination so that the structure come out perfectly? One small mistake can cause a great misery.

Blindwatchmaker: But?

Eyeopener: Look pal! You just think. This is what you need. Think about millions of creatures with different DNA structures with right DNA coding. Improbable is not the word enough to describe your idea that everything happened by chances.

Blindwatchmaker: I guess you are right. I should have gone blind. I need to change my name too from now on. No more, blindwatchmaker. Now my name is CLEARMIND.

21. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #306019 by isthatclear on December 24, 2008 at 3:55 am

Hold the phone? Whp is scared? Am I? Oh Man! So funny. I am scared if only I look at the evolution tree and think about my great greatfather worm and my lunch cousin fish.

Philip still you are dodgin in your own funny way.

A vast universe and well-designed universe has no designer because it is vast? Come on you can do better.

(Bloody hell, you actually have a problem with evolution by natural selection being luck or chance but are more than happy to accept the luck and chance of it actually being YOUR particular god?)

Now you accept that luck and chances are accpted in Evolution? Are you conflucting with yourself?
Please make a decision? Are they in or out? Let me help you with a role-play I prepared for my students? Have fun and Think.

22. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #305292 by isthatclear on December 22, 2008 at 10:13 pm

IMPROBABILTY OF EVOLUTION

If you see a table with scrabbled letters and if you throw them in the air or close your eyes and put them in order by your hands while you do not see letters, what are the chances you write the down the sentence

EVOLUTIONISJUSTAFAIRYTALE.

This analogy is done for DNA coding.

Luck&chances or intelligent designer? A one million dollar question?

23. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #305284 by isthatclear on December 22, 2008 at 9:55 pm

Dawkins argues that while ‘a rock can weather into the shape of a nose seen from a certain vantage point’,[14] such a rock is designoid. Mt. Rushmore, on the other hand, is clearly not designoid: ‘Its four heads are clearly designed,’[15] argues Dawkins, because: ‘The sheer number of details [i.e. the amount of complexity] in which the Mount Rushmore faces resemble the real things [i.e. the complexity fits four specifications] is too great to have come about by chance.’[16] In terms of mere possibility, says Dawkins: ‘The weather could have done the same job. . . But of all the possible ways of weathering a mountain, only a tiny minority would be speaking likenesses of four particular human beings.’[17] Hence: ‘Even if we didn’t know the history of Mount Rushmore, we’d estimate the odds against its four heads being carved by accidental weathering as astronomically high. . .’[18] When Dawkins doesn’t rule out design from the start, he deploys what is clearly a version of mathematician William A. Dembski’s ‘Explanatory Filter’ which posits intelligent design as the best explanation for examples of specified complexity.

quoted from
http://www.arn.org/docs/williams/pw_purposeoflife.htm

Philip
luck or chances is your delusional conception you base evolution on it. The discussion on luck anv chances is clearly presented on the website.

I just wonder when you will quit dodging the question of luck and chances once it is proved that creation of millions of species cannot be based on luck and chances. Please stop dodging the question by saying that luck and chances have nothing to do with evolution. Your mentor dawkins says otherwise? So is there another dilemma?

24. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #305281 by isthatclear on December 22, 2008 at 9:44 pm

Now I am from Nigerai! That is getting weird and weird. Does it matter, hungarian? As long as you are a human being with logic amd reason, No matter where you are from? Gotcha? Delusion Land is exception. Evolins' country is out of option/reason/logic.

25. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #305277 by isthatclear on December 22, 2008 at 9:40 pm

Dear evolins

Take it easy. They are just my students. You should not be so upset. See Dawkins! He is self-entertaining (or self assuring)himself by new -trend of interviews.

Just read the interwiew my students are having with Mr Dawkins. There will be some good questions.

26. Jimmy Carr on Richard Dawkins

Comment #304781 by isthatclear on December 22, 2008 at 6:41 am

GIFTED STUDENTS TRY TO HELP DAWKINS IN TERMS OF LOGIC.

Gifted students have an interview with Dawkins.

Gifted student: Mr Dawkins before our teacher clearmind has an interview with you, he asked us to have one first? How are you doing sir?

Dawkins: Busy busy busy as busy as a bee? Interviess, you know!

Gifted student: So speaking of bees, how do they make the honey as the best mathematician like works?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,3895593,00.html

Dawkins: Not God Of course, ha ha ha!

Gifted student: Then who?

Dawkins: This is very complicated topic. Bees did not learn anything to make honeycombs. Just luck and chances.

Gifted student: But the web page above says the quite opposite. They make honeycomb in the best useful way apart from dodging the question for you that how they survived according to your evolution story?

Dawkins:: Look kids, if I were you, I would get busy watching Harry Potter. Fantasy stories etc. Leave the science to us, okay!

Gifted student: We quoted a line one of your comments;

28. Comment #272482 by Richard Dawkins on October 27, 2008 at 1:42 pm
(……. I was talking about magic spells, turning princes into frogs and things like that. That is not science fiction, that is fairy tales.)

Gifted student: No offense, Mr Dawkins but your evolution story is nothing but a fairy tale story; You are turning the princess into frog, but you are saying that millions kinds of species just turned just from a great grandfather worm or a cousin fish turned into millions kinds of species? This is not even a fairy tale. The fairy tales know they logical limitations.


Dawkins: Look kids, evolution is a process not a fairy tale, okay. A process that it began in the sky then it landed on the earth, and then, …..


Gifted student: Sorry to interrupt? If so, who started the process?

Dawkins: Luck and chances.

Gifted student: Luck and chances have no conscious, wisdom and knowledge that they can think of millions of creatures and their extraordinary cooperation and communication to serve human being in the best interest. Okay Mr dawkins, let’s take a break. You are sweating. Just cool down. Take it easy.


To be continued.

27. Richard Dawkins and Aubrey Manning

Comment #297766 by isthatclear on December 5, 2008 at 6:00 pm

Don't miss it out.

Mr dawkins interwies with clearmind.



Mr dawkins, me and rest of the world is still waiting for your reply for millions of transitional bones that linger in your delusional world' Evasive, slandering, banning, which one do you choose'

28. Why we believe in gods

Comment #296704 by isthatclear on December 4, 2008 at 2:11 am

Irate atheist

Cunt is a transitional bones that was found? Or you are describing yourself? Hmm check the rules. Second option.

(Darwinism strikes me as one of the most successful scientific theories there are, indeed as one of the greatest intellectual achievements of the human mind.)

(Any comments)

Yeah I have got one?

Any transitional bones?


(No mention of worms?)

Nope! We deal now with fish cousins upon dawkins’s latest delusion.

Philip

Don’t be evasive by trying to answer my question by asking questions. First answer mine?

How many transitional bones do you need to prove Evolution delusion and how many did you find it so far?

Titania,
I asked the questions and you did not answer. You can check my previous answers. Please do not crack decius UP. Titania your kindness is really killing me softly.

TYler
No I am in Russia fishing around my cousin fishes. Oh man I like Dawkins. He is a quite laughter for my leisure time.

29. Why we believe in gods

Comment #294645 by isthatclear on December 1, 2008 at 8:32 am

BRIAN ENGLISH

You are thinkıng backward. The whole unıverse ıs created by God and you know what ı mean. The world has got many buıldıngs and many artcıtectures etc ıs not way to brıng an argument agaınt mıne. Thıs ıs just beıng a clown ın the cırcus of vocabulary.

My question ıs : Even a mini model of solar system requires a maker, how come the real one does not have a maker'

So'

Philip

You are beıng evasıve again ın your own way. We are not dıscussıng what relıgion or else we are discussing a resonable question

Even a mini model of solar system requires a maker, how come the real one does not have a maker'

So' Can you answer it' If you can,t you better be quiet. Better than talking nonsense.

Lee, CHINESE MATE

You better stay out of this argument. You know what I mean' Sınce you popped up a questıon that can be answered even by a kındergarten kid, your IQ does not fit in this argument. How about a bowl of rıce'

ROGERSTANDAWAY

Thanks for brief slef-descripıon of yourself. What about my question'

I wıll pop up another one for you' How many transtional bones do you need to prove evolutıon ıf you consıder trantıon perıods for mıllıon kınds of specıes'

Good rıddance!

Phatbat

I am the master of analogıes. Take ıt easy. So what do you say about the number of transitional bones you have to fınd for evolutıon' Being evasıve again'

Alan baylıs

What about the versıon of realıty about mıllıons of transitional bones that do not exist' What about a few fabricated ones' Can they help'

Frankus

There ıs a job vacancy ın the cırcus. Go try ıt. Lookıng for a clown.

Bonzaı
The level of your answer shows your IQ. Congrats. Keep it up.

SAERAIN and D ARCY


Then how the vulnerable sheep survıved or ducks or antelopes' Creatıon ıs not a fıt ın or dıe game. Okay let me smash you!

Trees, sunlıght, human beıng lungs, oxygen, carban dioaxide, blood, heart, photosyntesis, how do you explaın the cooperatıon and harmony between these creations' This is my questıon as well form y gıfted class and they all answered very well!

YES Mr DAWKINS WHAT DO YOU SAY' Me and my students are challengıng you!

Please dont start wıth survıve – fıt -crab. Just cut the crab and get me an answer, IF YOU CAN!

How many transtional bones do you need to prove evolutıon ıf you consıder trantıon perıods for mıllıon kınds of specıes'
And thıs ıs my second questıon mr dawkıns.

We are all ears.


MAY REASON WITH YOU ALL

30. The Sea Turtle's Tale: Back to the sea, and back again to the land

Comment #294600 by isthatclear on December 1, 2008 at 7:48 am

well well my beloved evolıns, you are at it again.
(accept there is a god without any evidence)

ıf you see the solar system as the best art and desıgned archıtecture, say where ıs your evidence. ı wıll send you to ıq test center.

you just hug one hoax turtle transtıonal make -up bone and play with the words to evade the realıty of unfound mıllıons of transitıonal bones of specıes and yet scream where ıs evıdence' agree where ıs your evıdence for transional bones of mıllıons creatures' Thıs ıs our topıc this month'

Yes Mr dawkıns, where are you' Hıdıng or you play ostrıch'

31. Why we believe in gods

Comment #292566 by isthatclear on November 28, 2008 at 1:27 am

(but they don't NEED religion. It's an attempt to answer the question: "Why is religion seemingly everywhere?")

Why not? Where there is an art, there must be an artist. Can you tell me any place that there is no creation? Space or earth? Anywhere? Let me put it this way?

There is a very updated mini model of solar system, universe and the life on the earth with all millions kinds of animals, vegetables, air, and human being and it is showed very clearly how beautiful harmony, cooperation between animals and plants and human beings like plants, oxygen, lungs of human beings or cows, grass, milk and beef and even the clothes. All the audience are amazed and overwhelmed by the art of the mini model of solar system and the earth. But a few guys called evolins claim that the model happened by it self or chances or one material turned into another one which turned another one by itself then there you go, the solar system and universe came out.

All the audience called 911 right away to ask for mental help for those guys, screaming, yelling and shouting “ all happened by itself all happened by itself”

Even a mini model of solar system requires a maker, how come the real one does not have a maker?

Religion is everywhere because where we look at we see the amazing God’s art not a transitional animal bones?

32. The Sea Turtle's Tale: Back to the sea, and back again to the land

Comment #292556 by isthatclear on November 28, 2008 at 1:05 am

There you go: see the evolins' IQ and intellectual level:

I asked;
Mr Dawkins
can you tell us how may transtional bones do we have to find out to prove your idea?

and evolins's answers

Me:
is wooter a cunt'

Fuck off. You're either an idiot or a liar. For your sake, I hope you're just a liar.

How many transitional fossils do you need to disprove your beliefs?

He said to tell you you're a cunt
replied "When is wooter not a cunt?"


ALL fossils are transitional fossils,(hmm very convincing. Where is your 'ALL?"

I rest my case. The answers show the reality. How cunt evolins are in reason and thinking.(oops they do not think. They just delude.)


As for Mr Dawkins,

still thinking. It is not easy, difficult, impossible, not a chance to find out millions of transitional bones or not to be stupid enough to claim that some day we will find ALL, VAAL'S ALL?

Good riddance Mr dawkins.

33. The Sea Turtle's Tale: Back to the sea, and back again to the land

Comment #291922 by isthatclear on November 27, 2008 at 1:20 am

Mr Dawkins

can you tell us how may transtional bones do we have to find out to prove your idea?

fhalf-fish half frog or half elephant -half butterfly or half dog half horse or half human being and half ape? seriously are you really serious about this improbable mountain of transtional bones linging over in your delusinal world?

34. The Sea Turtle's Tale: Back to the sea, and back again to the land

Comment #291914 by isthatclear on November 27, 2008 at 1:15 am

But it's not also feathered, and has no gills. It's still just a shell-less turtle, and so remains within the same kind.

Brian, how is that?

You are showing us only one transitional crazy made up animal like thing and you have got already answer in discussion form to refute it by itself. Now be smart if you can! How many species we have and do the math how many transtional bones do we have dig up? Or I would say we should have found out so far? Gimme a break. What kind of delusion is this? One of a kind?

35. The Sea Turtle's Tale: Back to the sea, and back again to the land

Comment #291741 by isthatclear on November 26, 2008 at 5:43 pm

(here is evidence that all modern turtles are descended from a terrestrial ancestor who lived before most of the dinosaurs)

Dinosaur : i am your great great ...grandpa. bow to me.

turtle: Are you pulling my leg?

Dinosaur : I am not. Don’t you see the resemblance between you and me.

turtle: tell me about it. You and me like Butterfly and Whale. One is flying and other si swimming; size does not matter even the brain size right? what about the transitional periods and the transitional animal bones? I mean half turtle half dinosaur? So funny.

Dina sour : This is so complicated. You would not understand.

turtle: yeah, right. try me my logic and science. what is your scientific evidence? Your evolution is totally sucks. You make one assumption by building on another assumption. So when the first assumption is FALSE, there you go, you evolution house made up by false assumptions like a paper foundation and bricks is knocked down by logic and science in the first place.

Dinosaur : but no transitional bones, you just popped out of me. that is it.

Turtle: Look pal. do tell your stories to your self but nobody else. otherwise you will be deemed as a clown that entertains people with illogical stories.

dinosaur : I will call Mr. dawkins and you will see what it is.

Turtle : That dawkins! oh man I heard that last time the fleas mocked him so badly. Bring him on. It is my turn.

36. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God

Comment #279224 by isthatclear on November 5, 2008 at 5:51 pm

peanutsplatter
(if he was as frank and honest as Professor Dawkins is.)

If dawkins "is" honest and frank then the rest of the world "were" honest and frank too.

Dawkins is good at
distorting the facts as he did while saying there are only 8 believers among nobe-prize holders

being evasive to ditch the logical questions through TRYING TO BE FUNNY.

blind and not objective; at the back his delusional book god delusion he just quoted the swears (most are made up by him, i believe) of believers as if he is not swearing when he is offended or atheists never swear.

If I have time I will make a swearing dictionary out of the ones atheist wrote on this web page.

Get real get the picture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

37. Interview with Richard Dawkins on fairy tales and retirement

Comment #277452 by isthatclear on November 3, 2008 at 9:07 pm

To frankus

Mr frankestain, how do you explain the sun's working whithout needing anything formillion years or its perfect location to the earth not too close or far away?

blindwatcmaker, maybe natural selection in the sky, strong planets survived and helium popped up and landed on sun and there you go; we can get the heat from the sun?

Oh man! please go eat some of your cousins to feed your IQ if any or watch your mentor(!)

To watch a very funny video - evolotion stumped- do the followings

1. get You tube
2. write down Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question
3. click on the video and have fun

I watch it every day. it is very entertaining. Thank God I am a believer

38. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #277163 by isthatclear on November 3, 2008 at 6:42 am

To alan Baylis:

(In all the months that we’ve been trying, all we get is “lalalalala” and that his IQ is much greater than ours and that he has proved evolution wrong with his own LOGIC!)

Let’s talk about IQ matters again and evolins’ logic

Go to You tube and write down

Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question,

watch the video and judge it yourself. You can have fun too.

Roger cantstand;

(Patronising creep. Wooter, you are so utterly stupid that even if you accepted evolution everyone here would still think you are bonkers.)

Check the video above see who the bonker is. Have fun.


Frankus says It is a strategy of unconscious self-deception. It is a strategy of which he is unaware perhaps.

I totally agree. ET is an unconscious self deception that goes to the level of delusion.


Alan baylis again!
I have noticed the odd person wistfully asking where all Christians have gone. All we seem to be left with lately is wooter!

I am here. Alan. No worries. Once dawkins gets retired (or gets tired of writing, talking, lecturing to prove that fish are our cousins) from evolution, I will be leaving too

39. Interview with Richard Dawkins on fairy tales and retirement

Comment #277149 by isthatclear on November 3, 2008 at 6:22 am

(Stop feeding him, although he is actually funny.)

Let's get funnier decius.
I am eating my fish cousins now. Please don't bother me.

Mr dawkins, are you really serious, i mean really serious that fish are cousins? Please tell entire world that you are joking?

40. Interview with Richard Dawkins on fairy tales and retirement

Comment #276635 by isthatclear on November 2, 2008 at 7:54 am

To vinelectric

(They provide their own energy They provide their own energy (stars), they are self propelled (planetary orbits) and, as you see in nice pictures of the Hubble space telescope, they are born spontaneously in regions of dense gas in the universe and go out, poof!, just like that.)

So you’re saying that the location of all planets are random and distance between earth and sun is just popped up at the best that we are not vaporized or be frozen, the happening of days and nights have nothing to do with planets and sun’s structure was designed, sorry I slipped happened so perfect that it has been burning for million years without any gas or coal

And

(Then look at your own body. The are no straight lines or perfect circles. Your heart rate varies from beat to beat. Each cycle of cell replication produces some minor ariation or genetic error.)

You are saying that our body, heart, blood vessels, white and red blood cells, lungs, stomach, intestines, and brain are not working in harmony to sustain our lives and the sicknesses and other babies who are born sick or crippled has nothing to do with drugs, aids, alcohol, smoking, etc but just proves that we are not created by God'

I am seriously asking “ are you serious' “


To Vaal

So when the last step of delusion came. One of monkeys said, I will be human being.(The other monkeys said “ me too me too.) But the CHOSEN MONKEY SAID, NO BLINDWATCHMAKER CHOSE ME. You will stay monkeys. But how' Good God' What about my hair on my face' I gotta hit my face do that hair can fall out. It is in the job description. But What about the female monkey human being' Male and female monkey, evolution, deception, delusion, please help me Dawkins'

Dawkins: I am busy writing the et books for kids. Don’t bother me.


Styre:

I teach children but I can’t teach evolins

41. Interview with Richard Dawkins on fairy tales and retirement

Comment #275531 by isthatclear on October 31, 2008 at 9:33 am

(Why are you afraid of evolution')
nope I am afraid of hearing that fısh is my cousın.
http://hk.youtube.com/watch'v=zaKryi3605g


vaal
you mean your cousin monkeys' They are busy shavıng theır face hair to look lıke you.

TYler

Nıce try. You can check my fırst comments. Or you can just look at yourself and see. Who created you created entıre earth lıke a very bıg ship decorated all useful thıngs to sustain our lıves. Products require a desıgner. A paintıng requıres an artıst. A robot requires a maker so human being requires a creator.

Fuller go play with bertrand Russell who scareams not enough evidence not enough evidence.as for beıng coherent you check your evolutıon tree.

Frasıer

Stıll dare to wrıte about me. Come on. I thought you quıt gettıng mocked by me.

(a teacher of actual live children.)

Much better than dawkıns
http://hk.youtube.com/watch'v=zaKryi3605g


My chınes pal gordon
Stıll survıve my mockıng'

Jamcam187

(Believing that the universe just "popped up" is exactly the kind of thing religious people say. For example, when asked, "How did the universe begin'" A likely reply is "God just created it that way". This is equivalent to saying "it just happened as if by magic")

If you see a mını model of solar system and claim that a wızard made it or WORSE, IT CAME OUT BY CHANCE AND LUCK people wıll think that you are crazy. But if you say a scıentıst made ıt wıth hıs knowledge then ıt ıs reasonable. How come a model solar system needs a desıgner but the real model system has no desıgner'

Dırus

You can be a fun dawkıns but dont be a funny topic of reason

42. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #275520 by isthatclear on October 31, 2008 at 9:12 am

Zora
That is certainly true.
Yep that is why I dont believe that fish ıs my cousın.


Philip
How is your fish cousins doing' IQ fish and my cousin

And check it out another IQ level of an evolıns.

http://hk.youtube.com/watch'v=zaKryi3605g

tıtanıa

no worries I am always here to watch over evolıns. You too.

43. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #275252 by isthatclear on October 31, 2008 at 3:02 am

Tarania
In the first place, I tried to reason with atheists but none of them have the same IQ as me. So It turned out to be mocking and getting mocked battle rather than discussing. So let me try it one more time with you.

I agree that there might be a big bang. In Holy books, they are described clearly.

In Bible
http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/4-22-2006-94124.asp


In Qur’an
http://us2.fmanager.net/api_v1/productDetail.php?dev-t=EDCRFV&objectId=3344


In Old testament
http://judaism.ajula.edu/Content/ContentUnit.asp?CID=1525&u=1542&t=0


I will get back to you with more. I gotta go.

44. Interview with Richard Dawkins on fairy tales and retirement

Comment #274436 by isthatclear on October 30, 2008 at 4:23 am

Evolution book for kids.


Travel in Future

Fairy tales
Long long time ago, while nothing happened, out of nowhere, the universe just popped up. Then there was a big huge sky sieve that strong planets survived and
weak ones were gone. The strong ones came in order by the wizard of luck and chances, and suddenly the sun and all planets are designed in perfect order amazingly. The location of sun, the earth and the moon were so perfect that day and nights and seasons started happening in order. Then the wizard of Luck and chances with his magic stick started sowing chemicals on the planets and those chemicals started raining on the earth. Then another wizard of blindwatcmaker came in. He started using his magical stick, which is using it to find his way as well to find the way, and making Dnas and then DNAS turned into worms and vegetables, fishes which turned into reptiles, birds, lizards, monkeys, zebras and finally human being. ( wizard caught the selfish gene(genie) as well who was trying to run away)The Blindwatcmaker wizard was so tired. He had done hell a lot of job. He tried to hold his stick which was so hot because of over working but he could not and he said, I am able to make the soul; it is not in job description. He changed one of fish into dog and he went home.

Dawkins: Okay kids, how is my story?

Class(in a jaw-dropped manner): Mr Dawkins, tis is just a fairy story, right?

Dawkins: Of course, it is not. This is the version of evolution for the kids.

Class: Please tell us that you are kidding?

Dawkins: Nope!

Class: But Mr Dawkins, millions of creatures cannot turn into one another wityh different DNA structure.

Dawkins: It is so complex. You cannot understand it.

Class: Sir, no offense, but you are trying to tell us that this math book changed into geography book and wan t us to believe that? this is absolutely an insult to our logic and reason. Okay guys let’s go!

Dawkins: Where are you going? I did not finish my class yet. I have got more delusions, sorry, fairy tales.

Class: Sorry mr Dawkins. We are through with you. We have got another class with Mr Clearmind; He is teaching us creation through Science. Take Mr Clearmind’s advice and retire from everything.

45. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #274384 by isthatclear on October 30, 2008 at 3:02 am

("Do not fear when your enemies criticize you. Beware when they applaud.")

Evolution idea is good. It is very reasonable. I believe that I came from a worm. Now I do not step on the ground for fear that I can crash one of my great ………… grandfather. God forbid.


(by a random word generator,)

Random, luck, chances, blindwatcmaker that fits in the description of ET and evolins rings the bell. No worries. ET does not deserve better than this.

(Remember that Flew has supposedly converted from atheism to deism. Flew, or whoever currently does his thinking for him, still rejects the ideas of an afterlife and of revealed religion.)

Do not cry over the spilt milk. For evolins, ejecting the ideas of an afterlife became a lifesaver to defend themselves. Oh yes! Flew put the entire evolution idea into trash bin but still does not believe in hereafter. Wow what a relief if it were true!

(I hope we atheists all around the world could stand united in raising consciousness and fighting the spell of ignorance.)

That will be nice. Don Xiote is on the way attacking on the logic of Mills. 14 percent minus FLEW are raising consciousness against 86 percent world population? Isn’t it logical?

(it is impenetrable to the rest of us because of your bizarre use of language. Could you ask somebody with a better command of English to help you with your posts?)

The reason you do not understand is your level of IQ not the language. If you still do not understand what I wrote above, my gifted class students can help you out.

Frankus1122

Long time no sea. According to the new rule, avatars are describing the personality of the commentator. Well? What do say pal?(sorry, I mean mate)

(Not only can wooter make joke funny)
Semantic doctor says something is wrong with your sentence? Who can tell?
Oh man my IQ is getting in the way. Be quick.



Okay Titanic, sorry, titania
Let’s cut a deal. You seem to have read a lot of books and expert. Okay I will ask questions briefly and you answer them briefly without making us lost in the jungle of evolution vocabulary or evolution-is so-complex cliché and appealing to our logic and science.

1. How did the universe happen at the beginning?

2. Where did the rain of chemicals drop down on the earth? And how did they happen?

3. Please tell us about evolution tree? What was the first species that happened and how this one evolved into another species?

If you answer these tree questions, I will give up.

Root12 squared

Nice to meet you, troll. My name is Reason? How are U? You seem to be in the dumps?

To Roger
If Roger does not have a low IQ, how dare he will try to write books every year to impose his delusions, since one book of his delusions is not enough.

We are all ears?

How do you explain the ears with evolution and hearing the sounds and recognizing them and but not to hear tiny sounds?

46. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #272293 by isthatclear on October 27, 2008 at 7:51 am

(appealing to his logic and reason - all to no effect.)
From the text

ET while has no logic and reasonm cannot appeal to logic and reason; it can be only a TOOL to logic to be mocked

To: Titania
(Edit: Since you like movies, I will send you the following dvds:
Evolution 4 DVD Box Set)

Did you ever try to read the book of universe in which millions of chapters are written in different languages or codes which are being tried to prove that all letters in different languages happened by chance and luck by evolins?

You try first and understand it later you will throw all the ET books and dvs trash out like Anthony Flew?

Nobody is blinder than the one who does not WANT TO see.

To Hawt4dawk
(he's dishonest and disrespectful.)

Dawkins likes to joke that old people go to church because they're "cramming for the final".
People might just be stupid, I suggest. "They might be, yes," he agrees cautiously.

Agreed.


Look pal, your man, dawkins started it. And while trying to mock the believers in his low IQ level, I would turn my head, move on. He is gonna be losing more argument battle against me and other believers since he cannot defend himself and ET against logic.

He does not respect himself as well while trying to distort the facts about the number of believers who won nobel prize owners and I proved it and he dodged my confrontation. Is tis respectful to the truth?

If I could say I would say he is a clown that clowns around with so-called funny jokes and pointless points, but I can’t since he has at least some respect among his people and bad words belong to the owner of the mouth that pops up.

So Mr dawkins, are you ready to get retired? May be you can see the truth as Anthony Flew did it.

FLEW: I think that the most impressive arguments for God’s existence are those that are supported by recent scientific discoveries. I’ve never been much impressed by the kalam cosmological argument, and I don’t think it has gotten any stronger recently.

47. All aboard the atheist bus campaign

Comment #271952 by isthatclear on October 26, 2008 at 7:59 pm

Mixgas

Do not mess with me about semantics! You have no idea about what I am writing about since my satire is far-fetched beyond your IQ level.
If you are talking about me, I will write back to you, if you are talking about ET, you will find me writing back. Or I can use third singular person to refer to you. Take it easy pal. Life goes on with or without ET.

Vaal

Oh Vaala! Ban ad MA in English literature and language. Crystal?

JamCam

“Vanity Fair” is for 10 years old kids. Now you made me laugh. My lovely IQ!

http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/novel_19c/thackeray/index.html

titania

Thanks for your kind offer. I’ll pass.


There is PROBABLY no evolution.

48. 'People say I'm strident'

Comment #271628 by isthatclear on October 26, 2008 at 7:28 am

Working on a case of delusion

(Dawkins tends to invoke people's innate intelligence, and attribute their flawed ways of thinking to ignorance rather than stupidity.)

Ignorance comes from the blindness. Nobody cannot be more blind than those who does not want to see! Flawed ways can be easiliy seen in ET*evolution theory.


("But I don't have any evidence," he concedes). "I could be wrong. I

http://www.amazon.com/There-God-Notorious-Atheist-Changed/dp/0061335290

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/magazine/04Flew-t.html

http://theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/21PbAr/Apl/FlewTheist.htm


(" People might just be stupid, I suggest.)

There you go. Stupis as stupid does and or thinks stupid. Who could be more stupid than the one who thinks 14 percent are not stupid but 84 are stupid.


(But at least my saying that ignorance is no crime is my defence against the charge of arrogance.)
Neither is evolution.

http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/stenger_25_2.html

http://www.arn.org/docs/williams/pw_antonyflew.htm

(Because if you tell people they're stupid, that certainly isn't the way to win friends and influence people.)

If you tell that atheits are stupid enough to believe that million kinds of species just came out of a worm, it is certainly not a way to wiln their conscious since thier pride and arrogancy would get in. Thus we can just try to convince them by reason and logic and leave them to the flow of time when the light bulb is on and lighten their dark mind and closed conscious.

İ AM STRIDENT.

Strident is a very strong word and it ‘s not the word that describes you, mr dawkins

I would like to say stupid but i cant since stupid even is a good word if you consider the movie forrest gump. You can say Dawkins is funny, no , ridicolus is the best/

Conclusion. get retired And find the truth as Anthony Flew did it.

49. All aboard the atheist bus campaign

Comment #270330 by isthatclear on October 24, 2008 at 3:55 am

To Mitch

Stand up for the truth and get real!

Say we put all atheists together in one place and ask them; Ask them to keep 1 million EURO for two years and we will get the money back. How many atheists will keep the money? A few PROBABLY SIX OR SEVEN? So if I judge all atheists are scumbag, is it fair?

Mixmastergas

Don’t think about who I am. TIS is not a question you can handle with your atheist mind. You will mix it another gas. Take it easy and say hi to my gifted class students.

JamCam
I am not Diacanu. Thank God I am not! You are not pulling my leg, right? An atheist can be a believer but a believer even cannot disguise an atheist? Why? IQs don’t match.
I read a lot about satire and especially William Makepeace Thackeray. So Dawkins is a piece of cake for me with his efforts which are openly an invitation to get satirized

To: bentleyd
(The word "probably" makes atheists seem unsure and wishy-washy!)

Now you are catching on! Dawkins PROBABLY is upset about this semantic goof. Take it easy, Dawkins. I promise I will not mock it so much. Wishy-washy is a good term to define ET and atheists’ efforts.

Mark Jones

We know that God exists because we CAN THINK and figure out that if there is a design, there must be a designer and if there is a creature, there must be a creator. The only thing to do is to think.

See later evolins, most PROBABLY!

50. All aboard the atheist bus campaign

Comment #270329 by isthatclear on October 24, 2008 at 3:55 am

(You do have humour in your country/culture, yes?)
We PROBABLY have.

(Haven't laughed so much since ... well)
Same here! Check it out and laugh more!

(There is PROBABLY no God
Now stop WORRYING and enjoy your life.)

Professor Dawkins is a big name for Mr Dawkins. The title of Professor is very big dress for Dawkins if you check his manners and attitudes, he does not fit in. To me a professor means:

Never lie
Never get discredited
Never go clowning around and being funny unnecessarily to prove his ideas
Never swear or insult
Be straight and honest
Never distort the facts to support his ideas
Never ban the ideas or people( He banned me three times and other victims as well)
So does he fit in? Nope! N-O No! He is a tailor who is trying to figure out dresses for all the creatures out ot a piece of cloth. So he can figure himself out before I do.

To Poor Mitchell
(If you don't want to get eaten by insects, get a cremation.)
So you deep inside are afraid. And solution is to get cremated. You don’t get it right? The torture in graveyard is a matter of soul. Soul is the one that suffers while we are alive and after we are dead. Our body is just a dress for us. We just leave it into the heart of soil.

To Titania

Yes I read it. God delusion, Blind watchmaker
Seriously! And I read Vanity Fair too

Root2squared
You probably have no idea what the rules are here: bad words belong to the owner of the mouth.

I would not pick on the word “coincidence” if I were you as an atheist?

To Vaal

Worm 1: Do you have any idea what the heck the atheists are talking about?
Worm 2: They believe that we are the forefather of millions of creatures.
Worm 1: Jeez. What mock is this? These atheists have no reason and logic?
Worm 2: Tell me about it.
Worm 1: So funny right. Now the elephant will come and call me great ….grandpa?
Worm 2: What about the Fish? They cannot eat us any more right? They cannot eat their grandmother right?
Worm1: Don’t get stupid. You will be eaten. These atheist guys are just live in a delusional world. When they die they will wake up.