601. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158832 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 5:14 am

Vaal

He sent a load of pigs off on a marathon run and made them jump off a cliff!

Worse still I think his feet must have been tremendously smelly because of his fetish for having them washed and oiled!

Who would want to follow that??

Heheheh

Philip

602. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158817 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 4:32 am

Paula


I think that is a great starting line when confronting any future frother on the site, is to ask very politely if Jesus would be impressed with this behaviour or did He tell them to do this!


Bloody hell, its 12:31, its time for more tea!


Philip

603. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158788 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 3:31 am

D.I. Ogenes

Blasphemer! You insult the Great and Mighty Dawkins?


Have you no shame?

Next you will be telling me you don't drink tea!


Philip

604. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158769 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 3:03 am

D.I. Ogenes

Damn you and your trousers! May Quetzalcoatl smite thee with his mighty army! (You are not a nun are you?)

Now stop all this blaspheming about evolution you crazy monkey, it will do you no good at all! First you had a go at Mum and Dad, I let you off for that but now you really have let yourself down!

In fact, while you are at it, I suggest you sit down, have a cup of good tea and think about how much of a naughty sinner you have been! :)

Philip

605. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158738 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 1:53 am

D.I. Ogenes

My mum and dad are two of the finest people who walk on this lovely Earth!

This cult of Dawkins, where do I sign up and do they serve Tea?

:)

Philip

606. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158721 by Philip1978 on April 11, 2008 at 1:29 am

Finally, somebody knows what its like to be me! Bravo Quetz!:)

I am with Steve on this one Vulcan, a God is the most complex thing in the entire universe as it introduces a myriad of questions that cannot be answered without some serious guesswork and imagination.

When you consider something as amazing and crazy as the universe there are many things that could explain how it got here, introducing a god then invites questions like which one? How? Why? When? Can we test it? etc etc

I think that last question is a good one, can we test it to verify it? If there is a less complex, less ambiguous method that explains how it is done that does not require the incredibly improbable then it is usually, though not always, the best route to take. Not that I discourage thinking outside the box, if people didn't do that we would not get anywhere in life but I do think its wise to consider all the options first.

Tally Ho!

Philip

607. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158291 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 9:44 am

Al

I prefer the question as posed by Dr Cox from Scrubs:


Now, when you were born, nay, *spawned* by the Dark Prince himself, did that rat bastard forget to give you a hug before he sent you along your way?

It just makes so much sense!

:)

Philip

608. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158180 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 7:24 am

Al

Sadly the bastard is serious, but I agree with you, he wont listen to anyone unless its a racist or non scholar.

Good post by the way, interesting read

Philip

609. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158168 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 6:58 am

Epeeist

Funnily enough she wrote a book, Denying the Holocaust, which discredited writings and sayings of a well known Holocaust denier David Irving among others.

He tried to sue her and got his arse well and truly kicked because it was found she was telling the truth.

So yes, the Stone Cutters obviously had a hand in that! :)

Philip

610. Fleabytes

Comment #158135 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 5:50 am

I love the T Shirt Steve!

Ohhh Suits you Sir!

:)

Philip

611. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158130 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 5:36 am

ASMarques

Quite frankly I don't give a damn what you think or claim, I don't even have to say any more because you seem to be doing a magnificent job of digging yourself into a tremendously large hole.


Deborah Lipstadt, a proper historian, said:

"We need not waste time or effort answering the deniers' contentions. It would be never-ending to respond to arguments posed by those who freely falsify findings, quote out of context and simply dismiss reams of testimony. Unlike true scholars, they have little, if any, respect for data or evidence. Their commitment is to an ideology and their 'findings' are shaped to support it."

I completely agree with her, you have only an ideology which pays no respect to any proper evidence. All you want to do is spread lies in order to feed your over-inflated ego, sad isn't it?

Just like the religious, you have no use for facts and evidence when ideology and distortion seems so much more comfortable. Any attempts to warn you of this and it falls on deaf ears whilst earning the accuser a reprimand that means nothing but somehow sounds authoritative.

Pathetic!

Philip

612. Fleabytes

Comment #158110 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 4:41 am

Sorry Tyler, I am not usually known for my quick typing!

Steve, how could I be far nicer than you? I KNOW you don't listen to Marilyn Manson! :)

Philip

613. Fleabytes

Comment #158101 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 4:25 am

How shall we fuck off oh Lord? :)

Philip

614. Expelled producers accused of copyright infringement

Comment #158006 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 1:07 am

God is not going to like them very much for this is He!

I wonder if The Killers music was allowed by the band?

That could prove interesting too!


:)

Philip

615. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158001 by Philip1978 on April 10, 2008 at 12:46 am

historical revisionism?

You might want to change that to Historical Butchering for what its worth.

I just love the way you can passively ignore everything in front of you and actually claim some form of intelligence, it makes you look like such an uncaring and evil person, keep going there!

I just love the way you ignore historical figures such as Dr. Josef Mengele, or commonly known as the Angel of Death, his experiments on twins and dwarfs are just some of the atrocities this evil bastard is connected with. One of his favourites was to forcibly shove tubes down children's noses and lungs, gas them, place them in hot water vats till the point of almost passing out ONLY because he wanted to collect body hairs, this amongst his other duties of sending people off to the gas chambers as they got off the trains.

Karl Brandt,Sieged Hadloser,Kurt Blome, Rudolf Brandt, Jochim Murgowsky, Helmut Poppendick, Wolfram Sievers, Gerhard Rose, Seigfried Ruff, Hans Wolfgang Romberg, Victor Brack, Herman Becker-Freyeseng, Georg August Weltz, Konrad Schaeffer, Waldemar Hoven, Wilhelm Beiglboeck, Adolf Pokorny, Herta Oberheuser and Fritz Fischer - you can ignore these guys too, they only got tried and convicted of their medical experiment crimes. Not important to you I know, they probably lied in court or the confession was beaten out of them, its not like there was any EVIDENCE against them!


So you just keep deluding yourself, I guess it helps numb the reality of what went on and I wish you all the best in your racist bigotry.

Philip

616. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #157508 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 8:00 am

ASMarques

I find your ignorance just utterly amazing, how you can just be so reckless with the truth is beyond words.

I have only studied very small parts of The Holocaust for both my school and university years but I agree with Cartomancer and MPhil as to not only the validity of the evidence that points to this happening but also to your insult to all those this affects. The fact that you casually swipe this to the side tells me you have no interest in this but to cause unwanted insult and trouble.

I have no curiosity to what "the other side" has to say because, quite frankly "the other side" has nothing VALID to say but still insist on wanting to appear magnanimous and intellectual.

I have typed to some disgusting religious people on this site, including one who claimed my best friend's rape was just something she had coming to her. What you have said about the Holocaust never happening is, in my eyes, about the same level of insult, ie you have made an insult that is truly unforgivable and I suggest you give up on it.

I am truly disappointed that you even bothered to come here to cause trouble, its sickening and I am sorry you think its clever.

Philip

617. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #157487 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 7:00 am

What can I say but thank you Steve for showing us the true way to debate. My favourite method of in the past has been the whole God vs Baal and the whole, "who can burn the sacrifice the quickest" but now after seeing how two people can talk gently over a cup of Tea, my mind has been changed again!

Tea always brings the best out in people, hence Dave Gorman saying "Warm your hands on the teapot!", what a guy! :)


Philip

618. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #157436 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 5:09 am

Gems

Fear not, Boris might win! :)

I have one thing to say about this debate its that infuriating, goal post moving comment, "Ah but that's not how my religion works, that's the maniacs fault"

My response would be "Its in your sodding magic book, those are the rules and you are not living by them, your God must really hate you!"

Its so annoying and is difficult watching such deluded bollocks!


Philip

619. Fleabytes

Comment #157434 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 5:03 am

Darwin's badger

Too Late? How do you know I wasn't calling you? hehehehhe! :)


Philip

620. Hitchens vs. Hitchens

Comment #157393 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 3:26 am

Brilliant Stuff!

Quote from Christopher on God:

A Celestial North Korea!

At least you can fucking die and leave North Korea

621. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157357 by Philip1978 on April 9, 2008 at 1:27 am

Paula,

Now that you are a tv star, do you do autographs? :)

I thought that was one of the best interviews I have seen in a long time. I remember the Marcus Brigstock interview and I kept thinking it was too short for Richard to really delve into his life's passion, Evolution and Science. I mentioned in that thread that there is one thing I could watch a tremendous amount of its scientists being highly enthusiastic about science!

This is the reason I am so pleased with the interview is that Richard was in his element and Paula I think you did a magnificent job in asking the right questions in the professional way that you did. I love hearing about science from people who REALLY know what they are talking about and I love watching them get enthusiastic about it, so BRAVO to the pair of you!

Cheers Tons!

Philip

622. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #156972 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 12:55 pm

Interesting and sometimes highly infuriating debate but on the whole I enjoyed its lively attitude, especially the freedom to offend but not incite hatred debate.

I do have one question from it all, and its for Professor Dawkins.

Do you think Jesus actually existed as a human being? You mentioned that as a scientist Adam could never have existed and I completely concur with that, but I find it odd that you think Jesus did.

From all my studies into the subject I have not yet found any accurate description or historical account that proves Jesus of Nazareth ever existed as a human being, let alone a messiah.

My conclusions so far are that he is a character derived from the traditions of previous Near Eastern Religions that follows a set pattern of events, namely virgin births, death and resurrection etc. Since most religions were created by word of mouth, passed down throughout the ages I think it is no surprise that Jesus's story is not really in any way different from that of Horus the Egyptian god for example.

The connection with the Zodiac, the position of the sun in the sky, the significance of certain dates like the 25th of December or the Bright Star in the East etc are all also highly important when explaining the story of Jesus or even Horus as it is described in the Bible or the book of the Dead. These stories surfaced centuries before Christianity arrived and it is no coincidence that Jesus is described as he is.

I would be very interested to hear what you have to say on this matter, I have done a bit of research on it but I am always welcome to a new approach

kind regards


Philip Priestley

623. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156751 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 8:19 am

Cartomancer



That's all very well young man but tell me this, in a gay marriage who gets to be the bride and who gets to be the groom? :) <\mock serious tone>

I completely agree with you, marriage is marriage as far as I'm concerned and equal rights for everyone who does. Call it Civil (or if you are both that naughty, Uncivil!) Partnership or Marriage - a declaration of love should not be dictated to in the slightest, damn any one's trousers if they don't like it!

Philip

624. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156691 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 6:36 am

yussel123

Uh hur hur, than' you very much!

Damn, let the cat out the bag again, ODIN, get back here this instant!

Philip

625. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156683 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 6:28 am

epeeist

Here is a VERY odd question indeed, can you speed up or slow down the speed of light from stars?

Surely the light from stars moves at a constant speed, some are just further away than others?

Philip

626. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156679 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 6:20 am

yussel123

Its absolutely fine, honest, if anything I think its really funny!

I raise my Tea, thanks AlanW, in your direction and promise I am not the angry type unless thy name be Wooter or Robertson!

:)

Philip

627. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156672 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 6:07 am

yussel123

Ah you just don't love me any more! Trolled! Oh the shame! :)

Hehehehehe!


Philip

628. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156666 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 5:55 am

yussel123

Eeek sorry! :)

I understand what you mean and I am glad you brought it up!

I like the discussion more than anything!

Ok, lets look at 1 aspect of Creationism:

A 6000 year old Earth


How many times would you have to tell a YEC this is simply not true? You show them, as people like Richard have done, that a whole host of evidence including multiple dating methods, fossils, geology etc You point out that the Earth is not 6000 years old because the people on the planet were playing with glue and domesticating the dogs at that time.


Sam Harris made a great point in a debate he was having about people who have seen Elvis and are under the delusion that he is still alive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szn6cG8fQl8

At what point do you, after hearing people speak about their cherished beliefs before you finally let them in on the fact that not only are they wrong, but they are delusional? At what point aren't they being crazy?

This is education we are talking about here, its highly important not to give any ground on it, it is delusional and I really don't know if its right to use the kid gloves when addressing it.

Philip

629. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156648 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 5:27 am

All I meant was that you can't go around telling people they are delusional about their most cherished ideas and at the same time express frustration that they don't accept what you have to teach them.

630. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156644 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 5:09 am

Dawkins presentations of his case give an opening to critics to claim that he is blind to any evidence against his position.

631. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #156628 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 4:34 am

As such, he gets to the point unerringly, provocatively, often in devastating fashion.

He reminds me of Indiana Jones, who, when presented with a sword-twirling opponent, gets out a gun.

632. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #156613 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 3:56 am

Great over from Dawkins there, he has had an amazing season, I think inclusion of Hitchens, Dennett and Harris in the team shows what a hard team they are to beat!
Why they put Robertson in the team we don't know, he has ducked everything that has been bowled at him!


Steve,

My parents are great, I am a lucky man!

I mostly practised at school so they didn't have to bear the brunt of it too much, plus without being too modest, I wasn't too bad at it so the music wasnt that nasty

I started playing guitar at about 12 or 13, its a good job they liked Queen and Jimi Hendrix otherwise they would never have put up with Guns and Roses... Actually, Mum says she misses the noise around the house, says its too quiet! :)

Philip

633. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #156597 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 2:23 am

Hehehehhehe!

Yikes, you put on a Marilyn Manson tune or two...


Steve, I worry greatly that you think I have descended into sheer madness, I have, but that's not the point...erm what might cheer you up?

If it makes you feel any better I am rather fond of classical music having played violin, cello, trumpet and clarinet when younger. I also love Jazz, Blues, bits of folk music, a band called 2 Gallants, ermmm The Divine Comedy, they are really cheery, The Cardigans, all albums, ermm Queen, Brian May is a guitar hero of mine etc Placebo, excellent group, Chilli Peppers REM, Radiohead...oh, help....

Muse, you like Muse don't you, so do I, see there is hope I tell you! :)

Its not all doom and gloom I promise, my love of life is testament to the fact that I can listen to Marilyn Manson - its probably the heaviest stuff I listen to- and survive its more grumpy persona! :)


Hows that?


Philip

634. Expelled Overview

Comment #156583 by Philip1978 on April 8, 2008 at 12:42 am

J. McPhearson

I would agree with you up to a point, it is good to be able to see all sides of an argument and know what it is you are up against.

I think the main reason I don't want to see this is that it is full of lies I have already come across many times, I have read interviews with the Stein's of this world and it is obvious exactly where they stand on matters.

According to Stein et all since I do not believe in any God at all I have the same moral standards as that of a Nazi. From all the things I have read about this film there is the repeated use of Nazi propaganda videos - Stein has been quoted saying he would have put more in that video if he could- to confirm this. It seems to be the main point used in the film and is basically there to show a rather tasteless and highly incorrect view that since I have these tendencies this is the reason why I don't want the Creationist's version of how life began and evolved on this planet taught in schools and universities around the world.


The reason why I don't think Creationism or Intelligent Design should be taught in schools or universities, it is not because I am a closet Nazi, it is that there is no proper scientific theory attached to it. Evolution provides the best explanation as to how life progressed to how it is today over many generations, it is a much better, provable, testable and less complex one than adding some Intelligent designer. A designer would need a designer and that has an infinite regress that just isn't worth the study.


I find the Nazi idea particularly insulting and I really don't think I need to go and see the film when I know what is going to happen in it.

Its everybody's choice if they want to go to the movie, go ahead but I think its so full of lies and deception its not worth it. The antics of the producers in banning one of the people who contributed to the film to go and see it reprehensible to say the least.

Anyway, enough of me ranting! I think I need more Tea :)

Cheers

Philip

635. Get out of here, atheists!

Comment #156365 by Philip1978 on April 7, 2008 at 12:03 pm

How very interesting!

What really gets me is she actually sounded frightened of Sherman, she practically accused him of wanting to harm children ONLY because he had no belief.

It seems that a person could be the Baby Eating Bishop of Bath and Wells, but the fact that he is a religious man, that somehow exonerates him from being the one who is a real danger to kids!

The person who turns around and asks people to stop forcing religion down kids throats and its all "SMITE HIM!"


Methinks double standards and dangerous ones at that, why can't people tell the difference between being a complete bastard who happens to be an atheist and someone who is just an atheist? Is it really that difficult to comprehend that a lack of belief is just that, a lack of belief and that decisions and morality come from COMPLETELY different things!

SPLITTERS!
:)

Philip

636. Fleabytes

Comment #156176 by Philip1978 on April 7, 2008 at 2:49 am

Shit, Quetz has rumbled me, I am not that quiet am I...ermm... what to do now...?

Meanwhile I do continue to pray for you all!

There, exoneration! :)

(Oops David, there goes my simplistic language again! I was worried using big words would confuse you!)

Philip

637. Fleabytes

Comment #156171 by Philip1978 on April 7, 2008 at 2:32 am

Steve,

You have to watch the quiet ones! :)


Mwhahahahhahaha!

Philip

638. Fleabytes

Comment #156166 by Philip1978 on April 7, 2008 at 1:54 am

Poor David, still can't rebut Professor Dawkins yet! Bottom of the barrel, actually my barrel overfloweth with the amount of times you have lied, distorted and generally made a total arse of yourself by being the attention seeking jealous coward that lies for Jesus on a regular basis. The challenge that was first given to you was to type out a rebuttal of Paula's wonderful essay, you haven't.

Meanwhile I do continue to pray for you all.

639. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #155587 by Philip1978 on April 5, 2008 at 2:35 am

SG

That has Monty Python's life of Brian written all over that - ITS THE JUDEAN PEOPLE'S FRONT!

Every single one of them yelling SPLITTER at the other, it sounds frightening and hilarious at the same time!
:)

Right, I am off to London to be sinful, Tally Ho!


Philip

640. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #155574 by Philip1978 on April 5, 2008 at 12:03 am

SG

I have met Lorraine Kelly and I think she is lovely - I was working in John Lewis and her daughter innocently walked up to the counter and said "My Mummy is going to be walking around London in her bra!"

I was in fits!


(Google The Moonwalk, its a marathon length charity walk around London at night time, all the women who take part are wearing their bras on the outside of their T Shirts, some even daring to venture forth into the freezing night without the T Shirt, such scandal I tell you!)

Great lady though, I have a lot of respect for the work she has done for breast cancer, truly wonderful stuff.



Any way, back to topic, I was wondering, David, where the hell are you man?

I would have thought after all we have been saying about your incredibly devious behavior you would be here to defend yourself and explain why, after being told PRECISELY what was going to happen, did you make such a stink? Personally I think your flatulent droning on about how John Lennox should have been there is LAUGHABLE! This is just one event out of the 100s of things Professor Dawkins does all year round and you had the arse about him turning up, having an interview and answering questions!

Now, am I to keep thinking you are just a glory seeking flea who can't hack it because Richard Dawkins is getting all the attention and not you? All these attempts at attempting to discredit his character and integrity are just a reflection of your worries that people might actually listen to what he has to say.

COME ON DAVID, show some backbone! Come and fight your corner!


If you neglect to do this I am going to have to take drastic measures and ... gosh am I really going to do this? ....Eeek.....think you are a.....COWARD!


Philip

641. Whale 'missing link' discovered

Comment #155169 by Philip1978 on April 4, 2008 at 8:04 am

Aragorn

I am with Reverend Shayne on this one, I too am working my hairy, English, arse off living life, taking my joy in the people around me and the time I have left to arse around!

Why would I have to imagine a good life when I can actually live it?

Living alongside a God is bollocks in comparrison to living alongside your fellow humans, especially those who love you.

You can only imagine God's love - though its more Stockholm Syndrome in God's case - my friends, my family, they are real, they make a real difference to my life and I am a VERY lucky man because of it.

There are things worth living for and I live for them, I don't call being God's hostage a worthy one, I call it living a lie - I would rather be honest with myself and those I care about.

If you think I am miserable without a God, think again, I challenge the world to find a happier man than me thats how sodding happy I am! Flippin heck, I have a cup of Tea by my side right now, HOW COOL IS THAT? :)

As for evolution, it happens mate, simple as that - works without God just fine, remove him from the equation and, wow, life continues to leap along!

Tally Ho!

Philip

642. Dawkins warns of human extinction

Comment #155116 by Philip1978 on April 4, 2008 at 7:22 am

Ah, so I got this wrong then Richard, you are not the messiah or a very naughty boy, but in fact the Devil in disguise! Thats quite a career shift but I suppose you are giving up your Charles Symoni Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford seat later this year so you'll want to keep busy!

It all makes sense now! :)

Well done to yourself and Paula on the talk, I look forward to watching the video when it turns up, I hope your voice gets back to normal!

Philip

643. Upside-down church sculpture on hit list

Comment #154904 by Philip1978 on April 4, 2008 at 12:15 am

Ah, I see somebody has finally done a sculpture of the Free Church of Scotland, looks realistic!

:)

Philip

644. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #154709 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 3:29 pm

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!

Thank you Diacanu! :)

Philip

645. Anti-gay Okla. lawmaker attracts 1,000 backers

Comment #154705 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 3:25 pm

Foth

There is nothing wrong with the state you live in, there is everything wrong with this evil wench of a senator!

Don't cry, just don't vote for the cow when the time comes!

Philip

646. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #154698 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 3:18 pm

Diacanu

I think this would have been better, I know its rather mean of me, but I still can't stop laughing, its the fundy atheist in me!

I think there are two from series 3 of Blackadder I might have gone for

Clearthinker, Clearthinker, He trusted in the church.
Clearthinker, Clearthinker. It left him in the lurch.

Lord Robertson, Lord Robertson, intelligent and deep.
Lord Robertson, Lord Robertson, a shame about the sheep.

Bad Bad me, oh well, I can't help it! :)

Philip

647. Anti-gay Okla. lawmaker attracts 1,000 backers

Comment #154673 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 2:57 pm

Cartomancer

You may not have known it, but we were on your side all along, we just wanted to keep McKellen from getting into trouble when we needed him! :)

We at MI1978 KNOW you want to put that bomb harness down.

Put the harness down, have your favourite hot or alcoholic beverage at the ready. If not, the Coke bottle will suffice, we suggest possibly pour the hot beverage down the senator's trousers!

We at MI1978 completely disown all association with this stupid woman and think she is a stuck up bitch!

Message ends....


MI1978 - Project Philip

648. Two More Fleas

Comment #154660 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 2:47 pm

i WAS BUSY THE WATCHING iMAX THE BEAVER;S SHOW

Bloody hell, have you been at the porn again Wooter?

:)

Philip

649. Pastor attacks scientist's talk

Comment #154645 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 2:32 pm

Picks self off floor laughing!

So let me get this straight, David, you are THAT vain and thick you decided to make a prat of yourself none-the-less?

There is evidence on your site and here to show that Paula told you EVERYTHING about what was going to happen, you KNEW it was all above board! You couldn't let it lie could you?

Here you are in the news wanting to hog the limelight, you absolute idiot! Are you THAT jealous of Professor Dawkins you would go ahead and do this? Bloody hell, I thought you were pathetic, now, you really have outdone yourself, congratulations!!

Some say all media is good media but now you have just made an arse of yourself in front of the BBC, hahhahahha! You twit!


Damn, I think I will have another cup of Tea, this is hilarious!

Philip

650. Fleabytes

Comment #154417 by Philip1978 on April 3, 2008 at 7:44 am

SG

I think Ballsy Dins bought that one up a while ago! :)

Epeeist

There were only 25 points between them last year, with Lancashire finishing with only one more win than Yorkshire, I think it will be an interesting season this year esp seeing if Sussex can build on their victory!


Dr Benway

So it's possible to feel that an extrordinary claim is well corroborated, when in fact it has not been corroborated.