Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by irate_atheist


1251. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158837 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 5:29 am

892. Comment #158831 by Vaal -

I wonder how he would respond to "unbelievers".


"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them - bring them here and kill them in front of me." (Luke 19:27)

Nice.

1252. Fleabytes

Comment #158826 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 5:00 am

7650. Comment #158820 by clodhopper -

It seems silly (to me) to complain that atheism does not meet ones personal needs.
Indeed. I prefer pound-cost averaging and compound interest. No false profits, please.

1253. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158814 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 4:21 am

Paula -'...the sight of these idiots foaming at the mouth is likely to have a most off-putting effect'. Er...sorry about that.

Oh. Those idiots foaming at the mouth. Yes, quite.

1254. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158813 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 4:19 am

337. Comment #158370 by al-rawandi -

A bigot wants us to "trust" him on the theory that one of the greatest and most well documented genocides ever was a fake.
Indeed. ArseMarks hardly endears himself to us, does he?

1255. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158805 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 3:59 am

877. Comment #158801 by Paula Kirby -

No matter how they try to sell it, a gilded turd smells just as bad as a fresh unadulterated one. This is their major problem.

1256. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158778 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 3:16 am

860. Comment #158776 by BillySands -

I blame their god myself. Look at how his son went about spitting on blind folk.
Ooh. I didn't know that one. Please enlighten me further Billy.

1258. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158762 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:49 am

Before anyone starts pestering me on this thread.

Oblig: Fucktard.

850. Comment #158760 by Tyler Durden -

Thanks. Lying for Jesus, indeed...

1259. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158756 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:33 am

846. Comment #158752 by Goldy -

What would Jesus say?
Either:

'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' (Luke 23:34)

Or

'And if your hand offends you, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life maimed than to have two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched.' Mark (9:43-46)

Neither of these are contradictory, of course...

1260. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158748 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:13 am

842. Comment #158745 by epeeist -

Well, I did once put a picture of Robert Mugabe in a strategic place and, yes, it was nicely watered by the next morning.

Edit: 820. Comment #158691 by Vulcan

Total shite from start to finish, and you know it is.

Or you can look for me between 1000 and 1300 UTC most days of the week on the following Ventrilo Server
No thanks. I'd rather stare at a cruet set for a couple of hours instead.

1261. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158747 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:11 am

841. Comment #158744 by alan baylis -

Don't worry. I'd never assume you were describing me as an honest person...

1262. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158742 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:04 am

833. Comment #158729 by Steve Zara -

The cat's contributions are infinitely more intelligible.


834. Comment #158731 by epeeist -

*Splutters*.

How could you even suggest such a thing?

1263. Lungless frog discovered in Borneo

Comment #158730 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:42 am

12. Comment #158705 by Adam Morrison -

'My frog has no nose'

'How does it smell?'

'Dreadful!'



*-> coat.....

1264. Expelled Overview

Comment #158727 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:41 am

So, he's out on day release again.

This whole care in the community concept has some serious flaws in its execution.

1265. Did pre-big bang universe leave its mark on the sky?

Comment #158726 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:39 am

Steve -

I agree. About as speculative as a punt on the Grand National, and with less chance of knowing who the winner is.

1266. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #158724 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:37 am

827. Comment #158718 by epeeist -

My cat leaves something more intelligent in it's litter tray most mornings.

1267. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World

Comment #158268 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 9:14 am

74. Comment #158264 by Vaal -

And people accuse of us of being joyless :-)
Joyless, probably not. Witless, well...that's another question. It is left as an exercise for the reader to determine.

1268. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World

Comment #158257 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 9:01 am

62. Comment #158232 by epeeist -

Absolutely agree. It's that people are prone to equate engineer with mechanic. And mechanics use engineering priciples to fix things, so - in effect - they're another branch of applied science. I'll rely on my garage's mechanicsfor advice on the car, because, well, they damn well know what they're talking about. I've known car designers I wouldn't let anywhere near a sump for fear of what they'd do...

We digress. The real purpose of this post was to - at Vaal's implicit request - pronounce judgement upon the festering dung-pile known as kjmastaw.

Verdict: Guilty of perverting the course of Natural Selection.

Bailiff - send in the next defendant.

Aah, Mr Robertson, so nice to see you...

Edit:Oh, as everyone here seems so insistent:

kjmastaw. It's official. You're a fucktard.

1269. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World

Comment #158225 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 8:28 am

59. Comment #158217 by epeeist -

Hmm...does my Masters in Engineering Sciences count as:

Engineering?

or

Science?

Before I pronounce judgement on the unfortunate kjmsastaw I need to know from what position I should launch my attack...

56. Comment #158191 by Vaal -

By all means. I await Epeeist's judgement on my position, first.

1270. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion

Comment #158207 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 8:06 am

51. Comment #158192 by hungarianelephant -

Unless, as irate says, the rent boys were telling him how to vote.
See? I don't just spout a load of old bollocks...

1271. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion

Comment #158155 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 6:41 am

43. Comment #158124 by hungarianelephant -

Yes, if he thought the rent boys were telling him how to vote in primary legislation...

1272. Fleabytes

Comment #158142 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 6:05 am

I'm BAEOZ!!!

Edit: Steve - I like the t-shirt!!

1273. Fleabytes

Comment #158125 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 5:17 am

On the subject of starting a topic in a topic, more halfwittery from the self-deluded:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20080410/tuk-cathedral-puts-ban-on-jerusalem-6323e80.html

The Pratt Green Trust(!).

Man - you couldn't make it up. At least, not as well as they do.

1274. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion

Comment #158115 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 4:53 am

40. Comment #158111 by epeeist -

I'll be the turd in the punchbowl here.

I think we should be at least aware of whether someone applying for one of the most powerful jobs in the world is, in fact, a total fruitcake.

1276. Fleabytes

Comment #158081 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 3:59 am

7585. Comment #158077 by Quetzalcoatl -

Better than that, it was, if read slyly, rather vague.

After all, Keith said he'd be back within the month. But he was crafty enough not to specify which particular month...

1277. Fleabytes

Comment #158074 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 3:45 am

7579. Comment #158067 by epeeist -

Keith Akbar!

Edit: Brian, Steve - I feel I have seen an overreaction on all sides the last couple of days, which is a real shame. In real life I like to give people the benefit of the doubt (no, really I do) - after all, we are only human. This forum allows me a vent - something the majority of us need from time to time. Some of my posts could be taken the wrong way, but usually people know when I'm being deliberately offensive to them, and I hope the rest get the joke...

1278. Reviews of Expelled

Comment #158042 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:50 am

9. Comment #158036 by Richard Dawkins -

One argument against Intelligent Design could be the lack of the former aspect amongst it's proponents...

1280. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158035 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:34 am

Quetz -

Given that we know DR is full of shit, this 'pack of lies' response is not particularly surprising.

Edit: Feel free to quote mine that, you self-serving prick, DR.

1281. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158032 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:30 am

261. Comment #158026 by irate_atheist -

I don't say fucktard much in the same way that you hardly ever proclaim yourself to be a god.
Well, I have to have faith in myself, and if I declared myself to be a god, I'd stop believing in myself and this could lead to all sorts of unforeseen consequences.

1282. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #158026 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:21 am

Philip, Quetz, Steve et al -

Why is it that I'm the one that's forced to be the first to call this ignorant prick a fucktard?

It simply isn't fair.

Your future cooperation in this matter would be much appreciated.

1284. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions

Comment #157562 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 9:08 am

127. Comment #157517 by ASMarques -

Wiful ignorance takes many forms.

Yours is just another example of human stupidity writ large.

1286. Get out of here, atheists!

Comment #157406 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 4:03 am

210. Comment #157400 by Shenonymous -

I'm not entirely sure. I think that for some their god (or) gods give them a moral 'benchmark' to follow. However, some of the moral ones decide what the benchmark is on the grounds that you can pretty much make a case for any kind of behaviour as a theist - so they choose the 'best bits' and interpret the rest as, well, it was different in those days...

Rationalisers - not rationalists.

Just my tuppence worth.

1288. Fleabytes

Comment #156810 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:32 am

7524. Comment #156804 by Quetzalcoatl -

Rather sad, really. I feel sorry for the guy.

1289. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156796 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:11 am

204. Comment #156793 by Bonzai -

It is a public statement of committment to someoene else.

Mind you, I'd always expected to have a quiet wedding in a registry office, whereas....

1291. In search of the God particle

Comment #156789 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:03 am

12. Comment #156785 by Quetzalcoatl -

He was referring to Jesus Harrington. The well known wrecker of various scientific experiments. He really screwed up one by Schrodinger when he brought a tin of 'Whiskas' into the lab. Boy, were they mad about that.

1292. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #156780 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:51 am

315. Comment #156773 by dunf2562 -

I can just picture 99% of you lot trampling over your own grannies to get his/her own equally whacky, unjustifiable ideas and teachings into general circulation
Please specify which particular unjustifiable ideas and teachings you are referring to.

1293. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156778 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:47 am

197. Comment #156777 by al-rawandi -

No one has figured out that "marriage" is a sinister plot by women.
Especially mother-in-laws. Beware the hostile takeover bid...

1294. In search of the God particle

Comment #156772 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:42 am

7. Comment #156759 by AdrianB -

This article allows comments, and the amount of rubbish posted by religious wingnuts is staggering.
"Only two things are infinite - the Universe and human stupidity - and I'm not sure about the Universe." - Albert Einstein

Spot on Al, spot on.

1295. In search of the God particle

Comment #156758 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:27 am

5. Comment #156750 by Pattern Seeker -

I might, or might not, chip in a few bucks. The envelope may - or may not - contain cash. Only by opening the envelope will we find out.

1296. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156743 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:13 am

172. Comment #156733 by yussel123 -

So yes, fantasies can be damaging, no matter how presented.
WTF? Is 'Holby City' irredemably damaging me?

1297. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday

Comment #156741 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:10 am

311. Comment #156719 by Quetzalcoatl -

In my experience, everyone else is wrong. Apart from you of course. And Epeeist. And Dr B And, oh bugger, another attempt at self-diagnosis falls by the wayside.

1298. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156734 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:05 am

153. Comment #156702 by yussel123 -

I will not be telling them the universe is 6000 years old.

I will not be telling them a sky daddy watches their every move.

Children have to be taught SOMETHING, don't they? Do you advocate leaving children on their own to let them learn things randomly? We teach them all sorts of things.
I certainly was not 'taught' all sorts of 'childish' things. I learnt how to read, write and do maths. I learnt about history, science, engineering, nature etc. None of these are childish 'thing's'. You can simplify an explanation for a child, but you DO NOT TEACH THEM LIES. A seven year old may not be able to understand quantum mechanics, but they can learn how a simple electrical circuit with a battery an a bulb works and that electron's 'flow' around the closed circuit and their energy is used to light (and heat) the bulb.

When they're young, of course you read them Chicken Little, nursery rhymes etc. but you sure as fuck don't end it by saying 'you have to believe this really happened - for the rest of your life - otherwise you're not a good person and won't get into a (fictional) heaven.

Children need education and information - not pig ignorant bullshit dressed up as fact. [/rant]

1299. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156700 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 6:58 am

148. Comment #156696 by yussel123 -

They are delusional. The least delusional think 'but there must be something more than this life. The most delusional and up living in caves and dropping logs on their own heads. We get to call the latter 'schizophrenics' and they get medical treatment.

Childhood indoctrination is a form of mental child abuse. I could write for years on this, but instead am currently undoing years of psychological damage done to someone by this.

1300. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'

Comment #156674 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 6:12 am

125. Comment #156669 by yussel123 -

...both sides are talking "at" each other and not "to" each other.
It is impossible to talk sense to someone who has deliberately given up their reason.
I don't know the answer to the question of how to deal with the delusion.
But then again...who does?