Comments by thewhitepearl

1251. A Holocaust Denier Hits Manhattan (And Hearts Hitchens)

Comment #219399 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 11:05 pm

It's a digital t.v. recorder. Surely you have heard of that.

1252. A Holocaust Denier Hits Manhattan (And Hearts Hitchens)

Comment #219394 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 10:59 pm

You bet your arse it is!!

I had to TiVO it, I couldn't watch them all because my attention was elsewhere last night.

But I did catch a bit here and there. I just never noticed them airing on BBCA before, (and I watch that channel a lot) so I was very surprised.

1253. Texas Fiction Science

Comment #219392 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 10:50 pm

[mumbles]Yes sir, I'm sorry sir.

That cretinous twat Don McLeroy is a fucktard!

1254. A Holocaust Denier Hits Manhattan (And Hearts Hitchens)

Comment #219389 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 10:45 pm

8teist, (goldy)

Slightly off topic here, but guess what marathon they had on BBCAmerica last night?

1255. Texas Fiction Science

Comment #219383 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 10:26 pm

Stella

thewhitepearl is proudly attending the university that is going to host the Bush library. No other university wanted it...really. (sound of bus brakes screeching...thump)

Taking up bus driving? :)

I can also proudly say that the university has also done it's share of ID bashing.

(http://www.smu.edu/dedman/viewpoint.pdf)

**sticks out toungue** so neeeyah!

1256. Sydney brothels say Pope's visit will give business a leg-up

Comment #219358 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 8:33 pm

I certainly prefer it to casual sex considering the risks involved in my dating pool.

And do tell Kkelly, what risks that are included in your dating pool that differ from anyone elses dating pool?

Personally, I'm against using any type of image or rhetoric to evoke an emotional response in an attempt to convert someone to your side's way of thinking. I'd rather use logic.

Excellently pointed out Mr. Davis.

1257. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #219300 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 3:56 pm

txpooper,

I studied evolution, accepted it, realised that the bible was wrong, ergo Yahweh did not exist. I then touched upon the deist territory before realising how improbable that also was. And now I am an atheist.

Proved you wrong.

1258. Sydney brothels say Pope's visit will give business a leg-up

Comment #219289 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 3:30 pm

And thank Dog thewhitepearl put her finger away.
Yes, I did find it offensive.
You never know where it's been.

Aww, you should have told me that. I would have changed it for ya!

1259. Sydney brothels say Pope's visit will give business a leg-up

Comment #219276 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 2:59 pm

If you chocked with your popcorn while laughing

There's popcorn here? Who has it?

As I have expected NONE of the persons whom I accused of narcissistic personality disorder actually responded.

I don't recall you listing any names. Or did I miss something?

1260. Write to UCF

Comment #219267 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 2:35 pm

Jamcam,

If you are going to use an analogy between food and Elvis, you shouldn't use a hamburger. Instead you should use fried peanut butter and banana sandwhich.

Comment #219269

It was his favorite thing to eat.

1261. Write to UCF

Comment #219246 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 2:14 pm

there are plenty of quasi-religious fat acceptance groups. Some even went mainstream. Remember Dove's "campaign for real beauty"?, which was really just average fat ladies dancing around on tv and embarrassing themselves.

*face palm* And you were doing so well on the social cue problem kkelly.

How is the "Campaign for Real Beauty" quasi-religious?

And you should be embarrassed of yourself for making such a cursory comment about a group of women who quite apparently weren't embarrassed about being average and brave enough to provoke change in the status quo definition of beauty.

You're the cardboard cutout of the type of consumer the Campaign for Beauty ad is reaching out to.

1262. Sydney brothels say Pope's visit will give business a leg-up

Comment #219192 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 12:51 pm

I am truly shocked and under painful impression that this discussion forum is hijacked by a bunch of people who are simply high from self-admiration and who just love to compose and discuss "stuff" exclusively for the pleasure of their shallow ego.
They know who they are. They are drooling, in this very moment, on their keyboards typing a response dripping from pompous phraseology that gives them erection.
Unfortunately personality disorders are very hard to treat and most of psychiatrists agree that narcissistic personality disorder is hardest to treat from all of them.

So...how'd you guys manage to piss of someone without me or al?

:)

Glad to be free from the punching bag today. Thus so far.

pompous phraseology that gives them erection

A bit discriminatory, eh?

1263. A Holocaust Denier Hits Manhattan (And Hearts Hitchens)

Comment #219188 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 12:34 pm

Defending an individual and defending an individuals rights are two very different positions. I doubt it was the former of the two, but that's just my presumption.

1264. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York

Comment #219165 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 11:54 am

Bod? What bod? I don't see an avatar at all.

[edit]

Mordy,

Too bad. It was fun while it lasted. Doesn't explain how the other one disappeared though.

meh, no worries.

Playing catch up today?

1265. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York

Comment #219142 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 11:05 am

Quetz-

It was raptured.

Really though, I don't know.

I noticed it was gone, so i replaced it, then that one was raptured...i give up.

1266. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York

Comment #219116 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 9:39 am

You think some of us are bad? Wait til you have to deal with Tera.

And you will. He'll find something you say to disagree with.

1267. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York

Comment #219100 by thewhitepearl on July 26, 2008 at 9:07 am

Spot On h4d!

1268. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218834 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 6:24 pm

Tera,

Go back and read all of my posts. I corrected what i meant in some. also i see how you provided a link, which in this case i don't really accept because it is wikipedia.

but even if i did. i noticed how you didn't provide a link for the opposite. Talking out of your ass?

And I wasn't aware that alcohol was considered a recreational drug.

So again I revert back to you are wrong.

and like i already pointed out, islamic terrorist and recreational drug deaths arent even on the same level.

I've already addressed all other issues. I suggest you go back and read.

now im over it.

1269. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218815 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:57 pm

Did you somehow inadvertently win the daily punching bag award? Sheesh, you're gettin' it from all directions today!

Yeah I was just thinking the same thing.

Righton.

Dont Know.

Rad,

Might as well. Let's see who else...Bonzai, Booby, and Dick.

1270. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218809 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:54 pm

Why Pearl? Why? Why Rad?

1271. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218799 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:44 pm

DK righton.

How many recreational drugs killed people in the US this year? And that's not even on the same level.

Drugs=optional
islamic terrorist=not optional.

Furthermore I was more so telling him he is wrong in his whole assertation. His logic I guess. (esp the nuke comments)

1272. Are the 'New Atheists' avoiding the 'real arguments'?

Comment #218797 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:40 pm

You know Teratronis is running amuck over in another thread. Why don't you go trolling with him? He's a christian claiming to be..well god knows what..

and you claim to be an atheist pretending to be a christian. But if you are a christian claiming to be an atheist claiming to be a christian,

it might be interesting.

1273. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218786 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:31 pm

Recreational drugs kill far more people in the United States every year than Islamic terrorists do. Al Qaeda would have to set off a number of loose nukes to catch up.

Wrong. In fact you are so wrong, I now pronounce you a fucktard.

You may try to back up what you just said with statistics.

You just flat out, fucking lied and have absolutley no idea what you are talking about. You made that shit up. And you generalised.

You are a troll. That's all. No wonder the shit you regurigitate sounds so stupid, illogical, and wrong. You're some kind of religious nutbag.

nice try at the rational life.

1274. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218779 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:21 pm

uuuuum

Biggus Diccus!

1275. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218767 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 5:01 pm

I'm not.

And it's HOW you phrase something. I'm not "a drunk" just like if you were to call Steve "a fag" he might take offense to this.

Oh Mr. Smart One you might want to take up lessons on social cues.

But like I said earlier, you are free to form your own twisted opinions.

And just to clarify, I didn't take it as an "attack" in a way you are obviously promoting the word. How about an ATTEMPTED attack. Suit you better?

1276. Texas Fiction Science

Comment #218754 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 4:52 pm

I stopped after March 2009.

Paper. Bag. Somone. Please.

1277. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218749 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 4:46 pm

What does "tight" mean in NZ?

1278. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218747 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 4:43 pm

Dick,

That was 161 posts ago. get over it.

1279. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218731 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 4:21 pm

Rad,

You guys were right, I'll never be the same again. You all have created a monster.

1280. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218713 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 4:04 pm

Sciros,

Cute. I'm afraid with the quality thing I can't really do anything about it. All of my pictures that I try fitting into the required limit's turn a bit pixel-y.

You don't enter into a shame spiral then? - 'Oh no! Someone has hurt feelings!' :)

"I came here to argue"
"Oh- Well this is abuse!"

1281. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218685 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 3:34 pm

Quetz,

Are you implying that I should change my avatar to something less provoking?

1282. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218651 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 3:07 pm

Al,

I didn't catch the aformentioned dig. I dismiss pretty much anything feather monster has to say. He argues like a little child. He shows up after a few days and reinstates old arguments. As if he's spent all his free time thinking about us and what to retort with. Perhaps scribbling them on little pieces of paper.

I have nothing to say. If I choose to get my emotional support from the bottle, that's my perogative. If he wants to keep bringing it up as a personal attack, that's his right. But don't expect me to lose any sleep over it or give it any thing more than a dismissive thought.

Pot. Kettle. Black. is right.

1283. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218616 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Oh I don't know Apathy, you tell me. Apparently I attack people personally. (???) IDK.

oh well.

EDIT

Al,

Well send out the search party then!

I have the same issue with my cell phone though. I actually just found one (which I hadn't seen in 4 or 5 months) at my friends house in his "random things left at my house drawer".

I felt victorious!

1284. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218589 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 2:34 pm

Yes, but I'm not satisfied with the quality of the refreshments. There's no booze, either!

You should have brought the barnoculars!

. I got your goat, humped him and set him free.

Oh stop, my sides can't take it anymore!

1285. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218560 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Tera,

For goodness sake man, I haven't had any liqour yet. I've already mentioned that I rarely read your posts. So who were you posting that for?

Shoo Shoo, off you go. Do not dumb yourself down by talking to me oh great feather monster.

1286. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218522 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:52 pm

DR. Doctor,

Could you please pass the popcorn? This is a good show.

Rad,

HOLA!! [waves excitedly]

1287. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218510 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:41 pm

Talking seriously now. To get a popular blog going, you need to be able to come up with ideas to post at the very least every few days. I try and post at least daily.

I don't see this being a problem. I have a spiral notebook that I keep with me at all times, whenever inspiration should strike. I always have something to say about something.

Ya know what though, Rachel Weiss does have amazing features..her eyes and lips mainly.

1288. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218495 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:26 pm

Steve,

Alright I'll get right on that. I'll prob mess around and do it tonight. Or this weekend. I presume the blogspot is the place to go?

Until then all i can offer is this
http://www.myspace.com/the_dirtball

1289. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218481 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:18 pm

Al,

Nope. Kiera Knightly has a way prettier face and jessica biel's body is way more in shape and ripped. Plus her ass is phenomenal...like that shot in "i pronounce you chuck and larry"..

But Fran is hot for her age.

Mitchell,

I've never been crazy about her face either.

1290. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218467 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:09 pm

Quetz,

Yeah I'm thinking about getting a blog and getting rid of the myspace.

Righton,

You mean she'll stop banging you if you grow that thing out?

1291. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218462 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 1:05 pm

Righton,

FR for you!

Guys,

As far as bodies go I'm going to have to go with Jessica Biel..

1292. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god

Comment #218441 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 12:48 pm

The less time you spend taking the clothes off, the more time you have for other things.

I second that notion.

Dicky,
You're starting to spam. Just about every comment I've seen from you has your myspace link. Stop.

[edit] Keira Knightly is more gorgeous than alba or jolie.

1293. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #218419 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 12:30 pm

Al,

Noted.

Joe,

Unfortunatley I'm all talk and no action. ;) If you don't like western women then don't stalk, er I mean obesses, er I mean marry one.

Besides, ALL STEAM AND NO ROAST started it!!!

*giggles and runs away*

1294. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218413 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 12:13 pm

Al,

We sure have been targeted (on a more personal note) at lot more lately. At least it seems that way.

1295. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #218406 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 11:54 am

Al,

Sorry, that sounds like a group of women I know that go to the gym.

Geez It's kind of stupid porn movies have all of the extravagent story and plot lines. Wonder how that one turned out. One would think the action would take place in the gym, but I wonder if they were allowed to use that particular one. Or fade to a scene that was supposed to be inside the gym but was really a set.

I'm analysing this more than needed.

I'm sure you are the peanut gallery at almost every possible place you can be.

1296. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #218397 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 11:28 am

Even while sober?

You are more honest than al-rawandi, and I appreciate that

Yeah, as a matter of fact, your arguments are easier to follow after I've had a couple to drink. Or maybe the alcohol makes it less of a headache so I'm more prone to actually read the entire thing. Either or.

1297. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #218388 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 11:02 am

TWP, the virgins are men with hairy arses.

Oh well, look at what I'm missing.

Al,

I'm sure that would generate quite a spectacle any where. What constitutes as "opening scene"?

1298. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #218376 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 10:35 am

Al,

Ahh didn't know you were a scholar in internet islamism as well. Thanks for clearing that up. Although I'm wondering if the sites are women that are strictly "virgins". Or just whatver.

Tez,

I was actually pretending to shoot myself...Most people use the index finger or the index and middle finger together when they do this...But what you see in the picture is called the birdy barrell..and well this isn't the time nor place.

1299. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #218364 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 10:06 am

I thought the countdown was some sort of role playing game. I thought he was bombing us.

Internet bombing/internet martyr/72 online virgins

1300. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York

Comment #218346 by thewhitepearl on July 25, 2008 at 9:38 am

H4D,

This is a forum for opinions and responses to news articles and the discussions they spark, so there is nothing wrong with offering opinions here

Right. Just remember there is a fine line between opinion offering and fact throwing on the board here. And Al is a fact-natzi. Try not to take things so personally in a debate. We all get heated during the debate and when it's over, most of the time, we're all friendly again.

:)