Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by Diacanu


1701. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227371 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 6:27 pm

8teist-


Thats creotards for ya.


Habitual bullshit artists?
Indeed.


I`m sure his flock of sheeple eat his shit with a spoon.


Of course.

1702. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227353 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 6:01 pm

8teist-

Well, if his marriage is sexless, and his job is con-man, then what was he bragging about?

And if he wasn't bragging, it was talking for the sake of talking, and that pretty much admits it was an evasion tactic.

1703. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227260 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 2:59 pm

Clearthinker-


this is because I have a life, a wife and a job


Yeah, yeah, yeah. I hear this shit all the time.

Your lot is always too busy to answer the tough questions, but never too busy to post just enough to spray a cloud of trolling bullshit.

Do you guys get this shit out of a handbook?
Is there a secret site somewhere where you clowns synchronize your brains to sound exactly the same?

And there's always mention of a wife.
You guys can't resist throwing in that you have a mate, like we give a shit.
Just say you're busy, I don't care about your sex life.
Got a wife? Fine, fuck her.
Fuck her all fucking day, and don't post here anymore.
I mean, you don't have a real job, call out sick, and have an all day fuckfest.
Go through the Kama Sutra a couple times.
Long as it shuts your fucking little clam yap.

Oh, was that uncouth of me?
What were you bragging up the wife for then if not the fucking?
"Look at me, look at me, I've got a cum-catcher!", right?
Ain't that what you're saying?
No? Then what?
Oh, somebody loves you?
Big fucking deal.
Ted Bundy got love letters, didn't make him a good guy.
Meaningless.

Your heart works, your dick works, how about your brain?
That's what I give a shit about.
Does your fucking brain work?
You have yet to prove this to my satisfaction.
And when pressed on the matter, you become intransigent and elusive.
And when pressed on that, you once again credit your functioning pecker.
And then pat yourself on the back for being a good debater.
It's quite tedious.
Please, break the cycle, I implore you.

1704. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227245 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 2:45 pm

Bonzai-



But there is no logical fallacy in thinking that God could work that kind of miracle.



What you are actually doing is to invent an all purpose escape clause from logic you can invoke in any and all occasions that suit your purpose and call it "God". You may as well say "by magic" the big Wizard can suspend the laws nature and does anything he likes.

This is a mockery of logic.


Wow, he actually pulled out the dusty old "it doesn't have to make your kind of sense, it's MAGIC!", argument.

Doesn't give me much hope of him backing up his sneering at me with some actual reasoned case.

Not that I had any anyway.

1705. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227199 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Clearthinker-


Try that logic in debate..


Okay, I will.

Prove me wrong.

Shut me up with an argument for the existence of the Christian God that isn't laced with bullshit.

Whollup me.

Go on, do it.

I'm all hot and ready for a spanking.

1706. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227192 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:15 pm

Hellene-


proves to me that you are a manipulating little man.


Congratulations, you figured out the essence of Robertson's core being within 3 posts.
That's gotta be a new record.

1707. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227189 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:12 pm

Diacanu-


I would, however, pardon his past outbursts,


Not me.
Some shit has to be unforgivable, and some people have to be opposed.

Unconditional forgiveness is for Jesus, and even that's a bunch of spin by the church of lies.

1709. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227174 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:02 pm

JAMCAM-

Click "other comments by Clearthinker", on one of his posts, and/or Google up all posts by David Robertson, or Wee Flea.

1710. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227169 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:58 pm

JAMCAM-

I haven't got the quote on me, Paula Kirby probably does, but among other things, he exploited the story of a couple's dying baby to say that atheists would only see that child as a "throwaway survival machine".

It was a scumbag argument, and it was scumbag to use the private tragedy of his friends to make the argument.
And that's if it were true.
He could've made that shit up, which would make him a scumbag LIAR.
He loses either way.

I do not like that man.
There isn't a quark in his carcass I find redeeming after that.

1711. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227164 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:51 pm

JAMCAM87-


I'm sorry but I don't understand why clearthinker is seen as a troll.


You haven't been around long enough.
He's said some vile shit.


He is probably quite a nice guy.


*Shakes head "no", with with a concerned frown*

1712. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227158 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:39 pm

Clearthinker-


Anyone who believes in the Virgin Birth is de facto stupid -


No, that they give me no reason to believe it besides a shoddily written book of fairy tales makes them de facto stupid.

Give me some historical/forensic evidence, i might consider it.

Right now, there's as much reason to believe in the virgin birth, as there is for fucking Leprechauns.
Hey, I'll believe in fucking Leprechauns if you bring me one to look over.
A bunch of double talk about flowers and sunrises being so pretty, Leprechauns must live in them, that ain't gonna do it, bucko.

1713. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227154 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:33 pm

Clearthinker-


Long live Dawkins....I can't listen to this drivel....Lennox should be shot. Glad to see that the oasis of clear thinking is keeping up its usual high standards of debate!


here we fucking go again.

Whining about your feelings, and that no one is "nice", to you, instead of ever having an actual argument on your side.


I now understand why most atheist apologists prefer to preach to the converted or stick within the comfortable citadels of your own websites and group dynamics. You usually get hammered when you come out and try to logically reason with others who do not share your viewpoint.


Well, I've yet to see you pull out anything resembling logic.
You holding some back for some inexplicable reason?


That is because for you it is not about logic, reason or seeking truth.


Can't speak for the others, but it is for me.
Religion has bullshit, atheism doesn't.
I sized the two up for a long time with an unbiased eye.
Atheism wins.

You got some religious apologia for me that doesn't have a drop of bullshit in it?
Plop it up on the counter, and let me have a good look at it.


You already know the truth.


Nope, I'm willing to be persuaded.
Give me some evidence.
Give me a bullshit-free argument.


It appears that in the great battle for the hearts and minds of the West...


Personally, I don't give a fuck for hearts and minds, I care what's true.
If everyone on earth but me believed in the tooth fairy, it wouldn't make the fucking tooth fairy real.
That religion keeps boasting of the numbers of its fanclub, and thinks this is an argument is obscene to me.


...the majority voted for the motion that there is a God.


Again, don't care.
And again, that's not an argument.
Give me evidence that god is real.
You actually seem contented with the prospect that if everyone shares your delusion, that's real enough.
That's pretty twisted.
And it's even more twisted that there seems to be not a single braincell in your being that realizes just how twisted.


- the more we seem to gain.


That seems to be the clearest admission possible that it's all about politics for you fucks.
You don't give a fuck about it being true on not, so long as everyone believes your fairy tales, and thus keeps you relevant.
in a saner world, you wouldn't be.
You'd have to get a real job, and that scares the fuck out of you.

Well, be scared, asshat.
You can't keep people stupid forever.
You'd have to commit a massive humanitarian crime of epic scale to stop the information flow now.
And a toad like you hasn't got the grapes.

1714. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #227143 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:10 pm

I saw this thread bumped back to life, and immediately knew, as I've come to know when any such dead thread experiences a flurry of activity, that some douchebag must've bumped it.

I was assuming a txpiper/wooter/Joe-Mo level idiot.

Ah, but no, it's Clearthinker!
King of the douchebags!
I'd've expected way more pages.

1715. Rochester Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified

Comment #225791 by Diacanu on August 7, 2008 at 11:32 am

All I care about is can this be used for molecular re-integration in a transporter?

I intend to be Seth Brundle without the fly fusion.

All these quantum egghads are going to invent the pieces for me, and I'm going to put them together, and get the fame.

1716. The best way to undermine the jihadists is to trigger a rebellion of Muslim women - and establish energy independence

Comment #225783 by Diacanu on August 7, 2008 at 11:24 am

Hey, this whole premise was stolen from stuff I said here.
I invented all of this.
I thought of everything!
Son of a bitch.
And I'm too poor to lawyer up.
Helplessly behind this keyboard, no one paying me..grr...
Fuckin' world.

1718. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225473 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 3:51 pm

ShadesOfGrey-


You forgot the final part of the 'cure'. When they find you a partner (of the opposite sex of course)from within the church to get married to. That's when you are 'cured'.


I'm amazed no single hetero guy hasn't figured out to go mincing and swishing into one of those treatment thingies to claim his free chick. :P

1719. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225469 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 3:47 pm

phil rimmer-


I'm still trying to get a handle on what is sinful in the fundie view, Us or the world or both? If WE are sinners we don't need demons to make us sin. Or is this just a matter of the degree of sinning? We need some extra help for anal sex or to be pro-choice perhaps?


You're putting more thought into it than they do.
If fundies reasoned through their moronic superstitions, they'd be atheist.

And they fear that, cuz then the ground would open up, and down to the firey pits they'd fall.

Despite that we haven't had that happen.
But that's just more scary logic to avoid.

1720. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225427 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:58 pm

TWP-

Well, of course they think that, but that's just all the mumbo-jumbo bullshit they've had to stack up on top of other bullshit, on top of other bullshit, and so on, just to back up the notion that homosexuality is a choice, so they can call it a sin.

It doesn't break anyone's arm, it doesn't pick anyone's pocket, so they literally have to make up invisible goblins to attach sin to it.

Oh, and...


They really believe that you aren't REALLY homosexual.


I'm not, I'm straight.
I mean, I like Queen, David Bowie, Abba, and the comedy of Kathy Griffin, so it can be hard to tell, but trust me, I dig chicks.

..or were you using the global "you"?

1721. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225401 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:27 pm

Quetz-


What makes it worse is that they genuinely think they are being considerate and understanding.


Well, there's that old line "one is as moral as their choices".
The christian sees their only choices as sending homosexuals to Hell with murder, passively allowing homosexuals to live their sinful lives, and going to Hell, but shedding crocodile tears that they are going to sin, OR by not choosing either option, going to Hell themselves.

So, that's really as "nice", as their nasty religion allows them to be.

1722. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225397 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:22 pm

Steve Zara-


That really gets me angry. I detest the patronising attitude of supposedly moderate and nice Christians who consider homosexuality sinful, "but we have to hate the sin, not the sinner". I have a similar detestation of the term "toleration" applied to homosexuality.

I consider myself a full and equal part of society. I am not someone who should be "forgiven" or "tolerated".


That's their little "compromise", because they refuse to let go of ANY hate, so they really think that's being nice.

But not really, because they think you're going to Hell, and they're perfectly contented with that notion.

But there again is that whole passive-aggressive "well, it's not ME being an asshole, it's God, and it's okay when God does it".

Course, every chain of events could be considered an act of God, so by that very same logic, they could stand idly by and watch a child drown.

But, point that out, you get either the plugged ears, or a shout down of pure emotionalism with no real argument.

Ah, ain't it fun to interact with these people?

1723. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225389 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:07 pm

Steve Zara-


We gays are the result of sin, don't you know? Once men and women started doing bad things, evil came into the world, resulting in earthquakes, famine, death, disease, Jerry Springer, cheese whizz, and gays.


Ah, I see.
Having one's prostate ring-a-ding-ed by a ding-a-ling of course being on par with an earthquake that kills thousands in the christian mind.

If picking only self-lubricating orifices to achieve orgasm with was such a huge deal for the creator entity, you'd think he'd but a big blinking warning label on the bum, or something.

Well, I suppose a christian would say Leviticus is the blinking bum label, but then we get into there being no outside evidence of its authority, and that christians cherry pick it for what they want to justify, and then that discussion gets stonewalled with the old plugged ears and humming trick.

1724. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #225345 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:19 pm

Sciros-

Hmm, tough one, they both have spikey hair, slacker 'tude, and a bigass surfboard sized sword.

1725. Call to teach biblical creation as science

Comment #225335 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:11 pm


she says gay people are "vile" and "an abomination".


Then why did God invent them?
And if he didn't, then so much for his infallibility.

1726. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #225331 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:06 pm

Summary of the last diarrhea blast.

Atheists are all potential Stalins, and they love Stalin, and want his cock, but they don't even know it.
The Koran says so.
Atheism is scientifically false, because Stalin was bad.
The Koran says so.
Materialism is bad, and it's about treating people like doo-doo poopy, and that makes me sad.
The Koran says so.
Allah is real, therefore people who hate religion are evil, and will eat babies.
The Koran says so.
So there.
Nyahh.


*Yawn*

1727. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #225202 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 10:38 am

mordacious1-


He didn't do so well in school.


Neither did I, but I still ended up an X-Man.
Joe just isn't any good.

1729. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224670 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:26 am

Sciros-

Agreed.
Let's abandon the little waif in the toy department.

1730. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224668 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:24 am

epeeist-

Ah, well, that would explain a lot, and it doesn't surprise me.
Bet he has issues with his mommy too.
Most misogynists do.

1731. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224661 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:14 am

Jooter-


the most important unifying influence among Masons is their philosophy-which can be best described according to such terms as "materialism" and "secular humanism."


Good.

Thought you were leaving.

1732. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224658 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:08 am

Jooter-


I am no longer wasting any time on the subject


*Waves*
Bye byyye!! Bye now!! Bubye!! Byyyee! Bye now! Bubye!! Bubye!! Bye!!! Caio!! Alohah!! Shalom!! Arividerchi!!

1733. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224656 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:04 am

Jooter-


THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT THAT HIS RECENT TROUBLES WITH THE LAW STEM FROM THE SAME ENEMIES WHO ARE OUT TO DISCREDIT HIM AND HIS REPUTATION.


HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

Oh, mercy.

You're a lunatic.
Dead stop.

1734. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224640 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 9:19 am

*Sigh* Jooter ignored my beautiful venomous rant from yesterday.
And I constructed it especially for him.
*Sob* :(

1735. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224638 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 9:15 am

Jooter-


VAIN WISHFUL-THINKING


Yep, that's pretty much all you've got, you nasty little egoist misogynist.

How about some evidence instead?

1736. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224339 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:29 pm

epeeist-


(Sorry Diacanu, I am sure you can do better on the invective front).


hope you enjoyed the latest.
B)

1737. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224328 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:20 pm

Jomo-


I WILL CONTINUE TO DISH OUT PAIN AND ASSERT MY SUPERIORITY OF YOU BLIND FOOLS!


You're a superstitious moron, Islam is a pathetic mongrel religion, a plagiarism of a fraud, and in its name, you're behaving like a total fucking infant, and bringing absolute disgrace on yourself and your cause.
Fuck off to wherever the fuck you came from, child.
Blither amongst your ignorant-ass patriarchal woman-hating fraternity where they probably think you're brilliant.

And speaking of balls, is there anything gayer than patriarchal woman haters?

At least real gays have the balls to suck balls.
I respect that.

But you guys, you Abrahamic assholes, you despise the pussy, you hang around with your little boyfriends, but you won't give 'em the reach around because you're homophobes on top of it.
Shit or get off the pot with that shit.
Pick a fucking hole, and commit.
Fruity-ass.

1738. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224313 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:05 pm

On the one hand, it gives me kind of relief that the creationist side is so full of blithering mental vegetables.

But, viscerally, it fills me with a bored sadness.
There's no challenge.

As an organism evolved to be a hunter-gatherer, there's this primal part of me that wants something more than little mole-rats to smash with my tomahawk.

And then intellectually, I come full circle, and think "how did these morons rule the world for so long? Why did my intellectual forebears have to swim so fucking hard upstream against such lame-ass childish ideas?".

Well, at least we're finally in the mop up phase now.

Jooter represents the death whimper of the dead-enders IMHO.

1739. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224254 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 11:37 am

...maybe "SHOW SOME BALLS!!", is what he screams at his wife, to which she replies "um...honey, I don't have any balls..", to which he replies "goddamned right you don't, bitch!!", then he storms off to his computer room to vent his confusion and frustration at us.

To think, a simple anatomy book would have solved all of this.

But, of course, anatomy books are written by the evolutionist/materialist conspiracy so....

1741. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224248 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 11:26 am

Jocko Jomo-


Argle-bargle, blaaugh, all a conspiracy, blaugh, blaaugh, all caps, blahhh!!!!!!


*Head pat* shhh, shhh, easy now, eat your lithium cupcake. Simmer down, little buckaroo....

1744. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224217 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 10:27 am

al-rawandi-


And his PR team???? Don't get me started.


Seems both Yahweh and Allah only allow applicants with borderline personality disorder, and/or Asperger's syndrome into their PR departments.

1745. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224208 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:59 am

So, am I all caught up to speed on the latest troll persona?

Hmm, not much to work with.
Can't see a reason to waste my A material...

Still, Txpiper is pretty dull, and I manage to have fun with that poor creature...

1746. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224200 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:41 am

So, where's Joe's proof of Allah?

Is it his chest thumping? His hatred of women?

Are we to believe that Joe is the model of perfection that only a cosmic entity like Allah could construct?

Is that why he says his posts are loaded with proof?

I dunno, it's a great case, really, but I'd still like this subjected to lab trials.

1747. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224194 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:32 am

al-rawandi-


He is married to a super model:


Palmela Handerson


She's seeing Ben Affleck behind his back. ;)

1748. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224191 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:30 am

quetz-


Who the hell is going to marry Joe Morreale?


Well, maybe a psychiatric nurse with a sort of Florence Nightingale thing going on?

Kinda like Harley Quinne, y'know?

1749. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224186 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:27 am

Jocko Jomo-


My comments are flooded with proof.


Um, they seem flooded with something else...is the proof buried under that?
Cuz, I don't feel like digging under all that with a clothespin on my nose, and arm length rubber gloves on, only to have you go "ha haaa! sucka! it's just poopy!!".

I've had creationist pull that before, you see.

1750. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224181 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:21 am

Joe-Mo-


You are indeed a joker!


Thank you for being so observant.

Allow me to introduce my sidekicks, the Smoker (points to Steve), and the Midnight Toker (points to Al).