1701. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227371 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 6:27 pm
8teist-
Thats creotards for ya.
I`m sure his flock of sheeple eat his shit with a spoon.
1702. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227353 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 6:01 pm
8teist-
Well, if his marriage is sexless, and his job is con-man, then what was he bragging about?
And if he wasn't bragging, it was talking for the sake of talking, and that pretty much admits it was an evasion tactic.
1703. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227260 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Clearthinker-
this is because I have a life, a wife and a job
1704. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227245 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 2:45 pm
Bonzai-
But there is no logical fallacy in thinking that God could work that kind of miracle.
What you are actually doing is to invent an all purpose escape clause from logic you can invoke in any and all occasions that suit your purpose and call it "God". You may as well say "by magic" the big Wizard can suspend the laws nature and does anything he likes.
This is a mockery of logic.
1705. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227199 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Clearthinker-
Try that logic in debate..
1706. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227192 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Hellene-
proves to me that you are a manipulating little man.
1707. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227189 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Diacanu-
I would, however, pardon his past outbursts,
1708. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227183 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Quetz-
Awsome, thanks.
*Thumbs up*
1709. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227174 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 1:02 pm
JAMCAM-
Click "other comments by Clearthinker", on one of his posts, and/or Google up all posts by David Robertson, or Wee Flea.
1710. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227169 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:58 pm
JAMCAM-
I haven't got the quote on me, Paula Kirby probably does, but among other things, he exploited the story of a couple's dying baby to say that atheists would only see that child as a "throwaway survival machine".
It was a scumbag argument, and it was scumbag to use the private tragedy of his friends to make the argument.
And that's if it were true.
He could've made that shit up, which would make him a scumbag LIAR.
He loses either way.
I do not like that man.
There isn't a quark in his carcass I find redeeming after that.
1711. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227164 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:51 pm
JAMCAM87-
I'm sorry but I don't understand why clearthinker is seen as a troll.
He is probably quite a nice guy.
1712. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227158 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Clearthinker-
Anyone who believes in the Virgin Birth is de facto stupid -
1713. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227154 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Clearthinker-
Long live Dawkins....I can't listen to this drivel....Lennox should be shot. Glad to see that the oasis of clear thinking is keeping up its usual high standards of debate!
I now understand why most atheist apologists prefer to preach to the converted or stick within the comfortable citadels of your own websites and group dynamics. You usually get hammered when you come out and try to logically reason with others who do not share your viewpoint.
That is because for you it is not about logic, reason or seeking truth.
You already know the truth.
It appears that in the great battle for the hearts and minds of the West...
...the majority voted for the motion that there is a God.
- the more we seem to gain.
1714. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox
Comment #227143 by Diacanu on August 9, 2008 at 12:10 pm
I saw this thread bumped back to life, and immediately knew, as I've come to know when any such dead thread experiences a flurry of activity, that some douchebag must've bumped it.
I was assuming a txpiper/wooter/Joe-Mo level idiot.
Ah, but no, it's Clearthinker!
King of the douchebags!
I'd've expected way more pages.
1715. Rochester Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
Comment #225791 by Diacanu on August 7, 2008 at 11:32 am
All I care about is can this be used for molecular re-integration in a transporter?
I intend to be Seth Brundle without the fly fusion.
All these quantum egghads are going to invent the pieces for me, and I'm going to put them together, and get the fame.
Comment #225783 by Diacanu on August 7, 2008 at 11:24 am
Hey, this whole premise was stolen from stuff I said here.
I invented all of this.
I thought of everything!
Son of a bitch.
And I'm too poor to lawyer up.
Helplessly behind this keyboard, no one paying me..grr...
Fuckin' world.
1717. PZ Myers Desecrates a Eucharist
Comment #225480 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 4:00 pm
....huh.
1718. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225473 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 3:51 pm
ShadesOfGrey-
You forgot the final part of the 'cure'. When they find you a partner (of the opposite sex of course)from within the church to get married to. That's when you are 'cured'.
1719. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225469 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 3:47 pm
phil rimmer-
I'm still trying to get a handle on what is sinful in the fundie view, Us or the world or both? If WE are sinners we don't need demons to make us sin. Or is this just a matter of the degree of sinning? We need some extra help for anal sex or to be pro-choice perhaps?
1720. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225427 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:58 pm
TWP-
Well, of course they think that, but that's just all the mumbo-jumbo bullshit they've had to stack up on top of other bullshit, on top of other bullshit, and so on, just to back up the notion that homosexuality is a choice, so they can call it a sin.
It doesn't break anyone's arm, it doesn't pick anyone's pocket, so they literally have to make up invisible goblins to attach sin to it.
Oh, and...
They really believe that you aren't REALLY homosexual.
1721. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225401 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Quetz-
What makes it worse is that they genuinely think they are being considerate and understanding.
1722. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225397 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Steve Zara-
That really gets me angry. I detest the patronising attitude of supposedly moderate and nice Christians who consider homosexuality sinful, "but we have to hate the sin, not the sinner". I have a similar detestation of the term "toleration" applied to homosexuality.
I consider myself a full and equal part of society. I am not someone who should be "forgiven" or "tolerated".
1723. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225389 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Steve Zara-
We gays are the result of sin, don't you know? Once men and women started doing bad things, evil came into the world, resulting in earthquakes, famine, death, disease, Jerry Springer, cheese whizz, and gays.
1724. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #225345 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Sciros-
Hmm, tough one, they both have spikey hair, slacker 'tude, and a bigass surfboard sized sword.
1725. Call to teach biblical creation as science
Comment #225335 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:11 pm
she says gay people are "vile" and "an abomination".
1726. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #225331 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Summary of the last diarrhea blast.
Atheists are all potential Stalins, and they love Stalin, and want his cock, but they don't even know it.
The Koran says so.
Atheism is scientifically false, because Stalin was bad.
The Koran says so.
Materialism is bad, and it's about treating people like doo-doo poopy, and that makes me sad.
The Koran says so.
Allah is real, therefore people who hate religion are evil, and will eat babies.
The Koran says so.
So there.
Nyahh.
*Yawn*
1727. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #225202 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 10:38 am
mordacious1-
He didn't do so well in school.
1728. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #225167 by Diacanu on August 6, 2008 at 10:04 am
Laurie Fraser-
Josh, please banish this troll now!
1729. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224670 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:26 am
Sciros-
Agreed.
Let's abandon the little waif in the toy department.
1730. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224668 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:24 am
epeeist-
Ah, well, that would explain a lot, and it doesn't surprise me.
Bet he has issues with his mommy too.
Most misogynists do.
1731. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224661 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:14 am
Jooter-
the most important unifying influence among Masons is their philosophy-which can be best described according to such terms as "materialism" and "secular humanism."
1732. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224658 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:08 am
Jooter-
I am no longer wasting any time on the subject
1733. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224656 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 10:04 am
Jooter-
THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT THAT HIS RECENT TROUBLES WITH THE LAW STEM FROM THE SAME ENEMIES WHO ARE OUT TO DISCREDIT HIM AND HIS REPUTATION.
1734. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224640 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 9:19 am
*Sigh* Jooter ignored my beautiful venomous rant from yesterday.
And I constructed it especially for him.
*Sob* :(
1735. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224638 by Diacanu on August 5, 2008 at 9:15 am
Jooter-
VAIN WISHFUL-THINKING
1736. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224339 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:29 pm
epeeist-
(Sorry Diacanu, I am sure you can do better on the invective front).
1737. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224328 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Jomo-
I WILL CONTINUE TO DISH OUT PAIN AND ASSERT MY SUPERIORITY OF YOU BLIND FOOLS!
1738. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224313 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 1:05 pm
On the one hand, it gives me kind of relief that the creationist side is so full of blithering mental vegetables.
But, viscerally, it fills me with a bored sadness.
There's no challenge.
As an organism evolved to be a hunter-gatherer, there's this primal part of me that wants something more than little mole-rats to smash with my tomahawk.
And then intellectually, I come full circle, and think "how did these morons rule the world for so long? Why did my intellectual forebears have to swim so fucking hard upstream against such lame-ass childish ideas?".
Well, at least we're finally in the mop up phase now.
Jooter represents the death whimper of the dead-enders IMHO.
1739. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224254 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 11:37 am
...maybe "SHOW SOME BALLS!!", is what he screams at his wife, to which she replies "um...honey, I don't have any balls..", to which he replies "goddamned right you don't, bitch!!", then he storms off to his computer room to vent his confusion and frustration at us.
To think, a simple anatomy book would have solved all of this.
But, of course, anatomy books are written by the evolutionist/materialist conspiracy so....
1740. Evangelically Serious Science
Comment #224251 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 11:32 am
Teratornis-
Blow it out your ass.
:)
1741. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224248 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 11:26 am
Jocko Jomo-
Argle-bargle, blaaugh, all a conspiracy, blaugh, blaaugh, all caps, blahhh!!!!!!
1742. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224236 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 10:58 am
*Sings*
Just for the taste of iiiiiit!!
Di-et piss!!
1743. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224227 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 10:44 am
Al-rawanadi-
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!
1744. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224217 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 10:27 am
al-rawandi-
And his PR team???? Don't get me started.
1745. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224208 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:59 am
So, am I all caught up to speed on the latest troll persona?
Hmm, not much to work with.
Can't see a reason to waste my A material...
Still, Txpiper is pretty dull, and I manage to have fun with that poor creature...
1746. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224200 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:41 am
So, where's Joe's proof of Allah?
Is it his chest thumping? His hatred of women?
Are we to believe that Joe is the model of perfection that only a cosmic entity like Allah could construct?
Is that why he says his posts are loaded with proof?
I dunno, it's a great case, really, but I'd still like this subjected to lab trials.
1747. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224194 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:32 am
al-rawandi-
He is married to a super model:
Palmela Handerson
1748. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224191 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:30 am
quetz-
Who the hell is going to marry Joe Morreale?
1749. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224186 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:27 am
Jocko Jomo-
My comments are flooded with proof.
1750. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya
Comment #224181 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:21 am
Joe-Mo-
You are indeed a joker!