Comments by Diacanu

1751. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224178 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:10 am

All I want for christmas is for Joe to give me proof of Allah.

I hope he doesn't leave me weeping, throbbing, and unsatisfied like Santa. :(

1752. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224175 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:06 am

Jo-mo-

So far all the top Muslim scholars have proven their case when challenged.

Wow, they had empirical proof of Allah?
You got a link of where this happened?
It must have changed the whole world over night, how did I miss it?

1753. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224171 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 9:04 am

Oh, and just so's ya know, Joe, attacking evolution isn't proof of God/Allah.

You've got all your work cut out for you to pull that one off.

Unless, you have a magic chunk of evidence right on you.
And I assume you must, given the claims you're making.

So, come on, don't be a stingy prick, gimme the evidence, baby.

1754. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224169 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:57 am

ClearwooterJo-mo-

I TOLD YOU BEFORE THAT US MUSLIMS ARE ON THE TRUTH AND ARE READY TO DEMONSTRATE THIS ANYTIME IF GIVEN THE CHANCE.

Ah, so you have proof of Allah then.

Okay, lay it on me.

This should be good shit.

1755. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224167 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:53 am

ClearwooterJo-mo-

I will leave you in misery for a while to reflect.

On that you brought no proof of God?
Well, there goes my smile. :(

1756. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224163 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:50 am

Joeclearwooter-

MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO KNOW OF THE DECEPTION.

IT IS THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THIS DISGRACEFUL DECEPTION.

You mean the bible?
Oh, good.
Nasty old thing.
Comic books are so much better for children.
Stan Lee never told anyone Spidey was real.

1757. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224159 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:44 am

Joe Mo-

DARWINISM HAS BEEN ANNIHILATED AND DEMOLISHED ACROSS THE WHOLE WORLD,

Really? You guys finally brought forth proof of God?
Oh, I'm so excited!
Let's see it!!

Is it footage of a big giant hand coming from a cloud, or a strand of DNA that when scanned into a computer plays a hologram message from Yahweh?

...or is it just more chest thumping, and theological double-talk?

1758. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224155 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:37 am

Myself-

So, what did I miss here, anything good?

Joe Morreale-

Darwinism, tried to be kept alive by engaging in demagogy and propaganda, has been refuted in all spheres and it is now widely recognized that it's no longer possible to defend Darwinism by demagogy. Dawkins' recent statement along the logic that "evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences" is nothing but a laughable misery of reason.

....I guess not.

1759. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #224153 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 8:34 am

Ahh, my new computer is powerful enough to load this fuckin' page!

So, what did I miss here, anything good?

1760. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #224145 by Diacanu on August 4, 2008 at 7:51 am

TXy, didja get my PM?
Huh, didja? Didja?

1761. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #223905 by Diacanu on August 3, 2008 at 4:53 pm

Oh, and...

Timmy Xavier-

My objections to evolution and my acceptance of creation theory are two completely separate things.

Um, no, I'm afraid not.
That's only your own personal mental compartmentalization, that has nothing to back it but "cuz I say so!".

If you reject evolution, and don't swallow *snicker* "creation theory", you're left floundering for a whole new theory.

One you've gone studiously out of your way to avoid supplying.

No, studiously doesn't cut it, you've contorted like a T-1000 in a bottling plant to dodge answering that one.

However, if you swallow "creation theory", you pretty much have to reject evolution out of hand, because you can't believe both.

You've made it fairly clear that you reject evolution because of your christianity, so you're clearly in the latter camp, so your religion has everything to do with your worldview.

So, saying these positions is separate is just plain bullshit.
Who the fuck do you think you're fooling??
It certainly isn't us.
It certainly isn't yourself.
So why even say this shit?
Meaningless time-waste rhetorical drivel.

Something the religious specialize in.
And there again usual words fail.
To say the religious specialize in meaningless rhetoric is like saying The Maquis De Sade was a tad kinky.

1762. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #223879 by Diacanu on August 3, 2008 at 3:29 pm

So, has TX supplied any positive evidence for ID yet?

He always loses my posts in the shuffle, maybe I should PM him every day with the question.

Maybe after 100 days, he'll notice.

Y'think?

Maybe it'd go faster if others asked along with me.

Y'know, 2 guys for 50 days, 4 for 25, etc...

1763. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #223036 by Diacanu on August 1, 2008 at 10:08 am

Criminy, Timmy Xavior is still swinging, despite his eyes being swollen shut, and his mouthpiece flung out of the ring.

His devotion to middle eastern myths is quite something.
I mean, they're not even GOOD myths.
Viking myths, now that's gripping shit.

Well, Viking myths had great action, and intrigue, but I guess that whole Abrahamic "you're made of dirt, born in sin, lowlife scum, but the universe has you in mind", combo that plays into people's solipsism overrides any decent sense of dramaturgy.

Fascinating that we're almost 10,000 posts into the proof of it.
What a pernicious and stubborn little mind virus this bullshit is.

TX, it's bullshit, and it's bad for ya.

1764. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #220134 by Diacanu on July 28, 2008 at 6:10 am

irate_atheist-

It's too damn hot here too. Too hot to think properly.

Imagine what it must've been like for those ancient desert dwellers.

No wonder their science fiction novellas are so cranky, and full of blood vengeance.

1765. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #220089 by Diacanu on July 28, 2008 at 4:40 am

Steve-

The ark was a TARDIS!
More Jesus magic, y'see?

And Armageddon will be brought on by a pissed off cosmic empowered Rose Tylor.

1766. Antony Flew reviews the Index of The God Delusion

Comment #214485 by Diacanu on July 20, 2008 at 2:10 pm

Shaka-

Flew is clealy just scared of dieing, because of his old age.

I don't really get the logic of that.

If there's no afterlife, wishing for it with all your heart, lungs, liver, and colon won't make it be there.

Likewise, if it turned out there is an afterlife, not believing in it won't make it not be there.

All this faith shit does, is ease passage into that last shrinking TV screen dot.

And really, oftentimes not even then.
Especially if that final TV dot moment was preceeded by the chomping of shark/alligator teeth.

Well, logic shmogic I guess, fear of death is a raw animal thing.

But so's flinging poo, and I don't do that either.
So, I still dodn't let people off lightly.
The apologists want militant, I'M militant. ;)

1767. Antony Flew reviews the Index of The God Delusion

Comment #214471 by Diacanu on July 20, 2008 at 1:55 pm

His article, reproduced below, shows Professor Flew's key reasons for his belief in a Divine Intelligence.

Didn't have the patience to plow through the whole thing, was presentation of empirical proof of God one of those reasons?
Doubting it.

1768. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #213920 by Diacanu on July 19, 2008 at 8:26 am

Steve Zara-

You say you aren't particularly bright, yet to state you are able to interpret data in a way that puts you far in advance of even Nobel-prize winning biologists and chemists and geologists.

Perhaps you could explain this? It would be a useful gift to share.

Pow! Bam! Zonk! He's Suuuperrrrmaaaaan!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDR-XvJpqBk

1769. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #213901 by Diacanu on July 19, 2008 at 7:57 am

Gregg Townsend-

All together now;

"I'm not a slave to a god that doesn't exist!"

Hahaha. Thanks D!

You are most welcome. :)

1770. The Return of Religion

Comment #213592 by Diacanu on July 18, 2008 at 4:09 pm

So, did RM ever come back to face the music?

Or, is he back in the false succour of David Robertson?

1771. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #213138 by Diacanu on July 18, 2008 at 7:55 am

Ah, I see...

1772. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #213127 by Diacanu on July 18, 2008 at 7:39 am

Steve Zara-

Okay, what's up?
Here at "lying for jesus", you're all about grinding theist bones to make your bread.

BUT, back at your blog, when I expressed the joys of trampling a theist into pulsating goo with my workboots, you were all like "Eeewe heewe! Ewe my goodness, that's all so horrid, and frankly American of you".

Are you messing with my mind?

1773. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #213123 by Diacanu on July 18, 2008 at 7:33 am

Txpiper, Andylacey-

Here, fire up this clip....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ74G4lU84I

...with your speakers cranked to full, and mashed against your ear.

Pay particular attention to the chorus.
It repeats often, you won't be able to miss it.
It's medicine. It will help you.

1774. The Return of Religion

Comment #212862 by Diacanu on July 17, 2008 at 7:05 pm

Oh, and Richard, do stop sucking up to Steve and MPHil.
It won't get you anywhere.
They're as tired of your bullshit as I am, they're just too nice to say so.

1775. The Return of Religion

Comment #212849 by Diacanu on July 17, 2008 at 6:43 pm

Richard Morgan-

How lovely for you that you've gotten back together with your imaginary friend.
You go have fun with that.

The rest of us will be adults.

Now, do stop pestering with behavior you know is unwelcome.
It's very immature.
A man of your age should know better.

1776. The Return of Religion

Comment #212640 by Diacanu on July 17, 2008 at 1:39 pm

CocoCantare-

I would like to ask why some posters on these threads continue to insult people with the words cunt and pussy?

Well, I not only called victim-christians pussies, but FUCKING pussies.
As in pussies that are doing some fucking.
Christians wish they were being so useful.
So, in a way, it's meant in irony.
Kind of showing what they could be doing instead of hurling prayers up to an invisible man who isn't there.
Or sniveling that I don't respect that they do in horrible articles.

But, you're right, it could come off as an insult to fucking pussies.
Fucking pussies are worthwhile.
I shall endeavor to find another word construct.

1777. The Return of Religion

Comment #212634 by Diacanu on July 17, 2008 at 1:27 pm

Steve Zara-

Clear thinking does not mean calmness. When one clearly sees the harm that religion enables, it is not surprising if some people get quite irate.

Here, here!

1778. The Return of Religion

Comment #212633 by Diacanu on July 17, 2008 at 1:24 pm

Richard Morgan-

OK. I'm convinced.

Atheists are not strident.

And this really is a clearthinking oasis.

So, what I told you about stopping the passive-agressive trolling went in one ear, and out the other, didn't it?

Why don't you try and point out where anything I said was actually wrong?

1779. The Return of Religion

Comment #212053 by Diacanu on July 16, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Sorry for the long absences, been busting my hump on my blog (http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/) the past couple weeks.

Anyway, I skimmed the first couple paragraphs and right off the bat I see "strident", three times in succession, and an immediate whining tone that projects a "myyeehh, hyeeh, hyeehh! *wipes eyes*", voice in my head as I read.

Need I go further? Is that pretty much what this is, another christian climbing up on the cross shedding crocodile tears, and bawling that religion is the victim?

If so, (and I sense strongly that it is) how fucking tedious.
They don't even try.
The same 5 arguments recycled like a merry-go-round.

And all of 'em sprinkled with martyrdom.

Relgiots, you're not victims.
You insult genuinly put apon people every time you claim it.
Words aren't violence, arguments aren't assaults, and criticism isn't bigotry.
Grow the fuck up.
And grow a pair too, you fuckin' pussies.

Go to fuckin' Rawanda, and then come back and cry to us how "violent", Richard fucking Dawkins is to your soft marshmallowy priveleged little perch on this fucking planet.

1780. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #209906 by Diacanu on July 13, 2008 at 1:45 pm

Txpiper still spraying hot fizzy diarrhea from the cloacca he calls a mouth?

Hose yourself clean with ....

SHMEGALAMONGA!!!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Areba!! Areba!! Ay-yi-yi-yi-yiii!!!

1781. Children Are Naturally Prone To Be Empathic And Moral

Comment #209897 by Diacanu on July 13, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Are your children lacking in empathy?

They're probably deficient in vitamin Z.

Give them some Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Mix well with chocolate pudding for best effect.

Do it now, before they grow up into a Republican senator.

1782. An Irishman's Diary

Comment #209896 by Diacanu on July 13, 2008 at 1:31 pm

Pedantry getting you down?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

No one knows WTF Shmegalamonga means.
But dammit, you make this thing popular, it'll mean something.
And even Dawkins will have to say it.
And I'll be there with a fuckin' tape recorder.
And then, I'll play that shit at my funeral.
It'll be gorgeous.
Just you wait.

1783. Church Cancels Teen Gun Giveaway

Comment #209887 by Diacanu on July 13, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Are your teens sobbing over not getting their fill of precious nutritious life giving guns this weekend?

Paint your nipples and suckle them with Shmegalamonga!!

Now in green apple!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

1784. Host Desecration is Old Anti-Semitic Nonsense

Comment #209883 by Diacanu on July 13, 2008 at 1:18 pm

Y'know what flushes the magic crackers out of my desperate pleading colon?

Shmegalamonga!!!

Now with Splenda!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

1785. Sir John M. Templeton, Philanthropist, Dies at 95

Comment #206369 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 10:10 am

Layla Nasredden-

I don't think it's appropriate to "dump" on the dead

Dump on?

Nahhh, not me.

But, I may just start drinking lots of root beer, and eating asparagus in preparation for something else.....

1786. Sir John M. Templeton, Philanthropist, Dies at 95

Comment #206339 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 9:36 am

95.

The fucktards always hang on so fuckin' long.

Meanwhile, the people I admire overdose or get murdered in their 30s-40's.

Is this post offensive?
Fuck it, Templeton offended me.
Why's that okay? Huh?

1787. Religion's role in the climate debate

Comment #206313 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 9:08 am

Is your planet warming up?
Is your civilization collapsing?
Is your species slotted for extinction within your lifetime?

Cheer up!

There's always Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Now with no CFCs, CO2, sugar, or carbs!

Shmegalomonga, it never judges, never accuses, and is a handy-dandy substitute for love!

Religion may claim those things, but Shmegalamonga delivers!

1788. Degrees of religion

Comment #206303 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 8:48 am

Quetz-

Thanks. :)

1789. Degrees of religion

Comment #206300 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 8:41 am

Oh, and if anyone wants to keep up with the Shmegalamonga commercials, here..

http://richarddawkins.net/userComments,page1,24281

They're gems.
;)

1790. Degrees of religion

Comment #206298 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 8:35 am

Cartomancer-

putting your back into the job is hardly ever as effective as putting your head into it.

Agreed.
I'm experiencing similar difficulty with pimping my blog.

Putting funny commericals in every thread on the front list, while fun, and amusing to myself, is both labor intensive, and seemingly innefective.

There has to be a better, a smarter way.
Sadly, I'm just not seeing it.

Suggestions?

1791. Teaching Evolution in Mexico: Preaching to the Choir

Comment #206258 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 7:46 am

King of NH-

But Mexico is kicking American ass in science.

El Luchadore run off with your chimichanga?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Made right here in the states by fat shiftless union slobs!

1792. Conversation between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #206228 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 7:25 am

John Lennox giving you that riding a bicycle too slowly feeling?

Do the memories linger on, and cause you to grab the sides of your head, and fill the night with screams?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Life need never be filled with flavorless mediocrity ever again!

Because Shmegalamonga comes in cherry, grape, and watermelon!

1793. Degrees of religion

Comment #206219 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 7:18 am

Religious victimhood having you break out the songbooks and violins?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

You'll still be blubbering for Jesus/Allah, but your adorable little tears will come in several lovely fruit flavors!

1794. Stephen Hawking's explosive new theory

Comment #206210 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 7:10 am

Are your new theories not only explosive, but painful, runny, oily, or perhaps even bloody?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Not only will your orifices thank you, but so will your spouse/life-partner/maid/whomever cleans up after you.

1795. Churches' secret talks to stop gay surge

Comment #206190 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 6:53 am

Gays, need a surge in the morning?

Try Shmegalamonga!!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Works for heteros too.

Bis, you're on your own.

Just kidding, have some Shmegalamonga!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

1796. [UPDATED] Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya

Comment #206180 by Diacanu on July 8, 2008 at 6:47 am

Have you got wooter all over your flagentula?

Try Shmegalamonga!

http://dickynoo.blogspot.com/

Not only will it un-wooter your flagentula, but your mitocondria will expholiate twice as fast as with the other leading brand.

Shmegalamonga!!

Because while Pharyngula may already oxydize your riboflavin, only Shmegalamonga will make you truly enjoy it.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.

1797. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #205250 by Diacanu on July 7, 2008 at 12:34 am

txpiper-

I'll have to respond to the rest of you tomorrow if time permits.

It won't.
*smirk*

You christians always seem to suddenly get stricken with terminally sick aunts who die multiple times, Shaq sized heaps of paperwork that fall from the sky, babies who mysteriously shit for 24 hours straight, and 72 continuous hour long gardening projects that can only be due to having to battle man eating creeper vines.

My, how your God besets you with inconvenience.

1798. Christians challenge teaching of evolution

Comment #204558 by Diacanu on July 5, 2008 at 8:02 am

Well, let's see some evolutionists speaking up in churches, and see how they like that shit.

Religionists just think they have carte blank to attack everything everywhere, but they get to have their little bunker.

Bullshit.

Doesn't work that way.

They broke the gentleman's agreement between religion and science ages ago.

Time for the glove slapping.

1799. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #204556 by Diacanu on July 5, 2008 at 7:53 am

txpiper-

Howcome you christians refuse to acknowlege people describing your beliefs and props as exactly what they are?

Magic books, bronze age legends, invisible sky daddy, underground fire place, invisible sky daddy's zombie son.

We use these terms as ridicule, but they're only honestly explaining by your own terms what these things are.

What, the magic won't work if you agree to these words by acknowleging them?

Tell me, would the bible still have magic if it were in Chinese, in braille, and you held it upside down, and it had pages missing?

If not, then what makes english so wonderful?

And if there's nothing particularly magic about english, then what's one more step, and decribing these things as they are?
Jesus is a zombie.
God is invisible, he lives in the sky, and he's a daddy.
The bible is supposedly magic.
Supernatural happenings are magic, why are you christians even annoyed by that word?

Seems like avoiding this language is yet another superstition.
And like all superstitions, it's irrational.

And it seems to me, by avoiding even addressing it, you can avoid facing what bullshit you actually believe in.
If you called God "invisible sky daddy", and Jesus "zombie carpenter", you'd feel silly.
So, you have to dress these concepts up in respectibility with the bullshit language of the Bible.
Or else, the magic won't work.

But, if you're reading that bullshit in english, you've already fucked the magic up, haven't you?

Unless, again, language doesn't matter.

In which case why be offended by zombie carpenter, invisible sky daddy, magic book, and puff of magic creation?

And if you're not offended, why avoid the terms?

You can't have it both ways.

And the fact remains that you christians do indeed try to have it both ways.

It's yet another hypocrisy.
And like all religion's hypocrisies, you never face them.

Plug your ears, hum, and ignore this post, and prove my point.

You humorless, oblivious, superstitious, mythology worshipper.

1800. Lying for Jesus?

Comment #204550 by Diacanu on July 5, 2008 at 7:32 am

txpiper-

To me, things like that are brown spots in your ideological banana.

So what does a banana look like that has NO evidence, and the case being made with that non-evidence is outlandish magical claims from middle eastern myths?

It'd pretty much be a fully blackened empty peel on a sidewalk with ants all over it, wouldn't it?