Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by notsobad


351. The Pagan Christ

Comment #103591 by notsobad on December 26, 2007 at 8:46 am

Atheism does not offer solutions because it's not a belief system or philosophy.
However, unlike religion, it lets you think and decide for yourself.

352. The Four Horsemen: on Christmas

Comment #103549 by notsobad on December 26, 2007 at 7:28 am

Paula Kirby wrote:

But is it really so unthinkable that the mechanics of evolution by natural selection would have left a legacy of revulsion about homosexuality - after all, gay relationships are guaranteed to be offspring-free and therefore not in the interests of one's own or the society's survival.

Do these people also fight against infertile men and find them disgusting?
No, I didn't think they did.
What about the irony of priests living in celibate who oppose homosexuals? If their beliefs are somewhat based on evolution, shouldn't they fight against celibacy too and hate themselves?

353. The Four Horsemen: on Christmas

Comment #103515 by notsobad on December 26, 2007 at 3:34 am

notsobad - just to give you an example... my children being with me, would be one instance where I am forced to pay attention to what's going on around me. I find it rather annoying to have gays bragging about being gay in front of my innocent kids (9 years and 5 years old).

Do you consider them kissing 'bragging about being gay?' Are heterosexuals kissing also bragging about being heterosexuals or are they just expressing their love or lust?
Why can't your kids see it?

But is it really so unthinkable that the mechanics of evolution by natural selection would have left a legacy of revulsion about homosexuality - after all, gay relationships are guaranteed to be offspring-free and therefore not in the interests of one's own or the society's survival.

Evolution is not about 'society's survival.'

354. The Four Horsemen: on Christmas

Comment #103458 by notsobad on December 25, 2007 at 5:46 pm

You consider kissing an 'act'? And who forces you to look at them kissing anyway?

And the 'intentional injection of homosexuality (gay parades)' is caused by the other extreme - irrational opposition to homosexuality. If people didn't say they find homosexuality disgusting and immoral like it's self-evident and didn't try to limit homosexuals' freedom and rights, there would be no gay parades.

355. The Four Horsemen: on Christmas

Comment #103451 by notsobad on December 25, 2007 at 5:28 pm

why my body feels disgusted when I am forced to see gay men in the act.

Someone forces you to do that? Or forced Ayn Rand?

Every time someone says that they find homosexuality disgusting I want to ask: Are you imagining homosexuals having sex when you hear that word or what's the deal here?

356. The Evangelical Rebellion

Comment #103375 by notsobad on December 25, 2007 at 10:14 am

I'm in England but I still have a vote, which will proudly go for Ron Paul. As a lover of the Constitution and Individualism (while at the same time opposing government intervention in private lives), he's the only one that I can truly support.

This is a myth. Ron Paul lets religion affect his professional decisions. He says he wouldn't let federal government limit people's freedom but he has no problem with states doing that. And all those things are Christianity-related, e.g. abortion and religion in public schools.
This is like the free will cop-out.

357. Man and God

Comment #103354 by notsobad on December 25, 2007 at 9:03 am

spiritual dimension goes far beyond mere awe at the sublime"


This is just more of the sweet metaphysical bullshit. If anything, religion turns people into shallow simpletons.
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/1761/036ax7.png

Among Christians, there is no doubt that confusion and disillusion are causing considerable anguish.

...

This, surely, is where the new militant atheism is wrong. It is totalitarian in its prescription for human happiness.

The author and many others use the term 'militant atheist' but I have yet to see a single example of this militancy.
Also, calling atheism ideology or a 'prescription for human happiness' is either lying or severe lack of knowledge.
And how is it totalitarian?

358. 2 fleas for the Christmas week

Comment #103327 by notsobad on December 25, 2007 at 5:37 am

Why won't God heal amputees?
By Malcolm McLean

Is this a pseudonym for someone from the Pythons or is this guy for real?
If so, his books can have some serious, albeit unintended, comedic value.

359. Priest who committed suicide for rebirth cremated

Comment #103246 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 4:22 pm

For his parents? Aren't they responsible for him being a religious tool in the first place?

360. Taking children for a ride

Comment #103191 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 12:47 pm

Goodwithwood,
idiots are everywhere and aplenty. This particular kind of idiocy spreads from the US though.

361. Atheists' sign sparks controversy

Comment #103189 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 12:39 pm

Houser and her beliefs are separable. That, of course, is what bothers Hauser.

Well said. It's the nature of religious dogmatic beliefs to make the believer unify with those beliefs and consider them inseparable.

362. 'Christian God is not to blame'

Comment #103036 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 8:26 am

I do not now want to get into arguments about the historicty of the gospels or their validity as historical documents - that matter has not been settled to your satisfaction, but it has to mine.

And if you were born in India (to Hinduist parents) you would say the same about Sruti and Smriti. That's how weak your argument is.

363. 'Christian God is not to blame'

Comment #103018 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 7:43 am

Babies are vulnerable, more helpless initially than any of the animals.

I often hear this argument from the clergy. The same clergy that indoctrinates and brainwashes children and the same clergy that shields child molesters.

364. 2 fleas for the Christmas week

Comment #103016 by notsobad on December 24, 2007 at 7:42 am

The author believes that the concept of a transcendent entity as the source of morality and ultimate justice, is an essential foundation of rational human life and functioning.

So that's why the more religious and dogmatic a country and society is the worse they are off (currently South America, Africa, Middle East, Bible belt...). And that's why the less religious and dogmatic a society is, the better they are off. The logic is impeccable.

365. Chasers war on everything: Evangelicals

Comment #102410 by notsobad on December 22, 2007 at 4:32 pm

These people (professional Christians) profit because there is demand, to which I can say only:
"A fool and their money are soon parted."

The tax-free part pisses me off indeed though.

366. Bible bashing dying out in Kansas

Comment #102387 by notsobad on December 22, 2007 at 3:05 pm

According to the Bible, god indeed hates homosexuals. Funny, because he is also supposed to have created them.

367. 'Atheistic fundamentalism' fears

Comment #102386 by notsobad on December 22, 2007 at 3:03 pm

What a kind message full of love and tolerance at the Christmas time!

368. Good God! A politician who doesn't believe...

Comment #101992 by notsobad on December 21, 2007 at 11:06 am

Horrible article

369. Sorry to disappoint, but it's nonsense to suggest we want to ban Christmas

Comment #101991 by notsobad on December 21, 2007 at 10:58 am

jeepyjay, the problem is between the computer and chair then :)

370. Jesus ad angers church groups

Comment #100691 by notsobad on December 19, 2007 at 6:03 am

Professional Christian have always supplied us with a lot of fun through their complaints.

371. CBC News: Sunday - Richard Dawkins

Comment #100447 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 4:05 pm

However, if atheists are now officially making the claim that the world would necessarily be better if there were no religion in it, on top of the claim that there is no god, then we have officially made ourselves fair game for comparison to the Soviets during the Stalinist period.

No. Dawkins et al say that they oppose religion because it is not based on evidence and it is dogmatic. So their criticism includes Marxist and Stalinist dogma.

372. Interview with Richard Dawkins: On Christmas

Comment #100445 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 4:02 pm

"You sound like the kind of person who sends Christmas cards to the Archers".

I didn't get this reference. What does it mean?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Archers

373. Borders Tags Atheist Book with 'O Come All Ye Faithless' Cards

Comment #100433 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 3:45 pm

The original should be more like "Come all ye hateful"

374. This Week's Flea

Comment #100415 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 3:20 pm

a world expert on science and theology

right

375. Borders Tags Atheist Book with 'O Come All Ye Faithless' Cards

Comment #100231 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 12:03 pm

"Christians have always been used to being punch bags..."

How stupid can you get?

376. Abstinence Programs Face Rejection

Comment #100116 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 9:01 am

About time:
"Teenagers who take virginity pledges -- public declarations to abstain from sex -- are almost as likely to be infected with a sexually transmitted disease as those who never made the pledge, an eight-year study released yesterday found."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48509-2005Mar18.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7232643/

These people also marry early and try fewer partners, so it's not surprising that these people have the highest divorce rates.

377. God rest you merry atheist

Comment #100065 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 7:32 am

The anger expressed in this article reminds me of a joke I've just heard in the last episode of the Simpsons.
Homer comes to Ned to ask him why Ned called the police last night. Ned answers he heard a hubbub. So Homer asks what he did, and Ned answers:
"I can't say for sure but as a Christian, I assume the worst."

378. God rest you merry atheist

Comment #100015 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 4:34 am

Libby Purves' comments and observations are an entirely reasonable contribution to the debate and it's concerning that we react rather than respond, when this is exactly what we criticise our opponents for.

Entirely reasonable? This childish rant? Should we respond in a similar manner and say that you cannot use electricity and wear glasses if you don't support science?

379. God rest you merry atheist

Comment #100005 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 3:56 am

May I ask my RD friends where THEY would "draw the line" in perpetuating christian rituals please? (I'm not clear myself, and I freely admit it. But I do hate hypocrisy.) At what point does "harmless" become "harmful"?

As long as you don't try to force your beliefs on others and limit others' freedom, you can do and believe in whatever you want.
Baptizing a baby is an infringement of the baby's freedom and future choices.
Anyway, we have always had religion-free Christmas in my family and I enjoyed it as a kid (maybe even more than the kids forced to go to church just because they have to).

380. God rest you merry atheist

Comment #99966 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 1:58 am

He can sing Christian mythology the same way anybody else can read Greek mythology and enjoy it.

While music of these songs is usually fine (e.g. Silent Night), lyrics are just boring.

BTW, I'd love to have Libby Purves' problems (and get paid for it).

381. Dawkins: I'm a cultural Christian

Comment #99960 by notsobad on December 18, 2007 at 1:23 am

And that MP is spewing bullshit indeed.

If you want to enjoy the holiday, you don't have to care about how others do it.
And if you meet with your family and give parents only because you are supposed to, it's fake anyway.

382. This Is Not a Test

Comment #99835 by notsobad on December 17, 2007 at 4:49 pm

Kucinich is the best one there (along with Gravel, but he has no choice).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Dennis_Kucinich

All other democrats and republicans will just keep the old bullshit rolling.

383. Dawkins: I'm a cultural Christian

Comment #99776 by notsobad on December 17, 2007 at 2:18 pm

Someone at BBC sure didn't know what to write about because Dawkins said this several times before.

Anyway, regarding the Christian heritage, many people give Christianity too much credit for things it didn't create.

384. Do the laws of God trump those of man?

Comment #99564 by notsobad on December 17, 2007 at 4:19 am

Yes. Freedom is nothing unless you have the right to be an idiot. What you don't get is the right to impose your idiocy on others - and yes, that can include your own children, if your idiocy can be shown to be harming them.

That's exactly my credo. However, the problem with religion - and dogmatic beliefs in general - is that it's a virus that wants to spread itself using its current hosts.

Oh, and comment #99532 by wooter was hilarious.

385. Creationists plan British theme park

Comment #99560 by notsobad on December 17, 2007 at 3:53 am

Who cares as long as they don't get a cent or tax exemption from the government.

Also, what ever happened to "You shall not make for yourself an idol?"

386. THE FOUR HORSEMEN - Available Now on DVD!

Comment #99235 by notsobad on December 16, 2007 at 2:38 am

ADH,
if you need an imaginary friend to find 'grace' and 'love', you need to find better friends, girlfriend, interests, etc.

387. Creation college seeks state's OK to train teachers

Comment #99046 by notsobad on December 15, 2007 at 10:34 am

They just want to cut on costs. Creationism Lesson 1 - god did it, end of lesson and course.

388. An Open Letter to Richard Dawkins

Comment #99011 by notsobad on December 15, 2007 at 7:32 am

'rational skepticism'... that is, 'atheism'.

Even that is still an exaggeration making atheism more than it is. You don't have to be a rational skeptic, not rational, not skeptical to be an atheist.

389. Where Is Atheism When Bad Things Happen?

Comment #99003 by notsobad on December 15, 2007 at 6:49 am

Downunder,
you wasted a lot of time marveling at pointless things.
Start with basics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy

390. Why Science Will Triumph Only When Theory Becomes Law

Comment #98809 by notsobad on December 14, 2007 at 12:02 pm

"Advocates for Faith and Freedom"
Now that's some contradiction in terms.

Anyway, the teacher's comments probably don't belong to public school but he is polite and accurate.

391. Functional Neuroimaging of Belief, Disbelief, and Uncertainty

Comment #98698 by notsobad on December 14, 2007 at 4:46 am

Now, I would like to gather up every televangelist preacher and run them through that test and see if they really believe the shit they preach.

Wouldn't that be fun?

They tested fMRI as a lie detector in the 9th episode of the current 6th season of Mythbusters named Confederate Steam Gun. Out of 3, 1 passed the test lying (and he didn't pass polygraph).

392. Jail for creationist row killer

Comment #98669 by notsobad on December 14, 2007 at 2:31 am

Trying to link this sorry affair to religion is silly.

But it obviously doesn't make people peaceful either.

The moral of the story is: "Don't argue with idiots; they will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."

393. Why Science Will Triumph Only When Theory Becomes Law

Comment #98661 by notsobad on December 14, 2007 at 2:13 am

Don_Quix:

Seriously, I think you're beating up on the mentally ill. Which isn't nice. Although it is kind of funny to watch. ;)

I concur.

394. Here's an improvement on democracy

Comment #98265 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 11:48 am

Not just secularism but anti-dogmatism (awkward word) to avoid non-religious bullshit (e.g. communism).

395. Atheists' sign sparks controversy

Comment #98261 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 11:44 am

Imagine an Internet where people don't assume that the only explanation for a disagreement is that the other person must be stupid and as such deserving of personal attacks and insults.

Conservapedia?

396. Why Science Will Triumph Only When Theory Becomes Law

Comment #98235 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 10:27 am

Christ is apparently the very foundation Britain was founded upon.

And so were slavery and genocidal colonization. Your point?
He's made the 'fatal' mistake of not understanding that the Bible cannot be properly interpreted by the natural man, and that God intended it this way and that the Bible bears witness of this, something Dawkins could not discern.

The Bible writers were conmen, much more educated and literate than the rest of the populace. They knew that pompous and ambiguous words, phrases and stories make writing seem mystic and more important than it really is. Today, if someone uses complicated language, they are either very bad, inexperienced speakers or professional bullshiters.

Walter Krämer from University of Dortmund concluded that using complicated language is the way to communicate your superiority and power over others.

Or was it just the good loving god bragging to deal with its insecurities?

397. Atheism's Wrong Turn

Comment #98226 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 9:57 am

public education deliberately avoids much of what religious education focuses on such as morality.

Morality is a meaningless term without context. If you were right, how come that the most religious societies - e.g. Christians in South America and Africa - are the most fucked up ones and pale in comparison with secular societies in today's Europe?
Even if we accept that secular public education avoids teaching morals, the reality would then show that not teaching morals gives better results than teaching religious morals.
Or, more realistically IMO, if you are educated in science and critical thinking, it has much better influence on you behaviour than being taught dogmatic orders you are not supposed to analyse and question.

398. Atheists' sign sparks controversy

Comment #98220 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 9:40 am


So much energy wasted on silly posts.

Welcome to the Internet.
http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/5323/internetanonymitygu6.jpg

399. Ayaan Hirsi Ali versus Timothy Garton Ash

Comment #98154 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 6:37 am

What was peeped out?

400. U.S. Congress Recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith

Comment #98118 by notsobad on December 13, 2007 at 5:18 am

2,000,000,000 haha
I bet at least 50% couldn't even tell you the first commandment.
More insecure bragging.

More Pages: Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Next