Blasphemy, Free Speech, and Rationalism: An Interview with Sanal Edamaruku


Sanal Edamaruku is a world-renowned author and rationalist currently facing a maximum sentence of three years in prison plus fines for criticizing the Catholic Church. As president of the Indian Rationalist Association, he is a fixture on Indian television where he provides a skeptical view about alleged miracles and paranormal claims. 
In 2012 Edamaruku investigated what was being called a miracle: a crucifix dripping water at Our Lady of Velankanni Church in Mumbai. He quickly discovered the dripping was actually caused by water seeping through the wall onto the crucifix. Edamaruku reported his results on TV-9 and criticized the Catholic Church for “creating” the so-called miracle and being “anti-science.” 

In response, the church demanded an apology and its supporters filed official complaints against Edamaruku. He was charged with violating 295(a) of the Indian Penal Code, also known as the “blasphemy law,” which prohibits “deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.” His lawyers are arguing that the law infringes on free speech and are requesting the courts declare the law unconstitutional. Meanwhile, he was refused bail and fled to Europe. In this interview he speaks about his work, his family, the criminal charges, and the dangers of the “blasphemy law.”

The Humanist: Tell us a little about your background.

Sanal Edamaruku: I was born in Kerala, India, and lived there until I came to Delhi in the late 1970s to study at Jawaharlal Nehru University. My parents were rationalists who came from different religious backgrounds; my father, Joseph Edamaruku, came from a Syrian Christian family. One of his uncles was a bishop. My mother, Soley Edamaruku, came from a Hindu family. Both my parents are from Edamaruku village and adopted the village name as their surname. Because they both came from religious families, the young couple faced a lot of problems and dangers when they decided to marry. The events around my birth were something like an acid test for their commitment to each other and to rationalism. When my mother was nine months pregnant, they were invited to my father’s parents’ house for the birth. They stayed there peacefully for some time. But the day my mother went into labor and my father happened to be out of the house, the family suddenly tried to force her to convert to Christianity. That night my parents made the hard decision to leave. They wandered—my mother travailing—through a rainy night not knowing where to go. I was born in the early morning hours under the open sky and rain before they could reach my maternal grandparents’ house.

The Humanist: What a vivid (and oddly familiar) beginning! What was your childhood like from there?

Edamaruku: My childhood was very colorful. At an early age, I became involved in traditional Kerala music, dance theater, and the world of mythology. Over many years, I studied and performed Kathakali (the highly stylized classical Indian dance-drama) with great enthusiasm—and success. I was also a passionate reader, making my way through my father’s diverse library, and was lucky to get acquainted with great thinkers, writers, and social reformers of that time, as our house was a meeting point and a place for intense discussions.

Though I grew up without gods or religious indoctrination, I wasn’t pressed into rationalism either. My parents wanted me to have every option and make my own decision, which I did at the age of fifteen. It was triggered by a dramatic event. There was a young woman in our neighborhood named Susan who was a nationally acclaimed athlete and who later developed blood cancer. Her deeply religious family did not allow any medical treatment but tried to “cure” her with prayers while we helplessly watched her die. Her death shook me deeply—and finally made me an active rationalist. Soon after, I founded a rationalist student organization and launched anti-superstition campaigns.

Written By: Ryan Shaffer
continue to source article at


  1. So, where is the counter charge against the Catholic Church for fraud; as pointed out with the evidence provided by Sanal? Also, would not the act of claiming something to be a miracle that is easily proven to be just another natural phenomenon be an act of blasphemy? Surely the act of calling capillary action a miracle shows a lack of reverence for their own god.

    It’s like calling farting or taking a piss miracles. Not sure why the cult followers didn’t drag them out into the street, defrock, mock and put in the dock. How dare these Catholic leaders try to pull one over on their followers. No all knowing god would stands for this bullshit in its name. Oh, that’s right, there is no god to anger.

  2. i’ve seen the video of the ‘god man’ that took the challenge of killing Sanal with his mantras in 3 minutes on a live TV show.. it is available in youtube. If you see the video, this Godman performs rituals and chants mantras, as a display of superpower, to kill Sanal; i however think that this godman wanted to bore him to death cause nothing happens after 20 minutes!!

  3. Just read this sad story,Three words resonated with me, (I WAS LUCKY)so was I! I was lucky (Should I say fortunate)To scrape into our local grammar sclool in 1946.Why was I lucky ? because I was introduced the world of science.This made me realize there is a rational answer to everything.This released me from the chains of religion and superstition.
    Why did I write this letter,because I think many people who visit this site have been very lucky.

  4. Awesome guy, and amazing he remains so positive about life after all he’s been through. I had the pleasure of interviewing him yesterday for my podcast, fascinating discussion.

  5. In reply to #5 by TrollingWLogic:

    Awesome guy, and amazing he remains so positive about life after all he’s been through. I had the pleasure of interviewing him yesterday for my podcast, fascinating discussion.


  6. It may be surprising that The Indian Penal Code that was constituted in the 1860, still is the major criminal law in India. Though it as undergone a few ammendments, most of the provisions are obsolete and need total revamp. People like Sanal should lead a much needed revolution in this country, blindly obsessed with their beliefs in their religions!

Leave a Reply