Timeline of human origins revised: New synthesis of research links changing environment with Homo’s evolutionary adaptability

Jul 15, 2014

By Science Daily

Many traits unique to humans were long thought to have originated in the genus Homo between 2.4 and 1.8 million years ago in Africa. Although scientists have recognized these characteristics for decades, they are reconsidering the true evolutionary factors that drove them.

A large brain, long legs, the ability to craft tools and prolonged maturation periods were all thought to have evolved together at the start of the Homo lineage as African grasslands expanded and Earth’s climate became cooler and drier. However, new climate and fossil evidence analyzed by a team of researchers, including Smithsonian paleoanthropologist Richard Potts, Susan Antón, professor of anthropology at New York University, and Leslie Aiello, president of the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, suggests that these traits did not arise as a single package. Rather, several key ingredients once thought to define Homo evolved in earlier Australopithecus ancestors between 3 and 4 million years ago, while others emerged significantly later.

The team’s research takes an innovative approach to integrating paleoclimate data, new fossils and understandings of the genus Homo, archaeological remains and biological studies of a wide range of mammals (including humans). The synthesis of these data led the team to conclude that the ability of early humans to adjust to changing conditions ultimately enabled the earliest species of Homo to vary, survive and begin spreading from Africa to Eurasia 1.85 million years ago. Additional information about this study is available in the July 4 issue of Science.

Potts developed a new climate framework for East African human evolution that depicts most of the era from 2.5 million to 1.5 million years ago as a time of strong climate instability and shifting intensity of annual wet and dry seasons. This framework, which is based on Earth’s astronomical cycles, provides the basis for some of the paper’s key findings, and it suggests that multiple coexisting species ofHomo that overlapped geographically emerged in highly changing environments.

“Unstable climate conditions favored the evolution of the roots of human flexibility in our ancestors,” said Potts, curator of anthropology and director of the Human Origins Program at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. “The narrative of human evolution that arises from our analyses stresses the importance of adaptability to changing environments, rather than adaptation to any one environment, in the early success of the genus Homo.”

The team reviewed the entire body of fossil evidence relevant to the origin of Homo to better understand how the human genus evolved. For example, five skulls about 1.8 million years old from the site of Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia, show variations in traits typically seen in African H. erectus but differ from defining traits of other species of early Homo known only in Africa. Recently discovered skeletons of Australopithecus sediba (about 1.98 million years old) from Malapa, South Africa, also include someHomo-like features in its teeth and hands, while displaying unique, non-Homo traits in its skull and feet. Comparison of these fossils with the rich fossil record of East Africa indicates that the early diversification of the genus Homo was a period of morphological experimentation. Multiple species of Homo lived concurrently.

5 comments on “Timeline of human origins revised: New synthesis of research links changing environment with Homo’s evolutionary adaptability

  • 1
    John Gohde says:

    In stead of always rushing to publish, RD should have passed on this turkey. This entire field is in a state of total chaos. Just because someone is trying to make noise in the rush to publish does NOT mean that it is news worthy. Total noise is what I would call it.

    Report abuse

  • John Gohde Jul 17, 2014 at 8:23 am

    In stead of always rushing to publish, RD should have passed on this turkey.

    Hi John,

    RD net does not just publish high-grade articles. It publishes ones which need clarification, and ones which are biased rubbish, on which posters exercise their analytical and demolition skills.

    This entire field is in a state of total chaos.

    There are certainly competing ideas on interpreting the sparce supplies of hominid fossils.


    Report abuse

  • 3
    John Gohde says:

    Too bad, there is absolutely nothing either in this article or the research itself, other than a lack of content to chew over. By all means, let me know when something new is published that that actually says something of merit.

    Report abuse

  • John Gohde Jul 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm

    I thought the work published in the various linked articles in the National Geographic, showed meticulous field palaeontology and was beautifully illustrated in its detail!

    Report abuse

  • the early diversification of the genus Homo was a period of morphological experimentation.

    I wish we could be a bit more careful when it comes to describing natural processes. By saying that it was a time of “morphological experimentation implies that there is some kind of conscious agent doing the experimenting.

    A better way to say it might be…
    “The environmental conditions at that time made it possible for multiple species of Homo to live concurrently.”

    Report abuse

Leave a Reply

View our comment policy.