By Jonathan Amos
A new assessment from Europe’s CryoSat spacecraft shows Greenland to be losing about 375 cu km of ice each year.
Added to the discharges coming from Antarctica, it means Earth’s two big ice sheets are now dumping roughly 500 cu km of ice in the oceans annually.
“The contribution of both ice sheets together to sea level rise has doubled since 2009,” said Angelika Humbert from Germany’s Alfred Wegener Institute.
“To us, that’s an incredible number,” she told BBC News.
In its report to The Cryosphere journal, the AWI team does not actually calculate a sea-level rise equivalent number, but if this volume is considered to be all ice (a small part will be snow) then the contribution is likely to be on the order of just over a millimetre per year.
9 comments on “Greenland ice loss doubles from late 2000s”
How will the deniers spin this result?
Report abuse
Nothing to see here folks. Move along now. Nothing to see. Just let the grown ups deal with. Just another hysterical report by communist / UN / scientists seeking scam funding grants conspiracy to take over the world and install a world wide secret Jewish government. Nothing you need concern yourselves with. The Free Market will fix everything. Oreskes and Conway are in jail.
As you are leaving, collect your wet suits and flippers over here. The instruction manual has been condensed to a video now. Collect it as you are leaving for the mountains. The video is called Waterworld. BTW. The thing with the gills is just Hollywood spin. It won’t happen. See you all in heaven.
Report abuse
Ah, so depressing.
Report abuse
it’s a hoax by scientists to get more funding. It’s a hoax by the government to provide an excuse to raise taxes.
For enough spin to power the planet for a hundred years you just need to read the Daily Mail readers’ comments.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2729731/Antarctica-unprecedented-Most-complete-map-reveals-continent-shrinking-rapidly.html
Report abuse
Time for some obscure peer of the realm to jump in and claim expertise. Any inconvenient facts will probably be totally ignored.
Report abuse
You refer to Lord Nigel of Lawson I presume Nitya.
There’s a man who can be taken at his word; if you’re sufficiently credulous that is.
I hear that he’s been swanning around in your neck o’ the woods putting a word or three in for your Prime Minister and his pals, apropos of the great climate chaos conspiracy.
I blame the parents.
Report abuse
The National Geographic did an article on “Rising Seas” – and of course the denial-net went into overdrive to misrepresent it!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/09/130913-rising-seas-cover-september-statue-liberty-climate-change-global-warming/
Report abuse
Hi Stafford.
I was thinking of a couple of fine examples as a matter of fact; Lawson and Monckton. We should all pay heed to,their ramblings because they’re our social betters and know what’s good for us! All we need now are a few words from the erudite Prince Philip and there you have it!
They can cherry-pick to their hearts content, but the melting ice sheets are hard figures to fudge.
Report abuse
Yup, this worst example of a toffee nosed pom has been here, telling us grubby fingered peasants and transportees to mind our manners and accept what our betters tell us.
Our Murdoch’s Poodle of a Prime Minister positively fawned over him as well.
It is all very depressing.
Report abuse