Scientists Ponder the Prospect of Contagious Cancer

Feb 23, 2016

Photo credit: Jon Krause

By George Johnson

For all its peculiar horror, cancer comes with a saving grace. If nothing else can stop a tumor’s mad evolution, the cancer ultimately dies with its host. Everything the malignant cells have learned about outwitting the patient’s defenses — and those of the oncologists — is erased. The next case of cancer, in another victim, must start anew.

Imagine if instead, cancer cells had the ability to press on to another body. A cancer like that would have the power to metastasize not just from organ to organ, but from person to person, evolving deadly new skills along the way.

While there is no sign of an imminent threat, several recent papers suggest that the eventual emergence of a contagious human cancer is in the realm of medical possibility. This would not be a disease, like cervical cancer, that is set off by the spread of viruses, but rather one in which cancer cells actually travel from one person to another and thrive in their new location.

So far this is known to have happened only under the most unusual circumstances. A 19-year-old laboratory worker who pricked herself with a syringe of colon cancer cells developed a tumor in her hand. A surgeon acquired a cancer from his patient after accidentally cutting himself during an operation. There are also cases of malignant cells being transferred from one person to another through an organ transplant or from a woman to her fetus.

On each of these occasions, the malignancy went no further. The only known cancers that continue to move from body to body, evading the immune system, have been found in other animals. In laboratory experiments, for instance, cancer cells have been transferred by mosquitoes from one hamster to another. And so far, three kinds of contagious cancers have been discovered in the wild — in dogs, Tasmanian devils and, most recently, in soft shell clams.

The oldest known example is a cancer that spreads between dogs during sexual intercourse — not as a side effect of a viral or bacterial infection, but rather through direct conveyance of cancer cells. The state of the research is described in a review, “The Cancer Which Survived,” published last year by Andrea Strakova and Elizabeth P. Murchison of the University of Cambridge.


Continue reading by clicking the name of the source below.

2 comments on “Scientists Ponder the Prospect of Contagious Cancer

  • The existence of cancer at all seems to be a very good argument against so called “intelligent design”.

    There is the problem of the diseases that people pass to each other possibly resulting in tumours developing years later. After all, it has been known since the 1930s that someone who irritates their lungs with tobacco smoke stands a much higher chance of developing tumours later in life. What about irritating lungs with the myriad of chest infections that many people seem to be quite happy to pass around amongst each other? What about irritating the stomach and bowels with gastric diseases that again circulate freely?



    Report abuse

Leave a Reply

View our comment policy.