Reform Muslims Stand Up To Take On the Ideology of Islamism

Mar 25, 2016

Photo credit: Andrej Isakovic/AFP/Getty

By Maajid Nawaz

We are in the midst of a Muslim Reform – do not miss the wood for the trees.

The tragic attacks in Brussels this week mark the arrival of the global jihadist insurgency to Europe. The deaths of over 34 people in coordinated attacks in the heart of Europe’s capital had me pondering how we got here, and how far we have yet to go.

This month of March marks ten years since my release as an Islamist political prisoner from Egypt’s Mazra Tora prison. To stave off madness in solitary confinement, I used to organize races between pebbles that I flicked across the floor of my cell, naming them Freddy-Fred and Johnny-John. My cell had no lights, no toilet and no sheets for the first four months. In those early days, among the concrete and cockroaches, I found solace in the one item I was allowed to keep with me, a pocket-sized version of the Qur’an. I eventually memorized half of it under the light of the moon as it shone through the bars of the skylight and into my cell. The echo of my voice in that cell as I chanted the passages remains with me till this day. As does the same pocket-sized Qur’an, which I preserve with mixed feelings as a keepsake.

It is surreal to think back now and consider how dogmatic and intellectually inflexible I had become by the age of my arrest as an Islamist at 24. My rage stares out, piercing the lens of the prison guard who snapped this mugshot that I eventually smuggled out of prison with me. Our defiance of the World Order was on display for all to see as we marched in and out of that Cairo court raising slogans against our torturers as loudly as we could muster.

There we were, a vanguard, calling for the return of a “Caliphate” that we would eventually denounce when ISIS declared one 12 years later.

Over those next five years in jail my hardened immaturity softened, as I experienced the contradictions of life in a setting akin to Orwell’s Animal Farm, but for jihadists. There, as far back as 2002 I witnessed conversations among cellmates about how slavery would be reinstituted under our caliphate, and how the world would come to be conquered through jihad. I eventually became convinced that if we Islamists achieved what we had been romanticizing, we would come to destroy everything beautiful around us.

But this process was slow and, well, a process. Even as news broke of our release in March 2006 and I began conducting interviews, I still had a great deal of that residual anger and ideological dogma stuck inside me. A BBC HardTalk interview from that year is perhaps one of the best examples of my former Islamist double-speak.

And my fiery speech at an anti-Israel rally outside the US embassy in London organized on ‘al-Quds day’ – serving as the death throes of my waning Islamism – remains a lingering reminder of just how far I have allowed my mind to wonder from those heady days when I was ever so certain of the good and the bad. Since then I have travelled twice to Israel as part of a British Parliamentary delegation, and have pulled back from much of my previous rhetoric, carefully crafting a more balanced perspective on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and much else.

Eventually, my dogma gave way to my humanity. I could no longer maintain the facade of looking down on people like Amnesty activist John Cornwall who had become my pen pal while I was in prison, writing to me of life’s everyday wonders, while my fellow inmates dreamed of nothing but caliphal conquest.

On 2 May 2007, I sent out an email to an audience of Islamists, Jihadists and Muslim “Community gatekeepers”; some who received this email back then will recognize the text:

Maajid al-Saleemi  wrote:

In the name of God the Compassionate, the Merciful

Assalaamu alaykum,

I have deemed it necessary to announce that, after serving in Hizb-ut-Tahrir for 12 years and since I was 17 years old, I have decided to leave the party and resign my membership effective immediately.

I humbly request that I do not discuss the reasons for my decision at this moment in time, and ask that I be left to complete my much delayed final examinations.

Forgive me for any offence caused.

Maajid Nawaz

But I didn’t stop there. Needing to take responsibility for my role in creating division among our communities, I announced on the national flagship BBC Newsnight that I would now dedicate myself to challenging the divisive Islamist rhetoric that I had previously been prepared to die for. My first public talk to Muslims was met with incredulity.

You’re calling for secularism? Many in the packed hall asked me aghast, after I had summarized my position. How long ago it now seems that in 2007 the British Muslim activist scene found it controversial to speak of secularism so openly. My first attempt at engaging Muslims in writing on these themes came in the form of a blog in which the comments section has faithfully captured the general mind set of British Muslim activism in 2007. My first national column for London’s Sunday Times, and my first New York Times profile came later, and by January 2008 we had announced the founding of Quilliam as the world’s first counter-extremism organisation, a course that would set me firmly upon the path of challenging Islamism while promoting a liberal, democratic and pluralistic reform of Islam today.

As I reflect in the ashes of this horrific attack in Brussels, I see that over the course of these last ten years much has changed among Muslims in the West.

Quite clearly, I changed.

But so has the Western Muslim scene. People often ask me whether this has been a change for better or worse.

My answer is, rather confusingly: both.

Consider what has happened to the debate within Western Muslim communities. Openly liberal, reforming Muslims have become far less defensive, and much more vocal and visible, since those earlier, darker years during the heyday of Bush’s War on Terror decade. Reform theologians such as Quilliam’s Dr Usama Hasan have been at the forefront, convening global initiatives to reconcile Islam and science, culminating this week in the Istanbul Declaration on reconciling Muslims with the scientific method.

Across the world, Ex-Muslims and liberal, reforming Muslims are more openly claiming their right to challenge taboos within our own communities, and public discourse is ever so slowly catching up with the fact that being a conservative Muslim is not the only way to be a Muslim. Media are realizing that just because Islamist sympathizers shout the loudest, this doesn’t mean they should be heeded any more than anyone else, if at all.

But here’s the bad news. Arab democrats and reformers’ biggest success to date, has also been their biggest failure. The Arab Uprisings were not sparked by Islamists – they initially caught them and everyone else totally off guard – but by democrats. For a brief period, for just a few months, it was suddenly chic to be an Arab democrat in a Kufiyyeh scarf calling for change.

And then the despots took their revenge.

Human Rights fare worse now under Egypt’s military ruler Sisi, than when Mubarak imprisoned us. Syria speaks for itself.

Those positive shifts in the community have also not gone unnoticed among Islamists, and conservative Muslims. Each grouping is feeling the heat of reasserted enlightenment values by Reform Muslims, and has doubled-down, retreating further into their entrenched positions while targeting nascent liberal Muslim activists as a way to further establish their legitimacy.

Source: The Daily Beast

10 comments on “Reform Muslims Stand Up To Take On the Ideology of Islamism

  • Although strictly speaking I’m not qualified to comment, it has seemed to me for a long time that there are certain character traits which predispose some individuals to continually go from one extreme to another to seek solace; or as some might put it “the truth”.

    I freely admit that I went through a short period of my life when I did just that, but soon realized that I was just chasing the rainbow’s end and stopped wasting my time.

    But I’ve known some people who only gave up when they died.

    But as my mum used to say, it takes all sorts to make a world; she used to say, worse things happen at sea, as well; but that’s got bugger all to do with anything here.

    Report abuse

  • @OP – It is surreal to think back now and consider how dogmatic and intellectually inflexible I had become by the age of my arrest as an Islamist at 24.

    The problem with Islam, is the trojan-like destructive codes buried in its indoctrination.
    These can be kept suppressed when in a country with laws enforcing even-handed respect, but once the restraints are removed the underlying destructive memes come to the fore! In majority theocracies they are fiercely dominant.

    Its like running a nuclear power-station or an aircraft with fundamental design flaws, and hoping the crew will juggle the variables to keep it from exploding!
    Much of the time they may succeed! – but under stressful conditions, or when the trained disciplined crews and independent restraints are removed, it will all go to Hell!

    Report abuse

  • There are words representing ideas which are generally acceptable when separate, but which in combination are absolutely toxic; consider them the ingredients of a poison. One such combination is “National” and “Socialism”, and another is “Political” and “Islam”.

    Report abuse

  • 5
    Pinball1970 says:

    It gives me some hope but not much.
    MN and his colleagues have already received death threats in the UK for their stance.
    That stance being- Islam, we have a problem

    Report abuse

  • The bigotry is in Islam, and that’s the source of the bigotry enabler in the psyches of faithistic delusional Muslims (and remember – Professor Dawkins pulled no punches when he said faith in god was a delusion, and Hitchens was right about it and he said it was literally pathological bullshit).

    [Link to user’s blogsite removed by moderator]

    Report abuse

  • Is it a Human Condition. Is the current motivator Islam, but over history, hasn’t there been many motivators. Anders Breivik was a White Right Wing Christian Racist terrorist. I would ponder that there is a tiny subset of the species Homo Sapiens that would commit terrorist acts, given the right trigger. Bolshevik Terrorists. Jewish terrorists blowing up the hotel after 1948. American fundamentalist terrorists killing abortion doctors.

    I’m just wary of applying the label “Terrorist” to the entire Islamic population. Most of them are like the once a month church going Church of Englands burghers. You need to remember that the bible out numbers the koran 3 to 1 in references to violence and cruelty.

    So….. The Label attached to the terrorist is a movable object.

    Report abuse

  • The problem is that even in developed countries, the faith thinking of Sharia Law, prevents proper regulation of standards of conduct.

    The Bank of England has imposed a fine of £1.385m on Qatar Islamic Bank’s UK arm, QIB (UK), saying that it had “failed to meet some of the most basic regulatory standards”.

    The fine was levied by the Bank’s Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) after QIB fell short of reporting requirements in 2011 and 2012.

    QIB had made no regular assessment of its capital, the PRA said.

    “QIB’s failures in this regard were serious,” it added.

    The PRA said that from 30 June 2011 to 31 December 2012, QIB failed to recognise that it had to comply with regulatory requirements relating to the assessment and maintenance of financial resources and capital.

    QIB further failed properly to monitor and report to the regulator its total exposure to connected parties and in December 2011 was significantly exposed to a group of connected clients,” the PRA said.

    Report abuse

  • UK Channel 4 TV has commissioned a survey to give figures on Muslim views.

    Channel 4 has commissioned an extensive and rigorous survey to get a better understanding of British Muslims’ attitudes to living in Britain and British institutions, social issues including gender equality, homosexuality and issues relating to freedom of expression and the degree of sympathy for the use of violence and terrorist acts.

    Report abuse

Leave a Reply

View our comment policy.