UC proposal on intolerance says ‘anti-Zionism’ is unacceptable on campus

Mar 16, 2016

Photo credit: Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press

By Teresa Watanabe

University of California officials are proposing to include “anti-Zionism” as a form of discrimination that is unacceptable on campus, according to a long-awaited draft statement on intolerance released Tuesday.

The inclusion immediately drew sharply divergent reactions, with pro-Israel groups hailing it as a needed step to protect Jewish students from hostility and those supporting Palestinian rights criticizing it as a naked attempt to suppress criticism of the Jewish state.

Scholars were similarly divided over whether a statement meant to express the UC regents’ principles against intolerance should include Zionism — historically an international movement to establish a Jewish homeland and now viewed as the belief in Israel’s right to exist.

One letter signed by more than 130 UC faculty members supported naming anti-Zionism as an expression of anti-Semitism, saying students need guidance on “when healthy political debate crosses the line into anti-Jewish hatred, bigotry and discrimination, and when legitimate criticism of Israel devolves into denying Israel’s right to exist.”

But another letter from more than 250 UC professors expressed fear that the proposed statement would restrict free speech and academic freedom to teach, debate and research about the complex and tumultuous history of Israel and the Zionist movement.

Judith Butler, a Berkeley professor of comparative literature who has written on Zionism, questioned who would define that term or decide what crossed the line into discriminatory speech.


Source: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-uc-antisemitism-20160315-story.html

41 comments on “UC proposal on intolerance says ‘anti-Zionism’ is unacceptable on campus

  • Surely we should be free to express our opposition to any political, religious or philosophical cause. If Zionism is seen by UC as belief in Israel’s right to exist, why should that belief be protected from criticism and not the belief that it has no right to exist? Anti-Zionism is as legitimate a stance as anti-Atheism, anti-Islamism and anti-anythingelseism.

    Discrimination is another matter, and should be opposed, but not stated opposition to philosophical viewpoints.



    Report abuse

  • 2
    Cairsley says:

    If by ‘anti-Zionism’ is meant expression of ideas unfavorable to the existence of Israel as a rightful nation, there is no need for officials to pronounce it unacceptable on campus, for those in favor of Zionism are free and able to defend the existence of Israel as a rightful nation. Such frank disputes, surely, is what one should expect at a university. But, if by ‘anti-Zionism’ the officials are referring to some kind of mob mentality occurring on campus, one can understand their effort to label the problem and deal with it, not as officials in an institute of tertiary education but rather as those in a primary or secondary school, where labels and the exercise of a certain rightful arrogance are effective tools for controlling unruly, immature pupils.



    Report abuse

  • A “right to exist” is a logical and ontological impossibility. Things, entities, constructs, thoughts, ideas either exist, or they do not exist. If Israel has a right to exist, when did it achieve that right? Was the right always in existence, from time immemorial, all during the time from 70 AD to 1947, when few Jews lived in Israel, and the population was predominately Christian or Muslim? If so you would have the absurdity of a state with the right to exist, which didn’t in fact exist. If on the other hand, Israel’s right to exist came into being in 1948, where did the right come from?

    And, what of other states? Where did the existential right of any other state come from, and where does it go to when the states disappear into the dustbin of history? Does the Soviet Union or the Ottoman Empire have a right to exist? If Israel can have had a right to exist, even during the nearly 2 000 years when it didn’t in fact exist; why not every other state that has ever existed?

    Having said that, states, like people have a right not to be murdered, but that is a different argument. The right to exist, claimed uniquely by Israel, is so forcefully argued that nearly all world leaders pay lip service to it, but they are being forced to buy into a logical absurdity, developed to cover the Israeli’s lack of title to the land, and predicated on the occult idea that that section of the Levant was given to Cain by God.



    Report abuse

  • @OP- One letter signed by more than 130 UC faculty members supported naming anti-Zionism as an expression of anti-Semitism,

    Oh dear! 130 bigoted political illiterates working in an educational institution, and playing the offended card in place of an evidenced argument!
    (I recognise the difficulty in trying to present an evidence based argument for Zionist abuses of the non-Jewish members of the local population! – But fundamentalists with “god-given-rights”, never needed evidence based rational arguments, a knowledge of history, or accurate reports, anyway!)

    saying students need guidance on “when healthy political debate crosses the line into anti-Jewish hatred, bigotry and discrimination, and when legitimate criticism of Israel devolves into denying Israel’s right to exist.”

    Yep” If the the circular thinking does not reach their preconceived conclusions it must be “offensive” – with the pro-Zionist bigotry of the establishment projected on to critics!



    Report abuse

  • Wow, the UC did something right! I never cease to be amazed by the disingenuous arguments lefties can use to justify their anti-Semitism. How about this for you to get your shorts in a bunch about: The Land of Israel, whole and entire, now and forever, from the sea to the river, from Mount Hermon to Eilat, with Jerusalem as its capital! Peaceful resident aliens welcome, of course. Oh, and by the way, the notion of a “Palestinian state” in Judea and Samaria, is not beneficial, particularly to the residents of that area, whom you love to patronize. “Palestinians” in Israel and the West Bank enjoy a life of which others in the Arab lands are jealous.



    Report abuse

  • Stephen #5
    Mar 17, 2016 at 9:30 am

    Wow, the UC did something right! I never cease to be amazed by the disingenuous arguments lefties can use to justify their anti-Semitism.

    You seem to have missed the bit about political illiterates who conflate, the Jewish religion, the Jewish culture, the Stern-gang terrorists, the Israeli government, anti-Semitism and Zionism or the psychological projection of Zionist bigotry on to critics who point out the Zionist settlers’ armed robbery of land owned for generations by Palestinian farmers, and the routine assassination of political opponents, by the Israeli military!

    How about this for you to get your shorts in a bunch about: The Land of Israel, whole and entire, now and forever, from the sea to the river, from Mount Hermon to Eilat, with Jerusalem as its capital!

    Or more correctly, the land high-jacked by armed terrorists (later to become prominent members of the Israeli government) who assassinated the UN mediator when he proposed and equitable solution! . and later armed invasions!

    Peaceful resident aliens welcome, of course.

    Funny thing that! That is what was proposed after WW2 for the Jewish refugee immigrants. Unfortunately the Zionists among them were not into “peaceful co-existence” with the native population, so launched terrorist campaigns!

    Oh, and by the way, the notion of a “Palestinian state” in Judea and Samaria, is not beneficial, particularly to the residents of that area, whom you love to patronize. “Palestinians” in Israel and the West Bank enjoy a life of which others in the Arab lands are jealous.

    You really need to take off those delusion blinkers, and read up on some history from reputable researchers.

    Zionists have never been prepared to live peacefully under equitable laws which treat all citizens equally!



    Report abuse

  • Stephen
    “The Land of Israel, whole and entire, now and forever”

    Great biblical, epic, heroic bombast. But you still haven’t answered my question, from where does this right come, and where does it now exist?

    disingenuous arguments
    If my arguments are disingenuous, then it is up to you to demonstrate where disinguenity occurs

    anti-Semitism
    No -one on this site has said anything anti-semitic, nor would the mods allow them to.

    In general your sneering tone is distasteful, particularly since you don’t advance any logical or historic blunders which would justify sneers. You have not engaged with anything anyone has said. Still it’s (almost) a free website, and if you want to use invective rather than logic, I suppose that you are allowed to do so.

    Please could someone tell me how to make quotes go orange. Can’t work any of it it out since they stole the toolbar.



    Report abuse

  • eejit #7
    Mar 17, 2016 at 10:22 am

    Please could someone tell me how to make quotes go orange.

    Place > at the beginning of a quoted line, and leave a double line-space at the end of it.

    For italics put * at the front and end of the text, but avoid big spaces in the text.

    Similarly for bold put ** at the start and end of the text.

    BTW: You make some good points on the nature of tribalistic cheerleading for Zionism!



    Report abuse

  • Olgun #12
    Mar 17, 2016 at 1:36 pm

    I usually highlight and hit the apropriate icon at the top of the comment box if that helps eejit?

    Do you still have icons on the top of your comment boxes? – and if so which browser are you using?



    Report abuse

  • It seems to me that any criticism of Israel is met with the accusation of being ant-Semitic or anti-Zionist.

    Anyone interested in that last should read Warriors at Suez by Donald Neff : unit 101, the Stern Gang and all that sort of thing.

    And generally speaking, successive Israeli Governments have behaved appallingly towards thier neighbours since 1948.

    The American political observer and writer Norman Finkelstein has written extensively about Israel. He coined a very powerful phrase, which I’m reluctant to utter, but which he used as the title of one of his books.

    It is terribly difficult to tell at which point religious dogma becomes political disingenuity. Maybe they are one and the same thing.



    Report abuse

  • Jesus was supposedly a Jew, yet his best advice along the lines of “take no thought for the morrow” and “give all your stuff away and follow me”, seems highly unlikely from a Jew. Whatever else the Jewish religion seems to keep its roots close to human existence. I suppose centuries of persecution has honed this art. Of course the Gospels were written by Christians, renegade Jews, and could hardly portray the “Messiah” in a bad light. No wonder the Christian authors of the Gospels had the Jews murder Jesus, rather than the Roman Empire, which is far more likely for a troublesome preacher stirring up unrest.

    As for the state of Israel, formed in 1948, where would it be without the support of the USA in particular ? Kruschev used to describe Britain as the USA’s aircraft carrier to be sunk on the first day of the next war. IMO Israel is America’s carrier in the middle east.

    In my life, I have seen countries come and go. East/ West Germany, Checkoslovakia, Jugoslavia, USSR, and many others. I agree with Marx where he said that “workers have no country”.



    Report abuse

  • Zionism is not Judaism.

    Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism. Not all Jews are Zionists! I am a strong anti Zionist and come from a Jewish family. The Zionist propagandists in Israel and in the U.S. want people to think that if you are a Jew and not a Zionist you are a “self-hating Jew” and if you are opposed to Zionism you are opposed to Israel and to Jews.

    This must be confronted and people must speak out against this horrible, insidious propaganda.

    A Jewish-only state. I am against it. (I would be opposed to a Christian state as well.) That is not the same thing as wishing for the destruction of Israel. That is a vile accusation (often made), sheer paranoia and manipulation.

    Discriminatory speech? This is really sad. If this university capitulates, shame on them. That would be, in fact, beyond shameful.



    Report abuse

  • From article (Clearly Judith Butler, a brilliant woman, is right, and the other woman quoted below is equating and conflating Zionism with Judaism. That makes her…forgive me, a dishonest and unethical person. This is exactly what I was describing above. It’s propaganda, designed to confuse people. Again, Zionism is not Judaism and people should be able to speak out against it. This is highly insidious and sickening.):

    Butler wondered whether those singled out as criticizing Zionism would be denied faculty research funds, promotions or other benefits. To include anti-Zionism as an instance of intolerance and bigotry is actually to suppress a set of political beliefs that we actually need to hear,” she said. “It saddens me and strikes at the heart of the task of the university.”

    Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, co-founder and director of the AMCHA Initiative, which has led the drive for a UC statement, said such fears were unfounded. She said the intent was not to punish speech but to raise awareness about hostility toward Jewish students.

    No, it’s about promoting the Zionist agenda – and continuing a cruel, illegal occupation.



    Report abuse

  • Dan @ # 18.

    If you’re referring to my post @ #16, I didn’t say they were the same thing; that would have read ‘and’, not ‘or’.

    Many Jews I know are very upset about what’s happened to Israel since the Kibbutzim days, and like many Muslims, feel they’ve been rendered vulnerable by the antics of the hard liners.

    And anyway, it’s not the Israeli population who’ve behaved badly, it’s their leaders and the fundamentalists who are the culprits.

    I worked together with the Israeli Palestinian theatre director, David Mouchtar-Samurai, doing the Hanoch Levin play Hefetz, a satirical comedy about Israel. Levin was finally banned; do democracies ban writers?

    Prior to meeting David, I had no idea that there was any such person as a Palestinian Israeli, and when, having directed the play, the theatre critic of the Jewish Chronical accused him of being anti-Semitic, I heard him tell said journalist that he’d fought for Israel in the six day war, and would take drastic action if the accusation was repeated.

    That was a very steep learning curve for yours truly.

    I hope I’ve clarified matters Dan.



    Report abuse

  • @stafford-gordon

    I was not replying to your comment, Stafford, saw nothing wrong with it either. On the contrary, the label “anti-Zionist” is being used side by side with “anti-semitic.” That’s a tactic.

    Based on what I have read, Rossman-Benjamin is, apparently, a notorious, highly unscrupulous person. For example, I read that her organization singles out professors who speak out against Israel, puts them on a “target list.” Whether that is true or not I cannot say with certainty. This I do think is certain: this is the silencing of dissent disguised as “awareness-raising”. The real goal is not to raise awareness about anti-semitism; it is to confuse and intimidate and ultimately silence people.

    Again, Zionism is not Judaism and people should be able to speak out against it.



    Report abuse

  • eejit #7
    Mar 17, 2016 at 10:22 am

    Stephen; “The Land of Israel, whole and entire, now and forever

    Great biblical, epic, heroic bombast. But you still haven’t answered my question, from where does this right come, and where does it now exist?

    No answers – and nothing learned from participation in the previous discussion, – and no credible answers in that one either!

    https://www.richarddawkins.net/2015/03/why-i-no-longer-support-israel/#li-comment-172902



    Report abuse

  • In the USA the concept of antisemitism is expanded to include criticism of the state of Israel.
    This is strange since many Jews too are highly critical of that government. Further, to avoid the charge of antisemitism you must avow that the land claims of the Palestinians are bogus, and that they are mostly
    terrorists. Israelis did absolutely nothing to provoke attacks.

    The catch is, in the conflict, 1 Jew has died for every 26 Palestinians. The unbalanced view required is simply untrue and ignores the history of 1948.



    Report abuse

  • … with pro-Israel groups hailing it as a needed step to protect Jewish students …

    Hmm, so the State is synonymous with the religion? I believe the evidence points to millions of Jews who do not subscribe to that view.

    Dear CU: Partisan, much … ?

    … with pro-Israel groups hailing it as a needed step to protect Jewish students from hostility and those supporting Palestinian rights criticizing it as a naked attempt to suppress criticism of the Jewish state

    Yees, that must mean that for CU to be politically neutral they will also censor all speech regarding the imposition of a state on the homeland of a homogenous ethnic group against their will to the extent of forced mass migration, mass disenfranchisement, mass theft, impoverishment, hostility with modern armaments and mass imprisonment? Israel is to become a none-subject at CU?

    How very academic … NOT!

    Peace (Ho … Ho … Ho … )

    Okay, my turn to be partisan over.

    Universities do not contribute to the debate when they insist on speech codes.

    My point is not that the Palestinians are right and that the Israeli’s are wrong. It’s that every point should be judged on it’s merits.

    This story is not typical, in the sense that Israel is super-sensitive about it’s very existence – and with good reason, when nearby state leaders call for its extinction and its history is overshadowed by its own nefarious acts. Forgive me, I digress.

    But in every other way this story is typical of university campuses in the English-speaking world, and beyond. University used to refer to a universal education – even to the extent that what might be learnt was seemingly perverse to the general population.

    If a university, such as CU, values their position as ‘social-crucible’ they will value free speech and it’s administrative leaders will take seriously their duty to explain to the public that this means they value honest debate even to the extent of its being, in most other measures, anti-social.

    The alternative is for CU to become a Technical College – a worthy institution turning out technicians.

    It’s not my problem. If CU’s administrators want to run a Technical College, and it’s academic leaders can’t be bothered, then fine. There are plenty of real universities to turn out the leaders of tomorrow.

    Peace.



    Report abuse

  • Stafford Gordon #16
    [G]enerally speaking, successive Israeli Governments have behaved appallingly towards their neighbours since 1948.

    One can only wonder why. Of course, one might also point out the somewhat appalling behaviour of the – so called – neighbours towards the state of Israel. Starting with their war of independence in 1948.



    Report abuse

  • Roedy #23 In the USA the concept of antisemitism is expanded to include criticism of the state of Israel.

    Somewhere or other Iread that Ben Gurion had three brilliant PR ideas:

    1 Equate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
    2 Work with the labour/social democratic parties around the world, as the Right will automatically support anything anti-Arab, like the founding of Israel.
    3 Cash in on the Holocaust.

    All three met with superb success. The abandonment of Eastern European Jewry by the Jewish Agency ensured that full attention was focussed on the creation of the Jewish state. The social-democrat appearance of the early Israel hooked a huge swathe of the young in Europe and the United States, including this writer. The post six day war behaviour of the Israelis began to make many of the idealistic young see sense, and ultimately lost Israel the respect of most of the labour movement; but rattling on about anti-Semitism still seems to have some traction.



    Report abuse

  • According to UC proposal ‘anti-Zionism’ is unacceptable because it is anti-Semitism, ERGO according to UC “anti-Nazism” is unacceptable because it is anti-German and that would discriminate against Germans.
    When I was a 6 year old kid and I was at school I was told that being “anti-Generalissimo Franco” was anti-Spanish and unSpanish, therefore UC, which I’m sure it doesn’t want to discriminate against Spaniards, must be “pro- Franco”. THAT’S if we accept UC proposal, of course.



    Report abuse

  • This is a category mistake, pure and simple. Zionism is not an ethnic characteristic or status, it is a belief, and one that is necessarily political. Discrimination rules generally do not ban discrimination against beliefs, especially political beliefs. (Hence, we might ban discrimination against Christians but not against marxists.) So using these policies to protect zionism against criticism makes no sense. Zionists are not more entitled to protection of their political views than are marxists, communists, fascists, etc.



    Report abuse

  • Anti-Zionism incorporates the themes, images and language of good old fashioned Christian anti-semitism. Israelis, as Jews were for centuries, are imagined as blood-lusting, greedy, manipulative, conspiratorial, ruthless, base and evil. Israel is called a rogue state, an international criminal, a systematic violator of human rights and the source of all conflict in shrill and histrionic language. Naked hatred, unlike any other toward any other nation or people permeate the arguments made against Israel. In this sense, anti-Israel sentiment and anti-semitism is precisely the same thing. Anti-Zionists, not just Iranian ones, call for the end of Israel or Zionism, a coded wish for another genocide of millions of Jews. Anti-Zionists who clamor for a single Israeli/Palestinian state willfully ignore that a bloody and prolonged civil war would inevitably result, the very catastrophe that the U.N. sought to avoid by dividing British Palestine into Hebrew and Arabic states. Haters are always spoiling for a fight.



    Report abuse

  • mogee #32
    Mar 23, 2016 at 1:36 pm

    Israel is called a rogue state, an international criminal, a systematic violator of human rights

    Perhaps without your shrill strawman additions, that is because these allegations are actually true!

    http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/01/27/rogue-state-israeli-violations-of-u-n-security-council-resolutions/

    Rogue State: Israeli Violations of U.N. Security Council Resolutions
    (1948 to 1970 – there have been many more since – )
    Following is a list of United Nations Security Council resolutions directly critical of Israel for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions, the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Conventions, international terrorism, or other violations of international law.

    Unfortunately the major powers and the UN, are too spineless to follow up with sanctions or action on Israel’s ignoring of these.

    In this sense, anti-Israel sentiment and anti-semitism is precisely the same thing. Anti-Zionists,

    This is a statement of the disingenuous, nonsensical, conflating of disreputable Zionist political activity with Jewish culture or religion, which was pointed out earlier on this thread.!



    Report abuse

  • The United Nations has discredited itself by obsessively focussing on the Jewish state. That is not only my opinion, but also the opinion of Ban Ki Moon, the current U.N. Secretary General and his predecessor, Kofi Annan. The U.N Human Rights Commission was disbanded and replaced by the U.N. Human Rights Council due to its near exclusive focus on Israel and near complete disregard for other, very serious human rights offenders like Saudi Arabia and Sudan. Denying that the U.N. has and continues to act outrageously disproportionately toward Israel is not just evidence of an anti-Zionist bias but, since Israel has taken on the identity and character of the biggest, dirtiest F***ing Jew in the minds of haters, anti-Semitic as well. Bigotry, Alan4discussion, is like halitosis – the last person to recognize the problem is the person with the problem



    Report abuse

  • mogee #34
    Mar 24, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    Bigotry, Alan4discussion, is like halitosis – the last person to recognize the problem is the person with the problem.

    I think you have just self-identified on that issue!

    Perhaps you should have watched the video @#28!
    https://www.richarddawkins.net/2016/03/uc-proposal-on-intolerance-says-anti-zionism-is-unacceptable-on-campus/#li-comment-200127

    On this site we look at scientific and historical evidence!



    Report abuse

  • Israel does not care about the moral views of world opinion or the rights of Palestinians.
    Its government will happily support those swatters stealing lands from Palestinians, and do nothing to address their grievances – as one would expect in an apartheid state!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35901317

    Israel has criticised the UN Human Rights Council for voting to establish a database of firms doing business in settlements in the occupied West Bank.

    The Israeli ambassador to the UN called the database a “blacklist” and said the body was acting obsessively against it.

    But the Palestinian envoy said the move was a “message of hope” for his people.

    Settlements built on territories occupied by Israel in 1967 are considered illegal under international law, but Israel disputes this position.

    About 500,000 Jews live alongside 2.5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

    Thirty-two of the 47 members of the Geneva-based Human Rights Council voted on Thursday to adopt the motion calling for the establishment of the database.

    None voted against the motion, while 15, mostly European nations, abstained.

    The BBC’s Yolande Knell in Jerusalem says the database will provide a resource for any organisation wanting to divest from companies involved in Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands.

    It will potentially include a number of Israeli and international firms working in industries from banking to construction and security services, our correspondent adds.

    The Palestinians have been campaigning for tougher sanctions against settlements.

    The Palestinian envoy to the UN said that the passage of this resolution and others by the Human Rights Council were a “message of hope” to his people.

    “Israel continues to systematically violate the inalienable rights of the Palestinians while enjoying impunity from the international community,” Ibrahim Khreisheh added.



    Report abuse

  • mogee #34
    Mar 24, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    The United Nations has discredited itself by obsessively focussing on the Jewish state. That is not only my opinion, but also the opinion of Ban Ki Moon, the current U.N. Secretary General and his predecessor, Kofi Annan. The U.N Human Rights Commission was disbanded and replaced by the U.N. Human Rights Council

    @#36 – Thirty-two of the 47 members of the Geneva-based Human Rights Council voted on Thursday to adopt the motion calling for the establishment of the database. None voted against the motion, while 15, mostly European nations, abstained.

    Strange how the new U.N. Human Rights Council, continues to pass resolutions about Israeli abuses, with NO MEMBERS VOTING AGAINST THEM, while the Israeli government uses armed force and international diplomacy, to support the robbers and abusers!

    You have it “right” and the rest of the world is wrong!!!!!
    Perhaps you have not heard of psychological projection!!

    the last person to recognize the problem is the person with the problem.



    Report abuse

  • Alan4discussion #36
    Mar 25, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Israel does not care about the moral views of world opinion or the rights of Palestinians.
    Its government will happily support those squatters stealing lands from Palestinians, and do nothing to address their grievances – as one would expect in an apartheid state!

    Apparently Zionist theft of Palestinian land is not acceptable in Brazil, but IS acceptable in New York!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-35910853

    Israel has reassigned its nominee for ambassador to Brazil, whose appointment Brasilia refused to accept, apparently because he is a former settler leader.

    Dani Dayan will now become Israel’s consul general in New York, ending a seven-month diplomatic stand-off.

    Israel had previously said it would not replace Mr Dayan as its nominee.

    Mr Dayan’s appointment caused outrage among left-wing groups in Brazil, which lobbied President Dilma Rousseff to reject it.

    The Argentina-born official was chairman of the Yesha Council, an umbrella group representing Jewish settlers in the occupied territories, from 2007 to 2013.

    The fate of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem – land claimed by Palestinians for a future state – is one of the most contentious issues between Israel and the Palestinians.

    The settlements are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.

    There can be little doubt about where support for Zionist thieves and wilful disregard of UN resolutions with impunity, comes from!

    Mr Dayan said his deployment to New York was “a victory over the BDS” – the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement which targets Israel politically, economically and culturally.

    “I think those elements who did not want a settler leader in Brasilia, got a settler leader in the world’s capital,” he told an anti-BDS conference in Jerusalem.

    Brazil is Israel’s largest trading partner in South America, but relations have been tense since 2010, when Brazil said it recognised Palestinian statehood in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

    They soured further in 2014 when Brazil recalled its ambassador from Israel in protest at what it called the “disproportionate use of force” by Israel in its summer offensive in Gaza.

    In response, an Israeli foreign ministry spokesman called Brazil a “diplomatic dwarf”.

    Zionist arrogance and belligerence is regularly openly displayed, for those without bigotry blinkers, who have eyes to see and and a willingness to look!



    Report abuse

  • This is exactly why the term Islamophobia was invented. They saw how much success the Zionists were having in shutting down opposition, by playing the anti-semitic card. And wanted a card like that for themselves.



    Report abuse

Leave a Reply

View our comment policy.