Here’s what to expect from Saturday’s March for Science

By Chelsea Whyte and Lisa Grossman

The March for Science is set for tomorrow, when thousands are expected to descend on the National Mall in Washington DC. Hundreds of satellite marches are set to take place around the globe. Despite criticisms of the organising committee and a perceived lack of a clear message, it could be a turning point for how scientists approach government.

In the days after the 2017 US presidential inauguration, resistance to the anti-science stance trumpeted during the 2016 campaign grew in online discussions on Reddit. Several people, including physiologist Jonathan Berman, proposed a march on Washington similar to the Women’s March in January.

“There was this building desire among scientists to become more willing to enter into the political discussion, and we sort of got the timing right to become the fulcrum for that,” says Berman, who became one of the national organisers of the March for Science.

Continue reading by clicking the name of the source below.


  1. The turnout for marches was probably much larger than expected – and the lying response from Trump pretending his administration is “supporting science”, was predictable!

    After all –
    Lying Trump 1.01 – Any audience must be told what they want to hear and like to hear, regardless of what is actually being done!

    That is likely to work better on fallacy loving Republicans than on scientists – as some of the comments on various article links show!

Leave a Reply