Acts of Faith Pennsylvania Supreme Court approves release of 900-page grand jury report about Catholic clergy sex abuse

Jul 30, 2018

By Michelle Boorstein

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Friday that a landmark 900-page grand jury report about child sex abuse by Catholic clergy should be released as soon as Aug. 8 — but with some of the 300 predators’ names temporarily redacted.

A court battle has been underway for weeks over questions of fairness and transparency, with prosecutors and abuse advocates saying the results of an 18-month investigation must be released for justice to be done. Ten news organizations, including the Morning Call in Allentown, Pa., and The Washington Post, joined in a brief urging the release of the grand jury report.

But people named in the report said that they have not had adequate opportunity to protect their reputations and could be severely harmed as a result.

The grand jury report comes after several other explosive ones in Pennsylvania targeting institutional sex abuse — in other Catholic dioceses and at Pennsylvania State, among other places — and is expected to be “sobering” and “rather graphic,” Erie Bishop Lawrence Persico said this month.

Continue reading by clicking the name of the source below.

One comment on “Acts of Faith Pennsylvania Supreme Court approves release of 900-page grand jury report about Catholic clergy sex abuse”

  • @OP – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Friday that a landmark 900-page grand jury report about child sex abuse by Catholic clergy should be released as soon as Aug. 8 — but with some of the 300 predators’ names temporarily redacted.

    If the investigations have been properly carried out so the report is based on credible evidence, this should give ample opportunity for any questions about accuracy to be raised before names are released!

    But people named in the report said that they have not had adequate opportunity to protect their reputations and could be severely harmed as a result.

    These people should therefore be able to question the evidence, or refute claims with counter evidence in good time.

    Perpetuating the cover-up on any pretext, is simple not acceptable.
    If the reputations of the guilty are harmed – so be it!



    Report abuse

Leave a Reply

View our comment policy.