Activity


  • By Hemant Mehta

    The three Washington State Supreme Court justices up for re-election this November won’t have a free walk into another term; there will be challengers for all of their seats.

    And one of the c […]

    • @OP – The Discovery Institute, of course, is the non-profit group that promotes the debunked theory known as Intelligent Design.

      Shouldn’t that be “the pseudo-theory known as Intelligent Design”?.

      In science this junk does not even rate as a credible hypothesis – unless scientific bodies have started accepting personal incredulity as a form of hypothesis which I have not heard about!

      “God-must have-did-it-by mysterious magic” , was never science!

      After all!
      People do not need to be very bright, logical, or perceptive , to think in circles to “discover” their own mistaken preconceptions!

    • I will get 100% guaranteed the good professor to PUBLICLY ADMIT THIS. He will have no choice to do so.

      I guarantee that I will force the good professor to admit to saying:

      GOD IS MY FATHER
      signed, Prof Richard Dawking

      If he does not sign, he fails to stand up to his science and maths for which I actually do respect him because I have been working on this for nearly 9 or 10 years.

      It required going through much of his work because THAT IS HOW I TRAPPED HIM !! Good lesson to all… find out more about an enemy before you attack him. We’ve been a bit short there – using blazing battleships when a stealth submarine is needed.

      Maths helped as well as a little dip into some stuff written by Steve Jones. Sad to say, I had to use a fraction of Darwin, but it was just an essential peek as Darwin also talks bout his faith in God. I needed this just to be sure Darwin was being serious..

      If he DOES sign, he is a welcome sheep into the family where he TRULY BELONGS! COME ABOARD WITH COURAGE. Richard… this is not a trap as such, but God did play a big part in this and provided me with the FINAL SOLUTION TO TELL THE WORLD OF YOUR TRUE BELIEFS

      After he signs it, he cannot withdraw from the commitment but I will offer him choice.

      There are TWO VERSIONS THAT SAY WHAT WE HAVE WANTED HIM TO BELIEVE FOR THE LAST 40 YEARS.
      They are IDENTICAL IN EVERY RESPECT.

      Here is your choice sir. You get to choose which of the documents you prefer. They mean the same thing, so you need only sign ONE. The other which has been junk since God created the universe you can now release yourself from.

      I think you will find it easier and much more friendly on the side you truly belong.

      NOW – this is a PRIVATE BET between the good professor and I, so none of the contents or even nature of this wager will ever be made public but Professor Dawkins will only need to say ONE THING.

      “I AGREE THAT I HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY TRAPPED AND AM NOW COMMITTED TO CHANGING MY VIEWS”.

      PROF DAWKINS IS UNDER NO OBLIGATIONS TO REVEAL ANYTHING ABOUT THE CONTEST. IF I HAVE CONVERTED HIM TO OUR PREFERRED WAY, ALL HE HAS TO SAY IS “I AM TRAPPED 100%” OR ANYTHING WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES HE’S COME OVER TO OUR SIDE.

      I TOO OBLIGE HIM FULL CONFIDENTIALITY – IF I DID NOT, HE WOULD NOT AGREE.

      The honourable man may wish to contact me first as it is fair he and I look carefully at all rules.
      What is really ironic though, is it took most of the ideas he spews out to come up with this trap.

      He cannot escape from this – of that I am close to 100% sure.

      NOW – HERE’S THE REAL CHALLENGE…

      Richard will get in touch with me, I am sure as he likes a challenge. Anyone in Prof’s team who can act on his behalf a private message will be appreciated in this first instance . WE ARE READY TO WELCOME YOU SIR, it is a place you will cherish. No more arguments with stupid people, time for interesting fun and relaxation.

    • Fairestcape

      “nearly 9 or 10 years”, huh?

      Do you think that is long enough?

      You’ve surely got to give it to God about managing the prokaryote to eukaryote transition? The docs are not the same. You’ve studied this stuff right?

      Without realising, though, you have rather conceded defeat. The button pusher of the identical God process is no real creator and certainly no designer. His notional tools (including the second law of thermodynamics in a probabalistic universe) ensure only complexity of form and not any specific form. Intercession breaks entirely your rule of identical outcomes. You reduce your god to a principle of physics.

      Hurrah. I have here a document for you to sign, freeing you from your phantom tyrant.

    • Fairestcape #2
      Jun 22, 2016 at 6:09 am

      I will get 100% guaranteed the good professor to PUBLICLY ADMIT THIS. He will have no choice to do so.

      I guarantee that I will force the good professor to admit to saying:

      GOD IS MY FATHER

      I think beliefs like this explain why it is called “The God Delusion” in the brains of those seeking an imaginary parental authority figure!

      Gods may well be proved to exist, but the most likely probability is that they will be proved by psychologists and neuroscientists to be delusions implanted by indoctrination in the brains of the believers following the numerous conflicting religions and sects.

      If anyone is to recognise a god, the first matter to be settled is which one of the thousands which have been worshipped at one time and another is to be recognised. – They conflict with each other, so can’t all be right!

    • Pinball1970 #6
      Jun 22, 2016 at 8:02 am

      No need for all the upper case btw but that is a very minor point compared to the rest of your post.

      These overpowering proofs of gods sweeping all arguments away before them, have been seen on this site before.

      It is supposedly a challenge to Richard, but do you want a private bet, that any one of half a dozen posters here, could demolish this in under ten minutes if/when it is revealed?

      @ Fairestcape – NOW – this is a PRIVATE BET between the good professor and I, so none of the contents or even nature of this wager will ever be made public but Professor Dawkins will only need to say ONE THING.

      “I AGREE THAT I HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY TRAPPED AND AM NOW COMMITTED TO CHANGING MY VIEWS”.

      The last time an “expert” in “Biblical biology” who had a published book of “irrefutable argument” and came here to impress, I shot it down in about five minutes worth of posting!

    • This is either not taking enough drugs or taking too many drugs.

      GOD IS MY FATHER
      signed, Prof Richard Dawking

      God will know this is a forgery. It’s not Richard Dawking

      Wrong guy.

    • David R Allen #9
      Jun 22, 2016 at 8:24 am

      It’s not Richard Dawking

      You have to take into account this . . . . . . :

      If he does not sign, he fails to stand up to his science and maths for which I actually do respect him because I have been working on this for nearly 9 or 10 years.

      . . .. .. .. represents nine or ten years of research study on science, maths, and the works of Richard Dawkins, – using FAITH_THINKING!!!!

      Another ten years working along these lines, might come up with some relevant science book titles where reading could start!

    • Goofballs are going to be coming down today, followed by regular sized hail………………..

    • David, I think he meant “Dogking”. And “Dog is my father”…………

    • a private bet

      All gods, in fact all occult experiences are private bets, because none of them is objectively verifiable.

    • @OP – The latest challenger is David DeWolf, a Gonzaga University law professor and senior fellow at the conservative Discovery Institute’s Center for{pseudo-}Science and Culture.

      This should be of serious concern to the judiciary, because to hold such a position at the “Discovery Institute”, there is a requirement to have an inability to to reach valid conclusions on the basis of material evidence and rational deduction!